Debates between Ben Obese-Jecty and David Lammy during the 2024 Parliament

UK-Ukraine 100-year Partnership

Debate between Ben Obese-Jecty and David Lammy
Monday 20th January 2025

(1 day, 7 hours ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
David Lammy Portrait Mr Lammy
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Ukrainians recognise our huge strengths in higher education and, as result, innovation, which my hon. Friend will that referenced in the eventual treaty. Prior to the war, there was immense expertise in tech and IT in Ukraine. The innovations in drone technology are extraordinary and, frankly, are changing the nature of warfare, from which we should benefit. For all those reasons, that is an important pillar, from which we will gain as much as Ukraine will over the coming years.

Ben Obese-Jecty Portrait Ben Obese-Jecty (Huntingdon) (Con)
- View Speech - Hansard - -

Pillar 2.3 states:

“Throughout the duration of the Declaration, neither Participant will be left alone in the face of an attack or aggression.”

To what extent does that act as a NATO article 5 commitment in lieu of Ukraine joining NATO? Does it, like article 5, facilitate direct UK military action in support of Ukraine should it be attacked again in the future in violation of the UN charter? Are other NATO allies also negotiating similar pacts, and to what extent do they complement this one?

David Lammy Portrait Mr Lammy
- View Speech - Hansard - - - Excerpts

Unusually, the hon. Gentleman is jumping ahead of himself somewhat. We continue to support Ukraine with every military effort. That is going on now, and in a sense that is the reference he is making. I have indicated an irreversible pathway to NATO, as we agreed back in September. This is not article 5.