4 Lord McColl of Dulwich debates involving the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport

Channel 4: Funding and Governance

Lord McColl of Dulwich Excerpts
Thursday 1st July 2021

(2 years, 10 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Barran Portrait Baroness Barran (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The noble Lord will be aware that I have often quoted both my right honourable friend the Secretary of State and the Minister for Media and Data, who have both been absolutely clear about wanting to see a thriving PSB sector, which is particularly important in a time of misinformation and disinformation.

Lord McColl of Dulwich Portrait Lord McColl of Dulwich (Con) [V]
- Hansard - -

My Lords, what means are open to the public and the authorities to encourage Channel 4 to report the news in an accurate and unbiased way and thereby triumph over the present, frequently prejudiced environment of the media?

Baroness Barran Portrait Baroness Barran (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

If my noble friend or any members of the public have concerns about the accuracy of any broadcaster, including Channel 4, they can send those concerns to Ofcom.

Office of Communications: Chair

Lord McColl of Dulwich Excerpts
Thursday 18th March 2021

(3 years, 1 month ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Barran Portrait Baroness Barran (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The noble Lord raises a very important point. Work is already starting within Ofcom to recruit the appropriate skills and experience that will be needed to deliver on the online safety regime, including the recent recruitment of a head of emerging technologies from Google.

Lord McColl of Dulwich Portrait Lord McColl of Dulwich (Con) [V]
- Hansard - -

My Lords, can the Minister give the House any valid reasons why the committee wants the power of veto over such appointments?

Baroness Barran Portrait Baroness Barran (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am afraid I do not follow my noble friend’s question, so, if I may, I will write to him.

Online Harms Consultation

Lord McColl of Dulwich Excerpts
Wednesday 16th December 2020

(3 years, 4 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Barran Portrait Baroness Barran (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

On the noble Baroness’s first point, I understand why she asks about it and we have given the matter careful consideration. Platforms will need to prove that children are not accessing their content by sharing any existing age verification or assurance information, by reviewing the data on their users. They will need to evidence that in a robust way to satisfy Ofcom. I shall take back the point regarding the Christchurch video. I know that my right honourable friend the Secretary of State talked about how he valued the expertise of both Houses, so I hope that is a warm note regarding scrutiny.

Lord McColl of Dulwich Portrait Lord McColl of Dulwich (Con) [V]
- Hansard - -

Because of its focus on user-generated content, it is quite clear that the online harms Bill greatly weakens the protection afforded to children in relation to assessing pornographic websites. This House determined that they should be provided through Part 3 of the Digital Economy Act, as the noble Baroness, Lady Benjamin, mentioned. Who has pressed the Government not to implement Part 3? What should I tell a concerned father who contacted me this morning, saying, “The Government promised to protect children from pornographic websites, not just user-generated content on pornographic websites”?

Baroness Barran Portrait Baroness Barran (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I understand my noble friend’s concern but, as I said to the noble Baroness, Lady Benjamin, the vast majority of pornographic content that children come across is on social media rather than online pornography sites, and those online sites are often intertwined with user-generated content. So we are confident that the vast majority of content will not be accessible to children.

Charities: Funding

Lord McColl of Dulwich Excerpts
Thursday 29th October 2020

(3 years, 6 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Baroness Barran Portrait Baroness Barran (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I understand the noble Baroness’s concern, but the Government have already focused on prioritising charities. The £750 million support package that we announced in the spring was the first sector-specific support package that the Government announced. Since then, billions have gone to charities and social enterprises, principally through the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme. We have also been active, working with philanthropists, raising an extra £85 million recently for charities across the board.

Lord McColl of Dulwich Portrait Lord McColl of Dulwich (Con) [V]
- Hansard - -

My Lords, does the Minister agree—and in her answers so far it would seem she does—that there are many honest, law-abiding citizens who wish their donations to charity to remain secret for perfectly legitimate reasons, not least of which is their wish to avoid boasting about their generosity?

Baroness Barran Portrait Baroness Barran (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I absolutely agree with my noble friend.