Information between 4th January 2026 - 24th January 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
7 Jan 2026 - Jury Trials - View Vote Context Sharon Hodgson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 284 Labour No votes vs 1 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 182 Noes - 290 |
|
7 Jan 2026 - Rural Communities - View Vote Context Sharon Hodgson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 328 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 332 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Sharon Hodgson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 323 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 348 Noes - 167 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Sharon Hodgson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 325 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 181 Noes - 335 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Sharon Hodgson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 328 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 173 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Sharon Hodgson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 334 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 187 Noes - 351 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Sharon Hodgson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 328 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 172 Noes - 334 |
|
13 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Sharon Hodgson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 321 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 331 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Sharon Hodgson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 338 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 350 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Sharon Hodgson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 333 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 341 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Sharon Hodgson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 336 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 181 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Sharon Hodgson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 336 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 344 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Finance (No. 2) Bill - View Vote Context Sharon Hodgson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 180 |
|
14 Jan 2026 - Public Order - View Vote Context Sharon Hodgson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 295 Labour Aye votes vs 26 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 110 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Sharon Hodgson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 332 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 188 Noes - 341 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Sharon Hodgson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 338 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 350 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Sharon Hodgson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 324 Noes - 180 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Sharon Hodgson voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 335 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 185 Noes - 344 |
|
12 Jan 2026 - Clause 1 - View Vote Context Sharon Hodgson voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 335 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 344 Noes - 181 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Sharon Hodgson speeches from: Northern Powerhouse Rail
Sharon Hodgson contributed 1 speech (108 words) Wednesday 14th January 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Transport |
|
Sharon Hodgson speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Sharon Hodgson contributed 2 speeches (91 words) Tuesday 13th January 2026 - Commons Chamber Department of Health and Social Care |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Warm Homes Plan
Asked by: Sharon Hodgson (Labour - Washington and Gateshead South) Friday 9th January 2026 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what the proposed timeline is for the implementation of the Warm Homes Plan, and what steps are being taken to ensure collaboration with local authorities, industry stakeholders, and consumer groups in its delivery. Answered by Martin McCluskey - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) The government remains committed to delivering the Warm Homes Plan which will be published soon. At the Autumn Budget 2024 the Chancellor announced an additional £1.5 billion of funding for the Warm Homes Plan, bringing total capital investment to almost £15 billion. This exceeds the manifesto commitment of £13.2 billion.
As part of the development of the Plan, this department has engaged with a broad range of stakeholders through a variety of different fora to ensure a wide range of views are considered.
This includes working with local authorities and social housing providers, who in March last year were allocated £1.8 billion to install energy saving measures across the country through the Warm Homes: Social Housing Fund and Local Grant. |
|
Energy Company Obligation
Asked by: Sharon Hodgson (Labour - Washington and Gateshead South) Friday 9th January 2026 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, if he will set out the detailed allocation plan for the additional £1.5 billion funding for the Energy Company Obligation, including the timeline for disbursement and the criteria for prioritising households. Answered by Martin McCluskey - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) ECO4 has played a part in delivering clean heat technologies; however, issues identified by the NAO and PAC support a shift to a more direct, publicly-funded approach focused on technologies that cut bills and accelerate the transition to clean heat such as heat pumps, solar PV and batteries. The government is providing an additional £1.5 billion—taking planned capital investment to almost £15 billion—to upgrade low‑income homes and scale clean home‑energy technologies. Deployment will be further supported through wider policies and details of this will be set out soon in the Warm Homes Plan.
|
|
Energy: Small Businesses
Asked by: Sharon Hodgson (Labour - Washington and Gateshead South) Friday 9th January 2026 Question to the Department for Energy Security & Net Zero: To ask the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, what measures are being introduced to protect and support small and medium-sized enterprises in the retrofit supply chain under the Energy Company Obligation and related schemes. Answered by Martin McCluskey - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Energy Security and Net Zero) ECO4 has played a part in delivering clean heat technologies; however, issues identified by the NAO and PAC support a shift to a more direct, publicly-funded approach focused on technologies that cut bills and accelerate the transition to clean heat such as heat pumps, solar PV and batteries. The government is providing an additional £1.5 billion—taking planned capital investment to almost £15 billion—to upgrade low‑income homes and scale clean home‑energy technologies. Deployment will be further supported through wider policies and details of this will be set out soon in the Warm Homes Plan. |
|
Heat Batteries: VAT
Asked by: Sharon Hodgson (Labour - Washington and Gateshead South) Monday 12th January 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment she had made of the potential implications for her policies that heat batteries do not qualify for VAT relief through the Energy Saving Materials framework, while being MCS-certified and eligible for support under the Boiler Upgrade Scheme in the same way as heat pumps. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) Installations of qualifying energy-saving materials (ESMs) in residential accommodation and buildings used solely for a charitable purpose benefit from a temporary VAT zero rate until March 2027, after which they will revert to the reduced rate of VAT at five per cent. The list of qualifying ESMs, which includes but is not limited to heat pumps, can be found here: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/vat-on-energy-saving-materials-and-heating-equipment-notice-7086. The Government assesses whether to add ESMs to this relief by evaluating them against the following tests: the primary purpose of the technology must be to improve energy efficiency and reduce carbon emissions; relieving the technology of VAT must be a cost effective lever for encouraging installations; and it must be practical for business to operate and for HMRC to administer.
