establish the Independent Football Regulator; to make provision for the licensing of football clubs; to make provision about the distribution of revenue received by organisers of football competitions; and for connected purposes.
The Football Governance Act 2025 was a Government Bill that became an Act of Parliament.
Is this Bill currently before Parliament?No. This Bill was introduced on 24 October 2024 and became an Act of Parliament on 21 July 2025.
Whose idea is this Bill?Government Bills implement the legislative agenda of the Government. This agenda, and the Bills that will implement it, are outlined in the Queen's Speech at the Session's State Opening of Parliament.
How can I find out exactly what this Bill does?The most straightforward information is contained in the initial Explanatory Notes for the Bill.
Would you like to know more?See these Glossary articles for more information: Act of Parliament, Government Bills, Process of a Bill
Official Bill Page Initial Explanatory Notes Initial Briefing papers Ministerial Extracts from Debates All Bill Debates
This bill has received Royal Assent and has become an Act of Parliament
Bill Progession through Parliament
1
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 18 during Committee StageClause 53, page 42, line 8, leave out “leviable functions” and insert “functions under this Act"
2
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 19 during Committee StageClause 53, page 42, line 13, leave out “leviable functions” and insert “functions under this Act"
3
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 20 during Committee StageClause 53, page 42, line 14, leave out “leviable functions” and insert “functions under this Act"
4
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 21 during Committee StageClause 53, page 42, line 19, leave out “leviable”
5
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 22 during Committee StageClause 53, page 42, line 26, leave out subsection (4)
6
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 23 during Committee StageClause 53, page 43, line 2, leave out “leviable functions” and insert “functions under this Act"
7
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 24 during Committee StageClause 53, page 43, line 4, leave out “its leviable” and insert “those”
8
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 25 during Committee StageClause 54, page 44, line 13, leave out “leviable functions” and insert “functions under this Act"
9
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 26 during Committee StageClause 54, page 44, line 14, leave out “its leviable” and insert “those”
10
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 27 during Committee StageClause 56, page 46, line 27, leave out “means an order under section 62(1) or (3)" and insert “has the meaning given by section (Distribution orders)(6)"
11
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 28 during Committee StageClause 56, page 46, line 42, leave out subsection (7)
12
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 29 during Committee StageClause 57, page 47, line 12, leave out “the application relates” and insert “the question or questions for resolution mentioned in subsection (1) relate"
13
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 30 during Committee StageClause 58, page 48, line 7, at end insert- "(za) set out details of the question or questions for resolution mentioned in section 57(1) to which it is intended the application will relate,”
14
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 31 during Committee StageClause 58, page 48, line 8, leave out “the application relates” and insert “that question relates or those questions relate”
15
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 32 during Committee StageClause 58, page 48, line 12, leave out paragraph (c)
16
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 33 during Committee StageClause 58, page 48, line 22, at end insert- "(za) set out details of the question or questions for resolution mentioned in section 57(1) to which the application relates,"
17
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 34 during Committee StageClause 58, page 48, line 23, leave out “the application relates” and insert “that question relates or those questions relate"
18
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 35 during Committee StageClause 58, page 48, line 27, leave out paragraph (c)
19
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 36 during Committee StageClause 59, page 48, line 33, leave out “the qualifying football season or seasons” and insert “one or more of the questions for resolution”
20
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 37 during Committee StageClause 59, page 48, line 34, after “relates” insert “(or a modified version of one or more of those questions)”
21
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 4 during Report StageClause 59, page 48, line 36, leave out “a” and insert “the”
22
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 38 during Committee StageClause 59, page 48, line 36, leave out “qualifying football season” and insert “question or questions for resolution"
23
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 39 during Committee StageClause 59, page 48, line 38, leave out “that season” and insert “each season to which the question relates or the questions relate”
24
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 40 during Committee StageClause 59, page 48, line 41, after “triggered” insert “in relation to the question or questions for resolution"
25
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 41 during Committee StageClause 59, page 49, line 4, after “triggered” insert “in relation to one or more of the questions for resolution"
26
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 42 during Committee StageClause 59, page 49, line 10, at end insert- "(4A) Where the IFR is minded that the resolution process should be triggered, the IFR must consult the Football Association on the question or questions for resolution in relation to which it is minded to trigger the process.”
27
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 43 during Committee StageClause 59, page 49, line 15, at end insert- "(zi) the question or questions for resolution in relation to which the IFR is triggering the resolution process,"
28
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 44 during Committee StageClause 59, page 49, line 16, leave out “the resolution process relates” and insert “that question relates or those questions relate”
29
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 45 during Committee StageClause 59, page 49, line 18, leave out sub-paragraph (ii)
30
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 46 during Committee StageClause 59, page 49, line 18, at end insert- “(iia) how the IFR has taken account of any representations, copies of which accompanied the application under section 57 by virtue of section 58(5)(d), in setting out that question or those questions, and”
31
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 47 during Committee StageClause 59, page 49, line 20, leave out “the question or questions for resolution” and insert "that question or those questions"
32
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 48 during Committee StageClause 59, page 49, line 21, at end insert- "(5A) Where any of the questions for resolution set out in the notice differ from those to which the application made under section 57 relates, the notice must set out the extent of, and reasons for, those differences."
33
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 49 during Committee StageClause 60, page 50, line 4, after “resolution” insert “set out in a notice under section 59(5)(b)(zi)"
34
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 50 during Committee StageClause 60, page 50, line 6, leave out “the question or questions for resolution” and insert "that question or those questions"
35
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 51 during Committee StageClause 60, page 50, line 15, after “resolution” insert “set out in a notice under section 59(5)(b)(zi)"
36
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment NC3 during Committee StageAfter Clause 60, insert the following new Clause – "Proposal stage (1) This section applies where mediation under section 60 comes to an end by virtue of the occurrence of an event within section 60(6)(b), (c) or (d). (2) As soon as reasonably practicable after the occurrence of the event, the IFR must give notice to the two specified competition organisers. (3) A notice under subsection (2) must- (a) set out the question or questions for resolution, (b) specify the qualifying football season or seasons to which that question relates or those questions relate, (c) set out any findings in the IFR's most recent state of the game report that the IFR considers relevant to that question or those questions, (d) invite each of the two specified competition organisers to submit to the IFR and to each other a proposal as to how that question or those questions should be resolved, (e) require any proposal to be accompanied by supporting evidence (including evidence as to how the proposal addresses the findings set out under paragraph (c)), (f) specify the day on or before which proposals are to be submitted. (4) A question for resolution may be set out in a notice under subsection (2) only if it is the question, or one of the questions, for resolution remaining unresolved when the mediation mentioned in subsection (1) came to an end. (5) Where a notice under subsection (2) sets out a question for resolution that relates to relegation revenue (within the meaning given by section (Distribution orders)(9)), the notice must require the specified competition organisers to explain in a proposal how the proposal will promote the financial sustainability of clubs which operate teams relegated from a competition organised by the specified competition organiser distributing the relegation revenue. (6) Subsection (7) applies if, on or before the day specified by virtue of subsection (3)(f), a specified competition organiser submits to the IFR a proposal which the IFR considers is not a qualifying proposal. (7) The IFR may give both specified competition organisers a notice specifying a later day (falling not more than seven days after the end of the day specified by virtue of subsection (3)(f)) on or before which proposals are to be submitted. (8) As soon as reasonably practicable after - (a) the initial proposal deadline, or (b) (if earlier) the day on which the IFR considers that both specified competition organisers have submitted qualifying proposals, the IFR must give a notice under subsection (9) to the two specified competition organisers. (9) A notice under this subsection must- (a) state which of the two specified competition organisers (if any) has submitted a qualifying proposal before the initial proposal deadline, (b) invite each such specified competition organiser to– (i) confirm their proposal, or (ii) make any permitted modifications to their proposal, and submit the confirmed or modified proposal to the IFR and the other specified competition organiser, and (c) specify the day on or before which the confirmed or modified proposal is to be submitted. (10) The IFR may specify in a notice under subsection (2) or (9) the form and manner in which proposals and supporting evidence must be submitted. (11) In this section- (a) "the initial proposal deadline” means- (i) the day referred to in subsection (3)(f), or (ii) where the IFR gives a notice under subsection (7), the day specified in the notice; (b) a "qualifying proposal” means a proposal which– (i) explains how the question or questions for resolution should be resolved, and (ii) complies with the requirements imposed by virtue of subsection (3)(e) and (5) (if applicable); (c) a modification to a proposal is “permitted” unless it results in the proposal no longer being a qualifying proposal."
37
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment NC4 during Committee StageAfter Clause 60, insert the following new Clause- "Distribution orders (1) This section applies where the IFR has given a notice under section (Proposal stage)(9). (2) Before the end of the period of 60 days beginning with the day on which the notice under section (Proposal stage)(9) was given, the IFR must give the two specified competition organisers a notice of the distribution order it proposes to make. (3) The IFR may extend the period in subsection (2) by up to a further 14 days if it considers it appropriate to do so. (4) A notice under subsection (2) must- (a) give reasons for the proposed distribution order, (b) explain how the proposed order applies the principles mentioned in subsection (8), (c) explain how the proposed order addresses the findings set out under section (Proposal stage)(3)(c), (d) invite each of the two specified competition organisers to make representations about the proposed distribution order, (e) specify the period within which such representations may be made, and (f) specify the means by which they may be made, and the IFR must have regard to any representations which are duly made. (5) The period specified under subsection (4)(d) must be a period of not less than 14 days beginning with the day on which the notice is given. (6) As soon as reasonably practicable after the end of the period specified under subsection (4)(d), the IFR must make an order requiring relevant revenue to be distributed in a way that the IFR considers appropriate for the purpose of resolving the question or questions for resolution set out under section (Proposal stage)(3)(a) (a "distribution order"). (7) In making a distribution order the IFR must – (a) apply the principles mentioned in subsection (8), and (b) have regard to any proposal submitted under section (Proposal stage)(9)(b). See also section 7 (in particular the IFR’s general duty to exercise its functions in a way that advances one or more of its objectives and to have regard to various matters). (8) The principles referred to in subsection (7)(a) are that – (a) the distribution order should not place an undue burden on the commercial interests of either specified competition organiser, and (b) the distribution order should not result in a lower amount of relegation revenue being distributed to a club during the relevant period than would have been distributed to the club during that period had the order not been made. (9) For the purposes of subsection (8) – “relegation revenue” means revenue distributed by a specified competition organiser to a club in consequence of a team operated by the club being relegated from a specified competition organiser organised by the specified competition organiser; "relevant period", in relation to a distribution order, means the period of one year beginning with the final day of the first football season in respect of which relegation revenue would be distributed in pursuance of the order. (10) A distribution order – (a) must impose on the specified competition organisers such obligations as the IFR considers appropriate for the purpose of securing compliance with the requirements set out in the order, and (b) may, where a distribution agreement is in force between the specified competition organisers in relation to the same qualifying football season or seasons to which the order relates, provide for that agreement to have effect subject to provision contained in the order. (11) At the same time as making a distribution order, the IFR must give the two specified competition organisers a notice- (a) including a copy of the order, (b) giving reasons for the order, (c) explaining how the order applies the principles mentioned in subsection (8), (d) explaining how the order addresses the findings set out under section (Proposal stage)(3)(c), and (e) including information about the possible consequences under Part 8 of not complying with the order. (12) The IFR must, as soon as reasonably practicable after making a distribution order, publish the order or a summary of the order."
38
Tabled: 9 Jul 2025Page 50, line 26, leave out Clause 61
39
Tabled: 9 Jul 2025Page 51, line 22, leave out Clause 62
40
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 54 during Committee StageClause 64, page 54, line 18, leave out “62(8)(b)” and insert “(Distribution orders)(10)(b)”
41
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 5 during Report StageClause 83, page 67, line 21, leave out “14” and insert “28”
42
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 6 during Report StageClause 83, page 67, line 25, leave out “14” and insert “28”
43
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 7 during Report StageClause 83, page 67, line 28, leave out “within” and insert “before the end of"
44
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 55 during Committee StageClause 94, page 76, line 14, leave out from “to” to end of line 15 and insert “. (a) a provision of this Act which requires the IFR to consult another person; (b) the provision made by section 10(5)(a) and (b)."
45
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 56 during Committee StageClause 94, page 76, line 18, leave out “carried out consultation” and insert “did anything"
46
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 57 during Committee StageClause 94, page 76, line 20, leave out “consultation carried out” and insert “anything done"
47
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 58 during Committee StageClause 94, page 76, line 21, leave out “consultation had been carried out” and insert “thing had been done"
48
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 59 during Committee StageClause 94, page 76, line 23, leave out “consultation carried out” and insert “anything done"
49
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 60 during Committee StageClause 101, page 80, line 11, leave out subsection (2)
50
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 61 during Committee StageSchedule 2, page 89, line 29, leave out “sections 61 and 82” and insert “section 82"
51
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 62 during Committee StageSchedule 2, page 91, line 41, at end insert - "(da) the function of deciding whether the resolution process should be triggered under section 59; (db) the function of making a distribution order under section (Distribution orders);"
52
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 63 during Committee StageSchedule 2, page 93, line 35, leave out “sections 61 and 82” and insert “section 82"
53
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 64 during Committee StageSchedule 5, page 103, line 18, after “specified” insert “from time to time by the IFR”
54
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 65 during Committee StageSchedule 8, page 109, line 14, leave out “a period of three months” and insert “so long as is necessary in all the circumstances"
55
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 66 during Committee StageSchedule 10, page 120, line 17, column 1, leave out “not to trigger” and insert “to trigger, or not to trigger,”
56
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 67 during Committee StageSchedule 10, page 120, line 17, column 2, leave out “a committee of the Expert Panel” and insert "the Board"
57
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 68 during Committee StageSchedule 10, page 120, line 19, column 2, leave out “a committee of the Expert Panel” and insert "the Board"
58
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 70 during Committee StageSchedule 10, page 120, leave out lines 21 and 22
59
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 71 during Committee StageSchedule 10, page 120, line 23, column 2, leave out “a committee of the Expert Panel” and insert "the Board"
60
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 69 during Committee StageSchedule 10, page 120, leave out lines 27 to 30
61
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 72 during Committee StageSchedule 10, page 120, leave out lines 35 and 36
62
This amendment was originally tabled as Amendment 73 during Committee StageSchedule 11, page 123, line 4, column 2, leave out “62(3)” and insert “(Distribution orders)(9)”
30
Max Wilkinson (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Home Affairs)Clause 26, page 19, line 20, at end insert—
“(c) respects and promotes the protection of human rights and prevents modern slavery (as set out in section [Human rights and modern slavery considerations]).”
NC9
Clive Betts (Lab)To move the following Clause—
“Prioritisation of competitions within English football
(1) This section applies where a regulated club is participating in a competition outside of English Football.
(2) Where the IFR considers that the regulated club’s participation in the competition is damaging to the heritage of English football, the IFR must take what measures it considers necessary to prevent that damage.
(3) Measures that the IFR might take include a direction to the club that it—
(a) prioritise any fixtures taking place in a competition within English football over those in the competition outside of English football;
(b) cease participation in the competition outside of English football.”
NC10
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)To move the following Clause—
“Player welfare
Within one year of the passing of this Act the Secretary of State must review how to improve the welfare of football players. This review should include consideration of—
(a) neurodegenerative diseases incurred by heading footballs;
(b) the number of games that footballers are required to play each season; and
(c) the impact on the welfare of current and former professional footballers as a result.”
NC11
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)To move the following Clause—
“Correspondence about the IFR
(1) The Secretary of State must publish any correspondence received by the Secretary of State from the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) and the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) about the IFR’s exercise of its functions.
(2) The IFR must publish any correspondence it receives from the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) and the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) about the exercise of its functions.”
This new clause would require correspondence between FIFA and UEFA and either the Secretary of State, or the IFR, with regards to the IFR’s regulatory functions, to be published.
NC12
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)To move the following Clause—
“Impact on Regulator of changes in Government administration
If the Department for Culture Media and Sport is abolished, or its functions in relation to football substantially relocated, the Government must automatically review the suitability of the continuation of the IFR and the impact that the abolition or relocation will have on the IFR.”
This new clause would require the Government to review the IFR in the instance that the Department for Culture, Media and Sport were abolished, or its functions substantially altered.
NC13
Chris Evans (LAB)To move the following Clause—
“Neurodegenerative care scheme
(1) The IFR must establish and supervise a scheme aimed at providing a high standard of care and support to any person who has developed a neurodegenerative condition linked to their career in English football.
(2) The Secretary of State must make regulations setting out—
(a) minimum requirements for the scheme,
(b) a timescale for the scheme’s establishment, and
(c) arrangements and a timescale for a periodic review of the scheme.
(3) The IFR must ensure that, as a condition of organising any competition specified pursuant to section 2(3), all specified competition organisers jointly operate, manage and fund the scheme in accordance with subsections (4) to (8).
(4) For the purpose of operating, managing and funding the scheme, all of the specified competition organisers must form a Joint Coordinating Committee (“JCC”).
(5) Any current or former player who has at any time been registered as a professional footballer is eligible for the scheme.
(6) The scheme must provide care and financial support to any eligible person who suffers from a neurodegenerative condition which is deemed, pursuant to subsection (7)(a), to have been caused or contributed to by playing or training activities within English football.
(7) The JCC must, under the supervision of the IFR, appoint a panel of independent experts—
(a) to determine whether, on the balance of probabilities, a neurodegenerative condition of an eligible person has been caused or contributed to by playing or training activities within English football, and
(b) to determine the appropriate provision of care and financial support required in the case of each eligible person.
(8) The IFR must ensure that the JCC acts upon the panel’s determinations.
(9) Where—
(a) specified competition owners, through the JCC, cannot agree about the operation, management or funding of the scheme, or
(b) at any time, the scheme does not meet either—
(i) the aim under subsection (1), or
(ii) any requirements set out in regulations under subsection (2),
the Secretary of State may, having taken advice from the IFR, make a direction about the operation, management or funding of the scheme.”
NC14
Iqbal Mohamed (Ind)To move the following Clause—
“Duty to vet financial investment in football clubs
(1) The IFR must review and approve all proposed financial investments in regulated clubs from funds which are located outside of the United Kingdom.
(2) A review under subsection (1) must include—
(a) assessing if any sources of revenue for such a fund is the result of money laundering;
(b) assessing if the owner of such a fund is charged with any breaches of UK or international law.
(3) If upon completing a review under subsection (1) the IFR has determined a source of revenue for a fund is the result of money laundering or the owner of a fund is in breach of UK or international law the IFR must direct the club to reject the investment.”
14
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 2, page 2, line 31, leave out subsection (3) and insert—
“(3) For the purposes of this Act a “specified competition” includes—
(a) the Premier League,
(b) the English Football League, and
(c) the National League.
(3A) The Secretary of State may by regulations made by statutory instrument subject to approval by both Houses of Parliament amend the competitions specified in section (3).”
This amendment would specify the leagues that are to be classed as “specified competitions” under Act.
29
Chris Evans (LAB)Clause 6, page 5, line 14, at end insert—
“(d) to ensure that the care and support of those who have developed neurodegenerative conditions linked to their career in English football is a central part of its approach to football governance, and to establish and supervise the scheme provided for under section [Neurodegenerative care scheme].”
This amendment places an objective on the IFR to establish and supervise a scheme to provide care and support to those who have developed neurodegenerative conditions linked to their career in English football (see NC13).
25
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 7, page 5, line 27, at end insert—
“(d) conflicts with any regulations or rules of international football governing bodies, including FIFA and UEFA.”
This amendment requires the IFR to exercise its functions so as to avoid conflicts with the regulations and rules of international footballing bodies.
21
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 11, page 7, line 41, at end insert—
“(7) No football governance statement may have effect unless approved by resolution of both Houses of Parliament.”
This amendment would require the football governance statement to be approved by Parliament before it could have effect.
28
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 14, page 9, line 3, at end insert—
“(aa) the cumulative impact of the costs imposed on clubs through compliance with the IFR’s regulatory regime, and”
This amendment would require the IFR to include in the annual report an account of the financial costs imposed on clubs through its regulatory requirements on them.
26
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 17, page 11, line 27, leave out subsection (9) and insert—
“(9) The IFR must make the decision whether to grant a regulated club a provisional operating licence within the period of one month.
(10) The IFR may extend the period in subsection (9) by no more than two weeks if it requires more time to consider the application due to—
(a) unusual staffing pressures, or
(b) discrepancies or abnormalities with the application.
(11) If the IFR extends the period as per subsection (10), it must give a notice to the relevant club stating—
(a) that the period has been extended,
(b) the length of the extension, and
(c) the reasons for the extension.”
This amendment places a time limit of one month for the IFR to decide whether to grant a provisional operating license.
15
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 37, page 28, line 28, at end insert—
“(fa) whether the individual is a member of a proscribed organisation as per section (3) and schedule (2) of the Terrorism Act 2000.”
This amendment requires that IFR, in determining whether an owner or officer has the requisite honesty or integrity, to consider whether the person is a member of an organisation proscribed under the Terrorism Act 2000.
24
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 53, page 42, line 3, at end insert—
“(1A) But the IFR may not require a club with fewer than 10 full time equivalent employees to pay the IFR a levy in respect of a chargeable period during which the club is a licensed club.”
This amendment would exempt clubs with fewer than 10 full time equivalent employees from having to pay the levy.
18
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 2, page 87, line 12, at end insert—
“(3A) Any political interests of, and political donations made by, the prospective chair of the Board, must all be declared as part of the appointments process, and published before the chair’s pre-appointment hearing with the Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee.”
19
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 2, page 87, line 37, at end insert—
“(5) No member may be appointed to the Board if they currently have any broadcast or media interests or any role in a television or media broadcast that relates to football.”
This amendment prohibits any person who currently has any interests or roles in a television or media broadcast that relates to football from being appointed to the Board.
23
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 2, page 88, line 37, at end insert—
“(1A) But the number of persons in the employment of IFR (including any persons seconded to the IFR) must at no time exceed 50.”
22
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 2, page 89, line 9, leave out subparagraph (3) and insert—
“(3) The IFR may pay a person appointed as the Chief Executive no more than £172,153 per annum.
(3A) Notwithstanding the remuneration of the Chief Executive Officer as per paragraph (3), the IFR must pay its employees such remuneration as may be determined by the non-executive members.”
This amendment limits the pay of the Chief Executive.
20
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 2, page 93, line 5, at end insert—
“(4A) No member may be appointed to the Expert Panel if they currently have any broadcast or media interests or any role in a television or media broadcast that relates to football.”
This amendment prohibits any person who currently has any interests or roles in a television or media broadcast that relates to football from being appointed to the Expert Panel.
16
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 4, page 99, line 37, at end insert—
“(f) the club’s political statements and positions.”
This amendment ensures that clubs have to engage their fans on the political statements a club might adopt.
27
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 5, page 102, line 7, at end insert “including the club’s official charity.”
This amendment would make clear that the activities of a football club’s official charity can be counted towards it meeting the corporate governance code.
17
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 5, page 102, line 13, leave out sub-paragraph (e)
This amendment removes the requirement for the corporate governance statement to cover what action the club is taking to improve equality, diversity and inclusion.
13
Clive Betts (Lab)Schedule 5, page 102, line 33, at end insert—
“(1A) The IFR must ensure that the persons referred to in subsections 1(a) and 1(b) are representative of the majority of the club’s fanbase and represent the club’s key supporters’ groups.
(1B) If it is unclear which are a club’s key supporters’ groups the IFR must consult with the Football Supporter’s Association to determine which groups apply for the purposes of this paragraph.”
NC6
Alex Sobel (LAB)To move the following Clause—
“Financial abuse, mismanagement or fraud: protection etc
(1) The IFR must, in any strategy it publishes, set out measures aimed at achieving the financial abuse, mismanagement and fraud objective.
(2) Measures to be set out under subsection (1) must include oversight of—
(a) robust education for relevant players on matters relating to financial abuse, mismanagement and fraud,
(b) industry wide standards aimed at relevant players in relation to those matters, and
(c) an equitable system of support and redress for relevant players where they have been affected by those matters.
(3) In this section, a “relevant player” means a current or former player in English football who—
(a) has been a victim of financial abuse, mismanagement, or fraud, or
(b) is at risk of becoming a victim of financial abuse, mismanagement, or fraud.”
NC7
Max Wilkinson (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Home Affairs)To move the following Clause—
“Human rights and modern slavery considerations
(1) When considering whether a person (“A”) satisfies the requirement in section 26(7)(c), the Regulator shall have regard to (among other things)—
(a) whether A has been complicit in any egregious or consistent violation of international human rights law, whether of any international human rights treaty, customary law, or other instrument,
(b) whether A has been convicted, cautioned or reprimanded or complicit in any egregious or consistent violation of domestic human rights legislation, including breaching provisions in the UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 or equivalent national legislation,
(c) whether A has been subject to a Slavery and Trafficking Prevention Order,
(d) whether A has been found liable in a civil claim relating to a human rights violation,
(e) whether A has been convicted of an offence, cautioned or reprimanded for failing to comply with their human rights and modern slavery reporting and due diligence obligations under applicable domestic legislation,
(f) any representations made by A or the club in accordance with the notice.
(2) In subsection (1)—
(a) where A is a body corporate or other non-corporeal entity (including a government or nation state), the Regulator shall consider the actions of anyone who controls that body corporate or entity (and “control” shall have the meaning given in section 255 of the Companies Act 2006), and
(b) the Regulator shall have absolute discretion to determine whether conduct falls within any of the categories in paragraphs (a) to (d).
(3) In respect of subsection (1)(c) and (d), a risk of disrepute shall not be valid grounds for disqualification of any person if such disrepute would, in the reasonable opinion of the Regulator, be unfounded.
(4) In accordance with Schedule 2, Part 2, paragraph 15, the Regulator may establish a committee or committees to discharge its functions under this Clause.”
NC8
Iqbal Mohamed (Ind)To move the following Clause—
“Duty to address ticketing market practices
Regulated clubs and competition organisers must take reasonable steps to—
(a) monitor practices in the secondary ticketing market that may lead to excessive price mark-ups or unauthorised resale;
(b) provide transparent information about ticket pricing and resale policies, including the face value of tickets; and
(c) provide official ticket exchange channels where reasonably practicable.”
12
Alex Sobel (LAB)Clause 6, page 5, line 14, at end insert—
“(d) to take responsibility for the protection, financial welfare, and safeguarding of current and former players involved in English football who—
(i) have been victims of financial abuse, mismanagement, or fraud, or
(ii) are at risk of becoming victims of financial abuse, mismanagement, or fraud, (referred to in this Act as “the financial abuse, mismanagement and fraud objective”).”
4
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 59, page 48, line 34, leave out “a” and insert “the”
This amendment corrects a grammatical error.
5
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 83, page 67, line 40, leave out “14” and insert “28”
This amendment increases the time period for the Board of the IFR to carry out an internal review of a reviewable decision from 14 to 28 days.
6
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 83, page 68, line 2, leave out “14” and insert “28”
This amendment increases the time period for a committee of the Expert Panel of the IFR to carry out an internal review of a reviewable decision from 14 to 28 days.
7
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 83, page 68, line 5, leave out “within” and insert “before the end of”
This amendment is to ensure consistency with the wording used in subsections (4) and (6) of clause 83.
NC2
Max Wilkinson (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Home Affairs)To move the following Clause—
“Duty not to promote or engage in advertising and sponsorship related to gambling
A regulated club or English football competition must not promote or engage in advertising or sponsorship related to gambling.”
This new clause prevents regulated clubs and competitions from promoting or engaging in gambling advertising or sponsorship.
NC3
Max Wilkinson (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Home Affairs)To move the following Clause—
“Free to air coverage
(1) The Independent Football Regulator must require that every season—
(a) at least ten Premier League football matches,
(b) the League Cup Final, and
(c) the Championship, League One and League Two playoff finals
are made available for live broadcast on free-to-air television channels in the United Kingdom.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1)(a) the matches must include a representative selection across different clubs and times in the season, subject to reasonable considerations of scheduling and broadcasting logistics.
(3) In this section “free-to-air television” means a service that satisfies the qualifying conditions of such a service defined by Section 2 of the 1996 Communications Act.”
This new clause would mandate a minimum of ten Premier League matches, the League Cup Final and the Championship, League One and League Two playoff finals on free-to-air television channels.
NC4
Max Wilkinson (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Home Affairs)To move the following Clause—
“Fan representation: mandatory golden share
(1) A licensed club must, as a condition of holding a licence under section 15, issue a non-transferable golden share to a recognised Supporters’ Trust or equivalent democratic fan organisation.
(2) The golden share must confer on its holder the right to veto any proposal by the club to—
(a) relocate the club’s home ground outside its current local authority area,
(b) change the club’s name,
(c) materially alter the club’s primary colours or badge, or
(d) enter into or withdraw from any competition not sanctioned by the Football Association, the Premier League, or the English Football League.
(3) A licensed club must—
(a) consult the holder of the golden share on any material changes to the club’s ownership, governance, or strategic direction,
(b) provide the holder with access to relevant financial and governance information reasonably required to fulfil its function, and
(c) facilitate structured and regular engagement between the club and the holder of the golden share.
(4) The Regulator must monitor compliance with this section and may—
(a) issue guidance to clubs and Supporters’ Trusts on the operation of the golden share,
(b) impose licence conditions or financial penalties for non-compliance, and
(c) take enforcement action where a club fails to uphold the rights associated with the golden share.
(5) In this section—
(a) “Supporters’ Trust” means a formally constituted, democratic, not-for-profit organisation that is recognised by the Regulator as representing the interests of a club’s supporters;
(b) “golden share” means a special share or equivalent legal instrument issued to a Supporters’ Trust, entitling its holder to the rights and protections described in this section.”
This new clause would give fans a veto on club proposals, exercised through a recognised Supporters’ Trust or equivalent democratic fan body.
NC5
Max Wilkinson (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Home Affairs)To move the following Clause—
“Protection of assets of regulated clubs
(1) Where any of the following assets belong to a regulated club, the asset must not be removed from the club’s ownership or used as collateral for a secured loan—
(a) any stadium,
(b) any training facility,
(c) any trophies,
(d) any car park,
(e) any hotel.
(2) But subsection 1 does not apply to a car park or a hotel where—
(a) the regulated club can demonstrate to the IFR’s satisfaction that the asset is causing financial loss or poses a material risk to the club’s financial sustainability, and
(b) the IFR has provided prior written approval for the disposal of the asset or the use of the asset as collateral.
(3) Where the current owner of a regulated club owns any asset listed in subsection (1)(a) to (c), the owner may not sell the club unless the owner has inserted the asset into the club’s ownership structure.”
This new claus would ensure that the club assets listed above are recognised as the inalienable property of the club rather than the club’s owners.
