Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Work and Pensions

Oral Answers to Questions

Stephen Timms Excerpts
Monday 28th March 2011

(13 years, 7 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Iain Duncan Smith Portrait Mr Duncan Smith
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Yes. The majority of existing and potential second earners will not, on the basis of the figures I have looked at, be affected by the reforms, because the household already has earnings that take them beyond the reach of the benefit system. Approximately—I stress this is an approximate figure—300,000 second earners may see a deterioration in the incentive to increase their hours, and it is possible that some second earners will choose—or may choose as a result of their home commitments—to reduce or rebalance their working hours or leave. However, universal credit will provide much better incentives for the first earner, giving a greater choice to the household about how it wishes to spread its income.

Stephen Timms Portrait Stephen Timms (East Ham) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

The Secretary of State told us on Thursday that the Government have not yet decided how to support child care costs in universal credit. Is he yet in a position to assure women with children that in the new system they will be better off in work—after child care costs have been taken into account?