Oral Answers to Questions

Bob Seely Excerpts

Wednesday 23rd October 2019 Commons Chamber

[Alex Norris (Nottingham North) (Lab/Co-op)]

2. What assessment the Government have made of the potential effect on the number of enfranchised people of the provisions on voter identification in the proposed legislation on electoral integrity.

[Mr Bob Seely (Isle of Wight) (Con)]

3. What steps the Government are taking to improve the integrity of electoral (a) processes and (b) systems.

[Henry Smith (Crawley) (Con)]

10. What steps the Government are taking to improve the integrity of electoral (a) processes and (b) systems.

--- Later in debate ---

[Oliver Dowden]

My wife is Canadian. When I first went to vote with her, she found it extraordinary that people could turn up at the ballot box without any form of identification. Voter ID is what happens in Canada, Switzerland, France and other advanced democracies.

As to the point about lower turnout. In the pilots we undertook, over 99% of people who wished to vote were able to do so.

[Mr Seely]

I welcome the Government’s plans, but do they go far enough? The United States introduced the Foreign Agents Registration Act in 1938 to protect that country against covert interference from malign states. Australia passed a similar Act in July 2018. Does the Minister think we need a FARA in this country?

[Oliver Dowden]

My hon. Friend raises an important point. The Home Office is reviewing legislation related to hostile state activity following the Salisbury attacks. This is a thorough process to assess whether additional powers are required to clamp down on the activities of hostile states that threaten the UK both here and overseas. As part of this we are considering the legislation of likeminded international partners to see whether the UK would benefit from adopting something similar.