Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Education

Oral Answers to Questions

Julian Smith Excerpts
Thursday 8th December 2011

(12 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Marcus Jones Portrait Mr Marcus Jones (Nuneaton) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

13. What recent progress his Department has made on its employment law review being undertaken as part of the red tape challenge.

Julian Smith Portrait Julian Smith (Skipton and Ripon) (Con)
- Hansard - -

17. What recent progress his Department has made on its employment law review being undertaken as part of the red tape challenge.

Ed Davey Portrait The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills (Mr Edward Davey)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We have made excellent progress with our employment law review. Our radical package includes streamlining the employment tribunals system, doubling the qualifying period for unfair dismissal, promoting early conciliation and mediation, and simplifying compromise agreements. We have also called for evidence on TUPE and collective redundancies as part of our wide reforms.

--- Later in debate ---
Ed Davey Portrait Mr Davey
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

We have listened to both employer and employee concerns about the cost and complexity of going to employment tribunals, and believe that our reforms will make a positive difference to both parties. We have set out our conclusions and our response to the “Resolving Workplace Disputes” consultation. Critical aspects of our new approach include a major new emphasis on mediation and a new pre-claim conciliation service by ACAS, and, finally, a fundamental review of the rules and procedures is now being undertaken by Lord Justice Underhill.

Julian Smith Portrait Julian Smith
- Hansard - -

Compensated no-fault dismissal could be a great fillip to very small businesses and the employment market. Will the Minister outline the timetable for the Government’s call for evidence and reassure the House that he is completely open-minded on the policy?