8
Clive Betts (Lab)Clause 46, page 39, line 5, at end insert—
“(c) in the case of a disposal under subsection (1)(a), it has taken reasonable steps to establish that the majority of the club’s fans domiciled in England and Wales approve of the disposal.”
9
Clive Betts (Lab)Clause 46, page 39, line 5, at end insert—
“(6A) Before the IFR grants an approval under subsection (6) it must—
(a) consult the supporters of the body in question, the relevant competition organisers and persons representing the local community with which the body is associated, and
(b) have regard to the views expressed by those consulted.”
10
Clive Betts (Lab)Schedule 5, page 100, line 26, at end insert—
“(e) an Asset of Community Value condition.”
This amendment adds the requirement to attach an Asset of Community Value condition to each club operating licence.
11
Clive Betts (Lab)Schedule 5, page 103, line 20, at end insert—
“Asset of Community Value
11A The Asset of Community Value condition is a condition requiring a club to either—
(a) obtain and maintain Asset of Community Value status for its home ground; or
(b) incorporate into its Articles of Association a restriction which substantially mirrors the restrictions placed on Assets of Community Value under the Localism Act 2011,
and the Secretary of State may create regulations detailing further the implementation of the Asset of Community Value condition.”
The amendment defines the Asset of Community Value condition that clubs are required to obtain for their home ground and is consequential on Amendment 10.
4
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 59, page 48, line 34, leave out "a" and insert "the"
5
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 83, page 67, line 40, leave out "14" and insert "28"
6
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 83, page 68, line 2, leave out "14" and insert "28"
7
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 83, page 68, line 5, leave out “within” and insert "before the end of"
3
Max Wilkinson (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Home Affairs)Clause 6, page 5, line 14, at end insert—
“(d) to ensure that the care and support of people who have developed neurodegenerative conditions linked to their career in English football forms part of any strategy published by the IFR, and to oversee an equitable and fair industry financial scheme to provide care for those people.”
NC1
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)To move the following Clause—
“Alcohol at football grounds
Within one year of the passing of this Act the Secretary of State must consult on lifting the ban on consuming alcohol in view of the pitch in the top five tiers of the men's game in England.”
1
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 10, page 7, line 6, at end insert—
“(d) an assessment of the impact that the IFR’s activities have had on the price of match tickets.”
This amendment would require the IFR to include in its state of the game report the impact that its regulatory activities have had on ticket prices.
2
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 14, page 9, line 3, at end insert—
“(aa) the impact that the IFR’s activities have had on the price of match tickets, and”
This amendment would require the IFR to include in its annual report the impact that its regulatory activities have had on ticket prices.
141
Clive Betts (Lab)Clause 62, page 52, line 11, leave out from “means” to “in” in line 13 and insert “the first full football season in respect of which relegation revenue would be applicable”
NC24
Lee Dillon (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Levy exemption procedure for clubs in administration
(1) The Secretary of State must make regulations establishing a procedure under which a regulated club that has entered administration may apply for an exemption from the levy provided for by section 53.
(2) The regulations under subsection (1) must include provision for the IFR to determine whether an exemption from the levy should be granted.
(3) Provision under subsection (2) must require the IFR—
(a) to take account of the circumstances under which the club entered administration, and
(b) only to grant an exemption from the levy if the IFR is satisfied that the owners of the club have not taken a decision to enter administration in order to secure an exemption from the levy.
(4) In this section, a club has “entered administration” if an administrator of the club has been appointed under paragraph 22 of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986.”
This new clause requires the Secretary of State to establish a procedure for clubs in administration to apply for an exemption from the levy. The IFR would only be able to grant an exemption if satisfied that the club had not deliberately entered administration as a means of securing the exemption.
NC25
Lee Dillon (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Youth and community projects: duty on the IFR
(1) The IFR must take steps to encourage regulated clubs to invest in youth and community projects.
(2) The IFR must, in pursuance of the duty in subsection (1), at least once a year report on the extent to which each regulated club has invested in youth and community projects.”
This new clause requires the Independent Football Regulator to take steps to encourage clubs to invest in youth and community projects, including through annual publication of a progress report.
80
Max Wilkinson (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Home Affairs)Clause 57, page 47, line 9, after “organisers” insert “or by a regulated club”
81
Max Wilkinson (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Home Affairs)Clause 57, page 47, line 19, leave out from “revenue” to “in” in line 21 and insert “received by one specified competition organiser or regulated club in or in respect of that season compared to the relevant revenue received by that specified competition organiser or regulated club”
82
Max Wilkinson (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Home Affairs)Clause 57, page 47, line 29, after “organisers” insert “, or by any regulated club participating in a competition organised by one of those organisers,”
130
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 57, page 47, line 35, leave out subsection (6) and insert—
“(6) Condition 4 is met in relation to a qualifying football season if—
(a) a distribution agreement is in force between the two specified competition organisers in relation to the season,
(b) the distribution agreement has been in force for at least the applicable period (see subsections (7) and (8)), and
(c) no distribution order has effect in respect of the specified competition organisers in relation to the season.
(7) Where—
(a) the specified competition organisers have agreed (whether in the distribution agreement or otherwise) a period for the purposes of condition 4, and
(b) both of the organisers have notified the IFR of the period so agreed,
the applicable period is that period.
(8) In any other case, the applicable period is 5 years.”
128
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 57, page 47, line 38, leave out “five years” and insert “the applicable period (see subsections (7) and (8))”
129
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 57, page 47, line 41, at end insert—
“(7) Where—
(a) the specified competition organisers have agreed (whether in the distribution agreement or otherwise) a period for the purposes of condition 4, and
(b) both of the organisers have notified the IFR of the period so agreed,
the applicable period is that period.
(8) In any other case, the applicable period is five years.”
93
Clive Betts (Lab)Clause 59, page 49, line 1, after “(c)” insert “has exercised any of the IFR’s other functions under this Act in order to resolve the question or questions for resolution and such question or questions remain unresolved, or”
125
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 62, page 51, line 35, leave out subsection (1)(c)
126
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 62, page 52, line 6, leave out subsection (3)
127
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 91, page 74, line 24, leave out subsection (3)(iii)
NC5
Max Wilkinson (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Home Affairs)To move the following Clause—
“Opportunity for levy exemption for clubs below the Football League
(1) The Secretary of State must by regulations make provision for a process whereby a licensed club may apply for a full or partial exemption from the levy established under section 53 if—
(a) the club’s first men’s team competes in the National League or any lower tier of the English football pyramid, and
(b) the club demonstrates, to the satisfaction of the IFR, that paying the levy would pose a significant risk to its financial sustainability.
(2) The IFR must report annually on the number of exemptions granted and the rationale for each decision.”
This new clause allows clubs in National League North and National League South to apply for a levy exemption under specific circumstances.
NC6
Max Wilkinson (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Home Affairs)To move the following Clause—
“Support to clubs
(1) The IFR shall provide reasonable and proportionate assistance to—
(a) regulated clubs seeking to obtain a provisional club licence;
(b) clubs with a provisional club licence seeking a full club licence; and
(c) unregulated clubs who are reasonably likely to become regulated clubs in the next football season.
(2) The IFR shall provide reasonable and proportionate assistance to regulated clubs in their efforts to continue to comply with the conditions of their provisional club licence or full club licence.
(3) This assistance may come in the form of—
(a) financial support;
(b) training;
(c) support staff; or
(d) temporary exemption from levy payments.”
This new clause will mandate a duty on the IFR to aid regulated clubs with compliance.
NC7
Max Wilkinson (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Home Affairs)To move the following Clause—
“Duty not to promote or engage in advertising and sponsorship related to gambling
A regulated club or English football competition must not promote or engage in advertising or sponsorship related to gambling.”
This new clause prevents regulated clubs and competitions from promoting or engaging in gambling advertising or sponsorship.
NC8
Max Wilkinson (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Home Affairs)To move the following Clause—
“Human rights and modern slavery considerations
(1) When considering whether a person (“A”) satisfies the requirement in section 26(7)(c), the Regulator shall have regard to (among other things)—
(a) whether A has been complicit in any egregious or consistent violation(s) of international human rights law, whether of any international human rights treaty, customary law, or other instrument,
(b) whether A has been convicted, cautioned or reprimanded or complicit in any egregious or consistent violation(s) of domestic human rights legislation, including breaching provisions in the UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 or equivalent national legislation,
(c) whether A has been subject to a Slavery and Trafficking Prevention Order,
(d) whether A has been found liable in a civil claim relating to a human rights violation,
(e) whether A has been convicted of an offence, cautioned or reprimanded for failing to comply with their human rights and modern slavery reporting and due diligence obligations under applicable domestic legislation,
(f) any representations made by A or the club in accordance with the notice.
(2) In subsection (1)—
(a) where A is a body corporate or other non-corporeal entity (including a government or nation state), the Regulator shall consider the actions of anyone who controls that body corporate or entity (and “control” shall have the meaning given in section 255 of the Companies Act 2006). and
(b) the Regulator shall have absolute discretion to determine whether conduct falls within any of the categories in paragraphs (a) to (d).
(3) In respect of subsection (1)(c) and (d), a risk of disrepute shall not be valid grounds for disqualification of any person if such disrepute would, in the reasonable opinion of the Regulator, be unfounded.
(4) In accordance with Schedule 2, Part 2, paragraph 15, the Regulator may establish a committee or committees to discharge its functions under this Clause.”
This new clause would prohibit individuals with a record of human rights abuses from club ownership.
NC9
Max Wilkinson (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Home Affairs)To move the following Clause—
“Free to air coverage
(1) The Independent Football Regulator must require that every season—
(a) at least ten Premier League football matches,
(b) the League Cup Final, and
(c) the Championship, League One and League Two playoff finals,
are made available for live broadcast on free-to-air television channels in the United Kingdom.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1)(a) the matches must include a representative selection across different clubs and times in the season, subject to reasonable considerations of scheduling and broadcasting logistics.
(3) In this section “free-to-air television” means a service that satisfies the qualifying conditions of such a service defined by Section 2 of the 1996 Communications Act.”
This new clause would mandate a minimum of ten Premier League matches, the League Cup Final and the Championship, League One and League Two playoff finals on free-to-air television channels.
NC10
Max Wilkinson (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Home Affairs)To move the following Clause—
“Fan representation: mandatory golden share
(1) A licensed club must, as a condition of holding a licence under section 15, issue a non-transferable golden share to a recognised Supporters’ Trust or equivalent democratic fan organisation.
(2) The golden share must confer on its holder the right to veto any proposal by the club to—
(a) relocate the club’s home ground outside its current local authority area,
(b) change the club’s name,
(c) materially alter the club’s primary colours or badge, or
(d) enter into or withdraw from any competition not sanctioned by The Football Association, the Premier League, or the English Football League.
(3) A licensed club must—
(a) consult the holder of the golden share on any material changes to the club’s ownership, governance, or strategic direction,
(b) provide the holder with access to relevant financial and governance information reasonably required to fulfil its function, and
(c) facilitate structured and regular engagement between the club and the holder of the golden share.
(4) The Regulator must monitor compliance with this section and may—
(a) issue guidance to clubs and Supporters’ Trusts on the operation of the golden share,
(b) impose licence conditions or financial penalties for non-compliance, and
(c) take enforcement action where a club fails to uphold the rights associated with the golden share.
(5) In this section—
“Supporters’ Trust” means a formally constituted, democratic, not-for-profit organisation that is recognised by the Regulator as representing the interests of a club’s supporters;
“golden share” means a special share or equivalent legal instrument issued to a Supporters’ Trust, entitling its holder to the rights and protections described in this section.”
This new clause would give fans a veto on club proposals, exercised through a recognised Supporters’ Trust or equivalent democratic fan body.
NC11
Max Wilkinson (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Home Affairs)To move the following Clause—
“Protection of assets of regulated clubs
(1) Where any of the following assets belong to a regulated club, the asset must not be removed from the club’s ownership or used as collateral for a secured loan—
(a) any stadium,
(b) any training facility,
(c) any trophies,
(d) any car park,
(e) any hotel.
(2) But subsection 1 does not apply to a car park or a hotel where—
(a) the regulated club can demonstrate to the IFR’s satisfaction that the asset is causing financial loss or poses a material risk to the club’s financial sustainability, and
(b) the IFR has provided prior written approval for the disposal of the asset or the use of the asset as collateral.
(3) Where the current owner of a regulated club owns any asset listed in subsection (1)(a) to (c), the owner may not sell the club unless the owner has inserted the asset into the club’s ownership structure.”
This new clause would ensure that the club assets listed above are recognised as the inalienable property of the club rather than the club’s owners.
NC12
Max Wilkinson (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Home Affairs)To move the following Clause—
“Duty not to stage home matches outside United Kingdom without approval
(1) A regulated club must not stage any home fixture in a competitive match at a venue outside the United Kingdom without the approval of the IFR.
(2) The IFR may only grant approval under subsection (1) if the fixture is not part of a specified competition.
(3) For the purposes of this section, a "home fixture" means any fixture where the club is designated as the home team by the rules of the relevant competition.”
This new clause would prevent a regulated club from staging a competitive home fixture outside of the United Kingdom. It will allow regulated clubs to stage non-competitive fixtures outside of the United Kingdom.
NC13
Max Wilkinson (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Home Affairs)To move the following Clause—
“Televising of football matches of national interest
(1) The Communications Act 2003 is amended as follows.
(2) After Section 299 (categorisation of listed events) (2)(d) insert—
“(e) the Independent Football Regulator, established by the Football Governance Act 2024, in relation to televising of football matches between licensed football clubs.””
This new clause adds the IFR as a statutory consultee on the listing of sporting events for free-to-air coverage.
NC14
Clive Betts (Lab)To move the following Clause—
“Incorporation of heritage restrictions in Articles of Association
(1) A regulated club must, within the time limit, ensure that the requirements in sections 48(4A) and 49(1) are incorporated into its Articles of Association.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the time limit is the period of one year from the day on which this section comes into force, or such other period of time as the Regulator may direct in relation to a particular regulated club.
(3) Subsection (1) is fulfilled if the club's Articles of Association provide for even greater fan consultation than sections 48(4A) and 49(1) require.”
NC15
Clive Jones (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Trade)To move the following Clause—
“Requirement to notify the IFR of a change in fitness criteria
(1) Individuals or organisations associated with a regulated club must notify the IFR when they have evidence or information that a material change in circumstances has occurred which is relevant to whether an individual, who is an owner or officer of the club, meets the fitness criteria to perform the role as defined under subsections 26(7) and 26(8) of this Act.
(2) Individuals and organisations with a duty to notify the IFR under subsection (1) include (but are not limited to)—
(a) owners,
(b) club employees (including officers and board members),
(c) competition organisers in the regulator's scope,
(d) supporters’ trusts,
(e) the Football Supporters' Association,
(f) Fair Game.”
This new clause places a duty on specified individuals and organisations to notify the Independent Football Regulator (IFR) if they have evidence of a material change in circumstances affecting whether a club owner or officer meets the statutory fitness criteria under Clause 26 of the Bill.
NC16
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)To move the following Clause—
“Duty to consult fans on political statements
(1) A regulated club may not publish any political statements, political opinions, or issue an items with party political connotations unless it has taken reasonable steps to establish that such statements, opinions or items are supported by the majority of the club’s fans in England and Wales.
(2) A regulated club may not permit any officers or employees, when acting in an official capacity, of the club to engage in political activities or publish political statements or wear any item with political links unless it has taken reasonable steps to establish that such activities, statements, or items are supported by a majority of the club’s fans in England and Wales.”
This new clause would give fans a say on the political positions adopted by regulated football clubs.
NC17
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)To move the following Clause—
“Impact on Regulator of changes in Government administration
If the Department for Culture Media and Sport is abolished, or its functions in relation to football substantially relocated, the Government must automatically review the suitability of the continuation of the IFR and the impact that the abolition or relocation will have on the IFR.”
This new clause would require the Government to review the IFR in the instance that the Department for Culture, Media and Sport were abolished, or its functions substantially altered.
NC18
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)To move the following Clause—
“Correspondence about the IFR
(1) The Secretary of State must publish any correspondence received by the Secretary of State from the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) and the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) about the IFR’s exercise of its functions.
(2) The IFR must publish any correspondence it receives from the Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) and the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) about the exercise of its functions.”
This new clause would require correspondence between FIFA and UEFA and either the Secretary of State, or the IFR, with regards to the IFR’s regulatory functions, to be published.
NC19
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)To move the following Clause—
“Alcohol at football grounds
Within one year of the passing of this Act the Secretary of State must consult on lifting the ban on consuming alcohol in view of the pitch in the top five tiers of the men's game in England.”
NC20
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)To move the following Clause—
“Player welfare
Within one year of the passing of this Act the Secretary of State must review how to improve the welfare of football players. This review should include consideration of—
(a) neurodegenerative diseases incurred by heading footballs;
(b) the number of games that footballers are required to play each season; and
(c) the impact on the welfare of current and former professional footballers as a result.”
NC21
Lee Dillon (LD)To move the following Clause—
“IFR duty to provide information and support on golden shares
(1) Within 6 months of the passing of this Act the IFR must publish guidance for recognised Supporters’ Trusts or equivalent democratic fan organisations holding a golden share as specified in section [Fan representation: mandatory golden share].
(2) The guidance published under subsection (1) must explain the purpose of a golden share and advise on how holders of a golden share can engage with their regulated club when utilising the rights bestowed by the golden share.
(3) The IFR must also provide an information support service for holders of a golden share to contact for advice on utilising their golden share.”
This new clause adds a duty for the IFR to support fan organisations in the use of their golden share through advice services and guidance.
NC22
Lee Dillon (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Consultation on changes to kick off times
(1) Within 6 months of the passing of this Act the IFR must conduct a consultation on changes to kick off times in English football.
(2) The consultation must consider—
(a) the availability of transport to and from fixtures with a change in kick off time to another time;
(b) the amount of notice given before a change in kick off time to another time;
(c) the impact of European football games mid-week kick offs on changes in kick off time to another time; and
(d) the welfare of players.
(3) As part of the consultation the IFR must consult—
(a) the Football Association;
(b) each specified competition organiser;
(c) fan groups;
(d) Premier League fan advisory boards; and
(e) such other persons as the IFR considers appropriate.
(4) With 6 months of commencing the consultation the IFR must publish a report on the consultation.”
This new clause requires the IFR to conduct a fan consultation on kick-off times within six months of the passing of the Act.
NC23
Lee Dillon (LD)To move the following Clause—
“Duty to create emergency fund
(1) As a condition of purchase of a regulated club the new owner may, if required by the IFR, pay an amount equal to the club's quarterly forecast expenditure into an emergency fund (referred to in this section as “the fund”).
(2) Withdrawals cannot be made from the fund while the person who deposited the fund is the owner of the club.
(3) When a club's quarterly forecast expenditure increases the owner must increase their deposit into the fund to match the increased forecast.
(4) If an owner does not update the fund to match an increase in the club’s quarterly forecast expenditure the IFR may suspend the regulated club’s operating licence until such time as the required deposit into the fund has been made.
(5) When a club files for insolvency the owner abrogates all claim to the fund and the fund may be accessed to pay club salaries and day to day running costs.
(6) When the owner who deposited the fund sells the club they may withdraw the fund but the fund must first be used to repay any debts accrued during the time period they were the owner.”
This new clause gives the IFR an option to require new club owners to establish an emergency fund to provide for club operational costs such as player and staff wages in an emergency scenario.
95
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 1, page 1, line 4, leave out subsection (1) and insert—
“(1) The purpose of this Act is to protect the financial sustainability and success of English football.”
96
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 1, page 2, line 1, leave out subsection (3) and insert—
“(3) For the purposes of this Act, English football is sustainable if it—
(a) continues to meet the needs of present fans without compromising the ability of future generations of fans to enjoy and benefit from the club;
(b) continues to contribute to the economic and social welfare of the local communities with which regulated clubs are associated;
(c) increases TV viewership;
(d) increases overall match attendance;
(e) improves international sporting competitiveness.
(3A) English football meeting the requirement in subsection (3)(a) includes all clubs continuing to operate teams in club competitions in a way that represents the unique heritage of the club as recognised by its fans and respecting the interests of those fans.
(3B) English football meeting the requirement in subsection (3)(b) includes all regulated clubs continuing to have a positive impact on economic and social factors that contribute to the welfare of the local community. This includes, but is not limited to, direct or indirect positive effects on the income of local businesses, cultural enrichment, or the reputation of the local area.”
This amendment creates a more precise definition of the sustainability of English football.
132
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 2, page 2, line 31, leave out subsection (3) and insert—
“(3) For the purposes of this Act a “specified competition” includes—
(a) the Premier League,
(b) the English Football League, and
(c) the National League.
(3A) The Secretary of State may by regulations made by statutory instrument subject to approval by both Houses of Parliament amend the competitions specified in section (3).”
This amendment would specify the leagues that are to be classed as “specified competitions” under Act.
74
Max Wilkinson (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Home Affairs)Clause 2, page 2, line 34, at end insert—
“(3B) The competitions specified by the Secretary of State must include the National League North and the National League South (but see section [Opportunity for levy exemption for clubs below the Football League] which provides for a process by which clubs in these competitions may apply for an exemption from the levy established under section 53).”
This amendment extends the scope of the regulator to National League North and National League South.
98
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 7, line 35, at end insert—
“(3A) The IFR may not redistribute revenue, income or any monies from one regulated club to another regulated club.”
This amendment prevents the IFR from redistributing any funds from one club to another.
97
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 7, page 5, line 27, at end insert—
“(d) conflicts with any regulations or rules of international football governing bodies, including FIFA and UEFA.”
This amendment requires the IFR to exercise its functions so as to avoid conflicts with the regulations and rules of international footballing bodies.
123
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 10, page 7, line 6, at end insert—
“(d) an assessment of the impact that the IFR’s activities have had on the price of match tickets.”
This amendment would require the IFR to include in its state of the game report the impact that its regulatory activities have had on ticket prices.
139
Lee Dillon (LD)Clause 10, page 7, line 22, at end insert—
“(iia) supporters trusts, fan groups and individual fans;”
This amendment adds fans and fan organisations to the list of groups that the IFR must consult about a state of the game report.
113
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 11, page 7, line 41, at end insert—
“(7) No football governance statement may have effect unless approved by resolution of both Houses of Parliament.”
This amendment would require the football governance statement to be approved by Parliament before it could have effect.
122
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 14, page 9, line 3, at end insert—
“(aa) the impact that the IFR’s activities have had on the price of match tickets, and”
This amendment would require the IFR to include in its annual report the impact that its regulatory activities have had on ticket prices.
134
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 14, page 9, line 3, at end insert—
“(aa) the cumulative impact of the costs imposed on clubs through compliance with the IFR’s regulatory regime, and”
This amendment would require the IFR to include in the annual report an account of the financial costs imposed on clubs through its regulatory requirements on them.
99
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 16, page 10, line 10, leave out subsection (c)
This amendment prevents the IFR from requiring information from clubs in the other than the personnel statement and strategic business plan specified by the Act, when applying for a provisional operating license.
100
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 16, page 10, line 25, leave out subsection (b)
This amendment prevents the IFR from requiring information in the strategic business plan not specified by the Act.
101
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 17, page 11, line 27, leave out subsection (9) and insert—
“(9) The IFR must make the decision whether to grant a regulated club a provisional operating licence within the period of one month.
(10) The IFR may extend the period in subsection (9) by no more than two weeks if it requires more time to consider the application due to—
(a) unusual staffing pressures, or
(b) discrepancies or abnormalities with the application.
(11) If the IFR extends the period as per subsection (10), it must give a notice to the relevant club stating—
(a) that the period has been extended,
(b) the length of the extension, and
(c) the reasons for the extension.”
This amendment places a time limit of one month for the IFR to decide whether to grant a provisional operating license.
106
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 19, page 13, line 19, at end insert—
“(c) inviting the club to make representations about the proposed revocation, and
(d) specifying the means by which, and the period within which, such representations must be made, which must be a period of not less than one month beginning with the day on which the notice under subsection (3) is given.”
This amendment allows clubs to make representations about the proposed revocation of their operating license.
107
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 22, page 14, line 35, leave out subsection (a)
This amendment prevents the IFR from being able to set licence conditions relating to internal controls.
108
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 22, page 14, line 37, leave out subsection (c)
This amendment prevents the IFR from being able to set licence conditions relating to the overall expenditure of a club.
109
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 22, page 15, line 12, leave out subsection (5)
This amendment removes the power of the Secretary of State to amend the discretionary licence conditions by regulations.
75
Max Wilkinson (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Home Affairs)Clause 26, page 19, line 20, at end insert—
“(c) respects and promotes the protection of human rights and prevents modern slavery (as set out in section [Human rights and modern slavery considerations]).”
This amendment is linked to NC8.
110
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 37, page 28, line 28, at end insert—
“(fa) whether the individual is a member of a proscribed organisation as per section (3) and schedule (2) of the Terrorism Act 2000.”
This amendment requires that IFR, in determining whether an owner or officer has the requisite honesty or integrity, to consider whether the person is a member of an organisation proscribed under the Terrorism Act 2000.
94
Clive Betts (Lab)Clause 43, page 34, line 38, at end insert—
“(e) following the revocation by the IFR of the club’s operating licence under clause 19 or under paragraph 9 of Part 1 of Schedule 9.”
87
Clive Betts (Lab)Clause 46, page 38, line 26, leave out first “home ground” and insert “specified properties”
88
Clive Betts (Lab)Clause 46, page 38, line 26, leave out second “home ground” and insert “specified properties”
89
Clive Betts (Lab)Clause 46, page 38, line 27, leave out “home ground” and insert “specified properties”
90
Clive Betts (Lab)Clause 46, page 38, line 28, leave out “home ground” and insert “specified properties”
83
Clive Betts (Lab)Clause 46, page 39, line 2, at end insert—
“(ii) in the case of the home ground and training ground, it is satisfied that there are suitable plans in place to ensure the club’s continued long-term use of the home ground or training ground or to secure an alternative home ground or training ground for the next football season;
(iii) in the case of a home ground, it is satisfied that any alternative under sub-paragraph (ii) will have been actively approved by the club’s fans domiciled in England and Wales if any of the following non-exhaustive factors represent a significant upheaval of the connection between the fans of a club and the club: proximity to home ground, proximity to other clubs' grounds, journey time for fans and any other factors that the Regulator deems relevant;”
84
Clive Betts (Lab)Clause 46, page 39, line 5, at end insert—
“(c) in the case of a disposal under subsection (1)(a), it has taken reasonable steps to establish that the majority of the club’s fans domiciled in England and Wales approve of the disposal.”
85
Clive Betts (Lab)Clause 46, page 39, line 5, at end insert—
“(6A) Before the IFR grants an approval under subsection 6 it must—
(a) consult the supporters of the body in question, the relevant competition organisers and persons representing the local community with which the body is associated, and
(b) have regard to the views expressed by those consulted.”
86
Clive Betts (Lab)Clause 46, page 39, line 11, leave out subsection (10) and insert—
“(10) In this section, “specified properties”—
(a) in relation to a body that is a regulated club, means the ground at which a relevant team operated by it customarily plays its home matches, the property at which a relevant team customarily trains and any other properties that make up a more than negligible part of the relevant team’s operations;
(b) in relation to a body that is a formerly regulated club, means (immediately before it ceased to be a regulated club) the ground at which a relevant team operated by it customarily played its home matches, the property at which a relevant team customarily trained and any other properties that make or made up a more than negligible part of the relevant team’s operations.”
91
Clive Betts (Lab)Clause 48, page 40, line 18, at end insert—
“(e) if the arrangements would represent a significant upheaval of the connection between the fans of a club domiciled in England and Wales and the club (taking into account the following non-exhaustive factors: proximity to home ground, proximity to other clubs' grounds, journey time for fans and any other factors that the IFR deems relevant) the club’s fans have actively approved the arrangements.
(4A) In order for the Regulator to be satisfied with subsection (4)(b), a regulated club must take reasonable steps to establish that the majority of the club’s fans domiciled in England and Wales do not consider the arrangements to constitute significant harm to the heritage of the club.”
140
Lee Dillon (LD)Clause 49, page 40, line 31 at end insert—
“(1A) A regulated club must notify the IFR if it is considering making any material changes under subsection (1) and the IFR must monitor the reasonable steps taken to independently establish that the changes are supported by a majority of the club’s fans.”
This amendment would require the IFR to take steps to independently oversee a club’s fan consultation process on the material changes specified.
92
Clive Betts (Lab)Clause 49, page 40, line 33, leave out "approved by the Football Association" and insert “supported by a majority of the club’s fans domiciled in England and Wales.”
111
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 49, page 40, line 33, at end insert “and a majority of the club’s fans”
133
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 53, page 42, line 3, at end insert—
“(1A) But the IFR may not require a club with fewer than 10 full time equivalent employees to pay the IFR a levy in respect of a chargeable period during which the club is a licensed club.”
This amendment would exempt clubs with fewer than 10 full time equivalent employees from having to pay the levy.
105
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 53, page 42, line 42, at end insert—
“(6A) Once the IFR has established a levy under subsection (1) and made the required payments under section 96, the IFR must only fund its functions under this Act through its own revenue streams.
(6B) For the purposes of subsection (6A) the IFR’s “own revenue streams” are any amounts payable to the IFR from regulated clubs under subsection (1).”
This amendment requires the IFR to be self-funding through the industry levy, but after it has paid its initial costs and the Secretary of State’s establishment costs to the Treasury.
102
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 54, page 44, line 7, leave out subsection (2)
This amendment would remove the ability for the IFR not to consult on changes to the levy rules if the IFR considered them to be minor.
103
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 54, page 44, line 10, leave out “As soon as is reasonably practicable” and insert “Six months”
The amendment requires the IFR to publish levy rules six months before the chargeable period.
76
Max Wilkinson (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Home Affairs)Clause 56, page 45, line 39, after “organisers” insert “or by a regulated club”
124
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 56, page 46, line 3, leave out subsection (2) and insert—
“(2) In this Part, revenue received by a specified competition organiser is “relevant revenue” if—
(a) it is revenue received as a result of the sale or acquisition of rights to exploit the broadcasting of football matches included in a competition organised by the specified competition organiser, and
(b) it is not revenue that the specified competition organiser distributes to a club by virtue of a team operated by the club being relegated from a competition organised by the specified competition organiser.”
77
Max Wilkinson (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Home Affairs)Clause 56, page 46, line 4, after “organiser” insert “or directly received by a regulated club”
78
Max Wilkinson (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Home Affairs)Clause 56, page 46, line 17, after “organiser” insert “or a regulated club”
79
Max Wilkinson (LD) - Liberal Democrat Spokesperson (Home Affairs)Clause 56, page 46, line 24, after “organisers” insert “or by any club participating in a competition organised by one of those organisers”
117
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 2, page 87, line 12, at end insert—
“3A Any political interests of, and political donations made by, the prospective chair of the Board, must all be declared as part of the appointments process, and published before the chair’s pre-appointment hearing with the Culture, Media and Sport Select Committee.”
