Debates between John Whittingdale and Frank Dobson during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Leveson Inquiry

Debate between John Whittingdale and Frank Dobson
Monday 3rd December 2012

(11 years, 11 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
John Whittingdale Portrait Mr Whittingdale
- Hansard - -

Of course it is important for us to establish public confidence. What we need to do is persuade the public that things will never be the same again: that the new regime on offer is completely different, that it is independent, and that it has real powers. However, as I think Shami Chakrabarti said at the weekend, the question of whether it requires statutory underpinning is about processes, not outcomes. We need to focus on the outcomes of this.

Frank Dobson Portrait Frank Dobson (Holborn and St Pancras) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Is it not the case that the proposed legal and financial incentives to be offered to the press would require legislation by the House to give the press privileges that are not available to other citizens?

John Whittingdale Portrait Mr Whittingdale
- Hansard - -

I think I have already dealt with that, but the right hon. Gentleman is right. Lord Hunt himself suggested that there should be some statutory recognition of the body in the context of, for instance, defamation cases, so that it can be taken into account when damages are awarded. However, that is not the same as setting up a body by statute, or statutory underpinning. It is all very well for the right hon. Gentleman to laugh, but there is a massive difference between the law recognising the existence of a body and the law somehow having power over that body.