Information between 21st October 2025 - 31st October 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
21 Oct 2025 - Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Eaton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 167 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 270 Noes - 160 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Eaton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 143 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 173 Noes - 120 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Eaton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 81 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 84 Noes - 113 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Eaton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 80 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 83 Noes - 113 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Eaton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 156 Conservative Aye votes vs 1 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 246 Noes - 169 |
|
22 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Eaton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 144 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 228 Noes - 113 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Eaton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 155 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 195 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Eaton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 158 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 240 Noes - 143 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Eaton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 189 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 153 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Eaton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 156 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 249 Noes - 142 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Eaton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 174 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 267 Noes - 153 |
|
28 Oct 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Eaton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 190 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 302 Noes - 159 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Eaton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 42 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 50 Noes - 115 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Eaton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 42 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 52 Noes - 113 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Eaton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 106 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 133 Noes - 188 |
|
29 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Eaton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 158 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 260 Noes - 141 |
|
27 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Eaton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 41 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 46 Noes - 133 |
|
27 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Eaton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 144 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 243 Noes - 157 |
|
27 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Eaton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 10 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 24 Noes - 93 |
|
27 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Eaton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 118 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 166 Noes - 139 |
|
27 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Eaton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 125 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 137 |
|
27 Oct 2025 - Planning and Infrastructure Bill - View Vote Context Baroness Eaton voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 36 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 49 Noes - 110 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Local Government
Asked by: Baroness Eaton (Conservative - Life peer) Wednesday 22nd October 2025 Question to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government: To ask His Majesty's Government what is the difference between commissioners and envoys in the context of local government intervention. Answered by Baroness Taylor of Stevenage - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip) The Secretary of State may intervene under the Local Government Act 1999 where they are satisfied that a council is failing to meet its Best Value Duty to make arrangements to secure continuous improvement. Intervention typically involves directing the council to take specific actions to improve and appointing individuals to work with the council to support their improvement. Commissioners have been appointed to seven councils to provide challenge and exercise specified council functions if necessary to accelerate improvement. Ministerial Envoys have been appointed to two councils to provide support and guidance, helping them drive their own improvement, and generally do not have the ability to exercise council functions. Some Ministerial Envoys hold powers in reserve to exercise council functions, which are intended to be used only as a last resort to ensure compliance with the Best Value Duty. |