This amendment would ensure that the political interests of the Secretary of State’s preferred candidate for the Chair are made public before the appointment is confirmed.
118
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 2, page 87, line 37, at end insert—
(5)No member may be appointed to the Board if they currently have any broadcast or media interests or any role in a television or media broadcast that relates to football.”
This amendment prohibits any person who currently has any interests or roles in a television or media broadcast that relates to football from being appointed to the Board.
114
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 2, page 88, line 3, at end insert “including the Chair.”
This amendment makes it explicit that there must be a system for the declaration and relevant interests of the Chair of the Board.
115
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 2, page 88, line 6, at end insert—
(3)“relevant interest” will always include donations to political parties.”
This amendment makes it clear that political donations should be declared as a relevant interest.
116
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 2, page 88, line 6, at end insert—
“7A The Chair of the Board must not
(a) be a member of a political party,
(b) canvass on behalf of a political party or on behalf of a candidate for election to the House of Commons, European Parliament, the Scottish Parliament or Welsh Assembly or local authorities, or
(c) speak to the public at large or to a section of the public with the apparent intention of affecting public support for a political party.”
This amendment would require the Chair not to be a member of a political party, or to publicly campaign for, or demonstrate support for, a political party.
138
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 2, page 88, line 37, at end insert—
“(1A) But the number of persons in the employment of IFR (including any persons seconded to the IFR) must at no time exceed 50.”
120
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 2, page 89, line 9, leave out subparagraph (3) and insert—
(3)The IFR may pay a person appointed as the Chief Executive no more than £172,153 per annum.
(3A)Notwithstanding the remuneration of the Chief Executive Officer as per paragraph (3), the IFR must pay its employees such remuneration as may be determined by the non-executive members.”
This amendment limits the pay of the Chief Executive.
119
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 2, page 93, line 2, at end insert—
“4A No member may be appointed to the Expert Panel if they currently have any broadcast or media interests or any role in a television or media broadcast that relates to football.”
This amendment prohibits any person who currently has any interests or roles in a television or media broadcast that relates to football from being appointed to the Expert Panel.
121
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 2, page 94, line 34, at end insert—
“31A (1)The Expert Panel must publish any decision that it makes relating to any of its functions under this Act.
(2)Any decision published by the Expert Panel must include—
(a)the number of members of the Expert Panel who supported the decision;
(b)the number of members of the Expert Panel who did not support the decision;
(c)the reasons for the decision;
(d)the reasons why those who did not support the decision decided not to.
(3)The Expert Panel must publish any records of its committee proceedings as recorded under paragraph (30).”
This amendment requires the Expert Panel to exercise its functions transparently.
104
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 4, page 99, line 31, at end insert—
“(f) the club’s political statements and positions.”
This amendment ensures that clubs have to engage their fans on the political statements a club might adopt.
112
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 4, page 99, line 34, leave out “crest” and insert “badge.”
135
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 5, page 101, line 20, leave out sub-subparagraph (ii)
137
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 5, page 102, line 2, at end insert “including the club’s official charity.”
This amendment would make clear that the activities of a football club’s official charity can be counted towards it meeting the corporate governance code.
136
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 5, page 102, line 7, leave out sub-paragraph (e)
This amendment removes the requirement for the corporate governance statement to cover what action the club is taking to improve equality, diversity and inclusion.
131
Louie French (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 5, page 103, line 16, at end insert—
“Agents fees
11A (1)An agents fees condition is a condition requiring a club employing an agent to cap their fees.
(2)The agents fee cap will be set by Regulations subject to approval by both Houses.”
29
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 57, page 47, line 12, leave out “the application relates” and insert “the question or questions for resolution mentioned in subsection (1) relate”
This amendment provides that a specified competition organiser may only apply under clause 57 if the conditions in clause 57 are met in relation to the qualifying football season or seasons to which the question or questions mentioned in subsection (1) of clause 57 relate.
30
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 58, page 48, line 7, at end insert—
“(za) set out details of the question or questions for resolution mentioned in section 57(1) to which it is intended the application will relate,”
This amendment provides that a notification under clause 59(1)(a) must set out details of the question or questions for resolution to which it is intended the application will relate.
31
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 58, page 48, line 8, leave out “the application relates” and insert “that question relates or those questions relate”
This amendment provides that a notification under clause 59(1)(a) must specify the qualifying football season or season to which the question or questions for resolution relate.
32
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 58, page 48, line 12, leave out paragraph (c)
This amendment is consequential on Amendment 30.
33
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 58, page 48, line 22, at end insert—
“(za) set out details of the question or questions for resolution mentioned in section 57(1) to which the application relates,”
This amendment provides that an application under clause 57 must set out details of the question or questions for resolution to which the application relates.
34
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 58, page 48, line 23, leave out “the application relates” and insert “that question relates or those questions relate”
This amendment provides that the application under clause 57 must specify the qualifying football season or season to which the question or questions for resolution relate.
35
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 58, page 48, line 27, leave out paragraph (c)
This amendment is consequential on Amendment 33.
36
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 59, page 48, line 33, leave out “the qualifying football season or seasons” and insert “one or more of the questions for resolution”
This amendment provides that the IFR must decide whether the resolution process should be triggered in relation to one or more of the questions for resolution to which the application under clause 57 relates.
37
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 59, page 48, line 33, after “relates” insert “(or a modified version of one or more of those questions)”
This amendment provides that the IFR may decide that the resolution process should be triggered in relation to a modified version of one or more of the questions for resolution set out in the application under clause 57.
38
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 59, page 48, line 36, leave out “qualifying football season” and insert “question or questions for resolution”
This amendment provides that the IFR must be satisfied that the conditions in clause 59(2) are met before deciding to trigger the process in relation to a question or questions for resolution.
39
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 59, page 48, line 38, leave out “that season” and insert “each season to which the question relates or the questions relate”
This amendment is consequential on Amendment 38.
40
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 59, page 48, line 41, after “triggered” insert “in relation to the question or questions for resolution”
This amendment is consequential on Amendment 38.
41
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 59, page 49, line 4, after “triggered” insert “in relation to one or more of the questions for resolution”
This amendment is consequential on Amendment 38.
42
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 59, page 49, line 10, at end insert—
“(4A) Where the IFR is minded that the resolution process should be triggered, the IFR must consult the Football Association on the question or questions for resolution in relation to which it is minded to trigger the process.”
This amendment requires the IFR to consult the Football Association on the question or questions for resolution in relation to which it is minded to trigger the process.
43
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 59, page 49, line 15, at end insert—
“(zi) the question or questions for resolution in relation to which the IFR is triggering the resolution process,”
This amendment provides that the notice under clause 59(5) must set out the question or questions for resolution in relation to which the IFR is triggering the resolution process.
44
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 59, page 49, line 16, leave out “the resolution process relates” and insert “that question relates or those questions relate”
This amendment provides that the notice under clause 59(5) must set out the qualifying football season or seasons to which the question or questions for resolution relate.
45
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 59, page 49, line 18, leave out sub-paragraph (ii)
This amendment is consequential on Amendment 43.
46
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 59, page 49, line 18, at end insert—
“(iia) how the IFR has taken account of any representations, copies of which accompanied the application under section 57 by virtue of section 58(5)(d), in setting out that question or those questions, and”
This amendment requires the IFR to set out in a notice under clause 59(5)(b) how it has taken account of any representations when setting out the question or questions in relation to which it is triggering the resolution process.
47
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 59, page 49, line 20, leave out “the question or questions for resolution” and insert “that question or those questions”
This amendment is consequential on Amendment 43.
48
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 59, page 49, line 21, at end insert—
“(5A) Where any of the questions for resolution set out in the notice differ from those to which the application made under section 57 relates, the notice must set out the extent of, and reasons for, those differences.”
This amendment requires the IFR to set out the extent of, and reasons for, any differences between the question or questions for resolution set out in a notice under clause 59(5)(b)(ii) and the question or questions for resolution set out in an application under clause 57.
49
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 60, page 50, line 4, after “resolution” insert “set out in a notice under section 59(5)(b)(zi)”
This amendment clarifies that the question or questions for resolution subject to the mediation process are those set out in a notice under clause 59(5)(b)(zi).
50
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 60, page 50, line 6, leave out “the question or questions for resolution” and insert “that question or those questions”
This amendment is consequential on Amendment 49.
51
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 60, page 50, line 15, after “resolution” insert “set out in a notice under section 59(5)(b)(zi)”
This amendment clarifies that the question or questions for resolution subject to the mediation process are those set out in a notice under clause 59(5)(b)(zi).
52
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Page 50, line 26, leave out Clause 61
This amendment is consequential on the insertion of NC3.
53
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Page 51, line 22, leave out Clause 62
This amendment is consequential on the insertion of NC4.
54
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 64, page 54, line 18, leave out “62(8)(b)” and insert “(Distribution orders)(10)(b)”
This amendment is consequential on the insertion of NC4.
65
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 8, page 109, line 14, leave out “a period of three months” and insert “so long as is necessary in all the circumstances”
This amendment provides that information obtained by the IFR under a warrant may be retained for so long as is necessary in all the circumstances.
66
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 10, page 120, line 17, column 1, leave out “not to trigger” and insert “to trigger, or not to trigger,”
This amendment includes a decision to trigger the resolution process in the list of reviewable decisions set out in Schedule 10.
67
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 10, page 120, line 17, column 2, leave out “a committee of the Expert Panel” and insert “the Board”
This amendment provides that the applicable reviewer for a decision to trigger the resolution process is the Board rather than a committee of the Expert Panel.
68
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 10, page 120, line 19, column 2, leave out “a committee of the Expert Panel” and insert “the Board”
This amendment provides that the applicable reviewer for a decision to make a distribution order under NC4 is the Board rather than a committee of the Expert Panel.
70
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 10, page 120, leave out lines 21 and 22
This amendment is consequential on the insertion of NC4.
71
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 10, page 120, line 23, column 2, leave out “a committee of the Expert Panel” and insert “the Board”
This amendment provides that the applicable reviewer for a decision to revoke a distribution order under clause 63 is the Board rather than a committee of the Expert Panel.
69
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 10, page 120, leave out lines 27 to 30
This amendment removes a decision to conduct an investigation under clause 68 and not to accept a commitment in lieu under clause 70 from the list of reviewable decisions in Schedule 10.
72
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 10, page 120, leave out lines 35 and 36
This amendment removes a decision to exercise the power to ask questions under paragraph 2 of Schedule 8 from the list of reviewable decisions in Schedule 10.
73
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 11, page 123, line 4, column 2, leave out “62(3)” and insert “(Distribution orders)(9)”
This amendment is consequential on the insertion of NC4.
55
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 94, page 76, line 14, leave out from “to” to end of line 15 and insert “—
(a) a provision of this Act which requires the IFR to consult another person;
(b) the provision made by section 10(5)(a) and (b).”
This amendment includes the provision made by clause 10(5)(a) and (b) in clause 94.
56
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 94, page 76, line 18, leave out “carried out consultation” and insert “did anything”
This amendment is consequential on Amendment 55.
57
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 94, page 76, line 20, leave out “consultation carried out” and insert “anything done”
This amendment is consequential on Amendment 55.
58
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 94, page 76, line 21, leave out “consultation had been carried out” and insert “thing had been done”
This amendment is consequential on Amendment 55.
59
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 94, page 76, line 23, leave out “consultation carried out” and insert “anything done”
This amendment is consequential on Amendment 55.
60
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 101, page 80, line 11, leave out subsection (2)
This amendment would remove the privilege amendment inserted by the Lords.
NC3
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)To move the following Clause—
“Proposal stage
(1) This section applies where mediation under section 60 comes to an end by virtue of the occurrence of an event within section 60(6)(b), (c) or (d).
(2) As soon as reasonably practicable after the occurrence of the event, the IFR must give notice to the two specified competition organisers.
(3) A notice under subsection (2) must—
(a) set out the question or questions for resolution,
(b) specify the qualifying football season or seasons to which that question relates or those questions relate,
(c) set out any findings in the IFR’s most recent state of the game report that the IFR considers relevant to that question or those questions,
(d) invite each of the two specified competition organisers to submit to the IFR and to each other a proposal as to how that question or those questions should be resolved,
(e) require any proposal to be accompanied by supporting evidence (including evidence as to how the proposal addresses the findings set out under paragraph (c)),
(f) specify the day on or before which proposals are to be submitted.
(4) A question for resolution may be set out in a notice under subsection (2) only if it is the question, or one of the questions, for resolution remaining unresolved when the mediation mentioned in subsection (1) came to an end.
(5) Where a notice under subsection (2) sets out a question for resolution that relates to relegation revenue (within the meaning given by section (Distribution orders)(9)), the notice must require the specified competition organisers to explain in a proposal how the proposal will promote the financial sustainability of clubs which operate teams relegated from a competition organised by the specified competition organiser distributing the relegation revenue.
(6) Subsection (7) applies if, on or before the day specified by virtue of subsection (3)(f), a specified competition organiser submits to the IFR a proposal which the IFR considers is not a qualifying proposal.
(7) The IFR may give both specified competition organisers a notice specifying a later day (falling not more than seven days after the end of the day specified by virtue of subsection (3)(f)) on or before which proposals are to be submitted.
(8) As soon as reasonably practicable after—
(a) the initial proposal deadline, or
(b) (if earlier) the day on which the IFR considers that both specified competition organisers have submitted qualifying proposals,
the IFR must give a notice under subsection (9) to the two specified competition organisers.
(9) A notice under this subsection must—
(a) state which of the two specified competition organisers (if any) has submitted a qualifying proposal before the initial proposal deadline,
(b) invite each such specified competition organiser to—
(i) confirm their proposal, or
(ii) make any permitted modifications to their proposal,
and submit the confirmed or modified proposal to the IFR and the other specified competition organiser, and
(c) specify the day on or before which the confirmed or modified proposal is to be submitted.
(10) The IFR may specify in a notice under subsection (2) or (9) the form and manner in which proposals and supporting evidence must be submitted.
(11) In this section—
(a) “the initial proposal deadline” means—
(i) the day referred to in subsection (3)(f), or
(ii) where the IFR gives a notice under subsection (7), the day specified in the notice;
(b) a “qualifying proposal” means a proposal which—
(i) explains how the question or questions for resolution should be resolved, and
(ii) complies with the requirements imposed by virtue of subsection (3)(e) and (5) (if applicable);
(c) a modification to a proposal is “permitted” unless it results in the proposal no longer being a qualifying proposal.”
This new clause substitutes clause 61 with a new clause providing for a revised procedure for the proposal stage of the resolution process.
NC4
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)To move the following Clause—
“Distribution orders
(1) This section applies where the IFR has given a notice under section (Proposal stage)(9).
(2) Before the end of the period of 60 days beginning with the day on which the notice under section (Proposal stage)(9) was given, the IFR must give the two specified competition organisers a notice of the distribution order it proposes to make.
(3) The IFR may extend the period in subsection (2) by up to a further 14 days if it considers it appropriate to do so.
(4) A notice under subsection (2) must—
(a) give reasons for the proposed distribution order,
(b) explain how the proposed order applies the principles mentioned in subsection (8),
(c) explain how the proposed order addresses the findings set out under section (Proposal stage)(3)(c),
(d) invite each of the two specified competition organisers to make representations about the proposed distribution order,
(e) specify the period within which such representations may be made, and
(f) specify the means by which they may be made,
and the IFR must have regard to any representations which are duly made.
(5) The period specified under subsection (4)(d) must be a period of not less than 14 days beginning with the day on which the notice is given.
(6) As soon as reasonably practicable after the end of the period specified under subsection (4)(d), the IFR must make an order requiring relevant revenue to be distributed in a way that the IFR considers appropriate for the purpose of resolving the question or questions for resolution set out under section (Proposal stage)(3)(a) (a “distribution order”).
(7) In making a distribution order the IFR must—
(a) apply the principles mentioned in subsection (8), and
(b) have regard to any proposal submitted under section (Proposal stage)(9)(b).
See also section 7 (in particular the IFR’s general duty to exercise its functions in a way that advances one or more of its objectives and to have regard to various matters).
(8) The principles referred to in subsection (7)(a) are that—
(a) the distribution order should not place an undue burden on the commercial interests of either specified competition organiser, and
(b) the distribution order should not result in a lower amount of relegation revenue being distributed to a club during the relevant period than would have been distributed to the club during that period had the order not been made.
(9) For the purposes of subsection (8)—
“relegation revenue” means revenue distributed by a specified competition organiser to a club in consequence of a team operated by the club being relegated from a specified competition organised by the specified competition organiser;
“relevant period” , in relation to a distribution order, means the period of one year beginning with the final day of the first football season in respect of which relegation revenue would be distributed in pursuance of the order.
(10) A distribution order—
(a) must impose on the specified competition organisers such obligations as the IFR considers appropriate for the purpose of securing compliance with the requirements set out in the order, and
(b) may, where a distribution agreement is in force between the specified competition organisers in relation to the same qualifying football season or seasons to which the order relates, provide for that agreement to have effect subject to provision contained in the order.
(11) At the same time as making a distribution order, the IFR must give the two specified competition organisers a notice—
(a) including a copy of the order,
(b) giving reasons for the order,
(c) explaining how the order applies the principles mentioned in subsection (8),
(d) explaining how the order addresses the findings set out under section (Proposal stage)(3)(c), and
(e) including information about the possible consequences under Part 8 of not complying with the order.
(12) The IFR must, as soon as reasonably practicable after making a distribution order, publish the order or a summary of the order.”
This new clause substitutes clause 62 with a new clause providing that the IFR may make a distribution order that distributes relevant revenue in the way that the IFR considers most appropriate for the purpose of resolving the question or questions for resolution.
18
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 53, page 42, line 8, leave out “leviable functions” and insert “functions under this Act”
This amendment is consequential on Amendment 22.
19
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 53, page 42, line 13, leave out “leviable functions” and insert “functions under this Act”
This amendment is consequential on Amendment 22.
20
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 53, page 42, line 14, leave out “leviable functions” and insert “functions under this Act”
This amendment is consequential on Amendment 22.
21
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 53, page 42, line 19, leave out “leviable”
This amendment is consequential on Amendment 22.
22
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 53, page 42, line 26, leave out subsection (4)
This amendment removes the definition of “leviable functions” so that the IFR may charge a levy for all of its functions under the Act.
23
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 53, page 43, line 2, leave out “leviable functions” and insert “functions under this Act”
This amendment is consequential on Amendment 22.
24
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 53, page 43, line 4, leave out “its leviable” and insert “those”
This amendment is consequential on Amendment 22.
25
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 54, page 44, line 13, leave out “leviable functions” and insert “functions under this Act”
This amendment is consequential on Amendment 22.
26
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 54, page 44, line 14, leave out “its leviable” and insert “those”
This amendment is consequential on Amendment 22.
27
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 56, page 46, line 27, leave out “means an order under section 62(1) or (3)” and insert “has the meaning given by section (Distribution orders)(6)”
This amendment is consequential on the insertion of NC4.
28
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 56, page 46, line 42, leave out subsection (7)
This amendment removes the definition of “the question or questions for resolution” which is now superfluous.
61
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 2, page 89, line 29, leave out “sections 61 and 82” and insert “section 82”
This amendment is consequential on the insertion of NC3.
62
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 2, page 91, line 41, at end insert—
“(da) the function of deciding whether the resolution process should be triggered under section 59;
(db) the function of making a distribution order under section (Distribution orders);”
This amendment provides that the Board may only delegate the functions of deciding whether the resolution process should be triggered under clause 59 or making a distribution order under NC4 to another committee of the Board.
63
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 2, page 93, line 35, leave out “sections 61 and 82” and insert “section 82”
This amendment is consequential on the insertion of NC3.
64
Stephanie Peacock (Lab) - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 5, page 103, line 18, after “specified” insert “from time to time by the IFR”
This amendment clarifies that the IFR may specify certain elements of the mandatory licence conditions from time to time.
3
Clive Betts (Lab)Clause 61, page 50, line 40, leave out "require any final proposal to be accompanied by supporting evidence" and insert “require any final proposal to—
(i) be accompanied by supporting evidence;
(ii) be consistent with the resolution of any relevant issues identified in the Regulator's most recently published State of the Game report;
(iii) give effect to the views of any relevant specified competition organiser which has not been invited pursuant to clause 61(4)(c) to submit to the committee a final proposal; and
(iv) advance the Regulator's objectives in section 6, consistent with its general duties and Regulatory principles in sections 7 and 8.”
This amendment would set additional requirements to accompany any final proposal for the resolution process.
4
Clive Betts (Lab)Clause 62, page 52, line 5, at end insert—
“(d) must address to the satisfaction of the Regulator any issues identified by the Regulator’s most recently published State of the Game report.”
This amendment would add the principle that the final proposal in the resolution process should address any issues identified by the Regulator’s most recently published State of the Game report.
5
Clive Betts (Lab)Clause 62, page 52, line 43, at end insert—
“(8A) Where subsection (1)(c), (4)(b), or (5) applies, the committee must make an order requiring the relevant revenue to be distributed in accordance with a proposal of its own that is consistent with the principles in subsection (2) on or before the last day of the period of 28 days beginning with the final proposal deadline.”
This amendment would require the IFR, under the circumstances specified in the amendment, to make an order requiring the relevant revenue to be distributed in accordance with its own proposal.
11
Clive Betts (Lab)Clause 92, page 75, line 17, after “functions” insert “or give rise to the perception that said person’s functions have been prejudicially affected, including (but not limited to) a situation in which a person is—
(a) employed by or engaged as a consultant by any specified competition organiser or any group undertaking of a specified competition organiser;
(b) connected in any capacity with an organisation which has, in the last year, received at least half of its income from a specified competition organiser;
(c) connected with a group undertaking of an organisation within the scope of part (ii);
(d) connected in any capacity with an organisation which has, in the last year, received at least half of its income from any of the organisations listed in parts (ii) or (iii); or
(e) connected (as defined in section 252 of the Companies Act 2006) with an individual within the scope of parts (i), (ii), (iii) or (iv) of section 92(1).”
The amendment gives further detail to the definition of “conflict of interest” within this Bill.
NC1
Chris Evans (LAB)To move the following Clause—
“Neurodegenerative care scheme
(1) The IFR must establish and supervise a scheme aimed at providing a high standard of care and support to any person who has developed a neurodegenerative condition linked to their career in English football.
(2) The Secretary of State must make regulations setting out—
(a) minimum requirements for the scheme,
(b) a timescale for the scheme’s establishment, and
(c) arrangements and a timescale for a periodic review of the scheme.
(3) The IFR must ensure that, as a condition of organising any competition specified pursuant to section 2(3), all specified competition organisers jointly operate, manage and fund the scheme in accordance with subsections (3) to (9).
(4) For the purpose of operating, managing and funding the scheme, all of the specified competition organisers must form a Joint Coordinating Committee (“JCC”).
(5) Any current or former player who has at any time been registered as a professional footballer is eligible for the scheme.
(6) The scheme must provide care and financial support to any eligible person who suffers from a neurodegenerative condition which is deemed, pursuant to subsection (7)(a), to have been caused or contributed to by playing or training activities within English football.
(7) The JCC must, under the supervision of the IFR, appoint a panel of independent experts—
(a) to determine whether, on the balance of probabilities, a neurodegenerative condition of an eligible person has been caused or contributed to by playing or training activities within English football, and
(b) to determine the appropriate provision of care and financial support required in the case of each eligible person.
(8) The IFR must ensure that the JCC acts upon the panel’s determinations.
(9) Where—
(a) specified competition owners, through the JCC, cannot agree about the operation, management or funding of the scheme, or
(b) at any time, the scheme does not meet either—
(i) the aim under subsection (1), or
(ii) any requirements set out in regulations under subsection (2),
the Secretary of State may, having taken advice from the IFR, make a direction about the operation, management or funding of the scheme.”
NC2
Clive Betts (Lab)To move the following Clause—
“Support to clubs
(1) The IFR shall provide reasonable and proportionate assistance to—
(a) regulated clubs seeking to obtain a provisional club licence;
(b) clubs with a provisional club licence seeking a full club licence; and
(c) unregulated clubs who are reasonably likely to become regulated clubs in the next football season.
(2) The IFR shall provide reasonable and proportionate assistance to regulated clubs in their efforts to continue to comply with the conditions of their provisional club licence or full club licence.
(3) In fulfilling its duty under subsections (1) and (2), the IFR shall have regard to the factors listed in section 53(9).
(4) This assistance may come in the form of—
(a) financial support;
(b) training; and
(c) support staff.”
This new clause would require the IFR to provide assistance to football clubs transitioning to the new licence regime and to enable clubs continued compliance with its requirements.
1
Chris Evans (LAB)Clause 6, page 5, line 14, at end insert—
“(d) to ensure that the care and support of those who have developed neurodegenerative conditions linked to their career in English football is a central part of its approach to football governance, and to establish and supervise the scheme provided for under section [Neurodegenerative care scheme].”
This amendment places an objective on the IFR to establish and supervise a scheme to provide care and support to those who have developed neurodegenerative conditions linked to their career in English football (see NC1).
2
Clive Betts (Lab)Clause 10, page 7, line 6, at end insert—
“(d) an assessment of any existing and effective financial distribution agreement against the principles set out in section 62(2);”
This amendment would require the state of the game report to make an assessment of any existing and effective financial distribution agreement against the principles set out in distribution orders for the resolution process.
9
Clive Betts (Lab)Clause 10, page 7, line 8, leave out “18” and insert “12”
This amendment would require the first State of the Game Report to be published within 12 months of the Bill passing.
10
Clive Betts (Lab)Clause 10, page 7, line 12, leave out “five” and insert “three”
This amendment would require all subsequent State of the Game Report to be published every 3 years.
12
Clive Betts (Lab)Clause 28, page 21, line 8, at end insert “and the applicant has provided a commitment to maintain long-term use of the relevant club’s home ground (with said commitment to be codified in such form as the IFR may determine).”
This amendment would include a commitment to maintain long-term use of the relevant club’s home ground as part of the determination of suitability for a new owner.
13
Clive Betts (Lab)Clause 28, page 21, line 16, at end insert—
“(c) the applicant has provided a commitment to maintain long-term use of the relevant club’s home ground (with said commitment to be codified in such form as the IFR may determine).”
See explanatory statement for Amendment 12.
6
Clive Betts (Lab)Clause 53, page 43, line 35, after “club” insert “and in particular that the starting point for calculation of the levy payment applicable to a particular club should be a percentage of annual revenue”
This amendment would require the IFR to have regard to a football club’s percentage of annual revenue when calculating a levy payment.
14
Clive Betts (Lab)Schedule 4, page 98, line 20, at end insert—
“(d) the home ground threshold requirement (see paragraph 4A)”
See explanatory statement for Amendment 15.
15
Clive Betts (Lab)Schedule 4, page 99, line 41, at end insert—
“Home ground
4A (1)The home ground threshold requirement is met, in relation to a club, if the club—
(a)has security of tenure over a home ground for at least the minimum period; and
(b)the home ground is suitable for the club's use for footballing purposes.
(2)In subsection (1)(a), the minimum period is 20 years, or such other period as the IFR may determine in respect of a particular club (where there are compelling reasons why it should be shortened).
(3)In determining whether subsection (1)(b) is satisfied in respect of a club, the IFR shall have regard to the specified competition and league in which a club plays and whether the facilities satisfy the requirements set out by the relevant competition organiser(s), as well as any other factors that it deems relevant.
(4)In this paragraph 5, "home ground" shall have the meaning given to it in section 46(10)(a).”
This amendment specifies what constitutes the home ground threshold requirement.
7
Clive Betts (Lab)Schedule 5, page 100, line 19, at end insert—
“(e) an enforcement condition.”
See explanatory statement for Amendment 8.
16
Clive Betts (Lab)Schedule 5, page 100, line 19, at end insert—
“(e) an Asset of Community Value condition.”
This amendment adds the requirement to attach an Asset of Community Value condition to each club operating licence.
8
Clive Betts (Lab)Schedule 5, page 103, line 16, at end insert—
“Enforcement
11A An enforcement condition is a condition requiring a club to incorporate and maintain within its Articles of Association (or equivalent constitutional document) provisions which—
(a) require any person in respect of whom the Regulator makes an order under section 43 to—
(i) transfer the shares and/or voting rights which are held, directly or indirectly, in the club by that person (or by the trustees or members referred to in paragraph 2(5)(a) of Part 1 of Schedule 1),
(ii) terminate that person's right (or that of the trustees or members referred to in paragraph 2(5)(a) of Part 1 of Schedule 1) to exercise, or cease to exercise, significant influence or control over the activities of the club, and
(iii) terminate that person's right (or that of the trustees or members referred to in paragraph 2(5)(a) of Part 1 of Schedule 1) to appoint or remove an officer of the club, and
(b) empower any director of the club, or any trustee appointed by virtue of an order under section 43, to complete, execute and deliver in the name of, and as agent and attorney on behalf of, the person referred to in paragraph 13(a) (or the trustees or members referred to in paragraph 2(5)(a) of Part 1 of Schedule 1) all documents necessary to fulfil that person's obligations under paragraph 13(a).”
This amendment creates an enforcement provision to better enable the removal of an unsuitable owner. It would require a club to amend its articles of association to include a standing set of compulsory share transfer provisions and restrictions on the usual powers of a majority shareholder.
17
Clive Betts (Lab)Schedule 5, page 103, line 16, at end insert—
“Asset of Community Value
11A The Asset of Community Value condition is a condition requiring a club to either—
(a) obtain and maintain Asset of Community Value status for its home ground; or
(b) incorporate into its Articles of Association a restriction which substantially mirrors the restrictions placed on Assets of Community Value under the Localism Act 2011,
and the Secretary of State may create regulations detailing further the implementation of the Asset of Community Value condition.”
The amendment defines the Asset of Community Value condition that clubs are required to obtain for their home ground and is consequential on Amendment 16.
94D
Lord Moynihan (Con)After subsection (5) insert—
“(6) If the report concludes that the IFR’s objectives could be achieved more effectively by delegating an IFR function to the Football Association or a specified competition organiser, then the Secretary of State may, after consulting the Football Association or the specified competition organiser, and with their agreement, transfer responsibility for that function from the IFR to the Football Association or specified competition organiser.”
96
Lord Moynihan (Con)Clause 99, page 78, line 13, at end insert—
“(2A) The Secretary of State may not make regulations under subsection (1) until the Secretary of State has published the guidance about the meaning of significant influence required by Schedule 1, paragraph 15(1).”
