Information between 19th January 2025 - 10th March 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
5 Feb 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord McColl of Dulwich voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 187 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 130 |
5 Feb 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord McColl of Dulwich voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 182 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 132 |
5 Feb 2025 - Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord McColl of Dulwich voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 126 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 183 Noes - 127 |
5 Feb 2025 - Water (Special Measures) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord McColl of Dulwich voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 116 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 123 Noes - 117 |
5 Feb 2025 - Water (Special Measures) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord McColl of Dulwich voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 116 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 168 Noes - 112 |
21 Jan 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord McColl of Dulwich voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 175 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 205 Noes - 159 |
21 Jan 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord McColl of Dulwich voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 170 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 186 Noes - 162 |
25 Feb 2025 - National Insurance Contributions (Secondary Class 1 Contributions) Bill - View Vote Context Lord McColl of Dulwich voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 199 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 305 Noes - 175 |
11 Feb 2025 - Great British Energy Bill - View Vote Context Lord McColl of Dulwich voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 138 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 177 Noes - 127 |
11 Feb 2025 - Great British Energy Bill - View Vote Context Lord McColl of Dulwich voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 140 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 148 Noes - 195 |
4 Mar 2025 - Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill - View Vote Context Lord McColl of Dulwich voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 196 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 213 Noes - 249 |
4 Mar 2025 - Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill - View Vote Context Lord McColl of Dulwich voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 197 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 248 |
4 Mar 2025 - Terrorism (Protection of Premises) Bill - View Vote Context Lord McColl of Dulwich voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 185 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 236 |
5 Mar 2025 - Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord McColl of Dulwich voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 152 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 228 |
Written Answers |
---|
Cultural Heritage: Solar Power
Asked by: Lord McColl of Dulwich (Conservative - Life peer) Thursday 23rd January 2025 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the proposal to cover the ancient Roman site at Richborough with solar panels. Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) Richborough Roman Fort is a scheduled ancient monument protected under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Areas Act 1979. We are not aware of any application for solar panels on the site, but are aware of an ongoing planning application in the vicinity of the ancient monument, which is for the Local Planning Authority to decide. It would not be appropriate for the government to comment on an individual planning case such as this, as it may come before Government Ministers for a decision at a later date. |
Forced Labour: Supply Chains
Asked by: Lord McColl of Dulwich (Conservative - Life peer) Thursday 6th March 2025 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask His Majesty's Government, following reports in the Sunday Times on 26 January of forced labour in bakeries supplying high street supermarkets and a McDonald's franchise, what assessment they have made of the benefits of introducing mandatory supply chain due diligence to identify and prevent exploitation of workers. Answered by Baroness Jones of Whitchurch - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The UK supports voluntary due diligence approaches taken by UK businesses to identify and prevent exploitation of workers across their operations and supply chains, in line with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. We will continue to assess and monitor the effectiveness of the UK’s existing measures, alongside the impacts of new policy tools that are emerging, to ensure we can best promote responsible business practices and take action where appropriate. |