To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Speech and Language Disorders: Health Services
Monday 14th September 2026

Asked by: Alison Griffiths (Conservative - Bognor Regis and Littlehampton)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether NHS England holds data on the number of integrated care boards that commission a defined pathway for the assessment and support of children and young people with selective mutism; and what steps she is taking to address variation in provision, including within NHS Sussex Integrated Care Board.

Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

Selective mutism can present differently across settings and may require support from a range of health and education services, depending on the child or young person’s individual needs. Local commissioners are best placed to determine how this multidisciplinary support should be organised to reflect local needs and service arrangements.

The Government is strengthening early identification and support in education through the National Inclusion Standards, backed by investment of up to £15 million by 2028, and research commissioned through UK Research and Innovation. The SEND Code of Practice is clear that support should be based on a child’s identified needs and does not require a diagnostic label.

The NHS Sussex Integrated Care Board is working with local partners and parent carers to improve front-line staff knowledge and explore alternative routes for assessment and support. This includes an ongoing working group and further engagement with parents and carers to identify gaps and strengthen local assessment and support arrangements.


Written Question
Speech and Language Disorders: Health Services
Monday 14th September 2026

Asked by: Alison Griffiths (Conservative - Bognor Regis and Littlehampton)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps she is taking with the Secretary of State for Education to establish a national evidence-based pathway for selective mutism that specifies (a) lead commissioning responsibility, (b) referral routes, (c) the respective responsibilities of speech and language therapy, children and young people’s mental health services, educational psychology services and education settings, (d) access criteria and (e) expected timescales for assessment and intervention; and if she will make it her policy for NHS England to publish a national service specification and commissioning framework for that pathway.

Answered by Alison McGovern - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

Selective mutism can present differently across settings and may require support from a range of health and education services, depending on the child or young person’s individual needs. Local commissioners are best placed to determine how this multidisciplinary support should be organised to reflect local needs and service arrangements.

The Government is strengthening early identification and support in education through the National Inclusion Standards, backed by investment of up to £15 million by 2028, and research commissioned through UK Research and Innovation. The SEND Code of Practice is clear that support should be based on a child’s identified needs and does not require a diagnostic label.

The NHS Sussex Integrated Care Board is working with local partners and parent carers to improve front-line staff knowledge and explore alternative routes for assessment and support. This includes an ongoing working group and further engagement with parents and carers to identify gaps and strengthen local assessment and support arrangements.


Division Vote (Commons)
11 Sep 2026 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context
Alison Griffiths (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 64 Conservative No votes vs 21 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 293 Noes - 218
Division Vote (Commons)
11 Sep 2026 - Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill - View Vote Context
Alison Griffiths (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 90 Conservative No votes vs 17 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 286
Division Vote (Commons)
10 Sep 2026 - Social Housing Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Alison Griffiths (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 76 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 77 Noes - 292
Speech in Commons Chamber - Wed 09 Sep 2026
Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [Lords]

"This has been a positive debate. I reiterate the call of the shadow Secretary of State, my right hon. Friend the Member for Basildon and Billericay (Mr Holden), and the Liberal Democrat spokesperson, the hon. Member for Didcot and Wantage (Olly Glover), for the Government to make a statement on …..."
Alison Griffiths - View Speech

View all Alison Griffiths (Con - Bognor Regis and Littlehampton) contributions to the debate on: Civil Aviation (Consumer Protection and Regulatory Reform) Bill [Lords]

Division Vote (Commons)
9 Sep 2026 - Plant Health - View Vote Context
Alison Griffiths (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 87 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 371 Noes - 100
Division Vote (Commons)
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context
Alison Griffiths (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 85 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 162 Noes - 297
Division Vote (Commons)
8 Sep 2026 - Draft ACAS Code of Practice on Time Off for Trade Union Duties and Activities - View Vote Context
Alison Griffiths (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 4 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 8 Noes - 4
Division Vote (Commons)
8 Sep 2026 - Health Bill - View Vote Context
Alison Griffiths (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 88 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 108 Noes - 357