94A
Lord Goodman of Wycombe (Con)In subsection (4), line 25, leave out “Secretary of State” and insert “panel”
94B
Lord Goodman of Wycombe (Con)In subsection (5), line 33, leave out “Secretary of State” and insert “panel”
94C
Lord Goodman of Wycombe (Con)In subsection (5)(d), leave out “Secretary of State” and insert “panel”
34
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Schedule 5, page 99, line 38, at end insert—
“(2A) The code of practice should include guidance on the appointment of independent non-executive directors and must recommend the appointment of at least two non-executive directors.”
1
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 1, page 1, line 4, leave out subsection (1) and insert—
“(1) The purpose of this Act is to protect the financial sustainability and success of English football.
(1A) The Secretary of State must, in taking any action under this Act, have regard to this purpose.
(1B) The Independent Football Regulator must, in exercising its functions under this Act, have regard to this purpose.”
This amendment alters the purpose clause to include financial sustainability and success, and to give legal effect by requiring the Secretary of State and the IFR to have regard to that purpose.
2
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 1, page 2, line 2, after the first “of” insert “current and prospective”
This amendment specifies that fans includes current and prospective fans.
35
Baroness Grey-Thompson (XB)Clause 21, page 14, line 6, at end insert “, and
(ii) if the club has a women’s team, ensure the club will meet, or will continue to meet, any licensing criteria applicable to the women’s team and its relevant competitions.”
3
Lord Addington (LD)Clause 1, page 2, line 4, at end insert—
“(c) meets the social responsibility duty set out in section (Social responsibility duty).”
This amendment includes in the definition of English football sustainability the social responsibility duty created by the amendment after Clause 51 in the name of Lord Addington.
38
Lord Goddard of Stockport (LD)Clause 23, page 15, line 24, leave out paragraph (b)
This is part of a package of amendments which introduce safeguards ensuring that clubs have a say in the processes where a league may only step into the IFR’s regulatory role if the club gives consent, and they ensure where a league does step in, its regulatory actions are confined to the club concerned.
40
Lord Goddard of Stockport (LD)Clause 23, page 15, line 40, at end insert—
“(4A) If the club objects to the proposed condition or variation, the IFR must then give a notice about the proposed condition or variation to the specified competition organiser which organises a specified competition in relation to which a relevant team is operated by the club.
(4B) The notice must follow the same specifications as in subsection (3), and the period specified in the notice for making representations or giving a commitment must be a period of not less than 14 days beginning with the day on which the notice is given.”
This is part of a package of amendments which introduce safeguards ensuring that clubs have a say in the processes where a league may only step into the IFR’s regulatory role if the club gives consent, and they ensure where a league does step in, its regulatory actions are confined to the club concerned.
42
Lord Fuller (Con)Clause 26, page 18, line 25, leave out “before a person becomes an owner or officer of a regulated club, or”
This amendment relates to another amendment in the name of Lord Fuller to leave out Clause 27.
43
Lord Fuller (Con)Clause 26, page 18, line 34, leave out “27” and insert “28”
This amendment relates to another amendment in the name of Lord Fuller to leave out Clause 27.
44
Lord Fuller (Con)Clause 26, page 18, line 35, leave out “prospective”
This amendment relates to another amendment in the name of Lord Fuller to leave out Clause 27.
45
Lord Fuller (Con)Leave out Clause 27
This amendment removes the requirement for a person, an individual or a regulated club to notify the IFR when there is only a ‘reasonable prospect’ of that person becoming an owner.
50
Lord Addington (LD)After Clause 51, insert the following new Clause—
“Social responsibility duty
(1) The Secretary of State must by regulations categorise the degree to which regulated clubs must comply with subsection (3) based on the league in which they play.
(2) This categorisation must determine that regulated clubs which play in higher leagues will have a more stringent requirement on them to meet the provision in subsection (3).
(3) The IFR must ensure regulated clubs establish training schemes in local communities.
(4) The training schemes must provide opportunities for individuals in local communities to develop knowledge and skills congruent with becoming—
(a) a sports club, charity, or voluntary group treasurer;
(b) a sports club, charity, or voluntary group secretary;
(c) a sports club, charity, or voluntary chairperson.
(5) Regulated clubs must publish an annual report regarding how they have met the social responsibility duty and its effects.”
This amendment would require the IFR to ensure that regulated clubs provide training to local communities which develop competencies consistent with officers of an organisation.
25
Baroness Brady (Con)Clause 12, page 7, line 38, leave out “sections 21 to 25 (discretionary licence conditions)” and insert “this Act”
27
Lord Ranger of Northwood (Con)Clause 14, page 8, line 37, at end insert—
“(aa) a review of the impact of the activity of the IFR on ticket prices, and”
55
Lord Goddard of Stockport (LD)Clause 55, page 45, line 13, at end insert—
“(6A) A specified competition organiser may add, remove or vary materially a specified competition rule only if the IFR agrees to the addition, removal or variation.”
When taken together, this and another amendment in the name of Lord Goddard provide that a league may only change relevant rules falling within the IFR’s remit if the IFR gives its agreement to the change, and allow the IFR to specify further information that a competition organiser must provide to the IFR when consulting it on a relevant rule change.
56
Lord Goddard of Stockport (LD)Clause 55, page 45, line 17, at end insert—
“(c) include such other information as may be specified by the IFR in rules.”
When taken together, this and another amendment in the name of Lord Goddard provide that a league may only change relevant rules falling within the IFR’s remit if the IFR gives its agreement to the change, and allow the IFR to specify further information that a competition organiser must provide to the IFR when consulting it on a relevant rule change.
60
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 57, page 47, line 32, leave out “five years” and insert “the applicable period (see subsections (7) and (8))”
61
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 57, page 47, line 35, at end insert—
“(7) Where—
(a) the specified competition organisers have agreed (whether in the distribution agreement or otherwise) a period for the purposes of condition 4, and
(b) both of the organisers have notified the IFR of the period so agreed,
the applicable period is that period.
(8) In any other case, the applicable period is five years.”
69
Baroness Brady (Con)Clause 61, page 50, line 30, leave out “relegated from” and insert “in”
71
Baroness Brady (Con)Clause 61, page 50, line 31, at end insert—
“(5A) A notice under subsection (3) must require the specified competition organisers to set out in their final proposal how any relevant revenue distributed through a distribution order under section 62 should be used by recipient clubs, and how such use will directly further the primary principle of the IFR, namely to protect and promote the sustainability of English football.”
73
Baroness Brady (Con)Clause 62, page 51, line 9, leave out from “with” to end of line 11 and insert “the proposal made by the specified competition organiser whose relevant revenue would be distributed under the proposal, unless there are compelling reasons not to do so;”
74
Baroness Brady (Con)Clause 62, page 51, line 22, leave out paragraph (b) and insert—
“(b) recognises and has particular regard to the fact that the distribution of relevant revenue constitutes a prima facie interference in the property rights of the distributor, and”
80
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)After Clause 85, insert the following new Clause—
“Armorial bearings
Nothing in this Act is to be read with prejudice to the powers of the Kings of Arms in regard to armorial bearings.”
83
Lord Addington (LD)Clause 91, page 73, line 40, at end insert—
“(iia) section (Social responsibility duty);”
This amendment would make regulations related to the social responsibility duty created by the amendment after Clause 51 in the name of Lord Addington subject to the affirmative procedure.
91
Lord Goodman of Wycombe (Con)In subsection (1)(a), leave out “carry out” and insert “commission”
92
Lord Goodman of Wycombe (Con)In subsection (1)(c), after “report” insert “on the GOV.UK website”
93
Lord Goodman of Wycombe (Con) After subsection (1) insert—
“(1A) The review must be undertaken by an independent review panel.
(1B) The panel under subsection (1A) must consist of—
(a) at least one person with expertise in competition law,
(b) at least one person with expertise in regulatory policy,
(c) at least one person with expertise in football administration, and
(d) at least one person with expertise in business regulation.”
8
Lord Maude of Horsham (Con)Schedule 2, page 85, line 12, at end insert—
““3A (1)The Secretary of State is to nominate a person (“the nominated person”) to be the chair.
(2)The nominated person must appear before a relevant Parliamentary Committee if invited to do so.
(3)The Secretary of State may not proceed with the appointment of the nominated person unless the relevant Parliamentary Committee has held a confirmatory vote if the Committee wishes to do so.
(4)Where the relevant Parliamentary Committee has expressed a negative opinion on the appointment of the nominated person, the Secretary of State may not proceed with the appointment of the nominated person.
(5)Where the relevant Parliamentary Committee has expressed a positive opinion on the appointment of the nominated person, the Secretary of State may proceed with the appointment of the nominated person.
(6)A relevant Parliamentary Committee is any Committee of the House of Commons, or House of Lords, or of both Houses, which has notified the Secretary of State, in writing, that they have assumed the function of scrutiny of football regulation.”
This amendment provides that the chair may undergo pre-appointment scrutiny and be approved by a select committee of Parliament.
36
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 22, page 14, line 33, at end insert “or conduct which it reasonably suspects to be harmful to the interests of the United Kingdom”
This amendment permits the Regulator to restrict funding for clubs which may be linked to conduct harmful to the interests of the United Kingdom.
4
Lord Moynihan (Con)Clause 1, page 2, line 4, at end insert—
“(3A) In exercising their powers and functions under this Act, the Secretary of State or the IFR may not act in a way which conflicts with any regulations or rules of international football governing bodies.”
5
Lord Moynihan (Con)Clause 2, page 2, line 16, at end insert—
““international football governing bodies” means FIFA and UEFA and any successor bodies to those organisations;”
6
Lord Moynihan (Con)Clause 2, page 2, line 31, leave out subsection (3) and insert—
“(3) For the purposes of this Act a “specified competition” includes—
(a) the Premier League,
(b) the English Football League, and
(c) the National League,
and any successors to those leagues.
(3A) The Secretary of State may by regulations made by statutory instrument amend the competitions specified in section (3).”
39
Lord Goddard of Stockport (LD)Clause 23, page 15, line 31, leave out paragraph (c) and insert—
“(c) in the case of a notice given to a club, invite—
(i) the club to make representations about the proposed condition or variation, and
(ca) in the case of a notice given to a specified competition organiser, invite the specified competition organiser—
(i) to make representations about the proposed condition or variation, and
(ii) to give a commitment to take action in lieu of the proposed condition or variation,”
This is part of a package of amendments which introduce safeguards ensuring that clubs have a say in the processes where league may only step into the IFR’s regulatory role if the club gives consent, and they ensure where a league does step in, its regulatory actions are confined to the club concerned.
7
Lord Moynihan (Con)Clause 3, page 3, line 15, leave out “influence or”
41
Lord Goddard of Stockport (LD)Clause 24, page 16, line 20, at end insert—
“(c) the club agrees to the commitment, and
(d) the commitment relates only to the club.”
This is part of a package of amendments which introduce safeguards ensuring that clubs have a say in the processes where league may only step into the IFR’s regulatory role if the club gives consent, and they ensure where a league does step in, its regulatory actions are confined to the club concerned.
16
Lord Moynihan (Con)Clause 7, page 5, line 34, at end insert—
“(f) its duties under section (Protection against trade disputes).”
46
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 37, page 28, line 28, at end insert—
“(fa) whether the individual is reasonably believed to be, or have been, involved in terrorism related activity;”
This amendment permits the regulator to restrict funding from sources that may be reasonably believed to relate to terrorism.
47
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 37, page 29, line 2, at end insert—
“(3A) In making a determination under this Part, the IFR may consult—
(a) the National Crime Agency;
(b) the Security Service;
(c) the Secret Intelligence Service;
(d) the Government Communications Headquarters;
(d) the Serious Fraud Office;
(e) His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs.”
This amendment permits the regulator to consult the bodies listed when making a determination of owners and officers.
21
Lord Birt (XB)Clause 10, page 6, line 35, at end insert “, including its global appeal”
22
Lord Birt (XB)Clause 10, page 7, line 7, at end insert—
“(4A) If a specified competition organiser makes an application under section 57, and more than two years have passed since the most recent state of the game report, the IFR shall update the state of the game report as necessary within three months of the date of the specified competition organiser’s application under section 57.”
23
Lord Addington (LD)After Clause 10, insert the following new Clause—
“Review of advertising and sponsorship related to gambling in English football
(1) Within one year of establishment, the IFR must conduct a review of advertising and sponsorship related to gambling in English football.
(2) The review must make recommendations regarding the necessary steps to achieve the elimination of advertising and sponsorship related to gambling in English football within five years of the day on which this Act is passed.
(3) The Secretary of State must lay the review before Parliament.”
This amendment requires the IFR to conduct a review and make recommendations regarding the steps required to eliminate advertising and sponsorship related to gambling in English football.
52
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 54, page 43, line 38, leave out subsection (2)
This amendment requires the regulator to consult on all changes to levy rules.
54
Lord Addington (LD)After Clause 54, insert the following new Clause—
“Duty to phase-out advertising and sponsorship related to gambling in English football
(1) The Secretary of State and the IFR must take all necessary steps to achieve the phase-out of advertising and sponsorship related to gambling in English football within 3 years of the passing of this Act.
(2) “Phase-out” means gradual elimination reaching an end-state of total elimination.”
This amendment requires the SoS and IFR to gradually eliminate advertising and sponsorship related to gambling in English football.
26
Lord Moynihan (Con)After Clause 13, insert the following new Clause—
“Protection against trade disputes
(1) The IFR must, in exercising its functions under this Act, ensure that any decisions or interventions affecting financial distributions or commercial operations—
(a) are fully compliant with the United Kingdom’s obligations under international trade agreements and bilateral investment treaties, including but not limited to—
(i) fair and equitable treatment standards for foreign investors,
(ii) protections against indirect expropriation, and
(iii) national treatment obligations,
(b) do not result in a regulatory framework that disproportionately or discriminatorily impacts clubs owned by foreign investors compared to those owned by United Kingdom entities.
(2) The IFR must consult with HM Treasury and the Department for Business and Trade before any major intervention affecting financial distributions or commercial operations, to assess whether the proposed action risks an international trade dispute or investor-state claim against the United Kingdom.”
This amendment seeks to address issues stemming from the high level of international ownership in the Premier League and the potential impact on trade and investment treaties of decisions affecting financial distributions.
57
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 56, page 45, line 32, leave out subsection (2) and insert—
“(2) In this Part, revenue received by a specified competition organiser is “relevant revenue” if—
(a) it is revenue received as a result of the sale or acquisition of rights to exploit the broadcasting of football matches included in a competition organised by the specified competition organiser, and
(b) it is not revenue that the specified competition organiser distributes to a club by virtue of a team operated by the club being relegated from a competition organised by the specified competition organiser.”
This amendment, and the other amendments to clause 62 in the name of Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay, prohibit parachute payments from being included in the distributions of revenue resolution procedure.
58
Lord Birt (XB)Clause 57, page 47, line 5, leave out “following conditions” and insert “conditions in subsections (3) to (6)”
59
Lord Birt (XB)Clause 57, page 47, line 6, at end insert—
“(b) that specified competition organiser has not already made an application to the IFR under subsection (1) within the last 5 years,
(c) the specified competition organiser has not agreed with the other specified competition organiser to exclude the effect of subsection (1) and the resolution process (and for that purpose a specified competition organiser may agree with another specified competition organiser to exclude the effect of subsection (1) and the resolution process for a period of up to 5 years),
(d) where the specified competition organiser has, with the prior written approval of the IFR, agreed with the other specified competition organiser to modify the effect of subsection (1) and the terms of the resolution process as between them for a period of up to 10 years, the application under subsection (1) is consistent with that agreement, and
(e) the latest version of the state of the game report was published at least 60 days before the date of the specified competition organiser’s application.”
64
Lord Birt (XB)Clause 59, page 49, line 8, at end insert—
“(5A) If the IFR is required to update the state of the game report under section 10(5), the IFR shall notify the specified competition organisers as to its expected timeframe for publishing the updated state of the game report.”
65
Lord Birt (XB)Clause 59, page 49, line 13, at end insert “, but if the IFR is required to update the state of the game report under section 10(5), the IFR’s deadline shall be within the period of 60 days from the publication date of the updated state of the game report”
67
Lord Birt (XB)Leave out Clause 60 and insert the following new Clause—
“Appointment of the panel and mediation process
(1) This section applies where the IFR gives a notice under section 59(5).
(2) Within 14 days of the IFR issuing a notice under section 59(5)—
(a) the IFR must nominate an individual to act as the chair (the “Chair”) of a three-person panel (the “Panel”), and
(b) the two specified competition organisers to which the section 59(5) notice was given may each nominate one individual to sit on the Panel.
(3) If a specified competition organiser fails to nominate a Panel member in time, then the IFR will make the nomination itself as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter.
(4) The Panel’s powers are set out in this section and section (The Panel’s distribution order).
(5) The Panel shall first facilitate the mediation process set out in subsections (11) to (14) below.
(6) The Chair shall lead the mediation process with the assistance of the two other Panel members (but the Panel is not an arbitral tribunal for the purposes of the Arbitration Act 1996).
(7) If that process does not resolve the matter, then the Panel must make a distribution order under section (The Panel’s distribution order).
(8) The Chair of the Panel must—
(a) be a qualified solicitor or barrister in England and Wales with more than 15 years’ post-call or post-qualification experience,
(b) have previous experience of acting as a mediator, and
(c) have significant experience in sports law or competition law.
(9) All members of the Panel must—
(a) have appropriate skills and experience,
(b) be independent of the party appointing them, the other specified competition organiser, and the IFR,
(c) be able to render an impartial decision, and
(d) complete a statement of independence and impartiality in such form as the IFR may require from time to time before acting as a Panel member.
(10) The IFR may extend the period in subsection (2) by up to a further 14 days if it considers there are special reasons for doing so.
(11) The Panel shall mediate negotiations between the specified competition organisers to resolve the question or questions for resolution until whichever of the following events occurs first—
(a) the specified competition organisers resolve the question or questions for resolution (whether by entering into a distribution agreement or otherwise), or
(b) the end of the period of 85 days from the day on which the Panel is fully constituted (the “Resolution Period”).
(12) The Panel shall have discretion to facilitate discussions between the specified competition organisers as it sees fit, provided that the following steps are mandatory—
(a) the specified competition organisers must submit their initial written proposals for resolving the question or questions to the Panel by day 7 of the Resolution Period,
(b) the specified competition organisers must submit their first final proposals for resolving the question or questions to the Panel by day 50 of the Resolution Period,
(c) the specified competition organisers must submit their final proposals for resolving the question or questions to the Panel by day 75 of the Resolution Period,
(d) by day 85 of the Resolution Period, the specified competition organisers must decide whether to agree to one of the parties’ final proposals or another mutually acceptable arrangement, and
(e) if the specified competition organisers do not agree to a settlement under paragraph (d), the Panel must proceed to determine the remaining question or questions for resolution itself under section (The Panel’s distribution order).
(13) During the mediation process, the Panel must—
(a) facilitate good faith discussions between the relevant competition organisers,
(b) in plenary sessions, interrogate each competition organiser’s initial, first final, and final proposals against the criteria in section (The Panel’s distribution order)(3),
(c) encourage the specified competition organisers to discuss issues in the latest state of the game report,
(d) provide recommendations to the relevant competition organisers for resolving the questions for resolution,
(e) procure that all parties maintain the confidentiality of all commercially sensitive information,
(f) give equal opportunity to all relevant competition organisers to present proposals,
(g) focus on achieving mutually acceptable solutions, and
(h) keep confidential any information privately communicated by any specified competition organiser to the Panel during the mediation process, and not share it with any other person without the prior written consent of the relevant specified competition organiser.
(14) The Panel may—
(a) extend the Resolution Period once by up to 30 days where all parties agree or the Panel considers in its sole discretion that substantial progress towards agreement is being made,
(b) require the specified competition organisers to attend meetings in person or virtually,
(c) appoint independent experts to provide analysis on the questions for resolution, and
(d) permit the specified competition organisers to make submissions, provide evidence, or adduce expert evidence, as it sees fit.”
70
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 61, page 50, line 31, at end insert—
“(5A) Where the Secretary of State has specified in regulations under section 56(2)(b) that relevant revenue may include relegation revenue, a final proposal under this section must not propose the prohibition of a specified competition organiser distributing relegation revenue to regulated clubs.”
This amendment prohibits a final proposal from abolishing parachute payments.
72
Lord Birt (XB)Leave out Clause 61 and insert the following new Clause—
“The Panel’s distribution order
(1) If the matter is not fully resolved by day 85 of the Resolution Period, any unresolved questions shall be referred to, and finally resolved by, the Panel as follows—
(a) the Panel shall notify the specified competition organisers that it is proceeding with the determination process on the first day after the end of the Resolution Period,
(b) the Panel shall comprise the same individuals appointed under section (Appointment of the panel and mediation process)(2),
(c) the Chair shall have discretion to determine the procedure for the Panel’s determination process,
(d) the Panel shall use its best endeavours to issue a determination on all unresolved questions within 14 days of its notice under subsection (1)(a), and
(e) the Panel shall provide full written reasons for its determination.
(2) The Panel shall make a distribution order that requires the relevant revenue to be distributed in accordance with—
(a) one specified competition organiser’s final proposal in full,
(b) part of one specified competition organiser’s final proposal,
(c) part of both specified competition organisers’ final proposals, or
(d) the Panel’s own determination on the questions for resolution where the Panel considers that neither competition organiser’s final proposal is wholly consistent with the principles in subsection (3).
(3) The Panel’s distribution order must—
(a) advance the IFR’s objectives,
(b) not place an undue burden on the commercial interests of either specified competition organiser,
(c) not allow a lower amount of relegation revenue to be distributed to a club during the relevant period than would have been distributed to the club during that period had the resolution process not occurred—
“relegation revenue” means revenue distributed by a specified competition organiser to a club in consequence of a team operated by the club being relegated from a specified competition organised by the specified competition organiser, and
“relevant period” , in relation to a final proposal, means the period of one year beginning with the final day of the first football season in respect of which relegation revenue would be distributed in pursuance of any distribution order made in accordance with the final proposal,
(d) address the evidence set out in the latest state of the game report, including in relation to—
(i) the circumstances affecting the health and effectiveness of clubs in major football leagues around the world, and
(ii) the position of the English leagues in relation to football leagues in other nations,
(e) maintain the international competitiveness and appeal of English football,
(f) promote growth and investor confidence across the English professional football game,
(g) not adversely affect the competitive balance in individual leagues,
(h) not adversely affect the competitive balance across the leagues, nor prevent well-managed clubs from rising up the football pyramid,
(i) not adversely affect the ability of clubs to move between leagues by promotion or relegation without risking financial instability and unfair competition,
(j) ensure long-term investment in stadia, facilities and youth development,
(k) have regard to the contribution intended to be made by the specified competition organisers to the wider football community, and
(l) have regard to the purpose to which a specified competition organiser will put any relevant revenue that it will receive by way of distribution.
(4) The Panel shall have the power to award that all or part of the legal or other expenses incurred in relation to the resolution process by a specified competition organiser, the Panel, and the IFR must be paid by another specified competition organiser.
(5) The Panel shall decide the amount of such costs on such reasonable basis as it thinks appropriate, provided that it must have regard to—
(a) each relevant competition organiser’s conduct during the resolution process,
(b) the extent to which each specified competition organiser genuinely attempted to resolve the questions in dispute, their level of co-operation in facilitating the resolution process, and their compliance with any requests made by the Panel during the resolution process, and
(c) any delay or failure to engage in the resolution process in any respect.”
75
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 62, page 51, line 24, leave out paragraph (c)
This amendment, and the other amendments to clauses 56 and 62 in the name of Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay, prohibit parachute payments from being included in the distributions of revenue resolution procedure.
76
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 62, page 51, line 29, leave out subsection (3)
This amendment, and the other amendments to clauses 56 and 62 in the name of Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay, prohibit parachute payments from being included in the distributions of revenue resolution procedure.
77
Lord Birt (XB)Leave out Clause 62 and insert the following new Clause—
“Appeals
(1) A specified competition organiser may appeal the Panel’s distribution order by sending a notice of appeal to the Chair of the IFR within 10 days of the date of the Panel’s determination.
(2) The appeal shall be heard in private by a three-person arbitral tribunal seated in England and Wales (the “Appeal Tribunal”).
(3) Within 14 days of the notice of appeal—
(a) the Chair of the IFR shall nominate an individual, who holds, or has held, high judicial office within the meaning of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, to act as chair of the Appeal Tribunal,
(b) the two specified competition organisers may each nominate one arbitrator to the Appeal Tribunal, and
(c) if a specified competition organiser fails to nominate an arbitrator in time, then the IFR will make the nomination itself as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter.
(4) The only grounds for an appeal of the Panel’s determination are that it was—
(a) based on an error of law,
(b) reached as result of procedural errors that have caused, or will cause, substantial injustice to the applicant, or
(c) a decision that no Panel who had applied their minds properly to the facts of the case could reasonably have reached.
(5) The Appeal Tribunal shall have the power to—
(a) allow the appeal,
(b) dismiss the appeal,
(c) vary or discharge the Panel’s distribution order,
(d) order a party to pay or contribute to the costs of the appeal including the Appeal Tribunal’s fees and expenses, and
(e) make such other order as it thinks fit.
(6) The chair of the Appeal Tribunal shall decide all procedural and evidential matters for the appeal.
(7) The Appeal Tribunal must use its best endeavours to issue its final award within 45 days of the notice of appeal.
(8) Subject to the provisions of sections 67 to 71 of the Arbitration Act 1996, or any re-enactment or amendment for the time being in force, the Appeal Tribunal’s award shall be final and binding on the specified competition organisers and the IFR.
(9) There shall be no right of appeal on a point of law under section 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996.
(10) The Secretary of State may by regulations amend subsections (1) to (9) to make new rules to govern the conduct of appeals of distribution orders.”
81
Lord Maude of Horsham (Con)After Clause 89, insert the following new Clause—
“Review: cost of compliance
Within one year of the day on which section 15 of this Act comes into force, the Secretary of State must lay before Parliament a review of the financial impact on regulated clubs of complying with the provisions in this Act.”
82
Lord Moynihan (Con)Clause 91, page 73, line 39, at end insert—
“(aa) section 2(3A)”
84
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 91, page 74, line 1, leave out paragraph (iii)
This amendment, and the other amendments to clauses 56 and 62 in the name of Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay, prohibits parachute payments from being included in the distributions of revenue resolution procedure.
85
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 91, page 74, line 12, leave out subsection (5)
This amendment removes the de-hybridising provision for statutory instruments.
94
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport) After subsection (3)(e) insert—
“(f) assess the impact of this Act and the operations of the IFR on ticket prices.”
95
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 99, page 78, line 13, at end insert—
“(2A) The Secretary of State may only make regulations for Part 3 to come into effect at the end of a relevant football season.”
This amendment states the regulator can only implement the licensing regime at the end of a football season.
10
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 2, page 90, line 16, after “six” insert “or more than twenty”
This amendment limits the number of people who can be appointed to the Expert Panel.
31
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Con)Schedule 5, page 99, line 11, leave out paragraph (ii)
This amendment, along with the other amendment in the name of Lord Jackson of Peterborough to Schedule 5, is intended to remove the equality, diversity and inclusion provisions of the Bill.
32
Baroness Twycross (Lab) - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)Schedule 5, page 99, line 36, at end insert—
“(ca) how the club contributes to the economic and social well-being of the local community with which it is associated,”
This amendment makes a club’s contribution to the economic and social well-being of its local community part of its corporate governance.
33
Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated)Schedule 5, page 99, line 37, leave out sub-sub-paragraph (d)
This amendment, along with the other amendment in the name of Lord Jackson of Peterborough to Schedule 5, is intended to remove the equality, diversity and inclusion provisions of the Bill.
37
Baroness Twycross (Lab) - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)Clause 22, page 15, line 14, leave out “such persons as the IFR considers appropriate” and insert “—
(a) all regulated clubs,
(b) each specified competition organiser, and
(c) such other persons as the IFR considers appropriate.”
This amendment requires the IFR to consult clubs and competition organisers, in addition to other persons it considers appropriate, before making a request to the Secretary of State to make regulations amending the types of discretionary licence condition set out in clause 22(1), (2) and (3).
17
Baroness Twycross (Lab) - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)Clause 8, page 6, line 6, leave out sub-paragraphs (i) to (iii) and insert—
“(i) persons on whom it may impose requirements or restrictions, namely clubs, owners, senior managers and other officers of clubs, and competition organisers, and
(ii) other persons who may be affected by its decisions, including players and fans;”
This amendment amends the regulatory principle in clause 8(b) so that the IFR should co-operate, and proactively and constructively engage, with persons who may be affected by its decisions.
18
Baroness Twycross (Lab) - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)Clause 8, page 6, line 9, at end insert—
“(ba) it should, before it imposes any requirement or restriction on a person, have regard to whether the requirement or restriction is necessary and whether a similar outcome could be achieved by less burdensome means;”
This amendment includes a regulatory principle that the IFR should, before it imposes any requirement or restriction on a person, have regard to whether it is necessary and whether a similar outcome could be achieved by less burdensome means.
49
Baroness Twycross (Lab) - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)Clause 49, page 40, line 27, leave out from “to” to end of line 28 and insert—
“(a) any emblem or crest of a relevant team operated by the club, or
(b) the predominant home shirt colours of such a team,”
This amendment adds a reference to a team’s “emblem” alongside “crest”, to avoid confusion with the heraldic use of the term “crest”.
28
Lord Moynihan (Con)Clause 16, page 10, line 14, at end insert—
“(4A) A club is not required to provide the information specified in subsections (4)(a) or (b) until the definition of “significant influence” has been consulted on and established by the Secretary of State under Schedule 1, paragraph 15(1).”
63
Baroness Twycross (Lab) - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)Clause 59, page 49, line 8, at end insert “, and
(iii) any findings in the IFR’s most recent state of the game report that the IFR considers relevant to the question or questions for resolution.”
This amendment requires the IFR to include in the notice under clause 59(5) the findings in its most recent state of the game report that it considers relevant to the question or questions for resolution.
87
Baroness Twycross (Lab) - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)Clause 92, page 75, line 15, leave out paragraph (a)
This amendment removes the Secretary of State’s power to amend the definition of “football season”.
90
Baroness Twycross (Lab) - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)After Clause 95, insert the following new Clause—
“Review of Act
(1) The Secretary of State must—
(a) carry out a review of the operation and effect of this Act,
(b) set out the conclusions of the review in a report,
(c) publish the report, and
(d) lay a copy of the report before Parliament.
(2) The report must be published before the end of the period of five years beginning with the day on which section 15 comes fully into force.
