Information between 24th January 2026 - 13th February 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill - View Vote Context Sharon Hodgson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 310 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill - View Vote Context Sharon Hodgson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 298 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 311 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill - View Vote Context Sharon Hodgson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 301 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 378 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill: Committee - View Vote Context Sharon Hodgson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 300 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 61 Noes - 311 |
|
28 Jan 2026 - Youth Unemployment - View Vote Context Sharon Hodgson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 280 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 287 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill: Committee - View Vote Context Sharon Hodgson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 303 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 88 Noes - 310 |
|
28 Jan 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Sharon Hodgson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 287 Labour Aye votes vs 3 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 294 Noes - 108 |
|
28 Jan 2026 - British Indian Ocean Territory - View Vote Context Sharon Hodgson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 277 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 103 Noes - 284 |
|
27 Jan 2026 - Medical Training (Prioritisation) Bill: Committee - View Vote Context Sharon Hodgson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 91 Noes - 378 |
|
3 Feb 2026 - Universal Credit (Removal of Two Child Limit) Bill - View Vote Context Sharon Hodgson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 358 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 458 Noes - 104 |
|
4 Feb 2026 - Climate Change - View Vote Context Sharon Hodgson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 316 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 392 Noes - 116 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Sharon Hodgson speeches from: Business of the House
Sharon Hodgson contributed 1 speech (117 words) Thursday 5th February 2026 - Commons Chamber Leader of the House |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
School Meals: Standards
Asked by: Sharon Hodgson (Labour - Washington and Gateshead South) Thursday 29th January 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, whether she has plans to introduce monitoring arrangements to assess compliance with the updated school food standards once they are in force. Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) The department aims to revise the School Food Standards and is engaging with stakeholders to ensure they support our work to create the healthiest generation of children in history.
School governors and trustees have a statutory duty to ensure compliance, holding school leaders to account for meeting the School Food Standards. Through our review, we will engage with the sector on a range of matters, including improving compliance. |
|
School Meals: Standards
Asked by: Sharon Hodgson (Labour - Washington and Gateshead South) Thursday 29th January 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, when he plans to launch the consultation on updating school food standards. Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) The department aims to revise the school food standards and is engaging with stakeholders to ensure they support our work to create the healthiest generation of children in history. We intend to consult on these revisions and further details on timings will be available in due course.
|
|
Free School Meals: Eligibility
Asked by: Sharon Hodgson (Labour - Washington and Gateshead South) Wednesday 4th February 2026 Question to the Department for Education: To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what assessment she has made of the potential merits of reviewing the No Recourse to Public Funds income thresholds to ensure equity of eligibility for all children when expanding access to the free school meals to children from families in receipt of universal credit. Answered by Olivia Bailey - Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State (Department for Education) (Equalities) The department has permanently extended free school meal eligibility to children in all households with no recourse to public funds, provided they meet income thresholds set out in public guidance. This ensures that children can access support regardless of their background or circumstances, including the immigration status of their parents. The income thresholds for No Recourse to Public Funds (NRPF) households were designed to account for the differences in household income between NRPF households and those with access to additional state support to ensure parity. The government has set out plans to extend free school meals to all children from households in receipt of Universal Credit from September 2026. The department continues to keep all aspects of the free school meals system under review. |
|
Hearing Impairment: Children
Asked by: Sharon Hodgson (Labour - Washington and Gateshead South) Friday 13th February 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what progress his Department has made on developing national guidance for Auditory Verbal therapy for deaf children since March 2025; and whether he plans to establish a timeline for publishing that guidance. Answered by Zubir Ahmed - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department of Health and Social Care) Integrated care boards (ICBs) are responsible for the provision and commissioning of services to meet the needs of their local populations, including services for non-hearing children. NHS England supports ICBs to make informed decisions about the provision of audiology services so that they can provide consistent, high quality, and integrated care.
Auditory verbal therapy (AVT) is one type of therapy to support children with hearing loss, and it is important that local commissioners have the discretion to decide how best to meet the needs of their local population, informed by the best available evidence and guidance.
Based on consideration of the current evidence on AVT for deaf children, NHS England has no plans to develop such national guidance. In November 2025, NHS England appointed two national specialty advisers for hearing and associated conditions who are considering care pathway improvements for hearing services. The national speciality advisors are committed to meeting with the charity Auditory Verbal UK (AVUK) to discuss AVT, with a meeting scheduled.
The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence’s prioritisation board considered childhood hearing loss as a potential guideline topic in August 2024, but concluded that there is limited evidence available in this area and that the 2015 NHS England Action Plan on Hearing Loss and guidance issued in 2019 addresses care for this population, and it is understood that AVUK are in the process of developing the evidence base for the intervention. The NHS England Action Plan on Hearing Loss is available at the following link: https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/act-plan-hearing-loss-upd.pdf |
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Tuesday 20th January Sharon Hodgson signed this EDM as a sponsor on Monday 2nd February 2026 Harm caused by exposure to sodium valproate 20 signatures (Most recent: 23 Feb 2026)Tabled by: Bob Blackman (Conservative - Harrow East) That this House recognises the severe and avoidable harm caused to individuals and families by exposure to sodium valproate; notes the findings of the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review First Do No Harm (2020), which identified serious failures in the regulation and prescribing of sodium valproate; further notes … |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
5 Feb 2026, 11:03 a.m. - House of Commons " Sharon Hodgson. >> The two. >> Year anniversary of the. >> Publication of the Hughes Report. >> Which set out how the government. " Mrs Sharon Hodgson MP (Washington and Gateshead South, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |