Written Question
Tuesday 15th September 2026
Asked by:
Darren Jones (Labour - Bristol North West)
Question
to the Department of Health and Social Care:
To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, if he will make it his policy to allow people born prior to section 43 of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 coming into force on 6th April 2009 to retrospectively amend their birth certificates to include both parents who are of the same sex, where only one parent is currently recorded.
Answered by Diana Johnson
- Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)
There are no current plans to review these provisions in the act.
Division Vote (Commons)
11 Sep 2026 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill -
View Vote Context
Darren Jones (Lab) voted No
- against a party majority
and in line with the House
One of
153 Labour No votes vs
190 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 286
Written Question
Friday 11th September 2026
Asked by:
Darren Jones (Labour - Bristol North West)
Question
to the Home Office:
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether her Department has an update on the timetable for responding to the report by the Migration Advisory Committee entitled 'Family visa financial requirements review', published in June 2025.
Answered by Jo White
- Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office)
There is no set date for when we will publish a response to the Migration Advisory Committee’s report. The recommendations are being considered in detail alongside the work being carried out as a result of the Immigration White Paper which made clear that family migration would be reformed to tackle the overly complex family immigration arrangements, including the financial requirements.
The Immigration and Asylum Bill, introduced on 30 June, will deliver a fundamental reset of the balance between individual Article 8 rights and the public interest for those who do not fall within our family policy. This will reflect a fair balance between individual circumstances and the UK’s economic and social interest and is flexible enough to ensure that the most vulnerable are not excluded.
The Home Secretary will respond to the report in due course.
Division Vote (Commons)
10 Sep 2026 - Social Housing Bill [Lords] -
View Vote Context
Darren Jones (Lab) voted No
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
245 Labour No votes vs
0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 292
Division Vote (Commons)
9 Sep 2026 - Plant Health -
View Vote Context
Darren Jones (Lab) voted Aye
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
317 Labour Aye votes vs
0 Labour No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 371 Noes - 100
Division Vote (Commons)
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill -
View Vote Context
Darren Jones (Lab) voted No
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
289 Labour No votes vs
0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 297
Division Vote (Commons)
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill -
View Vote Context
Darren Jones (Lab) voted No
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
292 Labour No votes vs
3 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 108 Noes - 357
Division Vote (Commons)
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill -
View Vote Context
Darren Jones (Lab) voted No
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
298 Labour No votes vs
0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 79 Noes - 300
Division Vote (Commons)
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill -
View Vote Context
Darren Jones (Lab) voted No
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
293 Labour No votes vs
0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 106 Noes - 302
Division Vote (Commons)
7 Sep 2026 - Health Bill -
View Vote Context
Darren Jones (Lab) voted No
- in line with the party majority
and in line with the House
One of
311 Labour No votes vs
0 Labour Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 170 Noes - 316