Debates between Lord McColl of Dulwich and Baroness Barran during the 2017-2019 Parliament

Tue 18th Jun 2019
Fri 1st Feb 2019
Organ Donation (Deemed Consent) Bill
Lords Chamber

Committee: 1st sitting (Hansard): House of Lords

Folic Acid

Debate between Lord McColl of Dulwich and Baroness Barran
Tuesday 18th June 2019

(5 years, 4 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text
Baroness Barran Portrait Baroness Barran
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I may need to write to the noble Baroness about the specific medication. More broadly, she is right that the Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition has looked at these issues. Also, Food Standards Scotland has updated the guidance. They support the mandatory inclusion of folic acid as long as it is combined with a reduction in the level of supplements such as those that exist in breakfast cereals. In the consultation the data is set out about the percentage of people whose intake might be above a tolerable threshold, and it is extremely low—between 0.5% and 1%.

Lord McColl of Dulwich Portrait Lord McColl of Dulwich (Con)
- Hansard - -

We must be sure that the right dose of folic acid is applied. The Americans did not put enough folate in; their dose was probably half what it should have been. Will the Minister ensure that the right dose is applied here?

Organ Donation (Deemed Consent) Bill

Debate between Lord McColl of Dulwich and Baroness Barran
Committee: 1st sitting (Hansard): House of Lords
Friday 1st February 2019

(5 years, 9 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Organ Donation (Deemed Consent) Act 2019 View all Organ Donation (Deemed Consent) Act 2019 Debates Read Hansard Text Amendment Paper: HL Bill 141-I Marshalled list for Committee (PDF) - (30 Jan 2019)
Baroness Barran Portrait Baroness Barran (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I wonder whether the noble Lord could be mindful of the time taken for his remarks.

Lord McColl of Dulwich Portrait Lord McColl of Dulwich
- Hansard - -

What is the limit? My apologies.

I return to my basic question and ask whether the Minister can confirm—[Interruption.] I am speaking to two amendments; 15 minutes each makes 30 minutes. Can the Minister confirm that the Government intend to define widely the word “information” in proposed new subsection (6B), introduced by Clause 1(4), so that if someone said, “I am convinced that my husband was unaware of the deemed consent law and would have opted out had he known, so you should not take the organs”, this would be regarded as meeting the definition of “information” in the Bill? If the answer is yes, I will happily withdraw the amendment and I will not die in a ditch for my second amendment, but it is entirely reasonable to suggest that the people of England deserve the same statutory assurances on advertising as the people of Wales. I beg to move.