Debates between Lord Haskel and Earl of Caithness during the 2010-2015 Parliament

House of Lords Reform Bill [HL]

Debate between Lord Haskel and Earl of Caithness
Friday 21st October 2011

(13 years, 1 month ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Haskel Portrait The Deputy Chairman of Committees (Lord Haskel)
- Hansard - -

Before the noble Lord responds, I have to call Amendment 143 as an amendment to Amendment 142.

Earl of Caithness Portrait The Earl of Caithness
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, in order to allow the noble Lord, Lord Steel, to speak, I am not going to move Amendments 143 to Amendments 161 inclusive because they are amendments to Amendment 142 which I am going to withdraw for the reasons I have said. I had to move it to get on the record my apology to the House.

Lord Steel of Aikwood Portrait Lord Steel of Aikwood
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, we have done very useful work today—

--- Later in debate ---
Lord Haskel Portrait The Deputy Chairman of Committees
- Hansard - -

Is Amendment 142 not moved?

Earl of Caithness Portrait The Earl of Caithness
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

No, my Lords, with respect to the Chairman, we are debating Amendment 142 at the moment and the noble Lord, Lord Steel, is on his feet. I have yet to speak on it again.

--- Later in debate ---
Earl of Caithness Portrait The Earl of Caithness
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am slightly confused. I do not know whether the Deputy Chairman of Committees has called Amendment 1. He certainly did not call any Peer to speak to Amendment 1, so I do not know whether we are in limbo land or debating an amendment.

Lord Haskel Portrait The Deputy Chairman of Committees (Lord Haskel)
- Hansard - -

I was obliged to call Amendment 1 but it was obvious that the Government Chief Whip wanted to say something, so I called it and then invited him to speak. If it is the wish of the Committee I shall call Amendment 1and the noble Earl, Lord Caithness.

Amendment 1