Debates between Bridget Phillipson and Esther McVey during the 2024 Parliament

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Bridget Phillipson and Esther McVey
Monday 9th December 2024

(2 weeks ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Esther McVey Portrait Esther McVey (Tatton) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

T1. If she will make a statement on her departmental responsibilities.

Bridget Phillipson Portrait The Secretary of State for Education (Bridget Phillipson)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

Children growing up in our country deserve the best start in life, and nothing less. That is why, last week, the Prime Minister published his plan for change, including an ambitious target to ensure that, by the end of the Parliament, a record proportion of children are ready for school. We will do this by transforming the early years, creating and expanding nurseries, rolling out childcare, strengthening family services and focusing on early intervention.

Mr Speaker, as we approach the end of the term, I wish you and all the staff of the House a very merry Christmas, and send my thanks to all the staff working across education.

Esther McVey Portrait Esther McVey
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

I have met private schools in and around Tatton that are attended by my constituents’ children, and they have all me told that, despite having applied for a VAT number, not one of them has received it. Will the Secretary of State explain to me what discussions she is having with the Chancellor to put this right, particularly in the light of the rushed implementation of this misguided ideological policy in January?

Bridget Phillipson Portrait Bridget Phillipson
- View Speech - Hansard - -

I would be happy to make sure that the point the right hon. Lady raises is looked into, but on the wider policy priority, I say to her that this party and this Government are determined to expand opportunity right across our country for the vast majority of children, who go to state schools. The Opposition may be happy to defend the indefensible, but should they wish to oppose what we are setting out, they need to say how they are going to pay for it.