Information between 20th April 2026 - 30th May 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Yasmin Qureshi voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 280 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 284 Noes - 149 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Yasmin Qureshi voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 285 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 144 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Yasmin Qureshi voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 284 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 288 Noes - 147 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Yasmin Qureshi voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 283 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 287 Noes - 150 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Yasmin Qureshi voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 290 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 293 Noes - 155 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Yasmin Qureshi voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 297 Noes - 147 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Yasmin Qureshi voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 298 Noes - 152 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Yasmin Qureshi voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 287 Noes - 149 |
|
28 Apr 2026 - Business without Debate - View Vote Context Yasmin Qureshi voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 297 Labour Aye votes vs 6 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 28 |
|
28 Apr 2026 - Business without Debate - View Vote Context Yasmin Qureshi voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 308 Noes - 81 |
|
28 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Yasmin Qureshi voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 322 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 335 Noes - 158 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Yasmin Qureshi speeches from: Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eleventh sitting)
Yasmin Qureshi contributed 5 speeches (1,611 words) Committee stage: 11th sitting Tuesday 28th April 2026 - Public Bill Committees Ministry of Justice |
|
Yasmin Qureshi speeches from: Courts and Tribunals Bill (Twelfth sitting)
Yasmin Qureshi contributed 4 speeches (1,610 words) Committee stage: 12th sitting Tuesday 28th April 2026 - Public Bill Committees Ministry of Justice |
|
Yasmin Qureshi speeches from: Courts and Tribunals Bill (Ninth sitting)
Yasmin Qureshi contributed 5 speeches (1,517 words) Committee stage: 9th sitting Thursday 23rd April 2026 - Public Bill Committees Ministry of Justice |
|
Yasmin Qureshi speeches from: Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)
Yasmin Qureshi contributed 5 speeches (520 words) Thursday 23rd April 2026 - Public Bill Committees Ministry of Justice |
|
Yasmin Qureshi speeches from: Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)
Yasmin Qureshi contributed 9 speeches (1,583 words) Committee stage: 7th sitting Tuesday 21st April 2026 - Public Bill Committees Ministry of Justice |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
King's Guards: Uniforms
Asked by: Yasmin Qureshi (Labour - Bolton South and Walkden) Monday 20th April 2026 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what progress has been made in developing King’s Guard’s hats made of faux-fur. Answered by Luke Pollard - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) The Department has not yet identified a synthetic alternative that meets the standards required to provide an effective replacement for bearskin ceremonial caps. However, the Ministry of Defence remains committed to finding a synthetic alternative and continues to welcome submissions of test results, from a testing house accredited by the United Kingdom Accreditation Service, on synthetic alternatives that meet our criteria for a suitable, affordable and sustainable alternative to bearskin caps. |
|
Epilepsy: Children and Young People
Asked by: Yasmin Qureshi (Labour - Bolton South and Walkden) Tuesday 21st April 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether his Department has made an assessment of the potential merits of establishing an observational trial for children and young people on private prescriptions for drug-resistant epilepsy who cannot access medical cannabis on the NHS. Answered by Zubir Ahmed The Department funds research on health and social care through the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). The NIHR welcomes funding applications for research into any aspect of human health and care, including medicinal cannabis for drug-resistant epilepsy. These applications are subject to peer review and judged in open competition, with awards being made on the basis of the importance of the topic to patients and health and care services, value for money, and scientific quality. The NIHR and NHS England have confirmed over £9 million in funding for clinical trials to investigate whether two different cannabis-based medicines, one containing cannabidiol (CBD) and one containing a combination of CBD and tetrahydrocannabinol, are safe and effective treatments for drug-resistant epilepsies in adults and children. The trials will produce evidence of significant scientific value suitable for informing future clinical and commissioning decisions. While observational studies can be useful in some circumstances, they cannot demonstrate whether a treatment is safe or effective and would therefore be of limited scientific value compared with these trials. |
|
Soft Drinks: Taxation
Asked by: Yasmin Qureshi (Labour - Bolton South and Walkden) Wednesday 22nd April 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether the Office for Budget Responsibility provided estimates between March 2016 and April 2028 on the potential impact that the proposed Soft Drinks Industry Levy would have on the Consumer Price Index (CPI); and what estimate her Department has made of the potential impact of that policy on the CPI in the 2018-19 financial year. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) Forecasting the economy, including the impact of Government policy decisions on inflation, is the responsibility of the independent Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR).
