Lord Haskel Portrait

Lord Haskel

Labour - Life peer

Joined House of Lords: 4th October 1993

Left House: 21st May 2026 (Retirement)


Deputy Chairman of Committees (Lords)
2nd May 2002 - 21st May 2026
Deputy Speaker (Lords)
9th Dec 2002 - 21st May 2026
Procedure and Privileges Committee
31st Jan 2024 - 27th Jan 2026
Liaison Committee (Lords)
31st Jan 2023 - 27th Jan 2026
Audit and Risk Assurance Committee (Lords)
11th Sep 2018 - 6th Dec 2024
Statutory Instruments (Joint Committee)
1st Jul 2019 - 31st Jan 2023
Economic Affairs Committee
28th Jan 2021 - 12th May 2022
Finance Bill Sub-Committee
23rd Jul 2021 - 9th Feb 2022
Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee
1st Jul 2019 - 28th Jan 2021
Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee
8th Jun 2015 - 4th Jul 2019
SLSC Sub-Committee A
4th Sep 2018 - 30th Apr 2019
Bribery Act 2010 Committee
17th May 2018 - 4th Mar 2019
Financial Exclusion Committee
25th May 2016 - 25th Mar 2017
National Policy for the Built Environment Committee
11th Jun 2015 - 23rd Jun 2015
Digital Skills
12th Jun 2014 - 4th Feb 2015
Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee
25th Nov 2009 - 14th May 2014
Information Committee (Lords)
25th Nov 2009 - 14th May 2014
Small and Medium Sized Enterprises Committee
29th May 2012 - 28th Feb 2013
Tax Law Rewrite Bills (Joint Committee)
9th Dec 2002 - 6th May 2010
Science and Technology: Sub-Committee I
21st Nov 2006 - 8th Apr 2010
Science and Technology Committee (Lords)
21st Nov 2006 - 8th Apr 2010
Science and Technology Committee
21st Nov 2006 - 8th Apr 2010
Information Committee (Lords)
4th Dec 2003 - 30th Nov 2007
Procedure and Privileges Committee
26th Jun 2001 - 18th Nov 2004
Science and Technology: Sub-Committee I
21st Nov 1995 - 20th Nov 2003
Science and Technology Committee (Lords)
22nd Nov 1994 - 7th Nov 2002
Science and Technology Committee
22nd Nov 1994 - 7th Nov 2002
Lord in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)
8th May 1997 - 28th Aug 1998
Consolidation, &c., Bills (Joint Committee)
18th Apr 1994 - 8th Apr 1997


Division Voting information

Lord Haskel has voted in 1046 divisions, and 7 times against the majority of their Party.

23 Jun 2020 - Corporate Insolvency and Governance Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Haskel voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 10 Labour Aye votes vs 104 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 155 Noes - 326
3 Apr 2019 - Flags (Northern Ireland) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 - View Vote Context
Lord Haskel voted No - against a party majority and in line with the House
One of 1 Labour No votes vs 16 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 55 Noes - 115
12 Dec 2012 - Crime and Courts Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Haskel voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 17 Labour No votes vs 23 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 150 Noes - 54
14 Mar 2007 - House of Lords: Reform - View Vote Context
Lord Haskel voted No - against a party majority and against the House
One of 45 Labour No votes vs 95 Labour Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 361 Noes - 121
14 Mar 2007 - House of Lords: Reform - View Vote Context
Lord Haskel voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 23 Labour Aye votes vs 104 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 45 Noes - 392
14 Mar 2007 - House of Lords: Reform - View Vote Context
Lord Haskel voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 36 Labour Aye votes vs 100 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 114 Noes - 336
14 Mar 2007 - House of Lords: Reform - View Vote Context
Lord Haskel voted Aye - against a party majority and against the House
One of 56 Labour Aye votes vs 79 Labour No votes
Tally: Ayes - 122 Noes - 326
View All Lord Haskel Division Votes

All Debates

Speeches made during Parliamentary debates are recorded in Hansard. For ease of browsing we have grouped debates into individual, departmental and legislative categories.

Sparring Partners
Lord Henley (Conservative)
(28 debate interactions)
Lord Bethell (Conservative)
(15 debate interactions)
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Crossbench)
(14 debate interactions)
View All Sparring Partners
Department Debates
Cabinet Office
(53 debate contributions)
HM Treasury
(49 debate contributions)
Home Office
(36 debate contributions)
View All Department Debates
Legislation Debates
Finance Act 2017
(2,328 words contributed)
Trade Bill 2019-21
(1,623 words contributed)
Financial Guidance and Claims Act 2018
(1,378 words contributed)
Finance Act 2020
(1,149 words contributed)
View All Legislation Debates
View all Lord Haskel's debates

Lords initiatives

These initiatives were driven by Lord Haskel, and are more likely to reflect personal policy preferences.


