Statutory law of the United Kingdom
The statuary laws of the United Kingdom. Acts of Parliament are written and approved by the House of Commons and Lords, enacted by the Queen and enforced by the courts.
Only Parliament has the power to create laws, so first get elected to the House of Commons or appointed to the House of Lords.
An MP or Lord tables a proposed Act before Parliament, called a Bill, that must perform the full bill process before becoming enacted into law. Around 40 Acts of Parliament are passed in each Parliamentary Session.
By tabling another Act of Parliament.
The majority of Acts of Parliament modify existing Acts of Parliament, rather than creating new standalone legislation. This allows legislation to be maintained within the original Act, rather than scattered across multiple Acts.
Not necessarily. An Act of Parliament may provide the Government with the power to issue and amend legislation under the Act, called Secondary (or Delegated) Legislation. Around 3,000 items of Secondary Legislation are enacted in each Session.
This power to create Secondary Legislation is often phrased as 'The Secretary of State may by order...' or 'Her Majesty may by Order in Council' within the 'primary' Act. Any Secondary Legislation will cite the section of the Act that allows it to be enacted.
Secondary Legislation can be very extensive. The detailed body of UK aviation law is contained entirely within a piece of Secondary Legislation called the Air Navigation Order, issued under the authority of Section 60 of the Civil Aviation Act 1982 .
Acts can provide 'Henry VIII' powers, to amend an Act of Parliament itself, without going through the Parliamentary process.
For example, the original Climate Change Act 2008 stated in Section 1(1):
However, Section 2 of the Act provides that:
In 2019, the Government used this power to issue the The Climate Change Act 2008 (2050 Target Amendment) Order 2019, a piece of Secondary Legislation which utilised the powers of Section 2, to amend the original target of 80% to one of 100%.
The power to utilise Secondary Legislation to create and modify law with lesser Parliamentary scrutiny has to be explicitly stated in the primary Act. If not provided then a new Act is required.
There is a general doctrine called 'implied repeal' which states that new Acts supercede previous Acts.
Parliament also performs 'housecleaning' of legislation every few years to repeal obsolete laws, called 'Statute Law (Repeals) Acts', most recently in 2013.
However, Acts of Parliament have supremacy over the courts, and if a mistake is made in an Act then the court has no discretion to fix it.
Yes, it does.
In 2003 Parliament passed the Criminal Justice Act 2003, which repealed section 116 of the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000. This change removed the powers of courts to impose additional sentences on prisoners who committed crimes while released on licence. The prisoner would have to return to prison under their licence conditions, but any additional sentence would be served during this period, rather than appended to the original sentence, meaning the crime was effectively committed 'for free'.
In 2008, Jamie Costello was released on licence after serving 2 years of a 4 year sentence for robbery and battery, but just 3 months after his release he assaulted his girlfriend with sufficient seriousness to warrant a 6 month sentence. However:
Costello appealed on the grounds that a 31 month sentence was not compatible with the law. The Criminal Court of Appeal found in his favour noting:
Much more important, however, is the repeal of s 116 PCC(S)A. This was clearly a deliberate repeal. No public statement of the reasons for it has been made that we have been able to find. It may be that it was thought that administrative recall would sufficiently deal with prisoners who re-offend on licence. As we have shown, it is far from clear that it does in fact do so, but in addition, it creates the problem set out in paragraph 1 above.
It seems unlikely that it was Parliament's objective that re-offending prisoners must have passed on them sentences which may add nothing to their time in custody. It is no doubt much more likely that this is an unintended consequence of the repeal. But it is not open to courts to disobey a Parliamentary enactment (or, here, repeal) on the grounds that it has unwittingly led to unfortunate consequences. To inflate sentence B, as the judge did here, is to attempt to avoid the repeal of s 116. We are unable to see that a court can be entitled to do this, however laudable its aim.
Costello, having served his sentence under licence at the time of the appeal, was released from custody.
