Information between 9th June 2026 - 19th June 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
9 Jun 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context Grahame Morris voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 275 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 157 Noes - 287 |
|
9 Jun 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context Grahame Morris voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 274 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 94 Noes - 297 |
|
9 Jun 2026 - Steel Industry (Nationalisation) Bill - View Vote Context Grahame Morris voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 275 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 90 Noes - 290 |
|
9 Jun 2026 - Business without Debate - View Vote Context Grahame Morris voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 280 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 356 Noes - 86 |
|
10 Jun 2026 - Railways Bill - View Vote Context Grahame Morris voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 263 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 149 |
|
10 Jun 2026 - Railways Bill - View Vote Context Grahame Morris voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 263 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 155 Noes - 279 |
|
10 Jun 2026 - Railways Bill - View Vote Context Grahame Morris voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 264 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 266 |
|
10 Jun 2026 - Railways Bill - View Vote Context Grahame Morris voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 268 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 271 |
|
17 Jun 2026 - National Security (State Threats) Bill - View Vote Context Grahame Morris voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 240 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 144 Noes - 244 |
|
17 Jun 2026 - National Security (State Threats) Bill - View Vote Context Grahame Morris voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 244 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 135 Noes - 258 |
|
17 Jun 2026 - National Security (State Threats) Bill - View Vote Context Grahame Morris voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 245 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 143 Noes - 249 |
|
17 Jun 2026 - National Security (State Threats) Bill - View Vote Context Grahame Morris voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 249 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 85 Noes - 317 |
|
17 Jun 2026 - National Security (State Threats) Bill (Allocation of Time) - View Vote Context Grahame Morris voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 231 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 233 Noes - 94 |
|
16 Jun 2026 - Business without Debate - View Vote Context Grahame Morris voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 249 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 262 Noes - 86 |
|
16 Jun 2026 - Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill - View Vote Context Grahame Morris voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 252 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 255 |
|
16 Jun 2026 - Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill - View Vote Context Grahame Morris voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 250 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 151 Noes - 258 |
|
16 Jun 2026 - Cyber Security and Resilience (Network and Information Systems) Bill - View Vote Context Grahame Morris voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 242 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 246 |
| Written Answers | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HM Coastguard: Pay
Asked by: Grahame Morris (Labour - Easington) Monday 15th June 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what alternative remuneration models were considered by the Maritime and Coastguard Agency prior to the decision to remove hourly remuneration for Coastguard Rescue Officers attending incidents, training exercises and operational duties. Answered by Keir Mather - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) In the last 12 months the following number of Coastguard Rescue Officers have left the Coastguard Rescue Service – Coastguard Rescue Officers leave the service for a variety of reasons:
Changing the Coastguard Rescue Service operating model was not something which we wanted to do but is a mandated consequence of the Court of Appeal ruling.
Public safety remains our priority and careful consideration was given to the options for a revised operating model. The legal position, the operational implications, and the wider organisational impact have all been looked at in detail, as well as the views of current Coastguard Rescue Officers (CRO). They were clear that serving their community was a major reason why they volunteer. Protecting volunteering preserves a valuable form of public service. The revised model protects choice, flexibility and the ability for people to serve alongside their primary employment. As a result, the decision was made to move to a new model with expenses but no hourly remuneration. This will be implemented in September 2026.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
HM Coastguard: Pay
Asked by: Grahame Morris (Labour - Easington) Monday 15th June 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, will the Department carry out an impact assessment on the removal of remuneration for Coastguard Rescue Officers on coastal communities within in the Easington constituency. Answered by Keir Mather - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) In the last 12 months the following number of Coastguard Rescue Officers have left the Coastguard Rescue Service – Coastguard Rescue Officers leave the service for a variety of reasons:
Changing the Coastguard Rescue Service operating model was not something which we wanted to do but is a mandated consequence of the Court of Appeal ruling.