(3) The report must, in particular—
(a) assess the extent to which the objectives intended to be achieved by this Act have been achieved,
(b) assess whether those objectives remain appropriate and, if so, the extent to which they could be achieved more effectively in any other way (for example if the IFR could delegate its functions to persons other than those listed in paragraph 17(1) of Schedule 2),
(c) assess the impact of this Act and the IFR’s actions on football in England and Wales,
(d) assess the interaction between this Act and the rules, requirements and restrictions imposed by competition organisers and whether that interaction is appropriate, and
(e) assess whether the appropriate competitions are specified under section 2(3), including whether a competition that is not specified should be specified.
(4) In carrying out the review, the Secretary of State must have regard to—
(a) the purpose of the Act (see section 1);
(b) the IFR’s objectives (see section 6);
(c) the IFR’s general duties (see section 7);
(d) the IFR’s regulatory principles (see section 8);
(e) any state of the game report published by the IFR (see section 10);
(f) any annual report submitted to the Secretary of State by the IFR (see section 14).
(5) Before publishing the report, the Secretary of State must prepare a draft report and consult the following about the draft report—
(a) the IFR,
(b) the Football Association,
(c) each specified competition organiser, and
(d) such other persons as the Secretary of State considers appropriate.”
The amendment requires the Secretary of State to carry out a review of the Act and publish and lay before Parliament a report setting out the conclusions of that review.
30
Baroness Twycross (Lab) - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)Schedule 4, page 97, line 27, leave out paragraph (b) and insert—
“(b) any emblem or crest of a relevant team operated by the club;
(ba) the predominant home shirt colours of a relevant team operated by the club;”
This amendment adds a reference to a team’s “emblem” alongside “crest”, to avoid confusion with the heraldic use of the term “crest”.
19
Lord Pannick (XB)At end insert “and it should seek to exercise its functions with a light-touch, conferring a broad margin of discretion on such persons”
This amendment seeks to state as a regulatory principle that the IFR must regulate with a light-touch.
12
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green)Clause 6, page 5, line 14, at end insert—
“(d) to monitor and promote the reduction of English football’s climate and environmental impacts (referred to in this Act as “the environmental objective”).”
This amendment would add climate and environment impact reduction to the IFR’s objectives.
14
Baroness Twycross (Lab) - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)Clause 7, page 5, line 26, leave out “financial investment in” and insert “the financial growth of, or financial investment in,”
This amendment requires the IFR to have regard to the desirability of exercising its functions in a way that avoids any adverse effects on the financial growth of English football.
48
Baroness Twycross (Lab) - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)Clause 46, page 38, line 39, leave out “carries on an activity” and insert “takes any step”
This amendment corrects a drafting inconsistency in clause 46.
20
Baroness Twycross (Lab) - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)Clause 8, page 6, line 13, leave out “recognises” and insert “has regard to”
This amendment makes a minor drafting change to the regulatory principle in clause 8(d).
51
Baroness Twycross (Lab) - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)Clause 53, page 43, line 19, at end insert—
“(8A) If levy rules make the provision mentioned in subsection (8)(b), they must provide—
(a) for the rate at which interest is charged not to exceed an annual percentage rate of 5% plus the Bank of England base rate,
(b) that the IFR may charge interest at a rate determined by the IFR that is lower than the rate that would otherwise be applicable under the rules, where the IFR considers that appropriate, and
(c) that the IFR may disapply a requirement for interest to be charged, where the IFR considers that appropriate.”
This amendment caps the rate of interest on late levy payments that the IFR may provide for in the levy rules at an annual percentage rate of 5% plus Bank of England base rate and gives the IFR discretion to charge a lower rate of interest or no interest in particular cases.
24
Baroness Twycross (Lab) - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)Clause 11, page 7, line 26, leave out “three” and insert “five”
This amendment changes the minimum frequency of revised football governance statements from every three years to every five years.
53
Lord Addington (LD)After Clause 54, insert the following new Clause—
“Duty to prevent advertising and sponsorship related to gambling in English football
English football must not promote or engage in advertising or sponsorship related to gambling.”
This amendment prevents regulated clubs and competitions from promoting or engaging in gambling advertising or sponsorship.
62
Baroness Twycross (Lab) - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)Clause 59, page 48, line 34, at end insert “, and
(c) considers that the question or questions for resolution could not be resolved within a reasonable period of time by the IFR exercising any of its other functions under this Act.”
This amendment requires the IFR to consider whether the question or questions for resolution could be resolved by the IFR exercising any of its other functions before deciding to trigger the resolution process.
66
Baroness Twycross (Lab) - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)Clause 60, page 50, line 6, at end insert—
“(6A) The IFR must extend the period in
subsection (6)(b)
—
(a) if requested in writing to do so by the mediator, and
(b) by such period as is set out in the request, which may be up to a further 28 days.
(6B) The period in
subsection (6)(b)
may only be extended once.”
This amendment requires the IFR to extend the mediation period by up to a further 28 days if requested to do so by the mediator.
68
Baroness Twycross (Lab) - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)Clause 61, page 50, line 27, leave out from beginning to “require” in line 28 and insert “Where a notice under subsection (3) sets out a question for resolution that relates to relegation revenue (within the meaning given by ), the notice must”
section 62(3)
This amendment requires specified competition organisers to include in their final proposal the explanation described in clause 61(5) where there is a question for resolution that relates to relegation revenue.
78
Baroness Twycross (Lab) - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)Schedule 9, page 116, line 13, leave out sub-paragraph (3)
This amendment removes the definition of “Bank of England base rate” in order for it to be moved to the definitions clause.
79
Baroness Twycross (Lab) - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)Schedule 10, page 117, line 36, column 1, leave out from “the” to “mentioned” in line 37 and insert “taking of any step”
This amendment is consequential on the amendment to clause 46 at line 39.
86
Baroness Twycross (Lab) - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)Clause 92, page 74, line 19, at end insert—
““Bank of England base rate” means—
(a) the percentage rate announced from time to time by the Monetary Policy Committee of the Bank of England as the official dealing rate, being the rate at which the Bank is willing to enter into transactions for providing short term liquidity in the money markets, or
(b) where an order under section 19 of the Bank of England Act 1998 is in force, any equivalent percentage rate determined by the Treasury under that section;”
This amendment, together with an amendment to paragraph 13 of Schedule 9, moves the definition of “Bank of England base rate” into the overarching definitions clause from Schedule 9.
88
Baroness Twycross (Lab) - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)Schedule 11, page 119, line 8, at end insert— Bank of England base rate section 92(1)
“
”
This amendment inserts a cross-reference to the definition of “Bank of England base rate” into the table in Schedule 11 of defined terms used in more than one place.
89
Baroness Twycross (Lab) - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)Schedule 11, page 120, line 30, at end insert— relegation revenue section 62(3)
“
”
This amendment is consequential on the amendment to clause 61 at line 27 and it adds the defined term “relegation revenue” to the table in Schedule 11 of defined terms used in more than one place.
9
Baroness Twycross (Lab) - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)Schedule 2, page 85, line 37, at end insert—
“Declaration and registration of interests of members of the Board
6A (1)The IFR must establish and maintain a system for the declaration and registration of relevant interests of members of the Board.
(2)In this paragraph “relevant interest”, in relation to a member of the Board, means a financial or other interest that may be relevant to the IFR’s exercise of its functions under this Act.”
This amendment requires the IFR to establish and maintain a system for the declaration and registration of relevant interests of members of the Board.
11
Baroness Twycross (Lab) - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)Schedule 2, page 91, line 3, at end insert—
“Declaration and registration of interests of members of the Expert Panel
23A (1)The IFR must establish and maintain a system for the declaration and registration of relevant interests of members of the Expert Panel.
(2)In this paragraph “relevant interest”, in relation to a member of the Expert Panel, means a financial or other interest that may be relevant to the IFR’s exercise of its functions under this Act.”
This amendment requires the IFR to establish and maintain a system for the declaration and registration of relevant interests of members of the Expert Panel.
29
Lord Addington (LD)Schedule 4, page 97, line 24, at end insert—
“(f) the club’s use of advertising and sponsorship by gambling companies, their affiliates, and partner organisations.”
This amendment requires clubs to consult fans regarding the club’s use of advertising and sponsorship by gambling companies, their affiliates, and partner organisations.
Clause 7, page 5, line 26, at end insert-"(d) adverse effects on the growth of English football.”
Clause 8, page 6, line 6, leave out sub-paragraphs (i) to (iii) and insert - "(i) persons on whom it may impose requirements or restrictions, namely clubs, owners, senior managers and other officers of clubs, and competition organisers, and (ii) other persons who may be affected by its decisions, including players and fans;”
Clause 8, page 6, line 9, at end insert - "(ba) it should, before it imposes any requirement or restriction on a person, have regard to whether the requirement or restriction is necessary and whether a similar outcome could be achieved by less burdensome means;”
Schedule 4, page 97, line 27, leave out paragraph (b) and insert- "(b) any emblem or crest of a relevant team operated by the club; (ba) the predominant home shirt colours of a relevant team operated by the club;”
Schedule 5, page 99, line 36, at end insert- "(ca) how the club contributes to the economic and social well-being of the local community with which it is associated,"
Clause 22, page 15, line 14, leave out “such persons as the IFR considers appropriate" and insert " (a) all regulated clubs, (b) each specified competition organiser, and (c) such other persons as the IFR considers appropriate."
Clause 49, page 40, line 27, leave out from “to” to end of line 28 and insert- "(a) any emblem or crest of a relevant team operated by the club, or (b) the predominant home shirt colours of such a team,”
Clause 59, page 49, line 8, at end insert “, and (iii) any findings in the IFR's most recent state of the game report that the IFR considers relevant to the question or questions for resolution.
Clause 92, page 75, line 15, leave out paragraph (a)
After Clause 95, insert the following new Clause- "Review of Act (1) The Secretary of State must- (a) carry out a review of the operation and effect of this Act, (b) set out the conclusions of the review in a report, (c) publish the report, and (d) lay a copy of the report before Parliament. (2) The report must be published before the end of the period of five years beginning with the day on which section 15 comes fully into force. (3) The report must, in particular – (a) assess the extent to which the objectives intended to be achieved by this Act have been achieved, (b) assess whether those objectives remain appropriate and, if so, the extent to which they could be achieved more effectively in any other way (for example if the IFR could delegate its functions to persons other than those listed in paragraph 17(1) of Schedule 2), (c) assess the impact of this Act and the IFR’s actions on football in England and Wales, (d) assess the interaction between this Act and the rules, requirements and restrictions imposed by competition organisers and whether that interaction is appropriate, and (e) assess whether the appropriate competitions are specified under section 2(3), including whether a competition that is not specified should be specified.
15
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 7, page 5, line 26, at end insert—
“(d) adverse effects on the growth of English football.”
13
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green)Clause 7, page 5, line 19, at end insert—
“(c) is compatible with the Climate Change Act 2008 and secures the long-term environmental sustainability of English football.”
295A
Lord Birt (XB)Clause 60, page 49, line 21, after “given” insert “and to the extent that the question or questions for resolution relate to financial distributions, that mediator must be appointed in accordance with the requirements in section (Appointment of mediator) to section (Guidance and review)”
297A
Lord Birt (XB)After Clause 60, insert the following new Clause—
“Appointment of mediator
(1) Where any question for resolution relates to financial distributions between specified competition organisers, the IFR must appoint as a mediator a person who—
(a) holds, or has held, high judicial office within the meaning of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005,
(b) has significant experience in sports law or competition law at a senior level, and
(c) has not, within the five years preceding appointment—
(i) held any position with a regulated club or competition organiser;
(ii) had any material financial interest in a regulated club or competition organiser;
(iii) acted in any professional capacity that might reasonably be considered to affect their independence in relation to matters under this Part.
(2) Before appointing an mediator to which this section applies, the IFR must consult with specified competition organisers.”
297B
Lord Birt (XB)After Clause 60, insert the following new Clause—
“Resolution process and initial procedures
(1) This section applies where mediation under section 60 comes to an end by virtue of the occurrence of an event within section 60(6)(b), (c) or (d).
(2) As soon as reasonably practicable after the occurrence of an event under subsection (1), the IFR must appoint an arbitrator and refer the matter to arbitration.
(3) A person appointed as an arbitrator under subsection (2) must be a person who the IFR considers to have appropriate skills and experience and, if the dispute relates to financial distributions between specified competition organisers, must be a person who meets the requirements of section (Appointment of mediator)(1).
(3) Upon the referral under subsection (2), the arbitrator must—
(a) within 14 days, notify all specified competition organisers—
(i) that a referral has been made by the IFR,
(ii) of the grounds for referral,
(iii) of the timetable for proceedings,
(iv) of their rights to make representations, and
(b) establish a resolution period of 90 days beginning with the date of notification.
(3) During the resolution period, each specified competition organiser must—
(a) submit initial proposals for financial distribution arrangements including detailed financial projections, implementation mechanisms, supporting evidence and impact assessments;
(b) engage constructively in resolution discussions;
(c) provide such information as the arbitrator reasonably requires;
(d) maintain confidentiality of commercially sensitive information.
(4) The arbitrator must, during the resolution period—
(a) facilitate structured discussions between parties;
(b) evaluate submitted proposals against the principles in section (Principles of determination);
(c) identify areas of potential compromise;
(d) provide non-binding recommendations for resolution;
(e) maintain detailed records of all submissions received, discussions held, positions taken by parties and, attempts at compromise.
(5) The arbitrator may—
(a) extend the resolution period once by up to 30 days where all parties agree or substantial progress toward agreement is being made;
(b) require parties to attend meetings;
(c) appoint independent experts to provide analysis;
(d) establish working groups on specific issues.”
297C
Lord Birt (XB)After Clause 60, insert the following new Clause—
“Determination process
(1) Where no agreement is reached during the resolution period, the arbitrator must commence determination proceedings by—
(a) notifying all parties within seven days that determination will proceed;
(b) establishing a 60-day determination period;
(c) requiring final submissions from all parties within 21 days including detailed financial proposals, supporting evidence and analysis for their respective positions, implementation plans and an assessment of the impact of that party’s proposal.
(2) During the determination period, the arbitrator must—
(a) evaluate all submissions against the principles in section (Principles of determination);
(b) consider—
(i) the evidence presented by the parties;
(ii) any expert analysis;
(iii) any systemic implications;
(iv) the practicality of implementing the parties’ proposals;
(c) maintain detailed records of all evaluation processes;
(d) protect commercially sensitive information.
(3) The Arbitrator must within the determination period—
(a) reach a determination that—
(i) meets all principles in section (Principles of determination);
(ii) is practically implementable;
(iii) includes clear transitional provisions;
(b) prepare a detailed determination report including—
(i) analysis of all submissions;
(ii) reasoning for decisions made;
(iii) assessment against principles;
(iv) implementation requirements;
(c) notify all parties of the determination.”
297D
Lord Birt (XB)After Clause 60, insert the following new Clause—
“Principles of determination
Any determination under section (Determination process)(3) must—
(a) be necessary to advance the IFR's objectives in section 6, consistent with its general duties and regulatory principles in sections 7 and 8;
(b) represent the least intrusive measures necessary to advance those objectives, and in particular to ensure the financial sustainability of prudently-run clubs;
(c) respect the following fundamental rights and interests—
(i) the contractual and property rights of regulated clubs and competition organisers;
(ii) the legitimate commercial interests of regulated clubs and competition organisers;
(d) have regard to whether the parties have acted in good faith in connection with the resolution process under this Part;
(e) not result in any prudently-run regulated club being at risk of breaching its obligations under the rules of the relevant specified competition organiser or other applicable financial rules;
(f) maintain the competitiveness of English football;
(g) preserve the appeal of competition for domestic and global audiences;
(h) enable sustainable long-term investment in facilities, development and communities;
(i) enable appropriate investment in competitive football;
(j) maintain the system-wide financial stability of English football.”
297E
Lord Birt (XB)After Clause 60, insert the following new Clause—
“Implementation
(1) The determination under section (determination process) may specify—
(a) detailed implementation timing,
(b) transitional arrangements,
(c) compliance requirements, and
(d) any other conditions deemed necessary.
(2) No determination may—
(a) take effect during a football season;
(b) require implementation in less than six months;
(c) create material risk to system stability;
(d) compromise existing regulatory compliance.”
297F
Lord Birt (XB)After Clause 60, insert the following new Clause—
“Appeals regime
(1) Any party may appeal a determination to the Competition Appeal Tribunal within 28 days on grounds of—
(a) error of law;
(b) material error of fact;
(c) procedural unfairness;
(d) irrationality.
(2) Appeals must specify the grounds in detail, provide supporting evidence, propose alternative solutions and address implementation implications.
(3) The Competition Appeal Tribunal may—
(a) dismiss the appeal,
(b) vary the determination,
(c) remit for reconsideration, and
(d) make consequential orders.”
297G
Lord Birt (XB)After Clause 60, insert the following new Clause—
“Guidance and review
(1) Before the first appointment of any arbitrator under section (Appointment of mediator) the IFR must publish guidance on—
(a) arbitration procedures;
(b) determination criteria including evidence standards and assessment, impact evaluation and implementation requirements;
(c) implementation processes.
(2) Before publishing guidance, the IFR must consult specified competition organisers.
(3) The IFR must keep under review and if necessary update guidance published under this Part.”
173B
Lord Hayward (Con)After Clause 22, insert the following new Clause—
“Principles Governing Capital Buffer Requirements
In establishing or imposing capital buffers as part of any liquidity requirements for regulated clubs under section 22(1)(b), the IFR must—
(a) have regard to any existing liquidity requirements imposed by a relevant competition organiser, or other applicable financial rules,
(b) ensure that capital buffers are not limited to cash reserves and take account of all appropriate categories of financial security,
(c) ensure that capital buffers take account of all liquid and semi-liquid assets, including—
(i) player registration rights;
(ii) anticipated revenues from the transfer market;
(iii) secured commercial income;
(iv) guaranteed broadcast revenues,
(d) consult with clubs and competition organisers to establish appropriate valuation methodologies that recognise—
(i) the fair market value of registered players;
(ii) the market value of academy players, including consideration of historic progression rates, comparable players and independent assessments;
(iii) the future value created by investments in youth development,
(e) have regard to existing financial sustainability rules imposed by a relevant competition organiser,
(f) have regard to the proportionality of the requirement to identified financial risks,
(g) have regard to the potential impact on investment in players, facilities and youth development, and
(h) have regard to the need to maintain competitive balance and operational flexibility.”
173A
Lord Moynihan (Con)Clause 22, page 15, line 14, leave out “such” and insert “—
(a) clubs,
(b) each specified competition organiser, and
(c) such other”
174B
Lord Moynihan (Con)Clause 23, page 16, line 10, at end insert “, except that where this paragraph applies the IFR must, as soon as reasonably practicable after attaching or varying a condition, invite the specified competition organiser to give a commitment in lieu of the condition or variation as set out in subsection (3)(c)(ii)”
187ZA
Lord Moynihan (Con)Clause 32, page 24, line 32, leave out “not”
187ZB
Lord Moynihan (Con)Clause 32, page 24, line 33, at end insert “until such time as the IFR determines otherwise”
187ZC
Lord Moynihan (Con)After Clause 32, insert the following new Clause—
“Exemption for persons with diplomatic immunity
(1) A person who is entitled to diplomatic immunity under the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations (1961), or any equivalent provision recognised by the United Kingdom, is not subject to the fitness and propriety test for the purposes of ownership or control of a regulated club.
(2) The exemption in subsection (1) applies where—
(a) the individual holds diplomatic status as recognised by the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO),
(b) the individual is a serving head of state, government minister or high-ranking official of a foreign government, and
(c) the individual’s involvement in the regulated club is directly or indirectly connected to their official duties.
(3) In cases where a person claims an exemption under subsection (1), the regulated club must notify the IFR in writing and provide—
(a) evidence of the individual’s diplomatic immunity or governmental role, confirmed by the FCDO;
(b) a declaration confirming that the individual’s ownership or control does not contravene the general objectives of the IFR as set out in section 6.
(4) The exemption under this section shall not apply where the individual’s diplomatic immunity is waived by their sending state.
(5) The Secretary of State make regulations or prepare and publish guidance under this section to clarify the application of the exemption and any conditions or limitations that may apply.”
242A
Lord Moynihan (Con)Clause 50, page 40, line 36, leave out from “that” to end of line and insert “would affect the IFR’s ability to achieve its objectives”
119A
Lord Moynihan (Con)Clause 13, page 8, line 22, at end insert—
“(3A) The Secretary of State must prepare guidance requiring all employees of the IFR to be independent of government influence.”
129A
Lord Moynihan (Con)Clause 16, page 10, line 14, at end insert—
“(4A) A club is not required to provide the information specified in subsections (4)(a) or (b) until the definition of "significant influence" has been consulted on and established by guidance published by the Secretary of State under Schedule 1, Part 2, paragraph 15(1) of this Act.”
167A
Lord Moynihan (Con)Clause 21, page 13, line 35, after “IFR” insert “has identified a clear risk to its threshold requirements and”
168A
Lord Moynihan (Con)Clause 21, page 13, line 36, after “licence,” insert “be required in order to”
168B
Lord Moynihan (Con)Clause 21, page 14, line 1, after “licence” insert “, be required in order to”
168C
Lord Moynihan (Con)Clause 21, page 14, line 5, after leave out “advance” and insert “be required in order to meet”
169A
Lord Moynihan (Con)Clause 21, page 14, line 6, at end insert—
“(3A) The IFR may attach a discretionary licence condition to an operating licence only if the IFR is satisfied that compliance with the condition is necessary to achieve one or more financial outcomes for clubs set out in the IFR’s guidance.
(3B) The Independent Football Regulator (IFR) must issue guidance to regulated clubs specifying the financial outcomes relating to financial soundness and financial resilience that it expects clubs to achieve.
(3C) Guidance issued under subsection (3B) must—
(a) set out principles and objectives to promote financial soundness and resilience, having regard to the following—
(i) the maintenance of adequate liquidity to meet short-term obligations;
(ii) the ability to absorb foreseeable financial shocks without compromising operational stability;
(iii) sustainable financial management to enable long-term investment in facilities, squads, player development and community programmes;
(b) identify broad financial indicators that regulated clubs should consider in meeting the principles, without prescribing specific thresholds, such as—
(i) liquidity measures;
(ii) debt management;
(iii) revenue sustainability.
(3D) The guidance must—
(a) recognise the autonomy of competition organisers and clubs to develop detailed rules and mechanisms to implement these principles;
(b) provide flexibility for clubs to apply the principles in a manner proportionate to their size, revenue streams and competitive context;
(c) avoid prescribing specific methodologies or operational rules, leaving their to competition organisers in circumstances where they wish to develop these methodologies or rules.
(3E) In preparing guidance under subsection (3B), the IFR must—
(a) consult with regulated clubs, competition organisers and financial experts;
(b) ensure alignment with existing regulatory frameworks and best practices within football governance;
(c) publish the guidance in a format that ensures clarity and accessibility for all stakeholders.
(3F) The IFR must periodically review and update the guidance to ensure it reflects evolving financial conditions, governance practices and developments in football.”
67A
Baroness Brady (Con)Clause 7, page 5, line 26, at end insert—
“(d) differential impact on regulated clubs participating in, or seeking to qualify for, competitions organised by international football bodies.”
103
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green)Clause 10, page 6, line 41, at end insert—
“(d) an assessment of the climate and environmental sustainability of English football, including its resilience against climate change.”
This amendment would require the IFR’s “state of the game report” to include assessment of the climate and environmental sustainability of English football.
104
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 10, page 6, line 41, at end insert—
“(d) an assessment of the overall financial health of English football, including that of specified competitions,
(e) an assessment of the current state of fan engagement, and
(f) an overview of current regulatory functions carried out by established bodies such as the FA and competition organisers, and”
This amendment adds three more statutory requirements for the state of the game report.
106
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 10, page 7, line 2, leave out “18” and insert “six”
108
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 10, page 7, line 6, leave out “five” and insert “four”
109
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 10, page 7, line 17, at end insert—
“(d) fans;”
111
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 11, page 7, line 28, leave out paragraph (b)
114
Baroness Brady (Con)Clause 12, page 8, line 2, at end insert “, and
(b) a statement of the outcomes that IFR expects the clubs to achieve for them to meet the threshold requirements (see section 18) and the systemic financial resilience objective (see section 6).”
116
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 12, page 8, line 3, leave out subsections (3) to (6) and insert—
“(3) The IFR must prepare and issue a code of practice for competition organisers and licensed clubs.
(4) The code of practice in subsection (3) must set out the measures recommended for the purpose of compliance with the other functions set out under this Act.
(5) In preparing the code of practice the IFR must consult—
(a) the Football Association;
(b) each specified competition organiser;
(c) each regulated club;
(d) such other persons as the IFR considers appropriate.
(6) The code of practice must be published within six months of the day on which this Act is passed.
(7) The IFR must publish any codes of practice or other guidance prepared under this section.”
This amendment requires the Regulator to prepare and publish a code of practice to establish how it will use its powers under this Act.
117
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 12, page 8, line 3, leave out “may” and insert “must”
This amendment requires the IFR to prepare guidance about its functions.
118
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 12, page 8, line 8, leave out subsection (6) and insert—
“(6) Before publishing first or revised guidance about any of its functions the IFR must consult—
(a) the Football Association,
(b) competition organisers, and
(c) regulated clubs.”
This amendment requires the Regulator to consult the FA, the competition organisers, and regulated clubs before publishing any guidance.
119
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 13, page 8, line 18, leave out “three” and insert “five”
120
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 14, page 9, line 2, at end insert—
“(c) the extent of compliance by regulated clubs with the rules and regulations set out by the IFR,
(d) a statement of the IFR’s finances for that year,
(e) a summary of any enforcement action undertaken by the IFR during that year,
(f) performance against its objectives,
(g) the amount of time taken to grant provisional and full operating licences, and
(h) a list of IFR employees with salaries of over £100,000.”
This amendment expands the content of the annual report the IFR is required to submit.
121
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 14, page 9, line 3, leave out subsection (3) and insert—
“(3) The Secretary of State must lay a copy of every report under this section before Parliament.”
123
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)After Clause 14, insert the following new Clause—
“Accountability of the IFR
(1) The IFR is accountable to the relevant Parliamentary Committee or Committees.
(2) The relevant Parliamentary Committee or Committees are any Committee or Committees of the House of Commons, or House of Lords, or of both Houses, which notify the Secretary of State, in writing, that they have assumed the function of scrutiny of football regulation.
(3) The IFR must cooperate with the relevant Parliamentary Committee or Committees to enable it or them to—
(a) question and approve the appointments to the Board of the IFR;
(b) question the Chief Executive Officer of the IFR on the exercise of the functions of the IFR;
(c) report on the exercise of the functions of the IFR;
(d) interrogate and report on whether the IFR exercises its functions with regard to its objectives under section 6 of this Act;
(e) interrogate and report on whether the IFR exercises its functions with regard to its objectives under section 7 of this Act;
(f) interrogate and report on whether the IFR exercises its functions with regard to its objectives under section 8 of this Act.
(4) Members of the Board and the Expert Panel must, when invited, appear before the Committee or Committees (separately or jointly) for examination, and the Chief Executive Officer must agree to appear before the Committee or Committees (separately or jointly) at least once per calendar year.”
This amendment requires the Regulator to subject itself to the oversight of any relevant Parliamentary Committee, such as a Joint Committee on Football Regulation.
124
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)After Clause 14, insert the following new Clause—
“Delegation of regulatory powers to competition organisers
(1) The Secretary of State may by regulations direct the IFR to delegate some of its functions under this Act to specified competition organisers.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1) the IFR may only delegate a function to a specified competition organiser if it is satisfied that the competition organiser—
(a) would discharge the function delegated under subsection (1) with the same degree of stringency as the IFR;
(b) would discharge the function delegated under subsection (1) with regard to the IFR’s objectives under section 6;
(c) would discharge the function delegated under subsection (1) with regard to section 7(2);
(d) would not alter or disregard its obligations under this section.
(3) If the IFR is satisfied that the specified competition organiser meets the conditions set out in subsection (2), and the Secretary of State has directed the IFR to delegate a function under this Act, the IFR must abide by the Secretary of State’s direction.
(4) If the Secretary of State is not satisfied that the IFR has taken all reasonable steps to comply with the direction to delegate a function under subsection (1), then the Secretary of State may take such action as is deemed necessary to ensure the IFR does comply.”
125
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 16, page 9, line 35, after “rules” insert “which must be made no later than the period of one month beginning with the day this Act is passed”
This amendment requires the Regulator to set out its rules regarding licences no later than one month after passage of the Act.
126
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 16, page 10, line 6, leave out paragraph (c)
This amendment prevents the Regulator from requiring information from clubs that is not specified by the Act.
127
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green)Clause 16, page 10, line 7, at end insert—
“(d) a climate and environment management plan (see subsection (5A)).”
This amendment would require a club to include a climate and environment management plan in their application for a provisional operating licence.
129
Lord Mann (Lab)Clause 16, page 10, line 14, at end insert—
“(e) setting out all financial arrangements with external agents or other intermediaries involved in contacts or recruitment, or both.”
130
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 16, page 10, line 21, leave out paragraph (b)
This amendment prevents the IFR from requiring information in the strategic business plan not specified by the Act.
131
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green)Clause 16, page 10, line 21, at end insert—
“(5A) A “climate and environment management plan” is a document containing information, in respect of the relevant period, about—
(a) the carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases resulting from the club’s operations,
(b) the environmental impact of the club’s operations,
(c) the impact of climate change and other environmental factors on the club’s operations,
(d) how those climate and environmental impacts will be reduced, mitigated and improved.”
This amendment would require a club to include a climate and environment management plan in their application for a provisional operating licence.
133
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 17, page 10, line 37, leave out “three” and insert “four”
134
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 17, page 11, line 10, leave out “14 days” and insert “one month”
135
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 17, page 11, line 22, leave out subsection (9) and insert—
“(9) The IFR must make the decision whether to grant a regulated club a provisional operating licence within the period of one month.
(10) The IFR may extend the period in subsection (9) by no more than two weeks if it requires more time to consider the application due to—
(a) unusual staffing pressures, or
(b) discrepancies or abnormalities with the application.
(11) If the IFR extends the period in accordance with subsection (10), it must give a notice to the relevant club stating—
(a) that the period has been extended,
(b) the length of the extension, and
(c) the reasons for the extension.”
136
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 18, page 12, line 19, leave out “14 days” and insert “one month”
144
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green)Schedule 4, page 97, line 24, at end insert—
“(f) the club’s plans relating to climate and environmental issues.”
This amendment would require a club to consult with its fans about climate and environmental issues facing the club.
145
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 4, page 97, line 24, at end insert—
(f) the club’s political statements and positions.”
