Debates between Grahame Morris and Lord Swire during the 2010-2015 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Grahame Morris and Lord Swire
Wednesday 9th February 2011

(13 years, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Grahame Morris Portrait Grahame M. Morris (Easington) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

2. What his policy is on the use of stop-and-search powers by security forces in Northern Ireland.

Lord Swire Portrait The Minister of State, Northern Ireland Office (Mr Hugo Swire)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My right hon. Friend the Secretary of State updated the House this morning on plans to make amendments to powers of stop and search in Northern Ireland. These powers are essential in Northern Ireland for tackling the threat from terrorism. They have prevented attacks, saved lives and led to arrests and convictions. The Police Service of Northern Ireland uses all available legislation to deal with the terrorist threat. Oversight and accountability mechanisms are in place to ensure that powers are used properly.

Grahame Morris Portrait Grahame M. Morris
- Hansard - -

I thank the Minister for that response and for the statement that has been placed in the Library. The use of section 44 powers has undoubtedly saved lives in Northern Ireland, along with powers under the Justice and Security (Northern Ireland) Act 2007. What assurances can he give the House that the PSNI will in no way be hampered in its efforts to disrupt and prevent terrorist activities?

Lord Swire Portrait Mr Swire
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

That is an entirely legitimate question. The changes that we are making are to bring legislation in Northern Ireland into line with changes to section 44. The hon. Gentleman should be reassured, because, as he would imagine, we have been discussing these matters closely with the PSNI. It has a range of other powers at its disposal, but I agree that it would be a retrograde step to limit its powers at what is a difficult time in Northern Ireland. The proposed amendment will not do that.