Debates between Maria Eagle and Jeremy Corbyn during the 2024 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Maria Eagle and Jeremy Corbyn
Monday 18th November 2024

(1 day, 18 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Jeremy Corbyn Portrait Jeremy Corbyn (Islington North) (Ind)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

13. Whether he has had recent discussions with Cabinet colleagues on potential risks arising from the use of nuclear weapons.

Maria Eagle Portrait The Minister for Defence Procurement and Industry (Maria Eagle)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

We recognise the serious risks posed by the use of nuclear weapons. It was a Labour Prime Minister who signed the non-proliferation treaty in 1968. The UK remains fully committed to the multilateral non-proliferation aim of a world without nuclear weapons. We also have a triple lock commitment on our nuclear deterrent, which is a vital part of UK defence and deterrence.

Jeremy Corbyn Portrait Jeremy Corbyn
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

According to the Nuclear Information Service, there have been 110 historical incidents involving UK nuclear weapons. There have been 25 well-recorded near misses between the United States and Russia—and, formerly, the Soviet Union. In that context, will the Minister explain why, on 1 November, when the United National General Assembly was invited to vote on establishing a panel for a scientific study on the effects of nuclear weapons, Britain, Russia and France were the only three countries to vote against its establishment? Fortunately, the committee was established. Will the Minister assure the House that Britain will fully co-operate in examining the devastating effect of nuclear weapons were they ever to be used?

Maria Eagle Portrait Maria Eagle
- View Speech - Hansard - -

The UK has always recognised the possible humanitarian consequences of the use of nuclear weapons. The proposed panel does not establish a clear mandate to address maintaining long-held knowledge of the devastating consequences of nuclear war using scientific research, and the resolution will not advance progress towards nuclear disarmament. That is why we voted against it.