146
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 4, page 97, line 27, leave out “crest” and insert “badge”
148
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 19, page 13, line 14, at end insert—
“(c) inviting the club to make representations about the proposed revocation, and
(d) specifying the means by which, and the period within which, such representations must be made.”
149
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 19, page 13, line 14, at end insert—
“(3A) The period specified by subsection (3)(d) must be a period of not less than one month beginning with the day on which the notice under subsection (3) is given.”
154
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green)Schedule 5, page 98, line 11, at end insert—
“(e) a climate and environment management plan condition.”
This amendment would require the IFR to include a climate and environment management plan condition as a mandatory licence condition for clubs.
138A
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Lab)Schedule 4, page 97, line 16, leave out “consults” and insert “meets regularly with”
84
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 8, page 6, line 21, leave out “should” and insert “must”
This amendment requires the Regulator, where appropriate, to hold the officers of a club responsible for the actions of the club.
85
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 8, page 6, line 24, leave out “should” and insert “must”
This amendment requires the Regulator to act transparently.
88
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 8, page 6, line 24, at end insert—
“(2) The IFR is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the Equality Act 2010.”
93
Lord Evans of Rainow (Con)After Clause 9, insert the following new Clause—
“Requirements on Football Agents
(1) The IFR must use its powers under this part to ensure that any person who is licenced by the Football Association to provide football agent services (“a football agent”) must—
(a) always act in the best interests of their client Players, Coaches or Clubs and in accordance with their fiduciary duties;
(b) abide by article 16 of the FIFA Football Agent Regulations relating to their conduct;
(c) respect and adhere to the statutes, regulations, directives and decisions of the competent bodies of FIFA, the IFR and the Football Association;
(d) avoid conflicts of interest while providing their Football Agent Services;
(e) ensure that their name, FIFA licence number, FA registration number, signature, the name of their client Player, Coach or Club and any other information as may be required by The Association from time to time appear in any contracts resulting from the provision of their Football Agent Service.
(2) Any football agent must, upon request, cooperate with the relevant body of the Football Association, or with the IFR, with respect to any type of information.
(3) A football agent must submit to the Football Association and the IFR any agreement with a Player, Coach or Club other than a Representation Agreement, including but not limited to agreements relating to Other Services within 14 days of execution.
(4) Within 14 days of payment of a fee related to any agreement entered into with a Player, Coach or Club other than a Representation Agreement, a football agent must submit confirmation of receipt and proof of receipt of such payment to the Football Association and the IFR.
(5) For the purposes of this section, a person is a football agent if they provide football agents services.
(6) For the purposes of subsections (1) and (5), “football agent services” means football-related services performed for or on behalf of a Client, including any negotiation, communication relating or preparatory to the same, or other related activity, with the purpose, objective or intention of concluding a Transaction.”
82
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 8, page 6, line 13, leave out “should” and insert “must”
This amendment requires the Regulator to acknowledge the unique sporting context of football and the competition rules by which clubs must abide.
83
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 8, page 6, line 18, leave out “should” and insert “must”
This amendment requires the Regulator to act consistently towards all regulated clubs.
187A
Baroness Grey-Thompson (XB)Clause 33, page 25, line 11, at end insert—
“(2A) The following individuals or groups associated with a regulated club must notify the IFR where they consider there has been, or may have been, a material change in circumstances which is relevant to whether the individual who is an owner or officer of the club is suitable to be an owner or officer of the club (as the case may be)—
(a) owners,
(b) officers,
(c) other club employees,
(d) competition organisers,
(e) the Football Supporters’ Association,
(f) supporters’ trusts, or
(g) supporters.”
This amendment aims to provide a route to the IFR for other individuals and groups of people, who may have more inside knowledge than the average fan, to act as whistleblowers and raise any concerns they have about the suitability of an owner or officer.
187B
Baroness Grey-Thompson (XB)Clause 33, page 25, line 18, leave out “or (2)” and insert “, (2) or (2A)”
This amendment is consequential on another amendment in Baroness Grey-Thompson’s name to Clause 33.
248A
Baroness Grey-Thompson (XB)After Clause 51, insert the following new Clause—
“Ticket pricing
(1) Regulated clubs must adhere to the following rules in relation to ticket pricing—
(a) dynamic pricing strategies for tickets are prohibited,
(b) concessionary ticket pricing categories are mandatory, and
(c) ticket prices for away fans must be capped at the level set in regulations by the Secretary of State.
(2) The Secretary of State must, by regulations, establish the categories and caps for concessionary ticket pricing under subsection (1)(c), including categorisation based on age and income.”
17A
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Lab)Clause 2, page 2, line 14, at end insert—
““fan” means an individual who is a season ticket holder of a regulated club;”
4A
Lord Maude of Horsham (Con)Clause 1, page 1, line 4, leave out “sustainability” and insert “success”
61A
Lord Maude of Horsham (Con)Clause 7, page 5, line 19, at end insert—
“(c) works through and supports existing competition structures where they are effective.”
288A
Lord Maude of Horsham (Con)Clause 59, page 48, line 34, at end insert—
“(c) has exhausted its other regulatory options, including the financial regulation of regulated clubs.”
7A
Lord Maude of Horsham (Con)Clause 1, page 2, line 1, leave out “sustainable” and insert “successful”
1
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 1, page 1, line 4, leave out “the sustainability of”
6
Lord Maude of Horsham (Con)Clause 1, page 1, line 5, at end insert—
“(1A) Nothing in this Act or the operation of the IFR should compromise the ability of football clubs, competition organisers or national teams to comply with their obligations to, or participate in competitions of, international governing bodies including UEFA and FIFA.”
7
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 1, page 2, line 1, leave out subsection (3) and insert—
“(3) For the purposes of this Act, English football is sustainable if it—
(a) continues to meet the needs of present fans without compromising the ability of future generations of fans to enjoy and benefit from the club, including through the club continuing to operate a team in club competitions, in a way that represents the unique heritage of the club as recognised by its fans, and respects the interests of these fans;
(b) continues to contribute to the economic and social welfare of the communities with which regulated clubs are associated, including, but not limited to, direct or indirect positive effects on the income of local businesses, cultural enrichment, or the reputation of the local area.”
This amendment intends to create a more precise definition of the sustainability of English football.
8
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 1, page 2, line 2, after the first “of” insert “current and prospective”
9
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 1, page 2, line 4, leave out “local”
13
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 1, page 2, line 4, at end insert—
(c) increases TV viewership,
(d) increases overall match attendance,
(e) improves international sporting competitiveness, and
(f) increases the overall income generated.”
14
Lord Addington (LD)Clause 1, page 2, line 4, at end insert—
“(c) meets the social responsibility duty.”
This amendment includes the social responsibility duty as part of the definition of English football sustainability.
16
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Con)Clause 1, page 2, line 4, at end insert—
“(3A) Notwithstanding the purpose of this Act, the IFR must have due regard to the potential economic harms of overregulating English football.
(3B) As part of fulfilling its duty under subsection (3A) the IFR must assess the effects of its activities on the financial position of regulated clubs and submit a report to the Secretary of State within six months in the first instance and annually thereafter which must be laid before Parliament within 28 days of their receipt of the report.”
17
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 2, page 2, line 14, at end insert—
““fans” means the individuals who follow and identify with the club, engage with the service the club provides, and have an interest in seeing the club succeed;”
19
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 2, page 2, line 31, leave out subsection (3) and insert—
“(3) For the purposes of this Act a “specified competition” includes—
(a) the Premier League,
(b) the English Football League, and
(c) the National League.
(3A) The Secretary of State may by regulations made by statutory instrument amend the competitions specified in section (3).”
20
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 2, page 2, line 31, leave out from “competition;” to end of line 34
22
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 2, page 2, line 35, leave out subsection (4)
25
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 2, page 3, line 6, leave out subsection (6)
30
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 3, page 3, line 21, at end insert—
“(3) The IFR must give a notice to a person it considers to be an owner under this section informing that person that he or she is considered an owner under this section.”
31
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 4, page 4, line 37, at end insert—
“(5A) The IFR must give a notice to all persons it considers to be an officer of a club for the purposes of this section informing them that they are considered as officers under this section.”
This amendment requires the Regulator to inform every individual that it considers an officer of a club.
36
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 2, page 85, line 37, at end insert—
“6A No person may be appointed to the Board if that person currently has any broadcast or media interests or any role in a television or media broadcast which relates to football.”
This amendment prohibits any person who currently has any interests or roles in a television or media broadcast that relates to football from being appointed to the Board.
37
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 2, page 85, line 37, at end insert—
““6A (1)Any person appointed to the Board must agree to appear before any relevant Parliamentary Committee.
(2)A relevant Parliamentary Committee is any Committee of the House of Commons, or House of Lords, or of both Houses, which has notified the Secretary of State, in writing, that they have assumed the function of scrutiny of football regulation.
(3)Any person appointed to the Board may not take their position unless they have been approved by a resolution of each relevant Parliamentary Committee.”
38
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 2, page 85, line 37, at end insert—
““6A (1)The Chief Executive Officer must resign their post if within the course of a calendar year they have not appeared before a relevant Parliamentary Committee which has invited them to appear.
(2)A relevant Parliamentary Committee is any Committee of the House of Commons, or House of Lords, or of both Houses, which has notified the Secretary of State, in writing, that they have assumed the function of scrutiny of football regulation.”
40
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 2, page 87, line 2, at end insert “, but may not pay any employee more than £172,153 per annum.”
This amendment limits the pay of the chief executive and employees of the Regulator.
42
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 2, page 90, line 16, after “six” insert “or more than twenty”
This amendment limits the number of members of the Expert Panel.
45
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 2, page 91, line 3, at end insert—
(7)No member may be appointed to the Expert Panel if they currently have any broadcast or media interests or any role in a television or media broadcast that relates to football.”
This amendment prohibits any person who currently has any interests or roles in a television or media broadcast that relates to football from being appointed to the Expert Panel.
47
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 2, page 91, line 15, leave out from “pay” to the end of line 16 and insert “to persons appointed to the Expert Panel no more than £91,346 per annum”
49
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Schedule 2, page 92, line 20, at end insert—
““28A (1)The Expert Panel must publish any decision that it makes relating to any of its functions under this Act.
(2)The decisions published by the Expert Panel must include—
(a)the number of members of the Expert Panel who supported the decision;
(b)the number of members of the Expert Panel who did not support the decision;
(c)the reasons for the decision;
(d)the reasons why those who did not support the decision decided not to support it.
(3)The Expert Panel must publish any records of its committee proceedings recorded in accordance with paragraph 30.”
This amendment requires the Expert Panel to exercise its functions transparently.
50
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Con)Schedule 2, page 94, line 26, leave out paragraph 36
This amendment removes the Secretary of State’s power to provide the IFR with financial assistance.
55
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green)Clause 6, page 5, line 14, at end insert—
“(d) to monitor and promote the reduction of English football’s climate and environmental impacts (referred to in this Act as “the environmental objective”).”
This amendment would add climate and environment impact reduction to the IFR’s objectives.
56
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 6, page 5, line 14, at end insert—
(d) to promote the growth of English football (referred to in this Act as “the growth objective”);
(e) to promote and protect financial investment in English football (referred to in this Act as “the financial investment objective”).”
This amendment creates two new objectives the IFR must promote.
57
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Con)Clause 6, page 5, line 14, at end insert—
“(2) Notwithstanding the IFR’s objectives in subsection (1), the IFR may not intervene in the internal financial affairs of any regulated club.”
58
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)After Clause 6, insert the following new Clause—
“Interpretation of section 6
(1) For the purposes of this Act—
(a) the “financial soundness of regulated clubs” means a measure of a club’s expected ability to continue meeting its liabilities and debts in the future, even in the face of changing circumstances;
(b) the “financial resilience of English football” means the aggregate financial sustainability and resilience of regulated clubs and relevant competitions;
(c) the “heritage of English football” means the tangible and intangible elements which define the unique historical identity of English football and its clubs;
(d) the “growth of English football” means the continued growth and expansion of all aspects of regulated clubs and specified competitions, which includes, but is not limited to—
(i) TV viewership;
(ii) match-day attendance;
(iii) fan engagement and participation;
(iv) the number of clubs, and
(v) the number of fans;
(e) “financial investment in English football” means money that is committed to regulated clubs or specified competitions with the intent to grow that club or competition.”
This amendment creates a more detailed definition of the IFR’s objectives.
59
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 7, page 5, line 16, leave out “, so far as reasonably practicable,”
60
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green)Clause 7, page 5, line 19, at end insert—
“(c) is compatible with the Climate Change Act 2008 and secures the long term environmental sustainability of English football.”
This amendment would require the IFR to act in accordance with the Climate Change Act 2008 and the long term environmental sustainability of English football.
61
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 7, page 5, line 19, at end insert—
“(c) always advances the growth objective.”
66
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green)Clause 7, page 5, line 26, at end insert—
“(d) negative impact on the climate and environment.”
This amendment would require the IFR to avoid exercising its functions in a way that negatively impacts the climate and environment.
67
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 7, page 5, line 26, at end insert—
“(d) adverse effects on the competitiveness of relevant competitions.”
69
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 7, page 5, line 28, at end insert—
“(za) its objectives (see section 6);”
This amendment requires the IFR to have regard for its objectives as established in section 6.
71
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 7, page 5, line 36, at end insert—
“(5) The IFR may not redistribute revenue, income or any monies from one regulated club to another regulated club.”
This amendment prevents the IFR from redistributing any funds from one club to another.
73
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 8, page 6, line 3, leave out “should” and insert “must”
This amendment requires the IFR to use its resources in the most efficient, expedient and economic way.
74
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 8, page 6, line 3, leave out “, expedient”
75
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 8, page 6, line 5, leave out “should” and insert “must”
This amendment requires the Regulator to co-operate and engage with relevant parties.
76
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 8, page 6, line 5, leave out “, so far as reasonably practicable,”
157
Lord Knight of Weymouth (Lab)Schedule 5, page 99, line 12, at end insert—
“(iii) how the club is meeting the standards of the UK Corporate Governance Code in respect of the appointment of independent non-executive directors, and”
This amendment seeks to embed a role for independent NEDs in bringing independent scrutiny and accountability, and would give them a key role to play in upholding the principles of sustainability and overseeing effective engagement with stakeholders.
159
Lord Blunkett (Lab)Schedule 5, page 100, line 6, at end insert—
(4A)A code of practice published under this paragraph must include guidance on the balance between executive and non-executive directors (officers) of regulated clubs, and how many directors or officers of such clubs are required in order to comply with company law.
(4B)A code of practice must also provide guidance for regulated clubs to ensure they have a clear, appropriate governance structure with a board that makes decisions collectively.”
160
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Schedule 5, page 100, line 14, leave out sub-sub-paragraph (a) and insert—
“(a) the club’s fans”
This amendment provides for the fan consultation condition to require consultation with the club’s fans, rather than with persons elected by the club’s fans to represent their views.
161
Lord Shamash (Lab)Schedule 5, page 100, line 14, after “views” insert “including supporters’ trusts”.
162
Lord Mann (Lab)Schedule 5, page 100, line 17, leave out sub-paragraph (2)
166
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green)Schedule 5, page 101, line 5, at end insert—
“Climate and environment management
11A (1)A climate and environment management condition is a condition requiring a club to—
(a)submit a climate and environment management plan containing specified information to the IFR before a specified date,
(b)update the climate and environment management plan annually and submit the updated plan to the IFR, and
(c)act in accordance with the latest climate and environment management plan submitted to the IFR.
(2)For the purposes of sub-paragraph (1)(a), the IFR—
(a)must specify—
(i)information about the club’s climate and environmental impact,
(ii)information about steps taken to measure, reduce and mitigate the club’s climate and environmental impact,
(iii)information about the impact of climate change and other environmental factors on the club’s operations,
(iv)climate and environment risk assessments and plans for managing climate and environment risks, and
(b)may specify such other information as the IFR considers necessary for the purpose of exercising its functions under this Act.”
This amendment would require the IFR to include a climate and environment management plan condition as a mandatory licence condition for clubs.
168
Lord Wood of Anfield (Lab)Clause 21, page 13, line 35, after “condition” insert “or the outcome it is intended to achieve”
169
Lord Wood of Anfield (Lab)Clause 21, page 14, line 6, at end insert—
“(d) in the case of a provisional or full operating licence, not be met by the club complying with all rules, requirements and restrictions which are or will be imposed by a competition organiser by virtue of teams operated by the club being entered into, being members of, or participating in a competition organised by that organiser.”
170
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 22, page 14, line 33, after “conduct” insert “or conduct which it reasonably suspects to be harmful to the interests of the United Kingdom.”
This amendment permits the Regulator to restrict funding for clubs which may be linked to conduct harmful to the interests of the United Kingdom.
171
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 22, page 14, line 36, after “internal” insert “financial”
This amendment restricts discretionary licence conditions to include only internal financial controls.
172
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 22, page 15, line 3, leave out paragraph (c)
This amendment removes the ability of the IFR to restrict a club’s overall expenditure.
173
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 22, page 15, line 7, leave out subsection (5)
This amendment removes the power of the Secretary of State to amend the discretionary licence conditions by regulations.
174
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 23, page 15, line 39, leave out “14 days” and insert “one month”
175
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 24, page 17, line 17, leave out “14 days” and insert “one month”
176
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 25, page 18, line 13, leave out “14 days” and insert “one month”
177
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 26, page 19, line 15, at end insert—
“(aa) has the requisite competence, and”
This amendment requires owners to have the requisite competence in the same way that officers must.
179
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 26, page 19, line 20, leave out paragraph (c)
This amendment omits the requirement for an officer of a club to be financially sound.
180
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 27, page 20, line 18, leave out subsection (7)
186
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 32, page 24, line 16, leave out from “is” to the end of line 20 and insert “one month beginning with the day on which the application under section 28 or 29 is made.”
188
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 34, page 25, line 22, after “criteria” insert “only”
189
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 35, page 26, line 36, after “criteria” insert “only”
190
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 37, page 28, line 9, at end insert—
“(1A) In making a determination under section 28 or 34, the IFR must also have regard to the foreign and trade policy objectives of His Majesty’s Government in the United Kingdom.”
191
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 37, page 28, line 20, after “to” insert “relevant”
192
Lord Addington (LD)Clause 37, page 28, line 28, at end insert—
“(fa) whether the individual has committed actions or demonstrated behaviors that conflict or obstruct intentions and development of equality, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) responsibilities;”
This amendment would require, as part of its propriety test, the IFR to include considerations surrounding EDI.
193
Lord McNally (LD)Clause 37, page 28, line 28, at end insert—
“(fa) whether the individual, or an entity controlled by or connected to the individual, is convicted, accused, or reasonably suspected of engaging in human rights abuses;”
This amendment requires the IFR to consider human rights abuses in the process of its suitability determinations of a potential owner.
194
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 37, page 28, line 28, at end insert—
“(fa) whether the individual is a member of a proscribed organisation in accordance with section 3 (proscription) and Schedule 2 (proscribed organisations) of the Terrorism Act 2000;”
This amendment is intended to prohibit a member of a proscribed organisation under the Terrorism Act 2000 from becoming an officer or owner of a regulated club.
195
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 37, page 28, line 29, leave out paragraph (g)
196
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 37, page 29, line 2, at end insert—
“(3A) In making a determination under this Part, the IFR must consult—
(a) the National Crime Agency;
(b) the Security Service;
(c) the Secret Intelligence Service;
(d) the Serious Fraud Office;
(e) His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs;
(f) the Sports Grounds Safety Authority.”
198
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 37, page 29, line 9, leave out subsection (6)
199
Baroness Grey-Thompson (XB)Clause 37, page 29, line 12, at end insert—
“(6A) The IFR will ban potential future owners who live, do business or store money in certain jurisdictions of risk that either—
(a) put or are likely to put limits on funds that can be transferred to the United Kingdom, or
(b) prevent, either intentionally or unintentionally, the possibility of IFR and competitions from doing proper and effective due diligence in their nation.”
202
Lord McNally (LD)Clause 38, page 29, line 21, leave out “may” and insert “must”
This amendment requires the IFR to disqualify a person from being an officer of a regulated club if it determines that person is not suitable.
203
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 38, page 29, line 35, leave out “14 days” and insert “one month”
204
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)After Clause 44, insert the following new Clause—
“Ownership of multiple clubs
The IFR may not prevent one person from owning, or becoming the owner of, more than one club, providing that the owner or prospective owner satisfies the conditions set out in this Part.”
206
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 45, page 37, line 10, at end insert “, unless it has ceased to be a regulated club by virtue of being relegated from competitions specified by the Secretary of State under section 2(3) of this Act.”
213
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 45, page 37, line 38, leave out “14 days” and insert “one month”
224
Lord Mann (Lab)Clause 46, page 38, line 39, at end insert—
“(5A) The IFR may not grant approval for the taking of any step mentioned in subsection (1) unless a majority of fans and a majority of democratically constituted club supporters groups have agreed the decision.”
230
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 46, page 39, line 11, leave out subsection (10) and insert—
“(10) In this section, “specified properties”—
(a) in relation to a body that is a regulated club, means the ground at which a relevant team operated by it customarily plays its home matches, the property at which a relevant team customarily trains and any other properties that make up a more than negligible part of the relevant team’s operations;
(b) in relation to a body that is a formerly regulated club, means (immediately before it ceased to be a regulated club) the ground at which a relevant team operated by it customarily played its home matches, the property at which a relevant team customarily trained and any other properties that make or made up a more than negligible part of the relevant team’s operations.”
This amendment defines “specified properties”.
232
Lord Mann (Lab)Clause 48, page 40, line 14, after “fans” insert “and democratically constituted club supporters groups”
233
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 48, page 40, line 18, at end insert—
“(e) if the arrangements would relocate the club’s home matches to a ground more than five miles from its current home ground, the club’s fans have actively approved the arrangements.”
This amendment adds a condition which must be met before the IFR grants approval for a club to move home ground.
235
Lord Wood of Anfield (Lab)Leave out Clause 48 and insert the following new Clause—
“48 Duty on competition organiser not to arrange matches away from home grounds
(1) A specified competition organiser must notify the IFR where the organiser considers that there is a reasonable prospect of the organiser entering into arrangements whereby a match between two teams operated by regulated clubs might be played at a ground that is not the home ground of either team.
(2) A notification under subsection (1) must be given as soon as reasonably practicable after the organiser considers the duty under that subsection to have arisen.
(3) The organiser must obtain the approval of the IFR before it enters into the arrangements mentioned in subsection (1).
(4) The IFR must grant approval for the organiser entering into those arrangements if the IFR is satisfied that the arrangements—
(a) would not harm the financial sustainability of the competition or of English football,
(b) would not cause significant harm to the heritage of the competition or of English football, and
(c) have the approval of UK-based supporters including those of the clubs involved.
(5) The IFR may not grant approval in any other circumstances.
(6) The IFR must, as soon as reasonably practicable after the organiser has sought approval, decide whether to grant approval under subsection (4).
(7) The IFR must notify the organiser of its decision to grant, or not to grant, that approval and give reasons for its decision.
(8) In this section “home ground”, in relation to a regulated club, has the meaning given by section 46(10)(a).”
236
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)After Clause 48, insert the following new Clause—
“Duty to consult the Office for Place
Before making a decision regarding a home ground or the building of a new home ground, a regulated club must consult the Office for Place.”
This amendment requires that a regulated club must consult the Office for Place before making any decision regarding their home ground.
238
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 49, page 40, line 28, after “colours” insert “, home shirt design”
This amendment requires a club to consult its fans on any changes to the home shirt design.
239
Lord Mann (Lab)Clause 49, page 40, line 30, at end insert “and a majority of the club’s democratically constituted club supporters groups”
240
Lord Mann (Lab)Clause 49, page 40, line 32, at end insert “, and
(b) the club has taken reasonable steps to establish that the changes are supported by a majority of the club’s fans in England and Wales and by a majority of the club’s democratically constituted club supporters groups.”
241
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 49, page 40, line 32, after “Association” insert “and its fans”
243
Lord Mann (Lab)Clause 51, page 41, line 6, after “fans” insert “and democratically constituted club fan supporters groups”
244
Lord Jackson of Peterborough (Con)After Clause 51, insert the following new Clause—
“Duty to consult fans on political statements
(1) A regulated club may not publish any political statements, engage in political activity, or issue any items or clothing with political connotations unless it has taken reasonable steps to establish that such statements, activity or items are supported by the majority of the club’s fans in England and Wales.
(2) A regulated club may not permit any officers, employees or players of the club, when acting in an official capacity, to engage in political activities, publish political statements or wear any item with political connotations unless it has taken reasonable steps to establish that such activities, statements or items are supported by the majority of the club’s fans in England and Wales.”
245
Lord Addington (LD)After Clause 51, insert the following new Clause—
“Social responsibility duty
(1) A regulated club must ensure it establishes training schemes in local communities.
(2) The training schemes must provide opportunities for individuals in local communities to develop knowledge and skills congruent with becoming—
(a) a sports club, charity, or voluntary group treasurer;
(b) a sports club, charity, or voluntary group secretary;
(c) a sports club, charity, or voluntary chairperson.”
This amendment would require the IFR to ensure that regulated clubs and competitions provide training to local communities which develop competencies consistent with officers of an organisation.
246
Lord Addington (LD)After Clause 51, insert the following new Clause—
“Environmental sustainability duty
(1) A regulated club has an environmental sustainability duty.
(2) This duty is fulfilled if a regulated club employs an environmental sustainability officer who is responsible for evaluating the club’s environmental impact.
(3) This individual must develop policies and initiatives which seek to reduce that impact.
(4) This individual may hold other positions at the club and does not need to be engaged in the work of the environmental sustainability officer full time.”
This amendment requires regulated clubs to employ an environmental sustainability officer tasked with evaluating and seeking to reduce the club's environmental impact, however, this individual may be employed by the club in some other capacity and is not expected to carry out the duties of an ESO full time.
247
Lord Addington (LD)After Clause 51, insert the following new Clause—
“Duty to facilitate football training for young women and girls
A regulated club must facilitate football training for young women and girls in local communities.”
This amendment would place a duty on regulated clubs to facilitate football training for young women and girls.
248
Lord Mann (Lab)After Clause 51, insert the following new Clause—
“Duty to register all contracts
A regulated club must register all player contracts, transfer and other fees including loan transactions with the IFR by 31 May for the preceding 12 months.”
249
Lord Mann (Lab)After Clause 52, insert the following new Clause—
“Duty to report on equal opportunities
A licensed club must publish an annual report detailing its diversity and inclusion strategy, including a breakdown of diversity in its workforce.”
251
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 53, page 43, line 19, at end insert—
“(c) any interest charged under paragraph (b) may not exceed the rate of inflation, as measured by the Retail Price Index, plus 2 per cent.”
This amendment limits the rate of interest the Regulator may charge on unpaid levies.
253
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 53, page 43, line 24, at end insert—
“(9A) Once the IFR has established a levy under subsection (1) and made the required payments under section 96, the IFR may only fund its functions under this Act through its own revenue streams.
(9B) For the purposes of subsection (9A) the IFR’s ‘own revenue streams’ are any amounts payable to the IFR from regulated clubs under subsection (1).
(9C) The IFR may not borrow any amount from any third party.”
This amendment requires the Regulator to be self-funding through the industry levy, but after it has paid its initial costs and the Secretary of State’s establishment costs to HM Treasury.
255
Lord Foster of Bath (LD)After Clause 53, insert the following new Clause—
“Duty to prevent gambling advertising and sponsorship in football
English football must not promote or engage in advertising or sponsorship related to gambling.”
This amendment prevents regulated clubs and competitions from promoting or engaging in gambling advertising or sponsorship.
256
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 54, page 43, line 35, leave out “Treasury” and insert “Chancellor of the Exchequer”
This amendment specifies that the Regulator must consult the Chancellor of the Exchequer and not anyone else at HM Treasury.
257
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 54, page 43, line 38, leave out subsection (2)
This amendment removes the provision allowing the Regulator not to consult if it considers the changes to the levy rules to be minor.
258
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 54, page 44, line 1, leave out “As soon as is reasonably practicable” and insert “Six months”
The amendment requires the Regulator to publish levy rules six months before the chargeable period.
263
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 56, page 45, line 32, leave out subsection (2) and insert—
“(2) In this Part, revenue received by a specified competition organiser is “relevant revenue” if—
(a) it is revenue received as a result of the sale or acquisition of rights to exploit the broadcasting of football matches included in a competition organised by the specified competition organiser, and
(b) it is not revenue that the specified competition organiser distributes to a club by virtue of a team operated by the club being relegated from a competition organised by the specified competition organiser.”
The amendment prohibits parachute payments from being included in the distributions of revenue resolution procedure.
265
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 56, page 45, line 38, at end insert—
“(2A) The reference in subsection (2)(a) to the sale or acquisition of rights to exploit the broadcasting of football matches includes the sale or acquisition of rights to exploit on-demand coverage of such matches, for example audiovisual content consisting of coverage of, or excerpts from, such matches where the content is selected by users from a range of such content made available to members of the public and is received by the user by means of the internet.”
This amendment expands the definition of “relevant revenue” to include revenue from full coverage or clips and highlights of football matches provided on demand via the internet.
270
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 56, page 46, line 29, leave out “60” and insert “(Independent notification for resolution process to be triggered by the IFR)”
This amendment is consequential on amendment 293.
271
Baroness Brady (Con)After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause—
“Principles of the resolution process
(1) For the purpose of this Part, the IFR must—
(a) pay due regard to the contractual or other property rights of—
(i) regulated clubs, and
(ii) a specific competition organiser;
(b) ensure that neither the process nor final decision place an undue burden on the commercial interests of the parties;
(c) have regard to whether the parties negotiated in good faith;
(d) consider whether there are less intrusive measures available that could be used without unacceptably compromising the achievement of the objectives set out in this Act;
(e) have regard to the fact that the process and final decision should not result in any regulated club being at risk of breaching its obligations under rules of the relevant specified competition organiser or other applicable financial rules.”
294
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 60, page 49, line 18, after “59(5)” insert “or section (Independent notification for resolution process to be triggered by the IFR)(4)”
This amendment is a consequential amendment relating to Amendment 293.
310
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 62, page 51, line 28, at end insert—
“(2A) When making a determination under this section, the committee of the Expert Panel must have regard for section 7(2).”
This amendment requires the committee of the Expert Panel to consider the impact on competitiveness and sporting outcomes in its decision on which final proposal to accept.
311
Baroness Brady (Con)Clause 62, page 51, line 35, leave out “one year” and insert “three years”
312
Baroness Brady (Con)Clause 62, page 51, line 35, leave out “final” and insert “first”
316
Baroness Brady (Con)Clause 63, page 53, line 2, at end insert “but no sooner than the beginning of the first football season following the football season in which a distribution order is made, and provided that the distribution order coming into force does not adversely affect any club’s ability to adhere to—
(a) mandatory licence conditions,
(b) threshold requirements, and
(c) obligations under rules of the relevant specified competition organiser or other applicable financial rules.”