The OBR set out its latest assessment of policy measures in its Spring Forecast 2026, published on 3 March 2026. The OBR did not publish a specific estimate of the impact of the Soft Drinks Industry Levy on inflation in that forecast, or in previous Economic and Fiscal Outlook publications since the levy was announced in 2016, which would include the impact for the 2018-19 financial year.
|
|
Visas: English Language
Asked by: Yasmin Qureshi (Labour - Bolton South and Walkden) Wednesday 22nd April 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, with reference to paragraph 5.60 of the policy paper entitled Explanatory memorandum to the statement of changes in the Immigration Rules: HC 1691, published on 5 March 2026, whether B2 level English language is required for applicants on the family visa route. Answered by Mike Tapp - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office) The changes to the English language requirements announced on 5 March 2026 will apply to individuals who are applying for settlement based on their family life, with effect from 26 March 2027. It is reasonable and proportionate that we give those already on a pathway to settlement 12 months to undertake the necessary learning. This does not affect individuals who are applying for temporary permission to stay in the UK based on their family life. The requirement to achieve B2 level English is equivalent to an A-level in a foreign language and evidences the ability to hold a conversation in English with a strong degree of fluency. Being able to communicate effectively in English is vital for integration, enabling people to make a meaningful contribution to their communities. We think this is a reasonable and realistic expectation. |
|
Conversion Therapy
Asked by: Yasmin Qureshi (Labour - Bolton South and Walkden) Wednesday 29th April 2026 Question To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, if she will include legislation to ban conversion therapy in the King's Speech in May 2026. Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) It has not proved possible to respond to the Hon Member in the time available before Prorogation. |
|
Infected Blood Inquiry
Asked by: Yasmin Qureshi (Labour - Bolton South and Walkden) Tuesday 28th April 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, with reference to Recommendation 9 (d) of the Infected Blood Inquiry report, what progress his Department has made on establishing functioning multi-disciplinary networks. Answered by Zubir Ahmed It is crucial we protect the safety of haemophilia care, and the Government is committed to implementing recommendation 9 of the 2024 Infected Blood Inquiry report. The Government is committed to improving the lives of those living with rare diseases, such as haemophilia. The UK Rare Diseases Framework sets out four priorities collaboratively developed with the rare disease community: these include getting a final diagnosis faster; increasing awareness of rare diseases among healthcare professionals; better coordination of care; and improving access to specialist care, treatments, and drugs. We published the fifth annual England action plan in February 2026, where we report on the steps we have taken to advance these priorities. Regarding 9d, the Clinical Community and the NHS England Clinical Reference Group for Blood Disorders support the need to develop and strengthen multi-disciplinary networks. NHS England has drafted a proposed National Clinical Network Specification specifically for these networks, which is dependent on additional funding and would embed key new requirements for providers to participate in a networked model of care. For 9f, NHS England currently provides ‘central’ funding of approximately 40% of the total annual cost for running the National Haemophilia Database. A task and finish group relating to the database has been established, reporting into the overarching recommendation 9 expert group. As of February 2026, stakeholders involved in the recommendation 9f working group are in agreement that the registry has been and remains immensely valuable in supporting the provision of clinical care. NHS England continues to work with the United Kingdom Haemophilia Centres Doctors' Organisation to understand the requirement for increased funding. Further progress on implementing recommendation 9 is subject to additional funding, and this has not yet been identified. NHS England and the Department will continue to work together to provide progress updates on the Government Reporting Integration Platform. |
|
Infected Blood Inquiry
