Debates between Danny Kruger and Sarah Sackman during the 2024 Parliament

Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill (Seventh sitting)

Debate between Danny Kruger and Sarah Sackman
Sarah Sackman Portrait Sarah Sackman
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Further to that point of order, Mrs Harris. I want to clarify the Government’s position. As the Committee knows, the Government are neutral on the Bill, but once the Committee has concluded its work and prior to Report, we are committed to publishing the ECHR memorandum, a delegated powers memorandum, the economic impact assessment that was committed to during the money resolution debate, and an assessment of the equalities impact of the Bill. In terms of the timing, it is necessary that the impacts that are assessed be of the Bill as it is brought forward. If the Bill is liable to change via amendments proposed by members of this Committee, it is important that we know what it is that we are assessing the impact of. That is why the proposed timing is to publish the impact assessment at that stage. The point is that before Members of the House come to a vote on Report and Third Reading, they will all have before them the impact assessment in respect of equalities and all those other aspects of the Bill.

Danny Kruger Portrait Danny Kruger
- Hansard - -

On a point of order, Mrs Harris.