321
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 76, page 61, line 23, leave out “14 days” and insert “one month”
322
Baroness Brady (Con)Clause 84, page 68, line 15, at end insert—
“(ea) any decision made under sections 62 and 63;”
323
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 84, page 68, line 15, at end insert—
“(ea) the making of a distribution order requiring one competition organiser to distribute revenue to another competition organiser under section 62;”
324
Baroness Brady (Con)Clause 85, page 69, line 2, after “section” insert “62, 63 or”
325
Baroness Brady (Con)Clause 85, page 69, line 2, at end insert—
“(za) a decision under section 62 or 63,”
326
Baroness Brady (Con)Clause 85, page 69, line 8, after “section” insert “62, 63 or”
327
Lord Maude of Horsham (Con)After Clause 85, insert the following new Clause—
“Review: cost of compliance
Within six months of the day on which this Act is passed, the Secretary of State must lay before Parliament a review of the financial impact on regulated clubs of complying with the provisions in this Act.”
328
Lord Ranger of Northwood (Con)After Clause 85, insert the following new Clause—
“Report: operation of the Premier League
Within six months of the establishment of the IFR, the Secretary of State must publish a report on the effect of this Act on the operation of the Premier League and lay it before Parliament.”
329
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 91, page 73, line 39, at end insert—
“(ia) section 2(3A);”
332
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 92, page 75, line 15, leave out paragraph (a)
This amendment removes the ability of the Secretary of State to amend the definition of a football season.
333
Baroness Brady (Con)Schedule 12, page 124, line 22, after “section” insert “62, 63 or”
334
Baroness Brady (Con)Schedule 12, page 124, line 24, after “section” insert “62, 63 or”
335
Baroness Brady (Con)Schedule 12, page 125, line 3, at end insert—
“(c) a decision under section 62 or 63 of the 2024 Act.”
336
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 99, page 77, line 33, after “to” insert “subsections (1A), (1B) and”
337
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 99, page 77, line 34, at end insert—
“(1A) This section comes into force on the day on which this Act is passed.
(1B) The other sections of this Act do not come into force until the Secretary of State has consulted UEFA on the provisions and impacts of this Act, and has confirmed to Parliament that he or she has done so.”
338
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 99, page 77, line 35, leave out “This section and” and insert “Subject to subsection (1B),”
339
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 99, page 78, line 1, at end insert—
“(ba) section 16(2);”
340
Lord Markham (Con) - Shadow Minister (Science, Innovation and Technology)Clause 99, page 78, line 13, at end insert—
“(2A) The Secretary of State may only make regulations for Part 3 to come into effect at the end of a relevant football season.”
This amendment ensures the operating licensing regime does not come into effect during a football season.
341
Lord Goodman of Wycombe (Con)After Clause 99, insert the following new Clause—
“Duration and review
(1) This Act expires at the end of the period of five years beginning with the day on which section 5 comes into force (“the initial period”), subject to the provisions of this section and section (Renewal and dissolution provisions).
(2) The Secretary of State must establish an independent review panel (“the Panel”) no later than 15 months before the end of the initial period.
(3) The Panel must—
(a) carry out a review of—
(i) the effectiveness of this Act,
(ii) whether the IFR has remained within its statutory purposes, and
(iii) whether the objectives of the Act could be achieved through less interventionist means,
(b) prepare a report of the review, and
(c) lay a copy of the report before Parliament, no later than 12 months before the end of the initial period.
(4) The Panel must consist of—
(a) at least one person with expertise in competition law,
(b) at least one person with expertise in regulatory policy,
(c) at least one person with expertise in football administration, and
(d) at least one person with expertise in business regulation.
(5) Where there is a change in the person holding the office of Secretary of State after the establishment of the Panel but before the report is laid before Parliament—
(a) the new Secretary of State may by written notice dissolve the existing Panel,
(b) where the Panel is dissolved under paragraph (a), the new Secretary of State must—
(i) establish a new Panel within 28 days,
(ii) ensure the new Panel meets the requirements of subsection (4), and
(iii) extend the period for the laying of the report by up to three months if necessary to allow the new Panel to complete its work,
(c) the new Panel may—
(i) consider any work undertaken by the previous Panel,
(ii) adopt any findings of the previous Panel that it considers appropriate, or
(iii) conduct an entirely new review.
(6) The new Secretary of State may only exercise the power under subsection (5) once in relation to the review required by subsection (3).
(7) The report under subsection (3) must include—
(a) an assessment of whether the IFR has—
(i) achieved its objectives under section 6,
(ii) remained within the scope of its original purposes as set out in section 1,
(iii) avoided expanding its regulatory reach beyond its core functions,
(iv) maintained proportionate intervention in the football industry,
(b) an assessment of—
(i) the regulatory burden imposed by the Act,
(ii) the costs of compliance for regulated entities,
(iii) whether the objectives could be achieved through less intrusive means,
(c) an analysis of any instance where the IFR has—
(i) exceeded its statutory powers,
(ii) created additional regulatory requirements beyond those explicitly authorised by the Act,
(iii) expanded its interpretation of its objectives beyond their original scope,
(d) a specific assessment of whether market conditions still justify statutory regulation, and
(e) a recommendation as to whether the Act should be—
(i) allowed to expire,
(ii) renewed for a further period with specific restrictions, or
(iii) renewed without modification.”
342
Lord Goodman of Wycombe (Con)After Clause 99, insert the following new Clause—
“Renewal and dissolution provisions
(1) The Secretary of State may by regulations made by statutory instrument provide that this Act continues in force beyond the initial period only if—
(a) the report of the Panel under section (Duration and review) demonstrates that—
(i) the IFR has not materially exceeded its original statutory purposes,
(ii) statutory regulation remains necessary and proportionate,
(iii) the objectives cannot be achieved through less interventionist means, and
(b) the Secretary of State is satisfied that appropriate safeguards are in place to prevent future expansion of the IFR’s powers beyond those necessary for its core functions.
(2) Any extension of the Act’s provisions under subsection (1)—
(a) may not exceed a period of five years,
(b) must include specific limitations on the IFR’s ability to expand its regulatory scope, and
(c) must require annual reporting to Parliament on measures taken to prevent unnecessary expansion of powers.
(3) A statutory instrument containing regulations under subsection (1) may not be made unless—
(a) a draft of the instrument has been laid before and approved by a resolution of each House of Parliament, and
(b) the Secretary of State has published a response to each recommendation made by the Panel.
(4) Where the Secretary of State, instead of extending the Act’s provisions under subsection (1), initiates a dissolution process—
(a) the Secretary of State must lay before Parliament a statement of intent to dissolve the IFR;
(b) the statement must include—
(i) reasons for the proposed dissolution;
(ii) an outline of proposed alternative arrangements for football regulation;
(iii) a timeline for dissolution not exceeding 12 months;
(c) a motion on the statement must be moved in both Houses of Parliament;
(d) if both Houses approve the statement by resolution, the Secretary of State must establish a dissolution committee within 28 days.
(5) The dissolution committee must—
(a) consist of persons independent from the IFR,
(b) complete the wind-down within the specified timeline, and
(c) report quarterly to Parliament on the progress of dissolution.
(6) During any dissolution process—
(a) the IFR must not—
(i) commence any new regulatory initiatives,
(ii) impose any new financial penalties exceeding £10,000, or
(iii) make any material changes to existing licenses,
(b) any ongoing enforcement actions must be reviewed by the dissolution committee to determine whether they should continue, and
(c) the dissolution committee may suspend any IFR action it considers non-essential to the immediate stability of football.
(7) This section does not affect—
(a) any liability incurred before the Act expires,
(b) the previous operation of the Act, or
(c) the continuation of any legal proceedings or enforcement action which began before the Act expires.
(8) The Secretary of State must by regulations make such transitional, transitory or saving provision as the Secretary of State considers appropriate in connection with the expiry of any provision of this Act.”
3
Lord Moynihan (Con)Clause 1, page 1, line 4, after second “the” insert “financial”
5
Lord Moynihan (Con)Clause 1, page 1, line 5, at end insert “within the rules laid down by FIFA, UEFA and the International Olympic Committee, relating to the autonomy of sport from government influence and control.”
12
Lord Maude of Horsham (Con)Clause 1, page 2, line 4, at end insert—
“(c) continues to be globally competitive in relation to audience and quality,
(d) continues to attract significant domestic and foreign investment,
(e) continues to grow economically in terms of commercial revenues, domestic and international broadcasting agreements, and asset and enterprise values; and
(f) continues to produce industry-led agreements on the distribution of revenues.”
18
Lord Moynihan (Con)Clause 2, page 2, line 28, after “a” insert “men’s”
23
Lord Beith (LD)Clause 2, page 2, line 36, at end insert “unless it customarily plays in competitions of which the members or participants are exclusively or predominantly teams whose home ground is not in England”
24
Lord Moynihan (Con)Clause 2, page 2, line 37 at end insert—
(za) must have regard to the effect that the regulation may have on the ability of teams to participate in international competitions,”
This amendment seeks to ensure that in making regulations, the Secretary of State has regard to whether they will prevent teams from participating in international competitions, given rules laid down by FIFA, UEFA and the IOC regarding the autonomy of sport from government influence and control.
26
Lord Addington (LD)After Clause 2, insert the following new Clause—
“Definition of fan group
(1) The IFR must produce a framework which defines what constitutes a legitimate body of fans.
(2) This framework must include provisions regarding the length of time the fan body has existed and the circumstances under which the fan body has been created.
(3) This framework must be subject to consultation.”
This amendment requires the IFR to produce a framework which defines what constitutes a legitimate body of fans given the provisions in the Bill that reference fan interests and engagement.
27
Lord Moynihan (Con)Clause 3, page 3, line 15, leave out “influence or”
28
Lord Moynihan (Con)Clause 3, page 3, line 18, leave out “influence or”
29
Lord Moynihan (Con)Clause 3, page 3, line 20, leave out “influence or”
51
Lord Maude of Horsham (Con)Clause 6, page 5, line 9, leave out “protect and promote” and insert “monitor and where necessary intervene to safeguard”
52
Lord Maude of Horsham (Con)Clause 6, page 5, line 11, leave out “protect and promote the financial resilience of English football” and insert “monitor the financial resilience of English football, and where it is substantially threatened, intervene to safeguard it”
54
Lord Blunkett (Lab)Clause 6, page 5, line 14, at end insert—
“(d) to ensure regulated clubs have a clear, appropriate governance structure with a board consisting of executive and non-executive directors enabling decisions to be taken collectively.”
62
Lord Maude of Horsham (Con)Clause 7, page 5, line 20, leave out from “must” to “any” in line 21 and insert “exercise its functions in a manner that avoids or minimises”
64
Lord Maude of Horsham (Con)Clause 7, page 5, line 26, at end insert—
“(d) adverse impacts on the ability of competition organisers to successfully manage their competitions;
(e) adverse impacts on clubs’ ability or incentives to take calculated sporting and commercial risks;
(f) conflict with existing rules made by specified competition organisers.”
65
Lord Mann (Lab)Clause 7, page 5, line 26, at end insert—
“(d) adverse impact on women’s football.”
68
Lord Maude of Horsham (Con)Clause 7, page 5, line 26, at end insert—
“(2A) The IFR must publish an annual statement to report on how it has considered, measured and performed in relation to its general duties under 7(2).”
70
Lord Addington (LD)Clause 7, page 5, line 34, at end insert—
“(3A) The IFR must engage with English football to create a package of financial support for women’s football clubs and competitions.”
This amendment requires the regulator to work with regulated clubs and competitions to support money flows from men’s football to women’s football.
79
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 8, page 6, line 9, at end insert—
“(iv) fans.”
This amendment requires the IFR to cooperate and engage with fans.
80
Lord Shamash (Lab)Clause 8, page 6, line 9, at end insert—
“(iv) supporters’ trusts.”
81
Lord Mann (Lab)Clause 8, page 6, line 9, at end insert—
“(iv) elected representatives of football club supporters groups.”
86
Lord Maude of Horsham (Con)Clause 8, page 6, line 24, at end insert—
“(h) it must intervene only where action will address a clearly identified harm, using the least intrusive measure possible, and taking steps to monitor the impact of the intervention;
(i) in the interests of fans, it should preserve competitive tension and enable ambitious ownership and investment;
(j) it should maintain incentives for sporting achievement and jeopardy, pyramid mobility and managed financial risk-taking;
(k) it should preserve regulated clubs’ commercial autonomy, maintain incentives for investment and growth, and enable innovation in clubs’ and competitions’ commercial models;
(l) it should protect legitimate business confidentiality;
(m) it should act to safeguard financial resilience only where competition organiser mechanisms prove demonstrably inadequate, intervention cannot be effectively achieved through existing structures, and action has been consulted on and considered with competition organisers.”
87
Lord Maude of Horsham (Con)Clause 8, page 6, line 24, at end insert—
“(2) To incentivise regulatory cooperation with competition organisers and a proportionate regulatory approach, the IFR should ensure that its overall number of staff does not exceed 40 full-time equivalents.”
90
Lord Addington (LD)After Clause 9, insert the following new Clause—
“Duty to facilitate football training
(1) The IFR must ensure the facilitation of football training at an amateur and community level.
(2) This must include facilitation for both sexes and separate development pathways.”
This amendment requires the IFR to facilitate football training at an amateur and community level.
91
Lord McNally (LD)After Clause 9, insert the following new Clause—
“Televising of football matches of national interest
(1) The Communications Act 2003 is amended as follows.
(2) After Section 299 (categorisation of listed events) (2)(d) insert—
“(e) the Independent Football Regulator, established by the Football Governance Act 2024, in relation to televising of football matches between licensed football clubs.””
This amendment adds the IFR as a statutory consultee on the listing of sporting events for free-to-air coverage.
92
Lord McNally (LD)After Clause 9, insert the following new Clause—
“Considerations as consultee on listed events
As a statutory consultee on the listing of sporting and other events under section 299(2) (categorisation of listed events) of the Communications Act 2003, the IFR must, in pursuance of its heritage objective, take account of the desirability of more domestic football matches becoming listed events.”
This Amendment is linked to another in the name of Lord McNally and places a requirement on the IFR to take into account the desirability of promoting more football matches becoming listed events in response to the Secretary of State’s consultation on the listing of sporting events for free-to-air coverage.
102
Lord Addington (LD)Clause 10, page 6, line 41, at end insert—
“(d) an assessment of the development of the women’s game with reference to its future regulation.”
This amendment requires that the first and subsequent state of the game report includes an assessment of the development of the women’s game to ensure that the women’s game undergoes a proper form of regulation.
132
Lord Mann (Lab)Clause 17, page 10, line 34, after “clubs)” insert “,
or would temporarily maintain the running of a club whose licence has been suspended or revoked due to insolvency or other financial or ownership irregularities”
139
Lord Mann (Lab)Schedule 4, page 97, line 16, after “fans” insert “and elected representatives of club supporters groups”
140
Lord Addington (LD)Schedule 4, page 97, line 23, at end insert—
“(da) the club’s name;”
This amendment includes a club's name in the relevant matters to be included in the consultation of fan views.
141
Lord Mann (Lab)Schedule 4, page 97, line 24, leave out “fan engagement” and insert “engagement with fans and democratically structured club fan supporter groups”
143
Lord Foster of Bath (LD)Schedule 4, page 97, line 24, at end insert—
“(f) gambling advertising and sponsorship.”
This amendment requires clubs to consult fans on gambling advertising and sponsorship.
153
Lord Mann (Lab)Schedule 5, page 98, line 11, at end insert—
“(e) a condition requiring the club to produce a report on modern slavery in relation to its academy and professional footballers, including pre-recruitment contact and third party linked potential footballer and academy recruitment.”
155
Baroness Fox of Buckley (Non-affiliated)Schedule 5, page 99, line 11, leave out paragraph (ii)
Clause 1, page 1, line 4, leave out “sustainability” and insert “growth and success”
Clause 1, page 1, line 5, at end insert - "(1A) Nothing in this Act or the operation of the IFR should compromise the ability of football clubs, competition organisers or national teams to comply with their obligations to, or participate in competitions of, international governing bodies including UEFA and FIFA.”
Clause 1, page 2, line 4, at end insert - “(c) requires regulated clubs to have access to funds that can meet their financial commitments for a six month period.
Clause 1, page 2, line 4, at end insert – "(c) continues to be globally competitive in relation to audience and quality, (d) continues to attract significant domestic and foreign investment, (e) continues to grow economically in terms of commercial revenues, domestic and international broadcasting agreements, and asset and enterprise values; and (f) continues to produce industry-led agreements on the distribution of revenues."
BARONESS TAYLOR OF BOLTΟΝ
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 1, page 2, line 4, at end insert - "(3A) In subsection (3), “environmental sustainability requirements” means (a) operating in a way that will achieve net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, and (b) materially reducing negative impact on the natural world and all species that inhabit it."
BARONESS TAYLOR OF BOLTΟΝ
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 2, page 2, line 34, at end insert- "(3A) Regulations made under subsection (3) must specify the National League North and the National League South."
BARONESS TAYLOR OF BOLTΟΝ
Baroness Grey-Thompson (XB)Clause 8, page 6, line 9, at end insert - "(iv) football organisations representing minority groups and communities;"
Clause 8, page 6, line 9, at end insert – “(iv) professional football players and their representatives.”
Clause 8, page 6, line 9, at end insert - "(iv) fans;"
Clause 8, page 6, line 9, at end insert - "(iv) supporters' trusts;"
After Clause 7, insert the following new Clause- "Support to clubs (1) The IFR must provide reasonable and proportionate assistance to – (a) regulated clubs seeking to obtain a provisional club licence, (b) clubs with a provisional club licence seeking a full club licence, and (c) unregulated clubs which are reasonably likely to become regulated clubs in the next football season.
BARONESS TAYLOR OF BOLTΟΝ
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 10, page 6, line 35, after "football" insert “, including factors related to the community and social impact of regulated clubs”
BARONESS TAYLOR OF BOLTΟΝ
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 10, page 6, line 41, at end insert – "(d) an assessment and examination of the financial consequences, and the impact on the integrity of specified competitions, of multi-club ownership models."
Clause 10, page 6, line 41, at end insert - “(d) an assessment of player welfare, taking into account the number of games played and any other issues the IFR deems relevant.”
BARONESS TAYLOR OF BOLTΟΝ
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 10, page 6, line 41, at end insert – "(
4
Lord Maude of Horsham (Con)Clause 1, page 1, line 4, leave out “sustainability” and insert “growth and success”
21
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 2, page 2, line 34, at end insert—
“(3A) Regulations made under subsection (3) must specify the National League North and the National League South.”
This amendment ensures that the regulator must cover the National League North and South.
78
Lord Watson of Invergowrie (Lab)Clause 8, page 6, line 9, at end insert—
“(iv) professional football players and their representatives.”
101
Baroness Brady (Con)Clause 10, page 6, line 41, at end insert—
“(d) an assessment of how the IFR in exercising its functions under this Act avoids the effects set out in section 7(2),
(e) an assessment of how the IFR in exercising its functions under this Act avoids placing an undue burden on the commercial interests of specified competition organisers, and”
110
Baroness Brady (Con)Clause 11, page 7, line 26, leave out “three” and insert “five”
163
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Schedule 5, page 100, line 34, at end insert—
(3)The IFR must set up an appeal mechanism to adjudicate complaints about the carrying out of a fan consultation.”
This amendment requires the IFR to set up an appeal mechanism to adjudicate complaints about the carrying out of a fan consultation.
221
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 46, page 38, line 27, leave out “home ground” and insert “specified properties”
This amendment expands the duty to notify the IFR of the use of a home ground as security for a loan to include the use of any specified properties as such security.
2
Lord Hayward (Con)Clause 1, page 1, line 4, after second “the”, insert “success and”
112
Baroness Brady (Con)Clause 12, page 7, line 37, leave out from ‘under’ to end of line 38 and insert ‘this Act.’
113
Baroness Brady (Con)Clause 12, page 8, line 1, after ‘(1)’ insert ‘so far as it relates to sections 21 to 25 (discretionary licence conditions)’
115
Baroness Brady (Con)Clause 12, page 8, line 3, leave out subsection (3)
209
Lord Hayward (Con)Clause 45, page 37, line 23, after “the”, insert “success and”
220
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 46, page 38, line 26, leave out second “home ground” and insert “specified properties”
This amendment expands the duty to notify the IFR of a potential disposal of a home ground to include a potential disposal of any specified properties.
225
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 46, page 38, line 40, leave out “taking of any step” and insert “carrying on of any activity”
This is intended to probe the difference in language between 46(5) and 46(6).
226
Lord Hayward (Con)Clause 46, page 39, line 2, after “financial”, insert “success and”
227
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 46, page 39, line 2, at end insert—
“(ii) in the case of the home ground and training ground, it is satisfied that there are suitable plans in place to ensure the club’s continued long-term use of the home ground or training ground or to secure an alternative home ground or training ground for the next football season;
(iii) in the case of a home ground, it is satisfied that any alternative under sub-paragraph (ii) will be within five miles of the current stadium or the place from where the club takes their name;”
This amendment inserts additional conditions to the granting of approval to dispose of an interest in a specified property or use it as security.
231
Lord Hayward (Con)Clause 48, page 40, line 10, after “financial”, insert “success and”
261
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 56, page 45, line 26, at end insert—
“(za) specified competition organisers are required to seek regulatory consent in connection with the distribution of relevant revenue received by one of the competition organisers,
(zb) the IFR must be satisfied that the distribution of relevant revenue proposed by the competition organisers complies with the principles in section 62(2),”
This amendment provides for competition organisers to obtain consent before determining the distribution of revenue, and requires the IFR to be satisfied that the distribution proposal complies with the principles in s.62(2).
266
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 56, page 46, line 5, leave out paragraph (c) and insert—
“(c) the relevant specified competition organisers.”
This is one of a series of amendments which provide for there to be more than two relevant specified competition organisers.
275
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 57, page 47, line 10, leave out “two”
This is one of a series of amendments which provide for there to be more than two relevant specified competition organisers.
280
Baroness Brady (Con)Clause 57, page 47, line 32, leave out “five years” and insert “the applicable period (see subsections (7) and (8))”
281
Baroness Brady (Con)Clause 57, page 47, line 35, at end insert—
“(7) Where—
(a) the specified competition organisers have agreed (whether in the distribution agreement or otherwise) a period for the purposes of condition 4, and
(b) both of the organisers have notified the IFR of the period so agreed,
the applicable period is that period.
(8) In any other case, the applicable period is 5 years.”
320
Baroness Twycross (Lab) - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)Clause 64, page 53, line 34, leave out “62(7)(b)” and insert “
62(8)(b)
”
This amendment corrects an erroneous cross-reference.
330
Baroness Twycross (Lab) - Baroness in Waiting (HM Household) (Whip)Clause 91, page 74, line 1, leave out “56(2)(a)(ii)” and insert “
56(2)(b)
”
This amendment corrects an erroneous cross-reference.
Clause 10, page 6, line 38, at end insert- "(ba) an assessment of how the IFR in exercising its functions under this Act avoids the effects set out in section 7(2), (bb) an assessment of how the IFR in exercising its functions under this Act avoids placing an undue burden on the commercial interests of specified competition organisers, and”
Schedule 4, page 98, line 3, at end insert- “Home ground 6 (1) The home ground threshold requirement is met, in relation to a club, if the club- (a) has security of tenure over a home ground for at least the minimum period, and (b) the home ground is suitable for the club's use for footballing purposes.
After Clause 28, Insert the following new Clause – "Human rights and modern slavery considerations (1) When considering whether a person (“A”) satisfies the requirement in section 26(7)(c), the IFR shall have regard to (among other things) – (a) whether A has been complicit in any egregious or consistent violation(s) of international human rights law, whether of any international human rights treaty, customary law, or other instrument, (b) whether A has been convicted, cautioned or reprimanded or complicit in any egregious or consistent violation(s) of domestic human rights legislation, including breaching provisions in the UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 or equivalent national legislation; (c) whether A has been subject to a Slavery and Trafficking Prevention Order, (d) whether A has been found liable in a civil claim relating to a human rights violation, (e) whether A has been convicted of an offence, cautioned or reprimanded for failing to comply with their human rights and modern slavery reporting and due diligence obligations under applicable domestic legislation, (f) whether A has been complicit in any hate incidents, including non-crime hate incidents,
After Clause 37, insert the following new Clause – "State-controlled clubs (1) For the purposes of this section, a state-controlled club is one which is wholly or majority-owned by individual(s), entities, or entities controlled by individual(s) who are deemed by the IFR or the Secretary of State to be under the influence of any state actor, including but not limited to - (a) members of any government or their immediate family, (b) a head of state or their immediate family, (c) diplomats, lobbyists, or other state representatives, or their immediate family, and (d) sovereign wealth funds.
Clause 56, page 46, leave out lines 13 to 17 and insert- ““distribution agreement” means an agreement (including an agreement entered into before the coming into force of this Part) between two or more specified
142
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Schedule 4, page 97, line 24, at end insert—
“(f) match ticket prices and kick-off times;
(g) any proposal by a club to play matches in a prohibited competition within the meaning of section 45(4);
(h) any proposal by a club to play home matches at a ground other than the club’s home ground, before giving notice of that intention to the IFR under section 48(1);
(i) any other matters that the IFR may notify clubs are relevant matters from time to time.”
This amendment inserts a number of “relevant matters” for the purposes of the fan engagement threshold requirement: match ticket prices, kick-off times, playing in prohibited competitions, playing at another home ground, and other matters determined by the IFR.
156
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Schedule 5, page 99, line 12, after “inclusion” insert “including, but not limited to, the diversity of season ticket holders, the diversity of staff and the diversity of its Senior Managers”
This amendment requires the corporate governance statement to explain the club’s actions to improve the diversity of season ticket holders, staff and Senior Managers.
158
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Schedule 5, page 99, line 35, at end insert “and the process by which decisions are made (including compliance with the factors set out in paragraph 13)”
This amendment amends the definition of “corporate governance” to include the process by which decisions are made.
201
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)After Clause 37, insert the following new Clause—
“Ownership and directorship by an individual with an unspent serious criminal conviction
(1) No individual with an unspent serious criminal conviction, whether or not in England and Wales, shall be permitted to own a controlling stake in, or serve as a director for, any regulated club.
(2) Nothing in this section shall affect the operation of section 37(2).”
219
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 46, page 38, line 26, leave out first “home ground” and insert “specified properties”
This amendment expands the duty to notify the IFR of a potential disposal of a home ground to include a potential disposal of any specified properties.
228
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 46, page 39, line 5, at end insert—
“(c) in the case of a substantial change under subsection (1)(c), it is satisfied that the changes would enhance the home ground or other specified property;
(d) in the case of a disposal under subsection (1)(a) and (c), it has taken reasonable steps to establish that the majority of the club’s fans in England and Wales approve of the disposal.”
This amendment inserts additional conditions to the granting of approval to dispose of an interest in a specified property or use it as security.
288
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 58, page 48, line 23, at end insert—
“(6) Neither a notification under subsection (1) nor any application under section 57 may be made if any specified competition organiser has received a notice under section 59(5).”
This amendment prevents a competition organiser triggering the mediation/resolution process if a notice has been given under s.59(5) (triggering of the process by the IFR).
258A
Lord Moynihan (Con)After Clause 54, insert the following new Clause—
“Duty to address ticketing market practices
Licensed clubs and, where relevant, specified competition organisers must take reasonable steps to—
(a) monitor practices in the secondary ticketing market that may lead to excessive price mark-ups or unauthorised resale,
(b) provide transparent information about ticket pricing and resale policies, including the face value of tickets, and
(c) support fans by providing official ticket exchange channels where reasonably practicable.”
302
Baroness Brady (Con)Clause 62, page 51, line 8, leave out “must” and insert “may”
303
Baroness Brady (Con)Clause 62, page 51, line 9, leave out from “with” to end of line 11 and insert “the proposal made by the specified competition organiser whose relevant revenue would be distributed under the proposal unless there are compelling reasons not to do so;”
304
Baroness Brady (Con)Clause 62, page 51, line 11, at end insert, “or
(ii) which contains elements of each proposal where it considers that this will result in an order which is most consistent with the principles in subsection (2).”
307
Baroness Brady (Con)Clause 62, page 51, line 21, leave out “should advance the IFR’s objectives” and insert “be necessary to advance the IFR’s objectives, consistent with the duties and regulatory principles as specified in sections 7, 8 and 9, and in particular those set out in section 7(2)”
317
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 63, page 53, line 8, leave out “two”
This is one of a series of amendments which provide for there to be more than two relevant specified competition organisers.
10
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 1, page 2, line 4, at end insert—
“(c) requires regulated clubs to have access to funds that can meet their financial commitments for a six month period.”
11
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 1, page 2, line 4, at end insert—
“(c) meets environmental sustainability requirements set out in subsection (3A).”
15
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 1, page 2, line 4, at end insert—
“(3A) In subsection (3), “environmental sustainability requirements” means—
(a) operating in a way that will achieve net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, and
(b) materially reducing negative impact on the natural world and all species that inhabit it.”
32
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Schedule 2, page 85, line 20, leave out “chair” and insert “Board”
This amendment requires the CEO of the IFR to be appointed by the Board as a whole, rather than by the Chair.
33
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Schedule 2, page 85, line 23, leave out “chair” and insert “Board”
This amendment is a consequential amendment following on from the above
34
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Schedule 2, page 85, line 27, leave out from “unless” to end of line 28 and insert “they do not have a conflict of interest.”
This amendment creates an objective test for whether a proposed IFR director has a conflict of interest, rather than leaving it for the person appointing that director to determine whether the director being appointed has a conflict of interest.
35
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Schedule 2, page 85, line 28, at end insert—
(1A)A member of the Board must declare their conflicts of interest and the Chief Executive Officer must maintain a register of interests of members of the Board.”
This amendment requires all IFR directors to declare conflicts of interest, and requires the IFR CEO to maintain a register of such interests.
39
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Schedule 2, page 86, line 13, leave out “may” and insert “must”
41
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Schedule 2, page 87, line 13, leave out “may” and insert “must”
This amendment requires (rather than permits) the removal of an IFR director if the person who appointed them is satisfied that any condition in (a)-(d) is met.
43
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Schedule 2, page 90, line 21, at end insert—
(1A)Members of the Expert Panel must declare their interests and the Chief Executive Officer must maintain a register of interests of members of the Expert Panel.”
This amendment requires all Expert Panel members to declare conflicts of interest, and requires the IFR CEO to maintain a register of such interests.