Lord Haskel has not introduced any legislation before Parliament

Lord Haskel has not co-sponsored any Bills in the current parliamentary sitting


Latest 4 Written Questions

(View all written questions)
Written Questions can be tabled by MPs and Lords to request specific information information on the work, policy and activities of a Government Department
1 Other Department Questions
7th Sep 2015
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the operating costs of the proposed National College for High Speed Rail; and how those costs will be met.

The Business Plan and Capital Application for the National College were submitted to the Department on 16 July. The proposals provide an estimate of the operating costs of the college and potential income sources. As an independent body, the college will be responsible for all decisions about the operations of the college and how these costs will be met. Employers will be expected to contribute towards these costs through investment in training and the provision of equipment.

Baroness Neville-Rolfe
Shadow Minister (Treasury)
24th Jun 2020
To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the impact on the transmission of COVID-19 by reducing the use of paper in supply chains; and whether the regulations on (1) e-signatures, and (2) e-transactions, apply to every aspect of a supply chain.

According to the World Health Organisation, the likelihood of an infected person contaminating commercial goods is low and the risk of catching the virus that causes COVID-19 from a package, including paper package, that has been moved, travelled, and exposed to different conditions and temperate is also low.

The Government has endorsed the conclusions reached in the Law Commission’s report Electronic Execution of Documents that the existing legal framework in England and Wales makes clear that businesses and individuals can feel confident in using e-signatures in commercial transactions.

Lord Callanan
Shadow Minister (Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office)
13th Nov 2017
To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the answer by Lord Henley on 2 November (HL Deb, cols 1434-5), in implementing the Made Smarter Review what arrangements they will make for those who are displaced by digitalisation; whether they intend to introduce a safety net; and what procedures will be implemented to ensure that people are not damaged by its introduction.

The Government believes that digitalisation of industry has the potential to achieve great benefits for the labour market, which can offset the impact of job displacement. Extensive research conducted for the review found that industrial digitalisation can result in a net gain of 175,000 jobs. However, government recognises that there will be challenges of job displacement in the short term and has already made preparations to mitigate this (see below).

We are working closely with industry and experts to consider its findings.

Examples of specific action government is taking now to upskill the current workforce and future workforce include:

  • Digital skills Partnership (currently in development), which sets out a high level proposal for some type of partnership to bring together private and public sector organisations to actively tackle the digital skills gap.
  • As indicated in the Digital Economy Act (April 2017), the Government will introduce an entitlement for adults who lack basic digital skills to undertake fully-funded training as part of the publicly-funded adult education offer.
  • A £10m fund for the Future Digital Inclusion project supports approximately 5,000 businesses and centres targeting those who are deprived and most likely to need support to deliver basic digital skills to adults in England.
  • Career/Lifelong learning - The Spring Budget 2017 announced spending of up to £40m by 2018-19 to test different ambitious new approaches to tackle the barriers to lifelong learning.
  • Cyber Apprenticeships – working with employers to help develop cyber security apprenticeships to help address the cyber skills gap in critical sectors, including Energy, Transport, Water, Telecoms and Broadcasting Media.
18th May 2022
To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have, if any, to modify the Apprenticeship Levy scheme to address (1) dissatisfaction from participants, and (2) concerns about its effectiveness.

The Apprenticeship Levy is a key part of the Government’s reforms to the apprenticeship system. It enables employers to make a long-term and sustainable investment in high-quality apprenticeship training.

The Government recognises that employers have frustrations with the way that these Apprenticeship Levy funds can be spent within the apprenticeships system and is delivering a suite of improvements to address these. These include the improvements announced at Spending Review 2021, such as introducing an enhanced recruitment service for SMEs, supporting the use of flexible training models, and introducing a return-on-investment tool to ensure employers can see the benefits that apprentices create in their business.

The Government’s ambition is to encourage greater levels of private sector investment in employee training, both for apprentices and for employees more generally. Therefore, at Spring Statement 2022, the Chancellor announced that he would consider whether further intervention is needed to encourage employers to offer the high-quality training the UK needs. This will include examining whether the current tax system – including the operation of the Apprenticeship Levy – is doing enough to incentivise businesses to invest in the right kinds of training.

While there will not be a formal review of the Apprenticeship Levy as part of this wider consideration on employer investment in training, the Government is committed to protecting the quality of apprenticeship training and further improving the system to respond to the concerns raised by employers.