Information between 7th March 2026 - 17th March 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 1 Green Party Aye votes vs 0 Green Party No votes Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 157 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 1 Green Party No votes vs 0 Green Party Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 216 Noes - 170 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 1 Green Party Aye votes vs 0 Green Party No votes Tally: Ayes - 252 Noes - 171 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 1 Green Party Aye votes vs 0 Green Party No votes Tally: Ayes - 257 Noes - 174 |
|
10 Mar 2026 - Victims and Courts Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 2 Green Party Aye votes vs 0 Green Party No votes Tally: Ayes - 273 Noes - 180 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 2 Green Party No votes vs 0 Green Party Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 162 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 2 Green Party Aye votes vs 0 Green Party No votes Tally: Ayes - 75 Noes - 190 |
|
9 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 2 Green Party Aye votes vs 0 Green Party No votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 172 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 1 Green Party No votes vs 0 Green Party Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 44 Noes - 153 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 1 Green Party No votes vs 0 Green Party Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 153 |
|
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 2 Green Party No votes vs 0 Green Party Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 227 Noes - 221 |
|
12 Mar 2026 - Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Scheme (Amendment) (Extension to Maritime Activities) Order 2026 - View Vote Context Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 2 Green Party No votes vs 0 Green Party Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 26 Noes - 134 |
|
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 2 Green Party No votes vs 0 Green Party Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 201 Noes - 177 |
|
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 2 Green Party No votes vs 0 Green Party Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 165 |
|
16 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 1 Green Party Aye votes vs 0 Green Party No votes Tally: Ayes - 48 Noes - 142 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Grasslands: Conservation
Asked by: Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party - Life peer) Monday 9th March 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to protect waxcap grasslands; and what steps they have taken toward creating a waxcap grassland habitat of principal importance. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Natural England is undertaking work to map waxcap grasslands and to understand their conservation status. In addition, Natural England is currently reviewing priority habitats, and the potential inclusion of waxcap grasslands within these habitats is being considered as part of the review. Under the Countryside Stewardship Higher Tier scheme, waxcap grasslands can be identified as a target feature for funding to prevent agricultural improvement or conversion that may threaten these grasslands. |
|
Fungi: Conservation
Asked by: Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party - Life peer) Monday 9th March 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer from Baroness Hayman of Ullock on 26 November 2025 (HL11789), what steps they have taken to communicate the ambition of the International Fungal Conservation Pledge and ensure national alignment with the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs' national team, the Joint Nature Conservation Committee and devolved government agencies. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Further to those actions set out in our response to PQ UIN HL11789, in September 2025 Defra participated in the launch of the UK Network for Fungal Conservation. The network, which currently includes Defra, NE, JNCC, NIEA and DAERA membership, brings together representatives from statutory bodies, research institutes, conservation NGOs and other fungal conservation professionals to work on fungal conservation across the UK. During the first quarter of 2026, the network will work on a collaborative new strategy and delivery plan for fungal conservation in the UK, enabling its integration with the new global strategy for fungal conservation.
Additionally, and in line with the UK’s commitment to the International Fungal Conservation Pledge, the UK led a proposal at CoP20 (December 2025) to develop a programme of work on how CITES should be applied to fungi in practice. This proposal was adopted by the Parties. |
|
Fungi: Disease Control
Asked by: Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party - Life peer) Thursday 12th March 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to address the biosecurity risks arising from (1) the lack of reference to non-pathogenic fungi, or (2) the ability of non-invasive species of fungi to cause extreme environmental harm, in the Environment Improvement Plan 25 biosecurity strategy. Answered by Baroness Hayman of Ullock - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The Environmental Improvement Plan (EIP) ensures that nature’s recovery is a key priority, including the conservation and recovery of plants, animals and fungi. It includes prioritised actions to enhance biosecurity and reaffirms our commitment to strategies including the Plant Biosecurity Strategy for Great Britain and the UK Biological Security Strategy, and highlights some of the ways we will deliver them.
This includes a dedicated programme of risk and horizon scanning, which continuously and proactively assesses emerging threats to plant health and the potential impact on the UK, including from fungi, using the UK Plant Health Risk Register as a screening tool. Where pests and diseases are deemed a significant risk, priority actions are identified and implemented to mitigate such risk, for example through regulation or research and development. |
|
Food: Antimicrobials
Asked by: Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle (Green Party - Life peer) Thursday 12th March 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask His Majesty's Government what antimicrobial resistance surveillance is currently conducted on imported foods at the UK border; and how that surveillance aligns with the UK's One Health approach to antimicrobial resistance. Answered by Baroness Merron - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs monitors antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in zoonotic and commensal bacteria from food samples taken from Third Country Imports to the European Union of fresh meat at Northern Ireland’s Points of Entry. This AMR testing is carried out on beef and/or pork and chicken and/or turkey on alternating years. These inspections are carried out in line with and under European Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1729 on the monitoring and reporting of AMR in zoonotic and commensal bacteria, which applies in Northern Ireland under the Windsor Framework. For the rest of the United Kingdom, port health authorities (PHAs) have a statutory obligation to prioritise sampling under official controls which are intended to mitigate known food safety risks. PHAs have their own local sampling plans which will be informed by the UK’s National Monitoring Plan and other intelligence. Currently, it is more practical to sample for AMR screening inland. The Food Standards Agency (FSA) is currently funding two AMR surveys at retail which includes testing foods imported into the United Kingdom. This includes the raw frozen chicken meat survey and the eggshell membrane food supplements survey, which includes supplements imported into the UK. The Government takes a ‘One-Health’ approach to controlling AMR through the UK’s 2024 to 2029 National Action Plan. The FSA leads on AMR in food and promoting good hygienic practices across the food chain. Surveillance improves our understanding of AMR by measuring, predicting, and understanding how resistant microorganisms spread from animals and agriculture to humans via the food chain. This allows decisions to be based on robust surveillance, scientific research, and datasets. We monitor AMR bacteria found in foods to understand trends over several years and detect emerging new threats to protect the public and future effectiveness of antibiotics both in healthcare and animal welfare. |