Information between 16th April 2026 - 26th April 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Yasmin Qureshi voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 276 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 281 Noes - 70 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Yasmin Qureshi voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 274 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 73 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Yasmin Qureshi voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 281 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 356 Noes - 90 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Yasmin Qureshi voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 285 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 174 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Yasmin Qureshi voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 241 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 157 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Yasmin Qureshi voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 290 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 299 Noes - 169 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Unpublished Divisions: Crime and Policing Bill (14 April 2026) - View Vote Context Yasmin Qureshi voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 284 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 300 Noes - 101 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Yasmin Qureshi voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 262 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 276 Noes - 155 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Yasmin Qureshi voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 262 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 269 Noes - 103 |
|
15 Apr 2026 - Pension Schemes Bill - View Vote Context Yasmin Qureshi voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 264 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 278 Noes - 158 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Yasmin Qureshi voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 280 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 284 Noes - 149 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Yasmin Qureshi voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 285 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 291 Noes - 144 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Yasmin Qureshi voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 284 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 288 Noes - 147 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Yasmin Qureshi voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 283 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 287 Noes - 150 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Yasmin Qureshi voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 290 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 293 Noes - 155 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Yasmin Qureshi voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 293 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 297 Noes - 147 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Yasmin Qureshi voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 298 Noes - 152 |
|
21 Apr 2026 - English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill - View Vote Context Yasmin Qureshi voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 282 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 287 Noes - 149 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Yasmin Qureshi speeches from: Courts and Tribunals Bill (Ninth sitting)
Yasmin Qureshi contributed 5 speeches (1,517 words) Committee stage: 9th sitting Thursday 23rd April 2026 - Public Bill Committees Ministry of Justice |
|
Yasmin Qureshi speeches from: Courts and Tribunals Bill (Tenth sitting)
Yasmin Qureshi contributed 5 speeches (520 words) Thursday 23rd April 2026 - Public Bill Committees Ministry of Justice |
|
Yasmin Qureshi speeches from: Courts and Tribunals Bill (Seventh sitting)
Yasmin Qureshi contributed 9 speeches (1,583 words) Committee stage: 7th sitting Tuesday 21st April 2026 - Public Bill Committees Ministry of Justice |
|
Yasmin Qureshi speeches from: Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fifth sitting)
Yasmin Qureshi contributed 9 speeches (1,351 words) Thursday 16th April 2026 - Public Bill Committees Ministry of Justice |
|
Yasmin Qureshi speeches from: Courts and Tribunals Bill (Sixth sitting)
Yasmin Qureshi contributed 7 speeches (925 words) Thursday 16th April 2026 - Public Bill Committees Ministry of Justice |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
King's Guards: Uniforms
Asked by: Yasmin Qureshi (Labour - Bolton South and Walkden) Monday 20th April 2026 Question to the Ministry of Defence: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what progress has been made in developing King’s Guard’s hats made of faux-fur. Answered by Luke Pollard - Minister of State (Ministry of Defence) The Department has not yet identified a synthetic alternative that meets the standards required to provide an effective replacement for bearskin ceremonial caps. However, the Ministry of Defence remains committed to finding a synthetic alternative and continues to welcome submissions of test results, from a testing house accredited by the United Kingdom Accreditation Service, on synthetic alternatives that meet our criteria for a suitable, affordable and sustainable alternative to bearskin caps. |
|
Epilepsy: Children and Young People
Asked by: Yasmin Qureshi (Labour - Bolton South and Walkden) Tuesday 21st April 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether his Department has made an assessment of the potential merits of establishing an observational trial for children and young people on private prescriptions for drug-resistant epilepsy who cannot access medical cannabis on the NHS. Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) The Department funds research on health and social care through the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). The NIHR welcomes funding applications for research into any aspect of human health and care, including medicinal cannabis for drug-resistant epilepsy. These applications are subject to peer review and judged in open competition, with awards being made on the basis of the importance of the topic to patients and health and care services, value for money, and scientific quality. The NIHR and NHS England have confirmed over £9 million in funding for clinical trials to investigate whether two different cannabis-based medicines, one containing cannabidiol (CBD) and one containing a combination of CBD and tetrahydrocannabinol, are safe and effective treatments for drug-resistant epilepsies in adults and children. The trials will produce evidence of significant scientific value suitable for informing future clinical and commissioning decisions. While observational studies can be useful in some circumstances, they cannot demonstrate whether a treatment is safe or effective and would therefore be of limited scientific value compared with these trials. |
|
Soft Drinks: Taxation
Asked by: Yasmin Qureshi (Labour - Bolton South and Walkden) Wednesday 22nd April 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether the Office for Budget Responsibility provided estimates between March 2016 and April 2028 on the potential impact that the proposed Soft Drinks Industry Levy would have on the Consumer Price Index (CPI); and what estimate her Department has made of the potential impact of that policy on the CPI in the 2018-19 financial year. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) Forecasting the economy, including the impact of Government policy decisions on inflation, is the responsibility of the independent Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR).
The OBR set out its latest assessment of policy measures in its Spring Forecast 2026, published on 3 March 2026. The OBR did not publish a specific estimate of the impact of the Soft Drinks Industry Levy on inflation in that forecast, or in previous Economic and Fiscal Outlook publications since the levy was announced in 2016, which would include the impact for the 2018-19 financial year.
|
|
Visas: English Language
Asked by: Yasmin Qureshi (Labour - Bolton South and Walkden) Wednesday 22nd April 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, with reference to paragraph 5.60 of the policy paper entitled Explanatory memorandum to the statement of changes in the Immigration Rules: HC 1691, published on 5 March 2026, whether B2 level English language is required for applicants on the family visa route. Answered by Mike Tapp - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office) The changes to the English language requirements announced on 5 March 2026 will apply to individuals who are applying for settlement based on their family life, with effect from 26 March 2027. It is reasonable and proportionate that we give those already on a pathway to settlement 12 months to undertake the necessary learning. This does not affect individuals who are applying for temporary permission to stay in the UK based on their family life. The requirement to achieve B2 level English is equivalent to an A-level in a foreign language and evidences the ability to hold a conversation in English with a strong degree of fluency. Being able to communicate effectively in English is vital for integration, enabling people to make a meaningful contribution to their communities. We think this is a reasonable and realistic expectation. |
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Monday 23rd February Yasmin Qureshi signed this EDM on Wednesday 22nd April 2026 Government response to Israel’s West Bank annexation plan 84 signatures (Most recent: 29 Apr 2026)Tabled by: Richard Burgon (Labour - Leeds East) That this House notes the Israeli Government’s 15 February approval of a plan to register land in the Occupied Palestinian Territory of the West Bank as Israeli state property; strongly condemns this illegal plan to seize yet more Palestinian land; further notes the statement backed by 85 UN Member States, … |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Courts and Tribunals Bill (Fifth sitting)
80 speeches (12,844 words) Thursday 16th April 2026 - Public Bill Committees Ministry of Justice |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Tuesday 28th April 2026 9:25 a.m. Courts and Tribunals Bill - Debate Subject: Further to consider the Bill View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 28th April 2026 2 p.m. Courts and Tribunals Bill - Debate Subject: Further to consider the Bill View calendar - Add to calendar |