Became Member: 21st June 2018
Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.
These initiatives were driven by Baroness Barran, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.
A Bill to make provision about local skills improvement plans; to make provision relating to further education; to make provision about functions of the Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education and relating to technical education qualifications; to make provision about student finance and fees; to make provision about assessments by the Office for Students; to make provision about the funding of certain post-16 education or training providers; and for connected purposes
This Bill received Royal Assent on 28th April 2022 and was enacted into law.
A Bill to make provision for and in connection with an expanded dormant assets scheme; to confer power to further expand the scope of that scheme; to amend the Dormant Bank and Building Society Accounts Act 2008; to enable an authorised reclaim fund to accept transfers of certain unwanted assets; and for connected purposes
This Bill received Royal Assent on 24th February 2022 and was enacted into law.
A bill to make provision about the Commonwealth Games that are to be held principally in Birmingham in 2022; and for connected purposes
This Bill received Royal Assent on 25th June 2020 and was enacted into law.
A Bill To Make provision for the regulation of Academies; about school and local education funding; about the attendance of children at school; about the regulation of independent educational institutions; about teacher misconduct; and for connected purposes
Baroness Barran has not co-sponsored any Bills in the current parliamentary sitting
Responses to the call for input were deemed invalid where they did not meet the criteria set out on the call for input Gov.uk page under ‘how to respond’.
Information on how issued funding is spent by arms length bodies, including payments to third party organisations, is not gathered centrally.
The majority of staff time spent on diversity staff networks is voluntary and unpaid. A maximum of two chairs from each of the 5 networks aligned to DBT’s evidence-led areas of focus are allocated up to 10% of their working hours as protected time for network activity. This applies to REACH (race); DisNET (disability); Gender Equality Network; Social Mobility Network; and LGBTQ+ Network. There are no plans to increase or reduce this.
UKEF does not hold the data requested. The majority of staff time spent on diversity staff networks is voluntary and unpaid.
The delivery of Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) Staff Network activity is agreed between networks and departments as the employer. This includes permitted time allocation and any funding arrangements. The majority of staff time spent on diversity staff networks is voluntary and unpaid.
Currently 6 Diversity Networks are given pro-rata time allocation to support respective network activity. We have 11 FTE Network Chairs in total.
Time allocation
Diversity-related network time ranges between 10% minimum - 20% maximum (based on business need) protected time during core hours
1x10% time allocation 37 – hour week contract equates to 3.7 per chair member.
1x 20% time allocation 37 – hour week contract equates to 7.4 per chair member.
Across all 6 Networks:
11 people support network activity as “Chairs” with their allocated time ranging between 10% - 20%
80% - 90% of their time focused on their contracted job role.
Diversity Networks
Ability Network
Ethnic Diversity Network
EU & International Network
Faith & Belief Network
LGBT+ Network
Social Mobility Network
Funding
When approaching EDI activity, the default must be to use internal resources and best practice in departments and across government, as outlined in the May 2024 Civil Service Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Expenditure Guidance. All external EDI spends are cleared and authorised by the Permanent Secretary.
Since the Machinery of Government (MOG) in February 2023, DCMS has typically spent <£1k per year, on Network activity, with no plans to to increase or reduce such funding.
I, as Minister for Skills, can confirm that I have considered the letter and the concerns raised in it. Officials and I have met with over 40 individuals to discuss the future of the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023, including academics with concerns about constraints on freedom of speech and academic freedom. A number of these academics were signatories to the open letter sent to my right hon. Friend, the Secretary of State for Education on 15 August 2024. This includes representatives from Academics for Academic Freedom, Committee for Academic Freedom and the London Universities Council for Academic Freedom. Officials have also met with representatives of nine sector mission groups, unions and representatives of minority groups.
This stakeholder engagement will feed into decision making on the future of the Act and this government’s longer-term policy on protecting freedom of speech across the higher education sector.
The department does not hold the data requested. The majority of staff time spent on diversity staff networks is voluntary and unpaid.
The government fully supports peaceful protest and lawful free speech in universities. However, that does not extend to unlawful free speech, including that which incites hatred and violence, or which causes harassment.
One of the reasons the government has paused further implementation of the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech) Act 2023 is because the higher education (HE) sector, minority groups and unions representing staff on campus have raised concerns about the Act, believing it to be disproportionate, burdensome and damaging to the welfare of students, and that fears of sanction could push providers to overlook minority groups’ safety. All students, regardless of race or religion, should be free to focus on their studies rather than worry about their safety. By pausing further commencement of the Act in order to consider all options, the government is ensuring that HE remains a space for constructive dialogue and diverse opinions, rather than a battleground for ideological clashes.
The government is committed to supporting students to study in a way that is right for them.
The department is working to ensure that its approach to lifelong learning will be as effective as possible, enabling people to gain the skills they need to support their careers.
The department will make further announcements about this work shortly.
The Office for Students (OfS) is the independent regulator of higher education (HE) in England. The OfS is responsible for monitoring and reporting on the financial sustainability of HE providers in England to ensure they have an up to date understanding of the sustainability of the sector.
The OfS’ most recent report, which was published in May 2024, is available in the attached document. In the report, the OfS stated that the HE financial model had become reliant on fee income from international students, with a particular vulnerability where recruitment is predominantly from a single country.
The department continues to work with the OfS and other relevant parties to understand the ongoing impacts and changing landscape of financial sustainability in the sector.