Public safety remains our priority and careful consideration was given to the options for a revised operating model. The legal position, the operational implications, and the wider organisational impact have all been looked at in detail, as well as the views of current Coastguard Rescue Officers (CRO). They were clear that serving their community was a major reason why they volunteer. Protecting volunteering preserves a valuable form of public service. The revised model protects choice, flexibility and the ability for people to serve alongside their primary employment. As a result, the decision was made to move to a new model with expenses but no hourly remuneration. This will be implemented in September 2026.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
HM Coastguard: Pay
Asked by: Grahame Morris (Labour - Easington) Monday 15th June 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment the Maritime and Coastguard Agency has made of the impact of the removal of remuneration for Coastguard Rescue Officers on (a) recruitment, (b) retention, and (c) operational capability. Answered by Keir Mather - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) In the last 12 months the following number of Coastguard Rescue Officers have left the Coastguard Rescue Service – Coastguard Rescue Officers leave the service for a variety of reasons:
Changing the Coastguard Rescue Service operating model was not something which we wanted to do but is a mandated consequence of the Court of Appeal ruling.
Public safety remains our priority and careful consideration was given to the options for a revised operating model. The legal position, the operational implications, and the wider organisational impact have all been looked at in detail, as well as the views of current Coastguard Rescue Officers (CRO). They were clear that serving their community was a major reason why they volunteer. Protecting volunteering preserves a valuable form of public service. The revised model protects choice, flexibility and the ability for people to serve alongside their primary employment. As a result, the decision was made to move to a new model with expenses but no hourly remuneration. This will be implemented in September 2026.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
HM Coastguard: Pay
Asked by: Grahame Morris (Labour - Easington) Monday 15th June 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether consultation took place with Ministers before the Maritime and Coastguard Agency decided to remove remuneration for Coastguard Rescue Officers. Answered by Keir Mather - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) Since the Court of Appeal judgment in January this year, which meant that the current model could not legally continue, careful consideration has been given to the legal and operational implications.
After careful review and consideration of the options available to comply with the judgment, I accepted the MCA’s recommendation that they should move the Coastguard Rescue Service to a revised volunteer model with expenses paid, but not hourly remuneration.
Volunteers will continue to receive training, equipment and operational support as well as uniforms and personal protective equipment. This revised volunteer model protects choice, flexibility and the ability for people to serve alongside their primary employment.
This decision does not reflect any reduction in the high value that we place on Coastguard Rescue Officers or the important service they provide.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
HM Coastguard: Resignations
Asked by: Grahame Morris (Labour - Easington) Monday 15th June 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, how many Coastguard Rescue Officers have resigned in each of the last 12 months. Answered by Keir Mather - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) In the last 12 months the following number of Coastguard Rescue Officers have left the Coastguard Rescue Service – Coastguard Rescue Officers leave the service for a variety of reasons:
Changing the Coastguard Rescue Service operating model was not something which we wanted to do but is a mandated consequence of the Court of Appeal ruling.
Public safety remains our priority and careful consideration was given to the options for a revised operating model. The legal position, the operational implications, and the wider organisational impact have all been looked at in detail, as well as the views of current Coastguard Rescue Officers (CRO). They were clear that serving their community was a major reason why they volunteer. Protecting volunteering preserves a valuable form of public service. The revised model protects choice, flexibility and the ability for people to serve alongside their primary employment. As a result, the decision was made to move to a new model with expenses but no hourly remuneration. This will be implemented in September 2026.
