Debates between Karl Turner and Hugh Robertson during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Karl Turner and Hugh Robertson
Thursday 14th February 2013

(11 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Hugh Robertson Portrait Hugh Robertson
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

As the hon. Gentleman well knows, all such appointments are made under very strict Office of the Commissioner for Public Appointments guidelines and can be challenged. In the appointments for which I have been responsible, we have worked extensively across boundaries. We appointed the former Minister with responsibility for the Olympics to the Olympics board and I kept the former Minister with responsibility for sports as a trustee of the football foundation. That arrangement was not extended to the Conservative party when it was in opposition.

Karl Turner Portrait Karl Turner (Kingston upon Hull East) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

T1. If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Karl Turner and Hugh Robertson
Monday 25th October 2010

(14 years, 2 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Karl Turner Portrait Karl Turner (Kingston upon Hull East) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

T3. Before the election, the Minister for Sport was keen to applaud Labour’s record on sport and pledged not to undermine it. With the massive cuts to funding for school sport, to local authorities and to Sport England, does he now feel that his Government are undermining the excellent progress that was made under the Labour Government?

Hugh Robertson Portrait The Minister for Sport and the Olympics (Hugh Robertson)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Absolutely not, because, as the hon. Gentleman will see if he examines the figures, in every year for the next four, the amount of money going to UK Sport and Sport England, with the exception of that to Sport England next year, is greater than it was under the Labour Government—so, no.