Debates between Ian Sollom and Pat McFadden during the 2024 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Ian Sollom and Pat McFadden
Monday 9th March 2026

(1 week, 4 days ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Ian Sollom Portrait Ian Sollom (St Neots and Mid Cambridgeshire) (LD)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

T5. With nearly a million young people not in education, employment or training, the growth and skills levy is due to launch in less than a month, but as few as eight courses have been confirmed, with no funding rates, no duration and no assessment detail published. How is anyone—a young person planning their future, a college planning its provision or an employer planning its workforce—supposed to act on a blank page?

Pat McFadden Portrait Pat McFadden
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

The hon. Member is right to point to the disparity of information that there sometimes is for apprenticeships compared with university courses. It is something that we need to address by improving the information available and ensuring that young people embarking on an apprenticeship are treated with just as much esteem and respect as those who undertake a university course. Information is very much part of the changes that we are pursuing.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Ian Sollom and Pat McFadden
Monday 8th December 2025

(3 months, 1 week ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Pat McFadden Portrait Pat McFadden
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

My hon. Friend is right to say that purposeful activity, be it training or work, can be an answer to some of the mental health problems that we are seeing in society, so I welcome her endorsement of the youth guarantee and the intentions behind it.

Ian Sollom Portrait Ian Sollom (St Neots and Mid Cambridgeshire) (LD)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

Employers across the construction, care and manufacturing sectors have warned that Skills England’s dumbed down reforms mean that apprenticeships will not be recognised by professional bodies. Today’s announcement of 50,000 apprenticeships is meaningless if employers will not recognise those standards, so will the Secretary of State guarantee that reformed apprenticeships will still meet those standards? That is a particular concern in the construction industry—