Information between 24th June 2026 - 14th July 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Friday 4th September 2026 Maria Eagle (Labour - Liverpool Garston) Private Members' Bills - Main Chamber Subject: Multi-Storey Car Parks (Safety) Bill: Second Reading Multi-Storey Car Parks (Safety) Bill 2026-27 View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
24 Jun 2026 - Climate Change - View Vote Context Maria Eagle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 261 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 94 |
|
24 Jun 2026 - Climate Change - View Vote Context Maria Eagle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 264 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 332 Noes - 94 |
|
24 Jun 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Maria Eagle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 315 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 323 Noes - 160 |
|
24 Jun 2026 - Climate Change - View Vote Context Maria Eagle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 267 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 93 |
|
1 Jul 2026 - Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill - View Vote Context Maria Eagle voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 303 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 177 Noes - 308 |
|
1 Jul 2026 - Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill - View Vote Context Maria Eagle voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 277 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 282 |
|
1 Jul 2026 - Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill - View Vote Context Maria Eagle voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 277 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 80 Noes - 281 |
|
1 Jul 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Maria Eagle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 107 |
|
1 Jul 2026 - Employment Tribunals - View Vote Context Maria Eagle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 307 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 323 Noes - 107 |
|
24 Jun 2026 - Customs - View Vote Context Maria Eagle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 315 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 323 Noes - 160 |
|
6 Jul 2026 - National Security (State Threats) Bill - View Vote Context Maria Eagle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 394 Noes - 85 |
|
13 Jul 2026 - Immigration and Asylum Bill - View Vote Context Maria Eagle voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 97 Noes - 358 |
|
13 Jul 2026 - Immigration and Asylum Bill - View Vote Context Maria Eagle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 263 Labour Aye votes vs 14 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 264 Noes - 90 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Social Services: Armed Forces
Asked by: Maria Eagle (Labour - Liverpool Garston) Thursday 25th June 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, in the context of the Armed Forces Bill extending the Armed Forces Covenant duty to include social care, how the Department will ensure that the needs of the armed forces community are recognised and embedded within future social care guidance, workforce training and professional standards. Answered by Preet Kaur Gill The Department of Health and Social Care fully supports the commitment to extend the Armed Forces Covenant duty to include social care. We are dedicated to working closely with the Ministry of Defence and local authorities to ensure the Covenant’s principles are effectively implemented to meet the specific care needs of service personnel, veterans, and their families, including considering where any further guidance might be required. |
|
Building Regulations
Asked by: Maria Eagle (Labour - Liverpool Garston) Monday 6th July 2026 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, when he PLANS TO launch the call for evidence on Building Regulations 2010 Guidance: Approved Document K (ADK). Answered by Samantha Dixon Officials are working closely with the Building Safety Regulator and plan to publish a Call for Evidence on Part K of the Building Regulations and Approved Document K in due course. |