|
|
Heat Batteries: VAT
Asked by: Sharon Hodgson (Labour - Washington and Gateshead South) Monday 12th January 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether she has considered adding heat batteries to the list of Energy Saving Materials. Answered by Dan Tomlinson - Exchequer Secretary (HM Treasury) Installations of qualifying energy-saving materials (ESMs) in residential accommodation and buildings used solely for a charitable purpose benefit from a temporary VAT zero rate until March 2027, after which they will revert to the reduced rate of VAT at five per cent. The list of qualifying ESMs, which includes but is not limited to heat pumps, can be found here: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/vat-on-energy-saving-materials-and-heating-equipment-notice-7086. The Government assesses whether to add ESMs to this relief by evaluating them against the following tests: the primary purpose of the technology must be to improve energy efficiency and reduce carbon emissions; relieving the technology of VAT must be a cost effective lever for encouraging installations; and it must be practical for business to operate and for HMRC to administer.
|
|
Fireworks
Asked by: Sharon Hodgson (Labour - Washington and Gateshead South) Monday 19th January 2026 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, if his Department will meet with fireworks industry stakeholders, such as Fireworks Impact Coalition, to discuss calls for a comprehensive review of fireworks legislation. Answered by Kate Dearden - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade) I will continue to engage with businesses, consumer groups and charities to gather evidence on fireworks-related issues. I also recently met with the Scottish Government, and a number of MPs to discuss fireworks policy and hope to meet with the Fireworks Impact coalition in the near future. The insights from these discussions, as well as other evidence gathered on the impact of fireworks will guide future action. |
|
Fireworks: Regulation
Asked by: Sharon Hodgson (Labour - Washington and Gateshead South) Monday 19th January 2026 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, whether his Department plans to adopt a UK-wide model similar to the Fireworks and Pyrotechnics Act (Scotland) 2022. Answered by Kate Dearden - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade) There are currently no plans to adopt a model similar to the Fireworks and Pyrotechnics Act (Scotland) 2022 on a UK-wide basis. I recently met with Siobhian Brown MSP, Minister for Victims and Community Safety in the Scottish Government to understand the impact of changes made in Scotland. In addition to this meeting, I will engage with businesses, consumer groups and charities to gather evidence on the issues and impacts of fireworks. The safety of the public and the impact on people, animals and property will be central in decisions on how the Government proceeds in relation to the regulation of fireworks. |
|
Fireworks
Asked by: Sharon Hodgson (Labour - Washington and Gateshead South) Monday 19th January 2026 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what assessment his Department has made to determine whether the 120 dB noise limit for consumer fireworks is sufficient to protect animals and vulnerable people from harm. Answered by Kate Dearden - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade) No recent formal assessment of the fireworks legislation has been made including whether further restrictions on sales and use would fuel illegal trade or whether the 120 dB noise limit for consumer firework is sufficient. I launched a public campaign on fireworks safety in October, just ahead of the fireworks season. Ensuring that these materials were shared widely helped to increase their impact. The campaign featured new guidance for those running community fireworks events, as well as social media materials that emphasised the risks associated with the misuse of fireworks. To inform any future decisions in relation to the regulation of fireworks, I will engage with businesses, consumer groups and charities to gather evidence on the issues and impacts of fireworks. The safety of the public and the impact on people, animals and property will be central in decisions on how the Government proceeds in relation to the regulation of fireworks. |
|
Fireworks: Smuggling
Asked by: Sharon Hodgson (Labour - Washington and Gateshead South) Monday 19th January 2026 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what assessment of the fireworks black market his Department has made to determine whether further restrictions on sales and use of fireworks would fuel illegal trade. Answered by Kate Dearden - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade) No recent formal assessment of the fireworks legislation has been made including whether further restrictions on sales and use would fuel illegal trade or whether the 120 dB noise limit for consumer firework is sufficient. I launched a public campaign on fireworks safety in October, just ahead of the fireworks season. Ensuring that these materials were shared widely helped to increase their impact. The campaign featured new guidance for those running community fireworks events, as well as social media materials that emphasised the risks associated with the misuse of fireworks. To inform any future decisions in relation to the regulation of fireworks, I will engage with businesses, consumer groups and charities to gather evidence on the issues and impacts of fireworks. The safety of the public and the impact on people, animals and property will be central in decisions on how the Government proceeds in relation to the regulation of fireworks. |