44
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Schedule 2, page 90, line 30, leave out from “unless” to end of line 31 and insert “they do not have a conflict of interest.”
This amendment creates an objective test for whether a proposed Expert Panel member has a conflict of interest, rather than leaving it for the IFR CEO to determine whether the proposed member has a conflict of interest.
46
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Schedule 2, page 91, line 8, leave out “may” and insert “must”
48
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Schedule 2, page 91, line 39, leave out “may” and insert “must”
This amendment requires (rather than permits) the removal of an Expert Panel committee member if the IFR CEO considers either condition in (a) or (b) is met.
53
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 6, page 5, line 11, after “resilience” insert “and sustainability”
This amendment expands the IFR’s objectives to include promoting the sustainability (as well as resilience) of English football.
63
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 7, page 5, line 26, at end insert—
“(d) adverse effects on the financial position, soundness, or sustainability of any regulated club or group of regulated clubs relative to other clubs.”
This amendment requires the IFR to regulate in a way which avoids adverse effects on the financial position, soundness or sustainability of clubs, or of a particular group of clubs.
72
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)After Clause 7, insert the following new Clause—
“Support to clubs
(1) The IFR must provide reasonable and proportionate assistance to—
(a) regulated clubs seeking to obtain a provisional club licence,
(b) clubs with a provisional club licence seeking a full club licence, and
(c) unregulated clubs which are reasonably likely to become regulated clubs in the next football season.
(2) The IFR must provide reasonable and proportionate assistance to regulated clubs in their efforts to continue to comply with the conditions of their provisional club licence or full club licence.
(3) In fulfilling its duty under subsections (1) and (2), the IFR must have regard to the factors listed in section 53(9).
(4) This assistance may come in the form of—
(a) financial support,
(b) training, and
(c) support staff.”
This amendment requires the IFR to provide financial support, training and support staff to clubs to assist those clubs to obtain (and comply with the terms of) a provisional licence or a full club licence (as applicable), and to assist unregulated clubs which are reasonably likely to become regulated clubs in the next season.
77
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 8, page 6, line 9, at end insert—
“(iv) football organisations representing minority groups and communities.”
This amendment requires the IFR to cooperate and engage with football organisations representing minority groups and communities.
94
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 10, page 6, line 35, after “football” insert “, including factors related to the community and social impact of regulated clubs”
This amendment requires the State of the Game report to include, in its overview of issues affecting English football, factors related to the community and social impact of regulated clubs.
95
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 10, page 6, line 41, at end insert—
“(d) an assessment and measure of how well each club is operated and managed, considering the threshold requirements and the mandatory licence conditions and such other factors as the IFR may determine from time to time.”
This amendment requires the State of the Game report to include an assessment and measure of how well each club is operated and managed, considering the threshold requirements, the mandatory licence conditions, and other facts determined by the IFR.
96
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 10, page 6, line 41, at end insert—
“(d) an assessment of any existing and effective financial distribution agreement against the principles set out in section 62(2).”
This amendment requires the State of the Game report to include an assessment of existing and effective financial distribution agreement against the relevant principles.
97
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 10, page 6, line 41, at end insert—
“(d) regardless of whether any women’s football competitions have been specified, consideration of the state of women’s football in England.”
This amendment requires the State of the Game report to include an assessment of the state of women’s football in England.
98
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 10, page 6, line 41, at end insert—
“(d) an assessment and examination of the financial consequences, and the impact on the integrity of specified competitions, of multi-club ownership models.”
This amendment requires the State of the Game report to include an assessment and examination of the financial consequences and impact on the integrity of specified competitions of multi-club ownership models.
99
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 10, page 6, line 41, at end insert—
“(d) an assessment of player welfare, taking into account the number of games played and any other issues the IFR deems relevant.”
This amendment requires the State of the Game report to include an assessment of player welfare, taking into account the number of games played and other issues determined relevant by the IFR.
100
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 10, page 6, line 41, at end insert—
“(d) an assessment of the efficacy of the enforcement by each specified competition organiser of its relevant rules surrounding profit, sustainability, and financial fair play between its regulated clubs, and
(e) an assessment of the progress of each club, and of the progress of English football as a whole, against metrics measuring and principles governing—
(i) equality, diversity and inclusion,
(ii) environmental sustainability,
(iii) social impact (including how participation reflects local demographics), and
(iv) ethics.”
This amendment requires the State of the Game report to include an assessment of the efficacy of the enforcement by each competition organiser of the enforcement of its rules regarding profit, sustainability and fair play, and an assessment of the progress of each club and English football as a whole against EDI, sustainability, social impact and ethical metrics.
105
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 10, page 7, line 2, leave out “18” and insert “12”
This amendment requires the first State of the Game report to be published no later than 12 (rather than 18) months after regulations under section 2(3) come into force.
107
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 10, page 7, line 6, leave out “five” and insert “three”
This amendment requires a State of the Game report to be published every three (rather than five) years.
122
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)After Clause 14, insert the following new Clause—
“Reporting requirements (women’s football)
(1) The Secretary of State must, no later than eighteen months after the date on which this Act is passed, carry out a review of the professional tiers of women’s football to determine whether the competitions specified by the Secretary of State under section 2(3) should include women’s football competitions.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the review should take account of—
(a) the State of the Game Report,
(b) the risk of financial failure in women’s football, and
(c) such other considerations as the Secretary of State considers appropriate.
(3) The results of the review must be published and laid before Parliament.”
This amendment requires the Secretary of State to carry out a review (no later than 18 months after the Act is passed) to determine whether women’s football should be within the IFR’s scope.
128
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 16, page 10, line 10, after “owner” insert “and their source of funds”
This amendment requires a personnel statement to identify both a club’s ultimate owner, and that owner’s source of funds.
137
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Schedule 4, page 96, line 13, at end insert “, and
(d) the home ground threshold requirement (see paragraph 6).”
This amendment makes it a threshold requirement (which a club must comply with to obtain a full licence) to meet certain requirements (as inserted by amendment 147) relating to the club’s home ground.
138
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Schedule 4, page 97, line 15, after “has” insert “structures and processes for effective engagement with its fans and”
This amendment alters the fan engagement threshold requirement by requiring a club to have structures and processes for effective engagement with its fans.
147
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Schedule 4, page 98, line 3, at end insert—
“Home ground
6 (1)The home ground threshold requirement is met, in relation to a club, if the club—
(a)has security of tenure over a home ground for at least the minimum period, and
(b)the home ground is suitable for the club's use for footballing purposes.
(2)In subsection (a), the minimum period is 20 years, or such other period as the IFR may determine in respect of a particular club (where there are compelling reasons why it should be shortened).
(3)In determining whether subsection (b) is satisfied in respect of a club, the IFR shall have regard to the specified competition and league in which a club plays and whether the facilities satisfy the requirements set out by the relevant competition organiser(s), as well as any other factors that it deems relevant.
(4)In this paragraph, "home ground" shall have the meaning given to it in section 46(10)(a).”
This amendment inserts the home ground threshold requirement, which will be satisfied if the club has security of tenure over its ground for a minimum period, and that ground is suitable for the club’s use for footballing purposes.
150
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Schedule 5, page 98, line 11, at end insert—
“(e) an Asset of Community Value condition.”
This amendment makes it a threshold requirement (which a club must comply with to obtain a full licence) to meet certain requirements (as inserted by amendment 164) relating to the treatment of the club’s home ground as an Asset of Community Value.
151
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Schedule 5, page 98, line 11, at end insert—
“(e) a corporate responsibility condition.”
This amendment makes compliance with corporate responsibility requirements a condition of a club’s operating licence.
152
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Schedule 5, page 98, line 11, at end insert—
“(e) an enforcement condition.”
164
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Schedule 5, page 101, line 5, at end insert—
“Asset of Community Value
11A The Asset of Community Value condition is a condition requiring a club to either—
(a) obtain and maintain Asset of Community Value status for its home ground, or
(b) incorporate into its Articles of Association a restriction which substantially mirrors the restrictions placed on Assets of Community Value under the Localism Act 2011,
and the Secretary of State may create regulations detailing further the implementation of the Asset of Community Value condition.”
This amendment inserts the Asset of Community Value threshold condition.
165
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Schedule 5, page 101, line 5, at end insert—
“Corporate responsibility
11A The corporate responsibility condition is a condition requiring a club to—
(a) demonstrate due consideration of the impact of the club’s operations and activities on society and the environment;
(b) take reasonable steps to—
(i) achieve the environmental sustainability requirements (set out in section 1(3)), and
(ii) increase diversity and inclusion of underrepresented groups and to eliminate discrimination;
(c) have a material positive impact on the community in which it (or its associated charitable entity) operates;
(d) establish and keep updated a target, which is consistent with corporate governance best practice, in respect of the gender diversity of the officers identified in section 4(1)(b) of the club;
(e) report as part of the corporate governance statement (see paragraph 4) its compliance with sub-paragraphs (a), (b), (c) and (d) above (and ensure that any associated charitable entity provides any information required to comply with this sub-paragraph).”
This amendment brings concerns around environmental sustainability into the remit of the regulator.
167
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Schedule 5, page 101, line 8, at end insert—
“Enforcement
13 An enforcement condition is a condition requiring a club to incorporate and maintain within its Articles of Association (or equivalent constitutional document) provisions which:
(a) require any person in respect of whom the IFR makes an order under section 43 to:
(i) transfer the shares and/or voting rights which are held, directly or indirectly, in the club by that person (or by the trustees or members referred to in paragraph 2(5)(a) of Schedule 1),
(ii) terminate that person's right (or that of the trustees or members referred to in paragraph 2(5)(a) of Schedule 1) to exercise, or cease to exercise, significant influence or control over the activities of the club, and
(iii) terminate that person's right (or that of the trustees or members referred to in paragraph 2(5)(a) of Schedule 1) to appoint or remove an officer of the club, and
(b) empower any director of the club, or any trustee appointed by virtue of an order under section 43, to complete, execute and deliver in the name of, and as agent and attorney on behalf of, the person referred to in paragraph 13(a) (or the trustees or members referred to in paragraph 2(5)(a) of Schedule 1) all documents necessary to fulfil that person's obligations under paragraph 13(a).”
This amendment requires clubs to incorporate into their Articles of Association provisions which would facilitate the sale of a club by an owner against whom an order by the IFR has been made.
178
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 26, page 19, line 16, at end insert—
(c) respects and promotes the protection of human rights and prevents modern slavery (as set out in section (Human rights and modern slavery considerations)).”
This amendment requires an individual to respect and promote the protection of human rights and prevent modern slavery in order to meet the individual ownership fitness criteria.
181
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 28, page 20, line 37, at end insert—
“(v) how the applicant satisfies the individual ownership fitness criteria;”
182
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 28, page 21, line 4, at end insert “and the applicant has provided a commitment to maintain long-term use of the relevant club’s home ground (with said commitment to be codified in such form as the IFR may determine).”
183
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 28, page 21, line 8, after first “the” insert “applicant has demonstrated, and the”
184
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 28, page 21, line 12, at end insert—
(c) the applicant has provided a commitment to maintain long-term use of the relevant club’s home ground (with said commitment to be codified in such form as the IFR may determine).”
185
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)After Clause 28, Insert the following new Clause—
“Human rights and modern slavery considerations
(1) When considering whether a person (“A”) satisfies the requirement in section 26(7)(c), the IFR shall have regard to (among other things)—
(a) whether A has been complicit in any egregious or consistent violation(s) of international human rights law, whether of any international human rights treaty, customary law, or other instrument,
(b) whether A has been convicted, cautioned or reprimanded or complicit in any egregious or consistent violation(s) of domestic human rights legislation, including breaching provisions in the UK Modern Slavery Act 2015 or equivalent national legislation;
(c) whether A has been subject to a Slavery and Trafficking Prevention Order,
(d) whether A has been found liable in a civil claim relating to a human rights violation,
(e) whether A has been convicted of an offence, cautioned or reprimanded for failing to comply with their human rights and modern slavery reporting and due diligence obligations under applicable domestic legislation,
(f) whether A has been complicit in any hate incidents, including non-crime hate incidents,
(g) whether A has engaged in any other conduct of a nature which, if A were to act as an owner or officer, risks bringing the league, the game, or any regulated club into disrepute,
(h) whether the fitness or propriety of any person, or of any government, entity, or organisation with whom A is connected in their personal, business or political dealings is of a nature which, if either person was to become an owner or officer, risks bringing the league, the game, or any regulated club into disrepute, and
(i) any representations made by A or the club in accordance with the notice.
(2) In subsection (1)—
(a) where A is a body corporate or other non-corporeal entity (including a government or nation state), the IFR shall consider the actions of anyone who controls that body corporate or entity (and “control” shall have the meaning given in section 255 of the Companies Act 2006). and
(b) the IFR shall have absolute discretion to determine whether conduct falls within any of the categories in paragraphs (a) to (d).
(3) In respect of subsection (1)(c) and (d), a risk of disrepute shall not be valid grounds for disqualification of any person if such disrepute would, in the reasonable opinion of the IFR, be unfounded.”
This amendment inserts a new list of human rights and modern slavery considerations which the IFR shall have regard to when considering whether an individual meets the individual ownership fitness criteria.
187
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 32, page 24, line 20, after second “extended” insert “and, in each case, the determination period shall have an end date which is as soon as is reasonably practicable.”
197
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 37, page 29, line 4, leave out “must” and insert “may”
174A
Lord Moynihan (Con)Clause 23, page 15, line 40, at end insert—
“(4A) No later than 6 weeks before giving the notice, the IFR must—
(a) inform the club and the specified competition organiser of the circumstances that give rise to the IFR seeking to attach the proposed condition or variation, and
(b) invite the specified competition organiser to give a commitment under subsection (3)(c)(ii).”
200
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)After Clause 37, insert the following new Clause—
“State-controlled clubs
(1) For the purposes of this section, a state-controlled club is one which is wholly or majority-owned by individual(s), entities, or entities controlled by individual(s) who are deemed by the IFR or the Secretary of State to be under the influence of any state actor, including but not limited to—
(a) members of any government or their immediate family,
(b) a head of state or their immediate family,
(c) diplomats, lobbyists, or other state representatives, or their immediate family, and
(d) sovereign wealth funds.
(2) No state-controlled club may be granted an operating licence, and any affected club must satisfy the IFR that they have divested themselves of their state-control before applying for an operating licence.”
This amendment prohibits state-controlled clubs (which are defined in the proposed amendment) being granted an operating licence.
205
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 45, page 37, line 6, at end insert “, or
(b) carry on any activity and/or take any step which the IFR considers would prioritise the operation of a team in a restricted competition over the operation of that team in any relevant competition.”
This amendment prohibits clubs prioritising certain “restricted competitions” over relevant competitions, i.e. it is designed to prevent clubs prioritising (for example) the Club World Cup (or similar) over the league/FA Cup etc.
207
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 45, page 37, line 10, at end insert—
“(c) a club that is not a regulated club but which bears a material resemblance to a club referred to in subsection (2)(a) or (b) due to factors including its name, shirt colours or players.”
208
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 45, page 37, line 14, at end insert—
“(4A) A “restricted competition” is a competition specified as a restricted competition for the purposes of this section in rules made by the IFR.”
This amendment defines a “restricted competition” as a competition which the IFR has specified as such.
210
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 45, page 37, line 26, at end insert—
“(5A) In considering whether to specify a competition as a restricted competition, the IFR must have regard to—
(a) whether a club which prioritises the operation of a team in the competition—
(i) could jeopardise the sustainability of any relevant competition,
(ii) could jeopardise the sustainability of clubs operating teams in relation to any relevant competition,
(iii) could harm the heritage of English football, and
(iv) could harm the ability of that club to operate that team in any relevant competition in a manner which respects the integrity of that relevant competition, and
(b) any other factors that the IFR specifies in rules.”
This amendment sets out factors which the IFR must consider when determining whether to specify a competition as a restricted competition.
211
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 45, page 37, line 27, after second “competition” insert “or a restricted competition”
212
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 45, page 37, line 30, after “competition” insert “or a restricted competition”
This amendment is a consequential amendment relating to Amendment 205.
214
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 45, page 37, line 39, after second “competition” insert “or a restricted competition”
This amendment is a consequential amendment relating to Amendment 205.
215
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 45, page 38, line 3, after “competition” insert “or a restricted competition”
This amendment is a consequential amendment relating to Amendment 205.
216
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 45, page 38, line 5, after second “competition” insert “or a restricted competition”
This amendment is a consequential amendment relating to Amendment 205.
217
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 45, page 38, line 9, after second “competition” insert “or a restricted competition”
This amendment is a consequential amendment relating to Amendment 205.
218
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 45, page 38, line 19, after “competition” insert “or a restricted competition”
This amendment is a consequential amendment relating to Amendment 205.
222
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 46, page 38, line 28, leave out “home ground” and insert “specified properties”
This amendment expands the duty to notify the IFR of the use of a home ground as security for a loan to include the use of any specified properties as such security.
223
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 46, page 38, line 28, at end insert—
“(c) making substantial changes to the specified properties or the site on which the home ground is situated.”
This amendment requires the IFR to be notified where there is a reasonable prospect of changes being made to the specified properties or site on which the home ground is situated.
229
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 46, page 39, line 5, at end insert—
“(6A) Before the IFR grants an approval under subsection 6 it must—
(a) consult the supporters of the body in question, the relevant competition organisers and persons representing the local community with which the body is associated, and
(b) have regard to the views expressed by those consulted.”
This amendment requires the IFR to consult the relevant supporters, competition organisers and local community, and have regard to their views, before granting approval to dispose of an interest in a specified property or use it as security.
234
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 48, page 40, line 18, at end insert—
“(4A) In order for the IFR to be satisfied of subsection (4)(b), a regulated club must take reasonable steps to establish that the majority of the club’s fans in England and Wales do not consider the arrangements to constitute significant harm to the heritage of the club.”
This amendment specifies how the IFR would determine that a club moving home ground would not cause significant harm to the heritage of the club, namely by establishing that a majority of the club’s fans in England and Wales do not consider that the move would do this.
237
Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay (Con) - Shadow Minister (Culture, Media and Sport)Clause 49, page 40, line 27, leave out “crest” and insert “badge”
To avoid the incorrect use of heraldic terms.
242
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)After Clause 49, insert the following new Clause—
“Incorporation of heritage restrictions in Articles of Association
(1) A regulated club must, within the time limit, ensure that the requirements in sections 48(4A) and 49(1) are incorporated into its Articles of Association.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the time limit is the period of one year from the day on which this section comes into force, or such other period of time as the IFR may direct in relation to a particular regulated club.
(3) Subsection (1) is fulfilled if the club's Articles of Association provide for even greater fan consultation than sections 48(4A) and 49(1) require.”
This amendment requires clubs to incorporate into their Articles of Association the heritage restrictions in sections 48(4A) and 49(1).
250
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 53, page 42, line 22, at end insert—
(f) the amount which the IFR estimates is necessary to fund appropriately for that period the Central Fund established pursuant to Section (Central Fund).”
This amendment adds another factor which must be considered (namely the amount required to fund the Central Fund - see amendment 254) when determining the amount of the levy.
252
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 53, page 43, line 22, after “club” insert “and in particular that the starting point for calculation of the levy payment applicable to a particular club should be a percentage of annual revenue”
This amendment provides for the levy to be calculated by reference to the annual revenue of a club.
254
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)After Clause 53 insert the following new Clause—
“Central Fund
(1) The IFR must—
(a) hold, manage and apply in accordance with the provisions of this section a fund to be known as the Central Fund,
(b) fund the Central Fund with the levy which is payable by licensed clubs pursuant to section 53, and
(c) have such powers and duties in respect of the Central Fund as are conferred or imposed by this section.
(2) The IFR may apply the Central Fund for the purposes set out in rules made by the IFR.”
This amendment provides for the IFR to establish and fund a Central Fund.
259
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 55, page 45, line 17, at end insert—
“(c) include evidence that the specified competition organiser has taken into account the views of all regulated clubs that compete in that specified competition.”
This amendment requires a competition organiser to demonstrate that it had consulted with clubs involved in that competition, when consulting the IFR about additions to/removals from/changes to a competition’s rules.
260
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 56, page 45, line 25, leave out “a specified competition organiser to apply to the IFR for”
This amendment is one of a series of amendments which mean that it is not only a specified competition organiser which can trigger the mediation process regarding the distribution of revenue.
262
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 56, Page 45, line 30, after “process” insert “, or if the IFR is not satisfied that the distribution which is the subject of that agreement complies with the principles in section 62(2)”
This amendment permits the IFR to make an order regarding revenue distribution if it is not satisfied that the proposal made by the competition organiser(s) complies with the principles in s.62(2).
264
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 56, page 45, line 35, leave out “the” and insert “any”
This amendment provides for this section to refer to multiple, rather than a single, competition organiser.
267
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 56, page 46, line 5, at end insert—
“(d) such other persons which appear to the Secretary of State to represent the views of the fans of regulated clubs, and
(e) such other persons which appear to the Secretary of State to represent the views of regulated clubs.”
This amendment requires the Secretary of State to consult people who represent the views of regulated clubs, and the views of fans of regulated clubs, before making regulations which specify the source or description of “relevant revenue”.
268
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 56, page 46, leave out lines 13 to 17 and insert—
““distribution agreement” means an agreement (including an agreement entered into before the coming into force of this Part) between two or more specified competition organisers that provides for the distribution of relevant revenue received by one, both or all of those organisers as applicable;”
This amendment amends the definition of “distribution agreement”.
269
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 56, page 46, line 20, after “57” insert “, or a notification under section (Independent notification for resolution process to be triggered by the IFR)”
This amendment is one of a series of which mean that it is not only a specified competition organiser which can trigger the mediation process regarding the distribution of revenue.
272
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 57, page 46, line 39, leave out “another” and insert “one or more other”
This is one of a series of amendments which provide for there to be more than two relevant specified competition organisers.
273
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 57, page 46, line 40, leave out “organiser” and insert “organisers”
This is one of a series of amendments which provide for there to be more than two relevant specified competition organisers.
274
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 57, page 47, line 8, leave out “two”
This is one of a series of amendments which provide for there to be more than two relevant specified competition organisers.
276
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 57, page 47, line 13, leave out “reduction” and insert “change (whether to the amount received in quantum or to the amount received as a proportion of the overall relevant revenue)”
This amendment provides that a competition organiser can apply to the IFR to trigger the resolution process if there has been a change (rather than only a reduction) to the revenue received by a competition organiser in a particular season as compared to the previous season.
277
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 57, page 47, line 17, leave out “two”
278
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 57, page 47, line 22, leave out “either or both of”
This is one of a series of amendments which provide for there to be more than two relevant specified competition organisers.
279
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 57, page 47, line 30, leave out “two”
This is one of a series of amendments which provide for there to be more than two relevant specified competition organisers.
282
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 58, page 47, line 39, leave out “organiser” and insert “organiser(s)”
This is one of a series of amendments which provide for there to be more than two relevant specified competition organisers.
283
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 58, page 47, line 39, leave out “respondent” and insert “respondent(s)”
This is one of a series of amendments which provide for there to be more than two relevant specified competition organisers.
284
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 58, page 48, line 5, at end insert—
“(ca) specify why the notifier considers that any issues highlighted or set out in the most recent state of the game report are not satisfactorily resolved by the distribution agreement in relation to that season or those seasons,”
This amendment requires any notification which a competition organiser gives to trigger the resolution process regarding distribution to explain why issues highlighted in the most recent state of the game report are not resolved by the distribution agreement in relation to that season/those seasons.
285
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 58, page 48, line 6, leave out “respondent” and insert “respondent(s)”
This is one of a series of amendments which provide for there to be more than two relevant specified competition organisers.
286
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 58, page 48, line 20, at end insert—
“(ca) specify why the notifier considers that any issues highlighted or set out in the most recent state of the game report are not satisfactorily resolved by the distribution agreement in relation to that season or those seasons,”
This amendment requires an application to trigger the resolution process regarding distribution to explain why issues highlighted in the most recent state of the game report are not resolved by the distribution agreement in relation to that season/those seasons.
287
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 58, page 48, line 22, leave out “respondent” and insert “respondent(s)”
This is one of a series of amendments which provide for there to be more than two relevant specified competition organisers.
289
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 59, page 48, line 40, leave out “either of the” and insert “one or more of the relevant”
This is one of a series of amendments which provide for there to be more than two relevant specified competition organisers.
290
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 59, page 49, line 3, leave out “two”
This is one of a series of amendments which provide for there to be more than two relevant specified competition organisers.
291
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 59, page 49, line 10, leave out “two”
This is one of a series of amendments which provide for there to be more than two relevant specified competition organisers.
292
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 59, page 49, line 15, leave out “special” and insert “compelling”
293
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Before Clause 60, insert the following new Clause—
“Independent notification for resolution process to be triggered by the IFR
(1) The IFR may decide that the resolution process should be triggered in relation to a qualifying football season if the IFR is satisfied that issues with a current distribution agreement or financial distribution order are identified in the latest state of the game report and at least one of the conditions in section 57 applies.
(2) In deciding whether the resolution process should be triggered under section 57(1)(a), the IFR may have regard to the purposes for which the distributed revenue would be used.
(3) In deciding whether the resolution process should be triggered in reliance on the condition in section 57(3), the IFR may have regard to whether the situation described in section 57(3) has arisen as a result of bad faith on the part of any specified competition organiser.
(4) If the IFR decides that the resolution process should be triggered, the IFR must notify every relevant specified competition organiser and give reasons for its decision, and set out in the notice—
(a) the qualifying football season or seasons to which the resolution process relates, and
(b) the question or issues for resolution.
(5) Where the IFR is deciding whether to exercise a function mentioned in section 57(1)(a), the IFR must notify the Chief Executive Officer.
(6) No notification under subsection (4) may be made if the IFR has received a notification under section 57 and it remains under consideration.”
This amendment inserts a mechanism for the IFR to trigger the resolution process.
295
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 60, page 49, line 19, leave out “two”
This is one of a series of amendments which provide for there to be more than two relevant specified competition organisers.
296
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 60, page 49, line 26, leave out “special” and insert “compelling”
297
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 60, page 50, line 5, leave out “either” and insert “any”
This is one of a series of amendments which provide for there to be more than two relevant specified competition organisers.
298
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 61, page 50, line 14, leave out “the two” and insert “all relevant”
299
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 61, page 50, line 19, leave out “each of the two” and insert “all relevant”
This is one of a series of amendments which provide for there to be more than two relevant specified competition organisers.
300
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 62, page 51, line 5, leave out “both”
This is one of a series of amendments which provide for there to be more than two relevant specified competition organisers.
301
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 62, page 51, line 7, leave out “both final proposals are” and insert “more than one final proposal is”
This is one of a series of amendments which provide for there to be more than two relevant specified competition organisers.
305
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 62, page 51, line 13, leave out “the other is” and insert “all others are”
This is one of a series of amendments which provide for there to be more than two relevant specified competition organisers.
306
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 62, page 51, line 16, leave out “neither” and insert “no”
This is one of a series of amendments which provide for there to be more than two relevant specified competition organisers.
308
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 62, page 51, line 23, leave out “either specified competition organiser” and insert “any regulated club”
309
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 62, page 51, line 28, at end insert—
“(d) should seek to close the financial gaps between divisions,
(e) should provide adequate compensation for player development, ring-fenced for academy development and the welfare of former players,
(f) should incentivise clubs to be well run,
(g) should provide training for volunteers at grassroots clubs, and
(h) should address to the satisfaction of the IFR any issues identified by the relevant state of the game report.”
This amendment ensures that any distribution deal must pass parameters set by the regulator, and that these parameters could include closing the growing financial gap between divisions, rewarding well-run clubs and providing adequate compensation for the development of players.
313
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 62, page 52, line 6, leave out “either” and insert “any”
This is one of a series of amendments which provide for there to be more than two relevant specified competition organisers.
314
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 62, page 52, line 14, leave out “special” and insert “compelling”
This amendment requires there to be compelling (rather than special) reasons for extending the deadline for making a distribution order.
315
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 62, page 52, line 23, at end insert—
“(8A) Where subsection (1)(c), (4)(b), or (5) applies, the committee must make an order requiring the relevant revenue to be distributed in accordance with a proposal of its own that is consistent with the principles in subsection (2) on or before the last day of the period of 28 days beginning with the final proposal deadline.”
This amendment gives the committee the power to make a distribution in accordance with its own proposal, rather than having to adopt one of the proposals presented to it.
318
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)Clause 63, page 53, line 11, after “relates” insert “provided that the distribution agreement complies with section 62(1)(a) or (b) or section 62(4)(a), and the principles set out in section 62(2)”
This amendment narrows the circumstances in which the IFR must revoke a distribution order where the competition organisers have agreed a distribution agreement to circumstances where that distribution order complies with section 62(1)(a) or(b) or section 62(4)(a), and the principles set out in section 62(2).
319
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 64, page 53, line 28, leave out subsection (3)
This amendment deletes the provision which permitted the competition organisers to agree how to distribute revenue, regardless of the IFR’s powers of oversight/review.
331
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Lab)Clause 92, page 74, line 24, at end insert “or give rise to the perception that the person’s functions have been prejudicially affected, including (but not limited to) a situation in which a person is—
(a) employed by or engaged as a consultant by any specified competition organiser or any group undertaking of a specified competition organiser,
(b) connected in any capacity with an organisation which has, in the last year, received at least half of its income from a specified competition organiser,
(c) connected with a group undertaking of an organisation within the scope of paragraph (b),
(d) connected in any capacity with an organisation which has, in the last year, received at least half of its income from any of the organisations listed in paragraphs (b) or (c), or
(e) connected (as defined in section 252 of the Companies Act 2006) with an individual within the scope of paragraphs (a), (b), (c) or (d) of this definition;”
This amendment expands the nature of a conflict of interest to include an interest which could give rise to the perception that a person’s functions have been prejudicially affected. The amendment also inserts some non-exhaustive examples of a conflict of interest.
Clause 46, page 38, line 25, leave out second “home ground” and insert “specified properties"
Clause 56, page 46, line 29, leave out “62” and insert "63"
Clause 60, page 49, line 18, after “59(5)” insert “or section 60(4)”
89
Baroness Taylor of Bolton (Lab)After Clause 8, insert the following new Clause—
“Reporting duty
(1) Within six months of the day on which this Act is passed and annually thereafter, the IFR must publish a report on the extent to which they have—
(a) achieved their objectives under Section 6 of this Act,
(b) discharged their general duties under Section 7 of this Act, and
(c) complied with their regulatory principles under Section 8 of this Act.
(2) The IFR must provide this report to the Secretary of State, who must lay it before Parliament.”
This amendment requires the IFR to publish a report (six months after the Act is passed and annually thereafter) on how it has achieved its objectives, discharged its duties and complied with the regulatory principles.