Information between 12th October 2026 - 22nd October 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
13 Oct 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context Jack Rankin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 96 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 306 |
|
12 Oct 2026 - The Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (Calculation of CBAM Rate and Determination of Carbon Price Relief) Regulations 2026 - View Vote Context Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 10 Noes - 4 |
|
13 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill (Carry-over Extension) - View Vote Context Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 97 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 179 |
|
13 Oct 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 99 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 193 |
|
13 Oct 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context Jack Rankin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 98 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 304 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 103 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 115 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) - View Vote Context Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 102 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 114 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - MOD Bicester and Illegal Migrants - View Vote Context Jack Rankin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 100 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 113 Noes - 309 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - Trade Unions - View Vote Context Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 103 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 115 |
|
14 Oct 2026 - Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism - View Vote Context Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 103 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 319 Noes - 115 |
|
15 Oct 2026 - Highways (Financing) Bill - View Vote Context Jack Rankin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 76 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 76 Noes - 231 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Jack Rankin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 104 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 117 Noes - 331 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Jack Rankin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 105 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 179 Noes - 336 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Jack Rankin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 102 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 176 Noes - 329 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 102 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 178 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill (Programme) (No.2) - View Vote Context Jack Rankin voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 97 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 286 Noes - 163 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Jack Rankin voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 107 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 330 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Gaming Machines: Excise Duties
Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor) Wednesday 21st October 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether HM Treasury has made an assessment of the potential impact of an increase in the rate of Machine Games Duty on receipts from (a) National Insurance contributions and (b) business rates. Answered by James Murray - Financial Secretary to the Treasury and Paymaster General The Chancellor makes decisions on tax policy at fiscal events, and does not routinely comment on proposals. |
|
Gaming Machines: Excise Duties
Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor) Wednesday 21st October 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether HM Treasury has modelled at what rate increasing Machine Games Duty would lead to a reduction in overall receipts from that duty. Answered by James Murray - Financial Secretary to the Treasury and Paymaster General The Chancellor makes decisions on tax policy at fiscal events, and does not routinely comment on proposals. |
|
Gambling: Taxation
Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor) Wednesday 21st October 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what consideration HM Treasury has given to the impact of recent increases in gambling taxes in the Netherlands on (a) tax receipts and (b) the illegal gambling market. Answered by James Murray - Financial Secretary to the Treasury and Paymaster General HMRC reviewed relevant international evidence when estimating the Exchequer impact of changes to Remote Gaming Duty and Remote Betting Duty announced at Budget 2025. More details can be found in the policy costing note published at Budget 2025. |
|
Kidney Diseases: Dialysis Machines
Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor) Monday 19th October 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what mechanisms NHS England will use to hold commissioned renal providers accountable for delivering its ambition for at least 20 per cent of dialysis patients to receive treatment at home; and whether provider-level performance against that ambition will be published annually. Answered by James Frith - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Renal Services Transformation Programme sets out high-impact changes which include increasing home dialysis towards the Getting It Right First Time programme ambition of 20%. Kidney networks are working with commissioners and providers to implement these changes and increase provision across their populations. Data on home dialysis is collected by the UK Renal Registry and available through the National Home Therapies Dashboard at the following link: |
|
Dialysis Machines
Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor) Monday 19th October 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, with reference to the Answer of 6 July 2026 to Question HL1306, when NHS England plans to publish the updated Renal Service Specification. Answered by James Frith - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The specification is being worked on by NHS England in line with its national service specification methods process, which is available at the following link: https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/methods-national-service-specifications NHS England will set out the expected date of publication as soon as this is available. |
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Monday 12th October Jack Rankin signed this EDM on Monday 12th October 2026 Senior Courts of England and Wales 18 signatures (Most recent: 15 Oct 2026)Tabled by: Neil Shastri-Hurst (Conservative - Solihull West and Shirley) That an humble Address be presented to His Majesty, praying that the Senior Courts (Transfer, Amendment and Consequential Provision) Order 2026 (SI, 2026, No. 723), dated 8 July 2026, a copy of which was laid before this House on 15 July, be annulled. |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
12 Oct 2026, 6:28 p.m. - Second Delegated Legislation Committee "Jack Rankin know. " Speaker 2 - View Video - View Transcript |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Friday 18th September 2026
Formal Minutes - Scottish Affairs Committee Formal Minutes 2024 - 2026 Scottish Affairs Committee Found: Maureen Burke Harriet Cross Lillian Jones Mr Angus MacDonald Douglas McAllister Susan Murray Jack Rankin |