Representation of the People (Young People’s Enfranchisement and Education) Bill Debate
Full Debate: Read Full DebateDanielle Rowley
Main Page: Danielle Rowley (Labour - Midlothian)Representation of the People (Young People’s Enfranchisement and Education) Bill
Danielle Rowley Excerpts
Danielle Rowley (Midlothian) (Lab)
I am honoured to speak in this debate, because when I came here after I was elected in June, it was not my first time in this place. I was here in 2009 during the UK Youth Parliament debate, in which we argued for votes at 16. As a 27-year-old, I have not changed my mind on that issue.
I was recently at Lasswade High School in my constituency, and I asked young people there if they agreed with votes at 16, and why. They told me that the question was very important to them, because they are growing into society and this Government—if they last the year—will make decisions that affect those young people’s job prospects, their safety net if something goes wrong, how their taxes are spent and how their society works, but they cannot elect the Government who will make those critical decisions about their lives.
I would love to refute some of the horrendous allegations that Conservative Members have made against young people, but there are so many that I simply do not have time.
Danielle Rowley
No, I will not give way. What I want to do is to bring to the House the message from my young constituents. It is not that young people are too unintelligent to vote or do not know enough about politics, as has been insinuated.
Madam Deputy Speaker (Mrs Eleanor Laing)
Order. On both sides of the House, there is too much noise. I want to hear the hon. Lady.
Danielle Rowley
On the accusation that young people are not ready, are not clever enough or do not have political knowledge, I ask Members whether everyone they know has such political knowledge.
Danielle Rowley
No.
On behalf of my constituents and of 16 and 17-year-olds watching across the country, I urge Members to vote for this important Bill.