Division Vote (Commons)
1 Jul 2026 - Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill -
View Vote Context
Jack Rankin (Con) voted Aye
- in line with the party majority
and against the House
One of
94 Conservative Aye votes vs
0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 177 Noes - 308
Division Vote (Commons)
1 Jul 2026 - Taxation (Energy and Vehicles) Bill -
View Vote Context
Jack Rankin (Con) voted Aye
- in line with the party majority
and against the House
One of
95 Conservative Aye votes vs
0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 282
Division Vote (Commons)
1 Jul 2026 - Employment Tribunals -
View Vote Context
Jack Rankin (Con) voted No
- in line with the party majority
and against the House
One of
94 Conservative No votes vs
0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 323 Noes - 107
Division Vote (Commons)
1 Jul 2026 - Deferred Division -
View Vote Context
Jack Rankin (Con) voted No
- in line with the party majority
and against the House
One of
94 Conservative No votes vs
0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 107
Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 30 Jun 2026
Oral Answers to Questions
"14. What estimate he has made of the number of prisoners released in error since July 2024. ..."Jack Rankin - View Speech
View all Jack Rankin (Con - Windsor) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions
Speech in Commons Chamber - Tue 30 Jun 2026
Oral Answers to Questions
"It is a disgrace that hundreds of prisoners have been released in error under this Government, but more concerning are the thousands it will have been an error to release early. The Secretary of State did not answer the previous question, so let’s try another. As we heard in this …..."Jack Rankin - View Speech
View all Jack Rankin (Con - Windsor) contributions to the debate on: Oral Answers to Questions
Division Vote (Commons)
30 Jun 2026 - Draft Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Act 2026 (Establishment of Schools) (Consequential Amendments) Regulations 2026 -
View Vote Context
Jack Rankin (Con) voted No
- in line with the party majority
and against the House
One of
3 Conservative No votes vs
0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 12 Noes - 3
Written Question
Tuesday 30th June 2026
Asked by:
Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor)
Question
to the Department for Transport:
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how many critical concrete structures are considered to be at risk of significant deterioration within the next decade.
Answered by Simon Lightwood
- Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport)
It is the responsibility of infrastructure operators, including local highway authorities and arm’s length bodies, such as National Highways, to maintain their networks and any associated concrete structures.
To help support this, the Government is investing billions of pounds in transport infrastructure, including £24 billion of capital funding between 2026-27 and 2029-30 to maintain and improve our motorways and local roads across the country.
MP Financial Interest
Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor)
Original Source (29th June 2026)
3. Gifts, benefits and hospitality from UK sources
Ascot Racecourse Limited - £590.00
MP Financial Interest
Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor)
Original Source (29th June 2026)
3. Gifts, benefits and hospitality from UK sources
Ascot Racecourse Limited - £300.00