All 2 Debates between Simon Hughes and Esther McVey

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Simon Hughes and Esther McVey
Monday 18th November 2013

(11 years, 1 month ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Simon Hughes Portrait Simon Hughes (Bermondsey and Old Southwark) (LD)
- Hansard - -

3. What comparative assessment he has made of the number of people in full-time and part-time employment.

Esther McVey Portrait The Minister of State, Department for Work and Pensions (Esther McVey)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Three in every four people work full-time, and full-time work accounts for all of the significant rise in employment over the last year.

Simon Hughes Portrait Simon Hughes
- Hansard - -

The Minister has done exactly what I hoped she would do, which is to deal with the fact that whereas the Leader of the Opposition in 2010 said that the Government’s policy would lose a million jobs, my understanding is that since the election there have been more than a million new jobs, and this year more than a quarter of a million new jobs. Will the Minister put it clearly on the record that these new jobs are not all part-time jobs, that there has been a significant growth in full-time employment and that that is predicted to continue?

Esther McVey Portrait Esther McVey
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

My right hon. Friend is correct. It is good news that UK business is creating so many new jobs. Since the 2010 election we have seen a rise of nearly 800,000 in the number of full-time jobs and of more than 300,000 in the number of part-time jobs.

Oral Answers to Questions

Debate between Simon Hughes and Esther McVey
Monday 20th May 2013

(11 years, 7 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Esther McVey Portrait Esther McVey
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

No, I do not think that a round trip of that long is acceptable. I will look into that case.

Simon Hughes Portrait Simon Hughes (Bermondsey and Old Southwark) (LD)
- Hansard - -

The transition to the personal independence payment is a good thing in theory, but some people are telling me that they are concerned that the threshold for qualification is unacceptably high and they feel unsupported in trying to work out how to make a difficult choice among the variety of suppliers available.

Esther McVey Portrait Esther McVey
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I was not exactly sure where the right hon. Gentleman was going with that question. The PIP was introduced to support the most vulnerable and to make it as easy as possible to do so, and to ensure that people who could not fill in a self-assessment form could see somebody on a one-to-one basis. This is the biggest ever change in welfare. I thank all the people who have helped with it in Jobcentre Pluses, and the stakeholders. Over 1,000 disabled people got involved to make sure that the system was right, and I thank them for making it a good transition to a new benefit.