The objective of the Office for Students’ (OfS) tender is to procure for services to evaluate the financial health and the management and governance capability of higher education providers to ensure that the interests of students are safeguarded throughout any financial adjustments or transition, including potential market exits.
The OfS are currently evaluating the bids to this tender and are not in a position to provide further information at this time.
The government is determined that the higher education (HE) funding system should deliver for the economy, for universities, and for students and will look carefully at all options and come forward with proposals.
Funding plans for the HE sector will be set out at the relevant fiscal event, in line with the approach to public spending commitments across government.
Higher education providers are independent of government and, as such, are responsible for deciding on effective business models. The department would expect individual providers to consider the right balance between teaching and research activity, according to their strategies and business models.
The government published its response to the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) report into student loans issued to those studying at franchised higher education providers on 5 September 2024. This is attached and can also be viewed here: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/66d9d2bfe87ad2f12182650e/E03194725_HMT_Treasury_Minutes_Sept_24_Accessible.pdf. The response sets out that the department intends to consult by January 2025 on proposals to strengthen oversight of partnership delivery in higher education.
The government is working closely with the Office for Students (OfS) to ensure that students studying at franchise providers are receiving good quality education. In November 2023, the OfS published its criteria for assessing providers in 2023/24 in relation to student outcomes, which included a focus on franchise arrangements. The OfS is now progressing investigations into franchise partnerships where it has concerns.
The department has been clear that responsibility for good quality provision in franchised partnerships should be led by the sector. In July 2024, Universities UK published a governance framework, with the aim of supporting universities to improve governance of franchised partnerships and mitigating risks so that these partnerships deliver for students.
The government is determined that the higher education (HE) funding system should deliver for the economy, for universities, and for students and will look carefully at all options and come forward with proposals.
Funding plans for the HE sector will be set out at the relevant fiscal event, in line with the approach to public spending commitments across government.
Diversity staff network chairs and committee members are permitted to use up to 10% of their work time for network activity, this was introduced as part of the Network Deal which was published internally in October 2023. Currently, the Department has 22 networks which fall within the diversity category, with 41 colleagues acting as chair or committee member. In addition, the chairs and committee members of those networks related to disability, race and ethnicity, and social mobility can request up to 15% of their working time for these activities. This is in recognition of these areas' alignment with the Civil Service Diversity & Inclusion Strategy and is subject to line manager discretion.
Because the Department offers working time for diversity staff network activity as a percentage of overall work time for each individual, the number of hours allocated in total will depend on an individual’s working pattern, such as part time or full time, alongside line manager discretion.
The Department does not currently offer funding for diversity staff network activity, except for those networks related to disability. This is in line with the recent Civil Service Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Expenditure Guidance published on 14 May 2024 in an online-only format. The Department’s disability network is named EnABLE.
The Department does not currently plan to increase or reduce funding for diversity staff networks.
On 29 July, the Government announced that, as of 1 January 2025, all education services and vocational training provided by a private school in the UK for a charge will be subject to VAT at the standard rate of 20%. This will include fees paid by CEA.
A small minority of diplomatic officials and service personnel are posted abroad for extended periods. In such circumstances, the Ministry of Defence and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office provide the Continuity of Education Allowance (CEA) to ensure this does not interfere with their children's education.
The government will monitor closely the impact of these policy changes on affected military and diplomatic families with any changes to this scheme being considered as part of the ongoing Spending Review.
Whilst developing these policies, the Government has carefully considered the impact that they will have on pupils and their families across both the state and private sector, as well as the impact they will have on state and private schools. Following scrutiny of the Government’s costing by the independent Office for Budget Responsibility, the Government will confirm its approach to these reforms at the Budget on 30 October, and set out its assessment of the expected impacts of these policy changes in the normal way.
With regards to the Ministry of Justice, the delivery of Equality, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) Staff Network activity is agreed between networks and departments as the employer. This includes permitted time allocation and any funding arrangements. The majority of staff time spent on diversity staff networks is voluntary and unpaid and there is no immediate plan to change this.
The 16 recognised Staff Networks currently operating in Ministry of Justice are:
ABLE
Carers
Christians in MoJ
Frontline
Gender Equality
Hindu
Humanists
Jobshare
International and EU Nationals
Muslim
Parents
Proud
Safe Space
Sikhs in MoJ
Spirit
Supporting the Workplace in Menopause (SWIM)
The Executive Board of the Attorney General’s Office appoints two volunteer members of staff to act as Diversity and Inclusion leads. With volunteer colleagues, they organise events (such as lunchtime talks) and circulate relevant information and materials around the Office. No maximum percentage of overall working time is specified for such activity and the time spent on such activity is not recorded.
As for the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), it has 27 staff who are permitted to undertake diversity-related network time during core working hours across its eight staff networks who are allocated ‘network time’. There is no specified maximum percentage of overall working time permitted to spend on such network activity, but the maximum allocated to any one individual in this financial year is 177.6 hours. For 2024/25, there are 3426.5 hours allocated in total.
There are no current plans in the CPS to increase or reduce funding in this financial year, however requests for funding are submitted and reviewed annually.
The names of the networks for the CPS are:
National Black Crown Prosecution Association (NBCPA)
Carers Association
Sikh Society
Muslim Network
Christian Fellowship
LGBTI
Social Mobility
Disabled Staff Network (DSN)