Asked by: Yasmin Qureshi (Labour - Bolton South and Walkden) Tuesday 28th April 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, with reference to Recommendation 9(f) of the Infected Blood Inquiry report, what consideration has been given to providing additional funding for the national haemophilia database. Answered by Zubir Ahmed It is crucial we protect the safety of haemophilia care, and the Government is committed to implementing recommendation 9 of the 2024 Infected Blood Inquiry report. The Government is committed to improving the lives of those living with rare diseases, such as haemophilia. The UK Rare Diseases Framework sets out four priorities collaboratively developed with the rare disease community: these include getting a final diagnosis faster; increasing awareness of rare diseases among healthcare professionals; better coordination of care; and improving access to specialist care, treatments, and drugs. We published the fifth annual England action plan in February 2026, where we report on the steps we have taken to advance these priorities. Regarding 9d, the Clinical Community and the NHS England Clinical Reference Group for Blood Disorders support the need to develop and strengthen multi-disciplinary networks. NHS England has drafted a proposed National Clinical Network Specification specifically for these networks, which is dependent on additional funding and would embed key new requirements for providers to participate in a networked model of care. For 9f, NHS England currently provides ‘central’ funding of approximately 40% of the total annual cost for running the National Haemophilia Database. A task and finish group relating to the database has been established, reporting into the overarching recommendation 9 expert group. As of February 2026, stakeholders involved in the recommendation 9f working group are in agreement that the registry has been and remains immensely valuable in supporting the provision of clinical care. NHS England continues to work with the United Kingdom Haemophilia Centres Doctors' Organisation to understand the requirement for increased funding. Further progress on implementing recommendation 9 is subject to additional funding, and this has not yet been identified. NHS England and the Department will continue to work together to provide progress updates on the Government Reporting Integration Platform. |
|
Haemophilia: Health Services
Asked by: Yasmin Qureshi (Labour - Bolton South and Walkden) Tuesday 28th April 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department has taken to (a) increase funding and (b) tackle inequities between haemophilia centres. Answered by Zubir Ahmed It is crucial we protect the safety of haemophilia care, and the Government is committed to implementing recommendation 9 of the 2024 Infected Blood Inquiry report. The Government is committed to improving the lives of those living with rare diseases, such as haemophilia. The UK Rare Diseases Framework sets out four priorities collaboratively developed with the rare disease community: these include getting a final diagnosis faster; increasing awareness of rare diseases among healthcare professionals; better coordination of care; and improving access to specialist care, treatments, and drugs. We published the fifth annual England action plan in February 2026, where we report on the steps we have taken to advance these priorities. Regarding 9d, the Clinical Community and the NHS England Clinical Reference Group for Blood Disorders support the need to develop and strengthen multi-disciplinary networks. NHS England has drafted a proposed National Clinical Network Specification specifically for these networks, which is dependent on additional funding and would embed key new requirements for providers to participate in a networked model of care. For 9f, NHS England currently provides ‘central’ funding of approximately 40% of the total annual cost for running the National Haemophilia Database. A task and finish group relating to the database has been established, reporting into the overarching recommendation 9 expert group. As of February 2026, stakeholders involved in the recommendation 9f working group are in agreement that the registry has been and remains immensely valuable in supporting the provision of clinical care. NHS England continues to work with the United Kingdom Haemophilia Centres Doctors' Organisation to understand the requirement for increased funding. Further progress on implementing recommendation 9 is subject to additional funding, and this has not yet been identified. NHS England and the Department will continue to work together to provide progress updates on the Government Reporting Integration Platform. |
|
Free School Meals
