Lord Katz
Main Page: Lord Katz (Labour - Life peer)Department Debates - View all Lord Katz's debates with the Home Office
(1 day, 10 hours ago)
Lords Chamber
Baroness Lawlor (Con)
My Lords, I shall say a few words in support of Amendment 449 from the noble Viscount, Lord Hailsham, and Amendment 454 from the noble Baroness, Lady Chakrabarti. I do so on the grounds, really, that—
Lord in Waiting/Government Whip (Lord Katz) (Lab)
Apologies, I did not mean to put the noble Baroness off, I was just trying to recall whether she was here for the start of the group.
Baroness Lawlor (Con)
I came in just as the noble Viscount, Lord Hailsham, got up.
Baroness Lawlor (Con)
I was simply going to say that I agree with the reasons given by noble Lords, but in particular I want to stress the importance of having checks and balances in the constitution. We need, particularly where our constitution is unwritten, to pay particular attention to the ability of Parliament to scrutinise the Executive. It is so simple for the Executive to bring in proscription, but it must be equally simple for Parliament to be able to scrutinise it and afford a proper check.
It is really for that reason that I support these amendments, at a time when constitutional liberty is under threat, on both sides of the Atlantic, from executive power, whatever the Government in power. We heard earlier this evening from a US Supreme Court judge who spoke of this happening under recent Presidents, going back some time, and it has happened under Governments of all complexions here. Therefore, I commend these important amendments because of the centrality of the separation of powers.