Information between 31st March 2025 - 10th April 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
31 Mar 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Katz voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 138 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 209 Noes - 143 |
|
31 Mar 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Katz voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 138 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 218 Noes - 143 |
|
31 Mar 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Katz voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 148 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 272 Noes - 157 |
|
31 Mar 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Katz voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 144 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 223 Noes - 157 |
|
2 Apr 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Katz voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 105 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 19 Noes - 112 |
|
2 Apr 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Katz voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 104 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 51 Noes - 106 |
|
2 Apr 2025 - Mental Health Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Katz voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 121 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 49 Noes - 129 |
|
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Katz voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 136 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 59 Noes - 148 |
|
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Katz voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 134 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 226 Noes - 142 |
|
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Katz voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 138 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 240 Noes - 148 |
|
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Katz voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 142 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 242 Noes - 157 |
|
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context Lord Katz voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 135 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 216 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Lord Katz speeches from: Chagos Islands
Lord Katz contributed 1 speech (55 words) Wednesday 2nd April 2025 - Lords Chamber Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Coronavirus: Monuments
Asked by: Lord Katz (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 8th April 2025 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask His Majesty's Government what discussions they have had with Lambeth Council, Friends of the Wall, and other volunteer groups about the ongoing maintenance of the National Covid Memorial Wall, and what assessment they have made of ongoing maintenance costs. Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Government recognises the significance of the National Covid Memorial Wall in London and its special role in supporting bereaved families to remember their loved ones. Its preservation was specifically recommended by the UK Commission on Covid Commemoration.
The Government is working closely with local partners including the Friends of the Wall and Lambeth Council, and other key partners to consider options, including the likely costs, for the longer term preservation of the Wall. We will respond to the report by the UK Commission in due course.
|
|
Coronavirus: Monuments
Asked by: Lord Katz (Labour - Life peer) Tuesday 8th April 2025 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask His Majesty's Government whether they plan to designate the National Covid Memorial Wall as a national monument to commemorate those who died during the pandemic. Answered by Baroness Twycross - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Government recognises the significance of the National Covid Memorial Wall in London and its special role in supporting bereaved families to remember their loved ones. Its preservation was specifically recommended by the UK Commission on Covid Commemoration.
The Government is working closely with local partners including the Friends of the Wall and Lambeth Council, and other key partners to consider options, including the likely costs, for the longer term preservation of the Wall. We will respond to the report by the UK Commission in due course.
|
|
Social Rented Housing: Furniture
Asked by: Lord Katz (Labour - Life peer) Thursday 10th April 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the levels of furniture poverty among social housing tenants. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) My department engages actively with a range of stakeholders on issues facing social housing tenants, and has engaged with groups such as End Furniture Poverty to understand their research on this issue. People currently living without important pieces of furniture may be able to get support from their local authorities via the ‘Household Support Fund’ and other services available locally. The Deputy Prime Minister is also part of the ministerial Child Poverty Taskforce, which is considering the impacts of living in poor quality housing on children.
|