To match an exact phrase, use quotation marks around the search term. eg. "Parliamentary Estate". Use "OR" or "AND" as link words to form more complex queries.


Keep yourself up-to-date with the latest developments by exploring our subscription options to receive notifications direct to your inbox

Written Question
Employment Tribunals Service: Expenditure
Thursday 10th April 2025

Asked by: Alison Griffiths (Conservative - Bognor Regis and Littlehampton)

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what funding has been allocated to the employment tribunal system in each of the last three financial years; and what proportion of that funding has been spent on digital case management systems.

Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice)

£M

22/23

23/24

24/25

Employment Tribunals

67.8

74.9

77.7

The table above gives the total allocated budget for the Employment Tribunals in the years shown in £m. This includes all staff costs, judicial salaries and fees, and other direct costs from the operation of the tribunals and the specific IT systems relating to Employment Tribunals, though excludes wider overheads such as the costs of buildings and other general IT systems.

It is not possible to identify separately the full running cost of the Employment Tribunals digital case management systems, as all maintenance, development and analysis work is carried out by HM Courts & Tribunals Service’s centrally-managed digital and data teams.


Written Question
General Practitioners: Sussex
Tuesday 8th April 2025

Asked by: Alison Griffiths (Conservative - Bognor Regis and Littlehampton)

Question to the Department of Health and Social Care:

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he is taking to (a) retain existing and (b) recruit new GPs in Sussex.

Answered by Stephen Kinnock - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care)

We are committed to training thousands more general practitioners (GPs) across the country, including in Sussex. We invested an additional £82 million into the Additional Roles Reimbursement Scheme (ARRS) over 2024/25, as part of an initiative to address GP unemployment and secure the future pipeline of GPs.

We are investing an additional £889 million through the GP Contract to reinforce the front door of the National Health Service, bringing total spend on the GP Contract to £13.2 billion in 2025/26. This is the biggest increase in over a decade.

Our commitment to growing the GP workforce includes addressing the reasons why doctors leave the profession and encouraging them to return to practice. We know that high workloads can be a key driver for GPs reducing their contracted hours or leaving the profession and we are tackling morale issues through drivers such as growing the workforce and reducing bureaucracy through our Red Tape Challenge, to improve job satisfaction and reduce the risk of burnout.

The fully qualified GP workforce in Sussex has increased by 6.3% or 51.0 full-time equivalent (FTE) compared to January 2024 and compared with 2.7% nationally or 1,019 FTE.

I understand that the Sussex Primary Care Workforce Plan was developed and published last year, and aims to further develop a sustainable healthcare workforce, ensuring high-quality patient care despite rising demand. The plan prioritises expanding the workforce, improving staff retention, and introducing innovative training methods.


MP Financial Interest
Alison Griffiths (Conservative - Bognor Regis and Littlehampton)
Original Source (7th April 2025)
3. Gifts, benefits and hospitality from UK sources
British Kebab Awards/Centre for Turkey Studies - £720.00

Speech in Commons Chamber - Thu 03 Apr 2025
UK-US Trade and Tariffs

Speech Link

View all Alison Griffiths (Con - Bognor Regis and Littlehampton) contributions to the debate on: UK-US Trade and Tariffs

Division Vote (Commons)
2 Apr 2025 - Driving Licences: Zero Emission Vehicles - View Vote Context
Alison Griffiths (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 95 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 101
Division Vote (Commons)
2 Apr 2025 - Onshore Wind and Solar Generation - View Vote Context
Alison Griffiths (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 94 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 307 Noes - 100
Division Vote (Commons)
1 Apr 2025 - Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Alison Griffiths (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 98 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 303 Noes - 110
Division Vote (Commons)
1 Apr 2025 - Product Regulation and Metrology Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Alison Griffiths (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 101 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 110 Noes - 302
Division Vote (Commons)
31 Mar 2025 - Business without Debate - View Vote Context
Alison Griffiths (Con) voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 93 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 296 Noes - 164
Division Vote (Commons)
31 Mar 2025 - Institute for Apprenticeships and Technical Education (Transfer of Functions etc) Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context
Alison Griffiths (Con) voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 96 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Vote Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 305