All 1 Debates between Stephen Hepburn and Penny Mordaunt

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Stephen Hepburn and Penny Mordaunt
Monday 27th March 2017

(7 years, 8 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Stephen Hepburn Portrait Mr Stephen Hepburn (Jarrow) (Lab)
- Hansard - -

17. What steps his Department is taking to ensure that personal independence payment assessments are undertaken fairly and efficiently.

Penny Mordaunt Portrait The Minister for Disabled People, Health and Work (Penny Mordaunt)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The Department robustly monitors provider performance and independently audits assessments. Assessment reports deemed unacceptable are returned for rework. A range of measures, including contractual remedies, are used to address performance falling below those standards.

Penny Mordaunt Portrait Penny Mordaunt
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

If the hon. Lady would let me have sight of that case, I will look into it in particular, because it is unacceptable and falls below the performance and the courtesy, quite frankly, that we would want from our providers. People’s personal experience is very important in getting this process right. I am pleased to be able to say that from April we will commence the user rep panels, with about 300 people initially, across the UK, to whom we will give real-time experience of PIP and ESA—employment and support allowance.

Stephen Hepburn Portrait Mr Hepburn
- Hansard - -

We have all had cases like that, but could it not only be an arrogant Tory Government who ignore legal decisions that override expert medical opinion in order to deprive people with mental health issues of the right to benefits? What level of cuts has the Minister promised the Chancellor in order to get this policy through?

Penny Mordaunt Portrait Penny Mordaunt
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I am afraid that the hon. Gentleman is being very irresponsible in saying that. He knows that there is no change to policy, to budget or to award amounts. I remind him that people with mental health conditions are receiving higher levels of benefit than they did under DLA. This benefit is not about people’s conditions; it is about the impact that those conditions have on the individual’s ability to thrive and live their life as they would wish. It is quite wrong and irresponsible to suggest anything otherwise.