All 3 Debates between Stephen Hammond and Jason McCartney

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Stephen Hammond and Jason McCartney
Monday 13th June 2022

(1 year, 10 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Stephen Hammond Portrait Stephen Hammond (Wimbledon) (Con)
- Hansard - -

14. What support his Department is providing to Ukraine’s military.

Jason McCartney Portrait Jason McCartney (Colne Valley) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

21. What support his Department is providing to Ukraine’s military.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Stephen Hammond and Jason McCartney
Thursday 12th September 2013

(10 years, 7 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Stephen Hammond Portrait Stephen Hammond
- Hansard - -

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. That is why the Government have had two tranches of pinch-point improvements for the national strategic road network, and have provided £170 million for local pinch-points as well. I would be delighted to meet him at some stage in the near future to discuss his schemes.

Jason McCartney Portrait Jason McCartney (Colne Valley) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

10. What progress his Department has made on procuring new rolling stock for the east coast main line.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Stephen Hammond and Jason McCartney
Monday 14th November 2011

(12 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Stephen Hammond Portrait Stephen Hammond (Wimbledon) (Con)
- Hansard - -

4. If he will make it his policy to oppose the creation of an EU operational headquarters.

Jason McCartney Portrait Jason McCartney (Colne Valley) (Con)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

10. If he will make it his policy to oppose the creation of an EU operational headquarters.

Lord Hammond of Runnymede Portrait The Secretary of State for Defence (Mr Philip Hammond)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

It is the policy of this Government that NATO remain the cornerstone of UK defence. We see no justification whatsoever for a permanent EU military operational headquarters, and we will continue to oppose it. We have been clear that the establishment of a permanent operational headquarters would be a duplication of existing capability provided by NATO, would permanently dissociate the EU from NATO, and would be an unnecessary and unjustified use of resources.