Acts are created with the same basic structure:
Acts have two titles, a Short Title by which the Act is commonly cited eg. Abortion Act 1967 and a Long Title, a description that outlines the scope of the legislation, such as "An Act to amend and clarify the law relating to termination of pregnancy by registered medical practitioners."
A standard introductory text stating the authority on which an Act of Parliament is founded:
The text will be given in clauses contained in subsections and paragraphs. These will be grouped into Sections, which in larger Acts, may be further grouped into Parts and Chapters.
Schedules are appendices, and used when an Act requires lengthy lists, tables or definitions that would be tiresome to have within the main body of the Act. Schedules have exactly the same legal force as text within the Sections of an Act.
For example, Schedule 5 of the Shops Act 1950 (now repealed) listed the trade that were permitted on Sundays and remained in effect until 1994.
Yes it is! Lets talk more about that Shops Act 1950. The Act was written at a time when Sunday trading was sharply limited and provided an explicit list in Schedule 5 of the transactions for which Sunday trading was permitted. This included:
Such wonderfully specific wording meant that a Sunday shopper would find Chinese takeaways selling fish and chips, and fish and chip shops selling hamburgers, but not a fish and chip shop selling fish and chips.
Similarly, Section(1)(h) provided that it was legal to sell:
Which meant, as one MP wryly noted:
However, Sunday trading being an issue of perennial debate, the Act did not provide any provision for the Government to amend this law through secondary legislation. These prohibitions remained in force until 1994, with the passage of the Deregulation and Contracting Out Act 1994 which Repealed the entire Shops Act 1950.
Quite a few. The Law Commission has produced a list exploring commonly believed quirky laws.
There are a number of resources for each Act that provide additional information to understanding the effect and impact of legislation, which can usually be accessed from the relevant Acts legislation.gov.uk page. These are usually provided to assist readers and are not considered legally binding definitions of the relevant Act.
Each Bill will provide Explanatory Notes that give a plain English explanation for the legislative text. For instance the Explanatory Notes for Section 54 of the Policing and Crime Actstate:
For legislation that will have a financial impact upon the Government, an impact statement must be produced and signed by the relevant Minister. Impact assessments may reveal additional insight into the motivations and objectives of legislation. For example, the impact assessment of the Immigration (Health Charge) (Amendment) Order 2020 states:
Keeling Schedules are akin to 'Track Changes' versions of the legislation being changed, with insertions, deletions and amendments being clearly indicated
Statutory laws are the written text (or ‘statutes’) of the law, but England and Wales operates as a ‘common law’ jurisdiction.
Common law comprises the body of binding legal judgments made by courts as to how exactly the law should be interpreted. As other courts will consider those precedents when making later judgments, this body of prior judgement becomes as much a part of the actual law as the written law itself.
Binding precedent can be overturned by a superior court, such as the Court of Appeal, or ultimately, the Supreme Court. Alternatively, statute law triumphs over common law, and can be used to remove any established precedents created under common law, such as the ‘year and a day’ rule previously applied to murder prosecutions.
Some offenses, such as murder, are only defined in common law, as they have been historically prosecuted before written laws and have never been place in statute.
Common law can cause confusion, as people may claim ‘common law’ rights, despite subsequent statute or precedent refuting those claims.
Consider a simple statuary law, Section 90 of the Police Act 1996, which defines the criminal offense of impersonating a police officer.
Clause 2 of the section deals with wearing items of clothing:
‘Any person who, not being a constable, wears any article of police uniform in circumstances where it gives him an appearance so nearly resembling that of a member of a police force as to be calculated to deceive shall be guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale.’
The statutory law defines a broad principle, but there are infinite variations on whether a particular item in a particular circumstance could be considered a breach of the law.
Until somebody is prosecuted and either convicted or acquitted in a particular circumstance, creating a common law precedent, it may not be clear whether a particular circumstance could be against the law or not. The law will thus be created by the court, and precedent used to establish in future prosecutions.
Much of the work done by lawyers involves searching for precedents relevant and supportive to a case. These can be used to argue that a court has already determined the issue, and their present case should be decided the same way as the previous court.
UK Parliament Glossary: Acts of Parliament