Procedure and Privileges Committee

Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle Excerpts

Thursday 23rd April 2026 Lords Chamber

[Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Lab)]

My Lords, I speak as the chair of the Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee, and I want to put on the record that I very much approve of the suggested additional day on Tuesdays specifically for delegated legislation. It is important that delegated legislation is given the stature that it deserves, and I think this will be a popular addition to the abilities of Members of your Lordships’ House to discuss delegated legislation. I note that it is only for a trial period initially, but I feel sure that it will be adopted on a permanent basis at the end of that period, which I would very much welcome.

[Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (GP)]

My Lords, I rise to express some concern about paragraph 16 of the report, under “Proposals relating to Delegated Legislation”, on time-limiting debates to 60, or possibly 90, minutes. For the sake of clarity, I wish to know whether that also applies when there is a regret or fatal Motion—I am getting a nod from the Chief Whip—or, indeed, both regret and fatal Motions, or sometimes multiple regret and fatal Motions. At this point, I guess all I can do is ask the usual channels to assure us that they will appropriately use that possibility of extension—I am getting a nod here, too, which I am putting on the record.

I am thinking back to the debate, which I am sure many noble Lords will remember, in the name of my noble friend Lady Jones of Moulsecoomb regarding the proscription of Palestine Action. From memory, that debate took three or four hours, engaged very many Members of your Lordships’ House and was a very serious issue for the country.

It is terribly important. We are seeing, and we hear many times, the problem with Henry VIII powers and the way in which the Government are using delegated legislation, instead of full legislation that we can debate and amend. This could very much be seen as a way to shut down debate on really important issues on which there is great concern in the House. I want to put that on the record and say that we will certainly be watching this very closely.

[The Senior Deputy Speaker]

Mr Lords, those were two interesting comments. I would obviously also want to take this opportunity to thank the noble Lord, Lord Watson of Invergowrie, and his committee for undertaking a very key part of our committee work. I say to the noble Lord and the noble Baroness, Lady Bennett of Manor Castle, that I specifically said that the committee wanted to have this as a trial. The intention behind all this rationale, when we as a committee looked at it, was in no sense to stifle scrutiny—indeed, it was to give Peers greater certainty about timing. We had had a number of observations about the difficulty of this issue. It is, as I say, for a trial. In fact, I know from chairing the committee that at no point did any of us see this as a route to—to use the words of the noble Baroness—shutting down debate. It is very important that these matters are properly scrutinised.

As this is one of my passing and final shots as Senior Deputy Speaker, I would say that whenever I have spoken to the House, it has almost unanimously felt that we should all speak succinctly and to the point and not overstress your Lordships with lengthy contributions. In this trial, we all need to ensure that there is proper scrutiny, yes, but that it is done in a way that is conducive to the whole spirit of having these debates in the terms I have described.

On that basis, and with the points made by noble Lords, I hope that your Lordships will approve the committee’s report.