Debates between Lord Haskel and Earl of Caithness during the 2010-2015 Parliament

House of Lords Reform Bill [HL]

Debate between Lord Haskel and Earl of Caithness
Friday 21st October 2011

(12 years, 11 months ago)

Lords Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Lord Haskel Portrait The Deputy Chairman of Committees (Lord Haskel)
- Hansard - -

Before the noble Lord responds, I have to call Amendment 143 as an amendment to Amendment 142.

Earl of Caithness Portrait The Earl of Caithness
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, in order to allow the noble Lord, Lord Steel, to speak, I am not going to move Amendments 143 to Amendments 161 inclusive because they are amendments to Amendment 142 which I am going to withdraw for the reasons I have said. I had to move it to get on the record my apology to the House.

Lord Steel of Aikwood Portrait Lord Steel of Aikwood
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My Lords, we have done very useful work today—

--- Later in debate ---
Lord Haskel Portrait The Deputy Chairman of Committees
- Hansard - -

Is Amendment 142 not moved?

Earl of Caithness Portrait The Earl of Caithness
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

No, my Lords, with respect to the Chairman, we are debating Amendment 142 at the moment and the noble Lord, Lord Steel, is on his feet. I have yet to speak on it again.

--- Later in debate ---
Earl of Caithness Portrait The Earl of Caithness
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am slightly confused. I do not know whether the Deputy Chairman of Committees has called Amendment 1. He certainly did not call any Peer to speak to Amendment 1, so I do not know whether we are in limbo land or debating an amendment.

Lord Haskel Portrait The Deputy Chairman of Committees (Lord Haskel)
- Hansard - -

I was obliged to call Amendment 1 but it was obvious that the Government Chief Whip wanted to say something, so I called it and then invited him to speak. If it is the wish of the Committee I shall call Amendment 1and the noble Earl, Lord Caithness.

Amendment 1