To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Tourist Attractions: Planning Permission
Friday 22nd November 2024

Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor)

Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport:

To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what her Department’s criteria are for sponsoring visitor attractions through the special development order process.

Answered by Chris Bryant - Minister of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)

DCMS works to support the growth of the visitor economy as part of the Government's Growth Mission. Special Development Orders are a long-established part of the planning system. Each case is considered on its individual merits.


Written Question
Planning Permission
Thursday 21st November 2024

Asked by: Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor)

Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government:

To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, if she will (a) publish proposals for the use of special development order powers under Section 59 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 to grant planning permission for commercial schemes and (b) consult on those proposals before they are implemented.

Answered by Matthew Pennycook - Minister of State (Housing, Communities and Local Government)

Special Development Orders are a long-established part of the planning system. Each case is considered on its individual merits. The government have no plans to change the current arrangements.


Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 20 Nov 2024
Asylum Seekers: Hotel Accommodation

Speech Link

View all Jack Rankin (Con - Windsor) contributions to the debate on: Asylum Seekers: Hotel Accommodation

Division Vote (Commons)
19 Nov 2024 - Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill - View Vote Context
Jack Rankin (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 97 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 350 Noes - 108
Division Vote (Commons)
19 Nov 2024 - Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Bill - View Vote Context
Jack Rankin (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 97 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 172
Division Vote (Commons)
12 Nov 2024 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context
Jack Rankin (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 89 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 98 Noes - 376
Division Vote (Commons)
12 Nov 2024 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context
Jack Rankin (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 71 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 435 Noes - 73
Division Vote (Commons)
12 Nov 2024 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context
Jack Rankin (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 90 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 98 Noes - 375
Division Vote (Commons)
12 Nov 2024 - House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Bill - View Vote Context
Jack Rankin (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 18 Conservative No votes vs 15 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 41 Noes - 378
MP Financial Interest
Jack Rankin (Conservative - Windsor)
Original Source (11th November 2024)
8. Miscellaneous
Unpaid director of Crocus and Bluebell Limited.
Date interest arose: 12 August 2024
(Registered 7 November 2024)