|
| Early Day Motions |
|---|
|
Tuesday 9th June 35 signatures (Most recent: 30 Jun 2026) Tabled by: Grahame Morris (Labour - Easington) That this House welcomes the establishment of the Orgreave Inquiry into the events surrounding the policing of the miners’ strike at Orgreave on 18 June 1984; recognises the profound significance of this decision for former miners, their families and coalfield communities across the UK; notes that, more than four decades … |
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Monday 29th June Grahame Morris signed this EDM on Tuesday 30th June 2026 Technology companies and crimes against Palestinians 31 signatures (Most recent: 2 Jul 2026)Tabled by: Apsana Begum (Labour - Poplar and Limehouse) That this House notes growing calls to end contracts with companies such as Palantir, Cisco and Oracle which are supplying technology used by Israel in its crimes against Palestinians; further notes that such technologies for mass surveillance enable arbitrary arrest and rights abuses against Palestinians in detention, and that technologies … |
|
Monday 29th June Grahame Morris signed this EDM on Monday 29th June 2026 Release of Venezuela's gold reserves held at the Bank of England 27 signatures (Most recent: 2 Jul 2026)Tabled by: Richard Burgon (Labour - Leeds East) That this House expresses its deepest condolences to the people of Venezuela following the devastating earthquake that has caused widespread loss of life and destruction, with reports of over 1,000 deaths, thousands more injured and displaced, and many tens of thousands of people missing; welcomes the Government's initial provision of … |
|
Tuesday 23rd June Grahame Morris signed this EDM on Tuesday 23rd June 2026 24 signatures (Most recent: 29 Jun 2026) Tabled by: Rebecca Long Bailey (Labour - Salford) That this House is concerned at the increasing frequency and intensity of heatwaves being experienced in the UK, as a result of man-made climate change; notes that surveys of workplace health and safety representatives show that high temperatures are one of their top concerns; regrets that whereas the law specifies … |
|
Monday 22nd June Grahame Morris signed this EDM on Monday 22nd June 2026 26 signatures (Most recent: 29 Jun 2026) Tabled by: John McDonnell (Labour - Hayes and Harlington) That this House notes that thousands of retired civil servants are facing financial hardship and distress, after pensions and lump sum payments failed to arrive on time; believes these delays have been deeply distressing for the individuals and families affected and that they should be compensated in recognition of this; … |
|
Monday 1st June Grahame Morris signed this EDM on Thursday 18th June 2026 Draft Code of Practice on Services, public functions and associations 163 signatures (Most recent: 2 Jul 2026)Tabled by: Nadia Whittome (Labour - Nottingham East) That the draft Code of Practice for Services, public functions and associations, a copy of which was laid before this House on 21 May, be disapproved. |
|
Wednesday 17th June Grahame Morris signed this EDM as a sponsor on Wednesday 17th June 2026 Fireworks anti-social behaviour and regulation 32 signatures (Most recent: 30 Jun 2026)Tabled by: Imran Hussain (Labour - Bradford East) That this House notes with deep concern the growing impact of fireworks misuse on communities across the UK; recognises that the unpredictable use of high-decibel fireworks causes significant distress to animals, wildlife, and those with sensory sensitivities or neurodiverse conditions; further notes that local councils and police forces lack sufficient … |
|
Wednesday 10th June Grahame Morris signed this EDM on Tuesday 16th June 2026 42 signatures (Most recent: 2 Jul 2026) Tabled by: Ben Maguire (Liberal Democrat - North Cornwall) That this House is deeply troubled by the Department for Transport’s Maritime and Coastguard Agency’s plans to cut Coastguard volunteers’ remuneration; notes with concern the significant support these services provide not only during peak tourist seasons, when visitors may be unfamiliar with local conditions and face heightened risks, but also … |
|
Monday 8th June Grahame Morris signed this EDM on Wednesday 10th June 2026 Communications blackout and human rights in Azad Jammu and Kashmir 46 signatures (Most recent: 22 Jun 2026)Tabled by: Imran Hussain (Labour - Bradford East) That this House expresses grave concern at reports of communications blackout, lockdown measures, mass arrests, and raids in Azad Jammu and Kashmir; condemns any excessive or unlawful use of force against peaceful protesters, and civil society representatives; notes with alarm the distress caused to British Kashmiris and others in the … |
|
Tuesday 9th June Grahame Morris signed this EDM on Tuesday 9th June 2026 31 signatures (Most recent: 15 Jun 2026) Tabled by: Richard Burgon (Labour - Leeds East) That this House warmly congratulates Tracy Thirlwall on her well earned retirement as Office Manager of the hon. Member for Leeds East's Constituency office after 11 successful years in that role; notes that her retirement comes after more than 4 decades of committed service for Leeds residents, firstly working in … |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Steel Tariffs
95 speeches (10,441 words) Wednesday 17th June 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Business and Trade Mentions: 1: Chris McDonald (Lab - Stockton North) Betts, Gideon Amos, Hannah Spencer, Mr Lee Dillon, Caroline Voaden, Ben Maguire, Steve Darling, Grahame Morris - Link to Speech |