Consultants

(asked on 21st July 2014) - View Source

Question to the Attorney General:

To ask the Attorney General, pursuant to the Answer of 8 July 2014, Official Report, column 184W, on consultants, who the consultants were; what they were contracted to do; and how much each was paid.


Answered by
Robert Buckland Portrait
Robert Buckland
This question was answered on 1st September 2014

The information requested in respect of the Crown Prosecution Service was contained in an answer given to the Rt. Hon Member by the Attorney General on the 16th July (Official Report, Col 678W).

The table below contains details on the consultants used by the SFO since 2010-11.

Year

Contractor

Work type

Amount (£)

2010-11

PA Consultancy

Support work for senior management

986k

2010-11

Corven

Development work relating to Deferred

Prosecution Agreements; coaching

480k

2010-11

SCC

IT consultancy

60k

2010-11

DTZ

Preparation of Business case for

relocation and satellite offices

24k

2010-11

Morland Consulting

Research & Support Strategic

Risk Assessment

10k

2010-11

Processflows Ltd

IT consultancy

1k

2010-11

Ravn Systems Ltd

IT consultancy

7k

2011-12

PA Consultancy

Support work for senior

management

208k

2011-12

Corven

Consultancy work relating to

Deferred Prosecution Agreements

542k

2011-12

BNP Paribas

Lease surrender

61k

2011-12

Ravn Systems

IT consultancy

44k

2011-12

Hill and Knowlton

Communication advice

1k

2012-13

PA Consultancy

Late invoice for work in

2011-12 (as above)

31k

2013-14

SCC

IT consultancy

32k

2013-14

CIO Partners

Preparation of specialist

IT specification

2k

2013-14

Others*

Data management reviews

14k

* Two individuals carried out some work relating to an incident of data loss

Note 1: Records for this type of expenditure were not properly documented prior to April 2012. Available records are summarised above:

Note 2: The combined total of costs for the year 2010/11 does not match SFO’s previously published figures. The previous figure was understated by £10k because of credits for late invoices relating to 2009/10 which had been incorrectly categorised as consultancy expenditure.

Reticulating Splines