All 1 William Wragg contributions to the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018

Read Bill Ministerial Extracts

Wed 15th Nov 2017
European Union (Withdrawal) Bill
Commons Chamber

Committee: 2nd sitting: House of Commons

European Union (Withdrawal) Bill Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Attorney General

European Union (Withdrawal) Bill

William Wragg Excerpts
Committee: 2nd sitting: House of Commons
Wednesday 15th November 2017

(7 years ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts Amendment Paper: Committee of the whole House Amendments as at 15 November 2017 - (15 Nov 2017)
New clause 55 would also safeguard standards of equalities, environmental and employment protection and consumer standards from amendment by subordinate legislation, precisely because in my experience as an MP, those are the areas that matter to people. I am aware that it has been suggested that some Conservative Members think that there are too many such rights around and that they in some way fetter economic activity. I regret to say that those are probably similar arguments, in some cases—no, I should withdraw that; I was about to say something that might have appeared improper. It is worth bearing in mind, however, that the history of this country since the middle of the 19th century has seen the development of protections for individuals. That started with little boys no longer being killed by being forced to go up chimneys and clean them. All those protections are part of a pattern that has radically contributed to the improvement of the quality of life of citizens in this country.
William Wragg Portrait Mr William Wragg (Hazel Grove) (Con)
- Hansard - -

Given the concerns in the House, will my right hon. and learned Friend tell us which party introduced such legislation in the 19th century?

Dominic Grieve Portrait Mr Grieve
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Yes, indeed: the Conservative party did precisely that. There is a proud record in the Conservative party—as, indeed, there is in the Opposition—of contribution to that process. I make it quite clear that I do not put the smallest imputation that those on the Treasury Bench, or on any of my colleagues in government, want to reduce those protections one bit.

--- Later in debate ---
William Wragg Portrait Mr Wragg
- Hansard - -

Will the hon. Gentleman remind us whether the legislation for the Scottish independence referendum contained a date in the event of there being a yes vote?

Peter Grant Portrait Peter Grant
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Yes, it did. A 600-page White Paper was also produced a year or so before the referendum, which allowed everyone taking part to be a lot better informed than even the same Scots voters were about the EU referendum.

It is also worth reminding ourselves that after what has been described as a disastrous and divisive referendum, the first thing that happened in Scotland was that campaigners from all sides got together in local churches, held services of reconciliation and committed ourselves to working together to make the result work, even if it was not the result that we wanted. In the immediate aftermath of the EU referendum, there was a massive increase in crimes of racial hatred against citizens in this country and elsewhere. That was not the fault of those who voted to leave, but a consequence of how the referendum had been set out and how, for too many people, the campaign was conducted.

--- Later in debate ---
Robert Buckland Portrait The Solicitor General
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Yes, I am happy to do that. That is very much in the spirit what I have already said.

William Wragg Portrait Mr Wragg
- Hansard - -

Will the Minister give way?

Robert Buckland Portrait The Solicitor General
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

No, I would like to press on, if I may. I am mindful of the time, and I want to make sure that we get these points on record.

I want to deal with the points, which I hope hon. Members want to hear, about the Government’s commitment not only to workers’ rights but to consumer protection rights and environmental obligations—all of which have been very much a part of the work that we have done with our European partners during our 43 years of membership of the European Union. That does not change. I want to move on to some of the other amendments—