(3 years, 6 months ago)
Lords ChamberI do understand the concern about the 16,500 placements but, as I tried to explain, during the lockdown employers have shown great commitment to involvement in Kickstart but wanted to do it when the lockdown ended. I say again to the noble Baroness that we are seeing day by day vast increases in the number of vacancies being filled, and we are confident that we are going to create hundreds of thousands of vacancies and place young people in them. On moving money around, I dare not get involved in that; I think I would be going a bit too far if I confirmed anything in that regard.
My Lords, the time allowed for this Question has elapsed, and it brings Question Time to an end.
(3 years, 8 months ago)
Lords ChamberI am really not aware that I or any of my colleagues have side-stepped meeting with Peers to talk about creativity, and I do not agree with the noble Baroness on that point. There will be a meeting where people will have the opportunity to discuss and put forward their ideas. I am sure that the department will consider them carefully.
My Lords, the time allotted to that Question has elapsed. We now come to the second Oral Question.
(3 years, 8 months ago)
Lords ChamberTo ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they have received any requests from Commonwealth countries to discuss reciprocal pension agreements in the last two years; and if so, which countries have made such requests.
I will call the noble Lord, Lord Randall, one more time. He is not there, so I call the noble Baroness, Lady Altmann, to ask her question.
My Lords, I understand that the Government are in talks with Canada on possible reciprocal arrangements for state pensions uprating. Can my noble friend tell the House whether they are in discussion with any other countries on this issue, including those in the EEA, EFTA and the EU?
As I understand it, the previous agreement with Australia, which did not include uprating, was terminated by Australia in 2001 due to the UK’s refusal to change its policy on pensions uprating abroad.
My Lords, all supplementary questions have been asked. This brings Question Time to an end.
(3 years, 11 months ago)
Lords ChamberThe noble Lord raises a very pertinent issue. I am well aware of the issues that rural communities face. What I would like to do, if he is happy with this, is go back to my colleagues in the jobcentre network in order to understand exactly what they are doing to target help at the rural communities, and come back to him in due course.
I call the noble Lord, Lord Desai. No? In that case, I call the noble Lord, Lord Young of Cookham.
My Lords, the Government introduced a welcome measure to help up to 4 million people on low incomes in September, offering a grant of £500 to those who had to self-isolate but could not work from home and therefore faced a drop in income. However, some of the local authorities through which this grant is routed are running out of funds, thereby prejudicing the success of the scheme. What steps can my noble friend take to ensure that those who are entitled to these grants get them?
The £15 million allocated for discretionary payments is a fixed envelope to cover cases of exceptional hardship that fall outside the scope of the main test and trace support payment scheme. In addition, the Government have made a range of other support available to those on low incomes who have to self-isolate. That includes changing the rules to allow claims for statutory sick pay, increasing the standard allowance of UC and the Self-employment Income Support Scheme.
My Lords, the time allowed for this Question has elapsed, and that brings Question Time to an end.
(3 years, 11 months ago)
Lords ChamberIt would not be right for me to comment on individual cases, as I have already said. However, I should point out that a clear, independent process is in place for the forfeiture of an honour, and the final decision on whether to revoke one is made by an independent committee.
My Lords, the time allowed for this Question has elapsed, which brings an end to Question Time.
(3 years, 11 months ago)
Lords ChamberI understand the noble Baroness’s concern over those hardest hit by the pandemic, especially their income, but it is not right to say that we are changing course. All we are confirming at the moment, as the Chancellor of the Exchequer set out last week, is that we wait for more clarity on the national economic and social picture before making the decision on the best way to support low-income families.
I call the noble Lord, Lord Monks. No? Then I call the noble Lord, Lord Taylor of Goss Moor.
My Lords, the time allowed for this Question has now elapsed. That brings Question Time to an end.
(4 years ago)
Lords ChamberI can only agree with the noble Lord that many people over 50 prefer to do business face to face, and I appreciate that that opportunity has been curtailed. I have no desire to be dismissive, but I think I have already answered questions about a new campaign, and I will come back to the House with an answer.
My Lords, the time allocated for that Question has now elapsed, and it is also the end of Question Time.
(4 years, 1 month ago)
Lords ChamberThe noble Lord makes a very good point. I think that I will need to write to him with the detail of those checks.
I call the next speaker, the noble Baroness, Lady Drake.
My Lords, there seems to be a sound issue for those attending virtually. I suggest that the House adjourns for five minutes.
I referred earlier to tax and the issues that people face as a result of scams. As I said to the noble Baroness, Lady Warwick, the Minister for Pensions is quite prepared to meet on this and other issues, and I will extend that invitation to the noble Baroness so she may raise her point.
My Lords, the time allowed for this Question has elapsed.
(4 years, 5 months ago)
Lords ChamberMy Lords, the time allowed for this Question has elapsed, so we have come to the end of Question Time.
(4 years, 5 months ago)
Lords ChamberUniversal credit is simpler and fairer than the legacy system. It is designed to target resources at those who need them the most and to provide support for people who cannot work. There is a monthly reconciliation, which we are absolutely clear is better than the annual reconciliation.
My Lords, the time allowed for this Question has elapsed. I offer my congratulations to all concerned, as we have got through all 10 questions. We come to the second Oral Question, from the noble Baroness, Lady Randerson.