Lord Cameron of Lochiel Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Cameron of Lochiel

Information between 12th March 2026 - 1st April 2026

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Division Votes
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cameron of Lochiel voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 41 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 44 Noes - 153
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cameron of Lochiel voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 149 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 153
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cameron of Lochiel voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 181 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 215 Noes - 180
11 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cameron of Lochiel voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 178 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 227 Noes - 221
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cameron of Lochiel voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 40 Conservative Aye votes vs 6 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 68 Noes - 163
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cameron of Lochiel voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 96 Conservative Aye votes vs 7 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 148 Noes - 185
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cameron of Lochiel voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 131 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 231 Noes - 188
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cameron of Lochiel voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 131 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 225 Noes - 189
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cameron of Lochiel voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 44 Conservative Aye votes vs 4 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 70 Noes - 166
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cameron of Lochiel voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 41 Conservative No votes vs 5 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 180 Noes - 58
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cameron of Lochiel voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 80 Conservative Aye votes vs 9 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 119 Noes - 191
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cameron of Lochiel voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 134 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 220 Noes - 191
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cameron of Lochiel voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 37 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes
Tally: Ayes - 83 Noes - 64
18 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cameron of Lochiel voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 36 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 69 Noes - 83
19 Mar 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cameron of Lochiel voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 140 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 217 Noes - 107
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cameron of Lochiel voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 175 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 285 Noes - 156
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cameron of Lochiel voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 163 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 250 Noes - 158
24 Mar 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cameron of Lochiel voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 121 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 157
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cameron of Lochiel voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 133 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 205 Noes - 147
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cameron of Lochiel voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 134 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 207 Noes - 148
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cameron of Lochiel voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 135 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 150
25 Mar 2026 - Crime and Policing Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cameron of Lochiel voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 168 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 306 Noes - 145
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cameron of Lochiel voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 136 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 163 Noes - 195
25 Mar 2026 - Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Cameron of Lochiel voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 160 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 266 Noes - 141


Speeches
Lord Cameron of Lochiel speeches from: Crime and Policing Bill
Lord Cameron of Lochiel contributed 1 speech (321 words)
Report stage part one
Wednesday 18th March 2026 - Lords Chamber
Home Office
Lord Cameron of Lochiel speeches from: Crime and Policing Bill
Lord Cameron of Lochiel contributed 1 speech (498 words)
Report stage part two
Wednesday 18th March 2026 - Lords Chamber
Ministry of Justice
Lord Cameron of Lochiel speeches from: Crime and Policing Bill
Lord Cameron of Lochiel contributed 5 speeches (1,840 words)
Report stage part one
Wednesday 11th March 2026 - Lords Chamber
Home Office
Lord Cameron of Lochiel speeches from: Crime and Policing Bill
Lord Cameron of Lochiel contributed 5 speeches (1,232 words)
Report stage part two
Wednesday 11th March 2026 - Lords Chamber
Home Office


Written Answers
Police: Termination of Employment
Asked by: Lord Cameron of Lochiel (Conservative - Life peer)
Thursday 12th March 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to their announcement on 14 January that they will introduce legislation to give the Home Secretary powers to force the retirement, resignation, or suspension of chief constables on performance grounds, whether any chief constable removed using such powers would still be entitled to a settlement agreement.

Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office)

As the Home Secretary said to the House on 14 January and published in the white paper “From Local to National: A New Model for Policing” published on 26 January, when a Chief Constable is responsible for a damaging failure of leadership, the public rightly expect the Home Secretary to act. This Government intends to restore their ability to do so and will soon reintroduce the Home Secretary’s power to dismiss Chief Constables.

There is no statutory entitlement to any settlement beyond the normal pay and pension entitlement that an individual has accrued. Any further settlement would be a matter for the Local Policing Body to determine.

The detail of the measures to give effect to the White paper commitments will be contained in legislation which we intend to bring forward when Parliamentary time allows.

Police: Termination of Employment
Asked by: Lord Cameron of Lochiel (Conservative - Life peer)
Thursday 12th March 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to their announcement on 14 January that they will introduce legislation to give the Home Secretary powers to force the retirement, resignation, or suspension of chief constables on performance grounds, what measures they will implement to prevent the abuse of such powers.

Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office)

As the Home Secretary said to the House on 14 January and published in the white paper “From Local to National: A New Model for Policing” published on 26 January, when a Chief Constable is responsible for a damaging failure of leadership, the public rightly expect the Home Secretary to act. This Government intends to restore their ability to do so and will soon reintroduce the Home Secretary’s power to dismiss Chief Constables.