Asked by: Yasmin Qureshi (Labour - Bolton South and Walkden) Wednesday 27th May 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment her Department has made of potential merits of providing free school meals to all school children. Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) This government is committed to breaking down barriers to opportunity and reducing child poverty. We have allocated over £1 billion towards expanding free school meals to all children in households on Universal Credit. This new entitlement will mean over 500,000 of the most disadvantaged children will begin to access free meals, pulling 100,000 children out of poverty. This is in addition to the money we already spend, around £1.5 billion annually, so that over 3 million pupils receive a healthy, nutritious meal during the school day. |
| MP Financial Interests |
|---|
|
27th April 2026
Yasmin Qureshi (Labour - Bolton South and Walkden) 8. Miscellaneous Chair of the Board of the Westminster Foundation for Democracy for a term of up to three years. This is an unpaid role. Source |
|
27th April 2026
Yasmin Qureshi (Labour - Bolton South and Walkden) 8. Miscellaneous Chair of the board of the Westminster Foundation for Democracy. This is an unpaid role Source |
|
27th April 2026
Yasmin Qureshi (Labour - Bolton South and Walkden) 8. Miscellaneous A Governor of the Board of the Westminster Foundation for Democracy for a three-year term. This is an unpaid role. Source |
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Tuesday 9th June Yasmin Qureshi signed this EDM on Tuesday 9th June 2026 30 signatures (Most recent: 9 Jun 2026) Tabled by: Richard Burgon (Labour - Leeds East) That this House warmly congratulates Tracy Thirlwall on her well earned retirement as Office Manager of the hon. Member for Leeds East's Constituency office after 11 successful years in that role; notes that her retirement comes after more than 4 decades of committed service for Leeds residents, firstly working in … |
|
Monday 1st June Yasmin Qureshi signed this EDM on Tuesday 2nd June 2026 Government response to Israel’s actions in the West Bank and Gaza 53 signatures (Most recent: 10 Jun 2026)Tabled by: Richard Burgon (Labour - Leeds East) That this House condemns the May 2026 order by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu for Israel’s army to seize 70% of the Gaza Strip; further condemns Israel's intensified annexation of the Occupied Palestinian Territory of the West Bank, including the approval of plans to register land there as Israeli state … |
|
Monday 18th May Yasmin Qureshi signed this EDM on Monday 18th May 2026 79 signatures (Most recent: 10 Jun 2026) Tabled by: Steve Witherden (Labour - Montgomeryshire and Glyndwr) That this House expresses grave concern at the executive order signed on 29 January 2026 by US President Donald Trump, which unjustifiably declares Cuba as an “extraordinary threat” to the national security of the United States and authorises new sanctions against any country supplying oil to Cuba; notes that Cuba … |
|
Wednesday 13th May Yasmin Qureshi signed this EDM on Thursday 14th May 2026 Redress for people impacted by surgical mesh, sodium valproate and Primodos 52 signatures (Most recent: 8 Jun 2026)Tabled by: Sarah Green (Liberal Democrat - Chesham and Amersham) That this House deplores the avoidable harm caused by the use of surgical mesh, Primodos and Sodium Valproate; acknowledges the ongoing need to support the hundreds of victims in the UK suffering as a result of these interventions; regrets that the recommendations made by Baroness Cumberlege in her 2020 report … |
|
Monday 23rd February Yasmin Qureshi signed this EDM on Wednesday 22nd April 2026 Government response to Israel’s West Bank annexation plan 84 signatures (Most recent: 29 Apr 2026)Tabled by: Richard Burgon (Labour - Leeds East) That this House notes the Israeli Government’s 15 February approval of a plan to register land in the Occupied Palestinian Territory of the West Bank as Israeli state property; strongly condemns this illegal plan to seize yet more Palestinian land; further notes the statement backed by 85 UN Member States, … |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Courts and Tribunals Bill (Twelfth sitting)
89 speeches (18,605 words) Committee stage: 12th sitting Tuesday 28th April 2026 - Public Bill Committees Ministry of Justice |
|
Courts and Tribunals Bill (Eleventh sitting)
55 speeches (18,984 words) Committee stage: 11th sitting Tuesday 28th April 2026 - Public Bill Committees Ministry of Justice Mentions: 1: None —(Yasmin Qureshi.)Brought up, and read the First time. - Link to Speech 2: Yasmin Qureshi (Lab - Bolton South and Walkden) —(Yasmin Qureshi.)This new clause would establish specialist courts for sexual offences and domestic - Link to Speech 3: None I therefore turn to Yasmin Qureshi—you can speak now if you wish to. - Link to Speech |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 28th April 2026 9:25 a.m. Courts and Tribunals Bill - Debate Subject: Further to consider the Bill View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 28th April 2026 2 p.m. Courts and Tribunals Bill - Debate Subject: Further to consider the Bill View calendar - Add to calendar |