Lord Booth Alert Sample


Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Lord Booth

Information between 1st April 2025 - 31st May 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.


Calendar
Thursday 1st May 2025
Lord Booth (Conservative - Life peer)

Oral questions - Main Chamber
Subject: The announced abolition of NHS England, and proposals to abolish other arm’s-length bodies
View calendar - Add to calendar
Wednesday 11th June 2025
Lord Booth (Conservative - Life peer)

Oral questions - Main Chamber
Subject: Economic growth mission, set out in the government's Plan for Change
View calendar - Add to calendar
Thursday 12th June 2025 1 p.m.
Lord Booth (Conservative - Life peer)

Short debate - Grand Committee
Subject: Plans to improve the detection, prevention and treatment of cardiovascular illness
View calendar - Add to calendar


Division Votes
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Booth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 151 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 226 Noes - 142
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Booth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 155 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 240 Noes - 148
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Booth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 164 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 242 Noes - 157
2 Apr 2025 - Bus Services (No. 2) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Booth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House
One of 177 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 214 Noes - 216
30 Apr 2025 - Armed Forces Commissioner Bill - View Vote Context
Lord Booth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 161 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 245 Noes - 157
12 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Booth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 150 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 164 Noes - 152
12 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Booth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 173 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 200 Noes - 183
12 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Booth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 155 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 272 Noes - 125
12 May 2025 - Data (Use and Access) Bill [HL] - View Vote Context
Lord Booth voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House
One of 177 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes
Tally: Ayes - 289 Noes - 168


Speeches
Lord Booth speeches from: Arm’s-length Bodies
Lord Booth contributed 2 speeches (113 words)
Thursday 1st May 2025 - Lords Chamber


Written Answers
Arms Length Bodies
Asked by: Lord Booth (Conservative - Life peer)
Thursday 10th April 2025

Question to the Cabinet Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 20 March (HL5765), which arm's-length bodies are in the process of being set up, and what estimate they have made of the annual cost of each.

Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

The Cabinet Office considers an ALB to be in the process of being set up when we have either received a business case for a proposed new body, or the proposal has been allowed to seek approval retrospectively. We then conduct a detailed process to ensure there is sufficient due diligence to establish a clear rationale for a proposed new body. The following bodies are in the process of being set up: There are currently 26 proposed public bodies, which are as follows:

  • Skills England

  • Armed Forces Commissioner

  • Infected Blood Compensation Authority

  • NISTA

  • Fair Work Agency

  • Industrial Strategy Council

  • Independent Football Regulator

  • Great British Energy - NDPB

  • School Support Staff Negotiating Body

  • National Data Library

  • Regulatory Innovation Office

  • National Wealth Fund - NMD

  • Anti-Money Laundering Supervision Reform Body

  • Technical Advisory Panel

  • "Project Seahorse"

  • Border Security Command

  • Passenger Standards Authority

  • National Care Service

  • National Centre of Policing

  • Ethics and Integrity Commission

  • Building Standards Regulatory Body

  • AI Regulation Body

  • Adult Social Care Negotiating Body

  • Local Audit Office

  • Office of Product Standards and Safety

  • Tax Advisory Body - Advisory NDPB

  • Animal Welfare Advisory Body

  • Heat Network Technical Assurance Scheme (HNTAS)

  • Ploughshare

Arms Length Bodies: Operating Costs
Asked by: Lord Booth (Conservative - Life peer)
Monday 19th May 2025

Question to the Cabinet Office:

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 10 April (HL6032) , what is their estimate of the annual cost of each of the 26 arm's-length bodies which they have confirmed are in the process of being set up.

Answered by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)

Departments are responsible for assessing the potential costs of proposed new bodies as part of their business case development. The Cabinet Office does not centrally estimate costs for departments’ proposals.

The government is conducting a full line-by-line Spending Review which will cover the costs of proposed and existing ALBs to ensure value for money is being delivered for the taxpayer.

On 6 April, the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster announced a full review of all arm’s length bodies to ensure their existence can be strongly justified against key principles. Any future decision to set up any new ALBs would need to demonstrate alignment with these principles and follow the joint HMT and Cabinet Office approval process for new bodies.




Lord Booth mentioned

Select Committee Documents
Monday 12th May 2025
Oral Evidence - London Institute of Space Policy and Law, and Earth Space Sustainability Initiative

UK Engagement with Space - UK Engagement with Space Committee

Found: Members present: Baroness Ashton of Upholland (The Chair); Baroness Bonham- Carter of Yarnbury; Lord Booth-Smith

Monday 12th May 2025
Oral Evidence - Science and Technology Facilities Council, Seraphim Space, and Satellite Applications Catapult

UK Engagement with Space - UK Engagement with Space Committee

Found: Members present: Baroness Ashton of Upholland (The Chair); Baroness Bonham- Carter of Yarnbury; Lord Booth-Smith

Monday 31st March 2025
Oral Evidence - Earth-i Ltd, Telespazio UK, and The National Centre for Earth Observation

UK Engagement with Space - UK Engagement with Space Committee

Found: meeting Members present: Lord Clement Jones (in the Chair); Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury; Lord Booth-Smith

Monday 31st March 2025
Oral Evidence - Eutelsat OneWeb, Excelerate Technology Group, and University of Surrey

UK Engagement with Space - UK Engagement with Space Committee

Found: meeting Members present: Lord Clement-Jones (in the Chair); Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury; Lord Booth-Smith