There is no statutory entitlement to any settlement beyond the normal pay and pension entitlement that an individual has accrued. Any further settlement would be a matter for the Local Policing Body to determine.

The detail of the measures to give effect to the White paper commitments will be contained in legislation which we intend to bring forward when Parliamentary time allows.

People Smuggling: Boats
Asked by: Lord Cameron of Lochiel (Conservative - Life peer)
Monday 16th March 2026

Question to the Home Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Hanson of Flint on 9 February (HL13910), whether they will provide an annual breakdown of how many of the 950 small boats and engines related to Channel crossings were seized by the National Crime Agency and the Border Security Command in each year since 2023.

Answered by Lord Hanson of Flint - Minister of State (Home Office)

The Border Security Command oversees a system-wide, comprehensive strategy aimed at disrupting all elements of the business model that makes small boats crossings possible. Seizing small boats equipment, which is often conducted in collaboration with international partners, forms one strand of this approach.

Due to the operational nature of this data and the frequency of revision as a result of ongoing reporting, we cannot provide an accurate breakdown of this data on an annual basis.

This data includes information provided by international partners, working with the NCA and the Border Security Command, which may be revised as on-going reporting is received. Accordingly, seizures are reported over a longer time period to ensure accuracy.




Lord Cameron of Lochiel mentioned

Live Transcript

Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm.

19 Mar 2026, 1:53 a.m. - House of Lords
"Pollock, and indeed noble Lord, Lord Cameron of Lochiel. As I think "
Lord Katz (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript
25 Mar 2026, 5:07 p.m. - House of Lords
"alone, my noble friend, Lord Cameron of Lochiel, set out our concerns about the lack of scrutiny "
Lord Davies of Gower (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript
25 Mar 2026, 5:10 p.m. - House of Lords
"noble friend, Lord Cameron of Lochiel and the noble Lord Sandhurst throughout the passage of "
Lord Davies of Gower (Conservative) - View Video - View Transcript
25 Mar 2026, 4:45 p.m. - House of Lords
"grateful to the noble Lord Davies of Gower, the noble Lord Cameron of Lochiel, the noble Lord Sandhurst "
Lord Hanson of Flint, The Minister of State, Home Department (Labour) - View Video - View Transcript


Parliamentary Debates
Crime and Policing Bill
53 speeches (9,134 words)
3rd reading
Wednesday 25th March 2026 - Lords Chamber
Home Office
Mentions:
1: Lord Hanson of Flint (Lab - Life peer) and our disagreements on others, I am grateful to the noble Lords, Lord Davies of Gower, Lord Cameron of Lochiel - Link to Speech
2: Lord Davies of Gower (Con - Life peer) ever.To address the regret amendment from the noble Baroness, Lady O’Loan, my noble friend Lord Cameron of Lochiel - Link to Speech

Crime and Policing Bill
96 speeches (21,360 words)
Report stage part one
Wednesday 18th March 2026 - Lords Chamber
Home Office
Mentions:
1: Lord Hanson of Flint (Lab - Life peer) on youth diversion orders as part of this.I am grateful for the support of the noble Lord, Lord Cameron of Lochiel - Link to Speech

Crime and Policing Bill
106 speeches (29,168 words)
Report stage part two
Wednesday 11th March 2026 - Lords Chamber
Home Office
Mentions:
1: Baroness Brinton (LD - Life peer) My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Cameron of Lochiel, introduced Amendment 402, which proposes that the - Link to Speech

Crime and Policing Bill
92 speeches (21,957 words)
Report stage part one
Wednesday 11th March 2026 - Lords Chamber
Home Office
Mentions:
1: Lord Katz (Lab - Life peer) As the noble Lord, Lord Cameron of Lochiel, said, it is important that we focus on this not just because - Link to Speech
2: Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con - Life peer) Pannick, the noble Baroness, Lady Pidgeon, in her absence, as well as to my noble friend Lord Cameron of Lochiel - Link to Speech
3: Lord Hanson of Flint (Lab - Life peer) in due course.I hope that, with those reassurances, despite the support of the noble Lord, Lord Cameron of Lochiel - Link to Speech
4: Lord Hanson of Flint (Lab - Life peer) I noted the support from the noble Lords, Lord Carter of Haslemere and Lord Cameron of Lochiel, and the - Link to Speech
5: Lord Davies of Gower (Con - Life peer) My Lords, Amendment 391 stands in my name and those of my noble friend Lord Cameron of Lochiel and the - Link to Speech