|
Fireworks
Asked by: Sharon Hodgson (Labour - Washington and Gateshead South) Monday 19th January 2026 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, if his Department will conduct a review into fireworks legislation. Answered by Kate Dearden - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Business and Trade) No recent formal assessment of the fireworks legislation has been made including whether further restrictions on sales and use would fuel illegal trade or whether the 120 dB noise limit for consumer firework is sufficient. I launched a public campaign on fireworks safety in October, just ahead of the fireworks season. Ensuring that these materials were shared widely helped to increase their impact. The campaign featured new guidance for those running community fireworks events, as well as social media materials that emphasised the risks associated with the misuse of fireworks. To inform any future decisions in relation to the regulation of fireworks, I will engage with businesses, consumer groups and charities to gather evidence on the issues and impacts of fireworks. The safety of the public and the impact on people, animals and property will be central in decisions on how the Government proceeds in relation to the regulation of fireworks. |
|
Public Sector: Washington and Gateshead South
Asked by: Sharon Hodgson (Labour - Washington and Gateshead South) Wednesday 21st January 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many public sector workers have received an above-inflation pay rise in Washington and Gateshead South constituency since 5 July 2024. Answered by James Murray - Chief Secretary to the Treasury We value all our public sector workers, and pay awards reflect the important work that our nurses, teachers, doctors, prison officers and soldiers do to keep the country running. The overwhelming majority of awards announced in 2025/26, including for all of the above workforces, announced are above the OBR’s forecast for CPI inflation over the 2025/26 pay year.
Whilst I cannot confirm the number of public sector workers in the Washington and Gateshead South constituency in receipt of those pay awards, all those workers set out above will benefit from the above inflation pay uplift.
|
|
Poverty: Washington and Gateshead South
Asked by: Sharon Hodgson (Labour - Washington and Gateshead South) Wednesday 21st January 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment his Department has made of the potential impact of measures to reduce child poverty on children in Washington and Gateshead South constituency. Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Department for Work and Pensions) Estimates of the total impact on low income poverty levels, and the number of children gaining, from the main changes included in the strategy for the United Kingdom as a whole are available here: Child Poverty Strategy: Impact on low income poverty levels and children gaining in the UK: December 2025 - GOV.UK. Across the United Kingdom, the measures set out in the strategy are expected to reduce the number of children in poverty by 550,000 in the final year of this Parliament, compared to our estimates without these measures.
Estimates for the number of children and households that are expected to gain from the removal of two-child limit policy at constituency level are available here: Poverty impacts of social security changes at Budget 2025 - GOV.UK. The number of children who are expected to gain from the removal of the two-child limit policy in the Washington and Gateshead South constituency is 2,620. |
|
Police: Washington and Gateshead South
Asked by: Sharon Hodgson (Labour - Washington and Gateshead South) Wednesday 21st January 2026 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps she is taking to ensure adequate policing in Washington and Gateshead South constituency. Answered by Sarah Jones - Minister of State (Home Office) The Government’s Safer Streets Mission sets a clear expectation for policing to deliver safer communities and improved public confidence. An effective, well-supported police service is central to achieving this. For 2025-26, a total of up to £422.2 million will be available for Northumbria Police through the police funding settlement, an overall increase of up to £28.8 million when compared to the 2024-25 settlement. This includes:
It is for Chief Constables and directly elected PCCs, and Mayors with PCC functions, to make operational decisions based on their local knowledge and experience. This includes how best to allocate and deploy the resources at their disposal to provide an effective service to local communities. |
|
State Retirement Pensions: Washington and Gateshead South
Asked by: Sharon Hodgson (Labour - Washington and Gateshead South) Wednesday 21st January 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many pensioners in Washington and Gateshead South constituency are covered by the pension triple lock. Answered by Torsten Bell - Parliamentary Secretary (HM Treasury) Caseload statistics for State Pensions are available via Stat-Xplore - Log in. The latest published data currently relate to the quarter ending May 2025.
The State Pensions Triple Lock applies to recipients of the core element of State Pension. Based on latest data, the number of pensioners resident in the Washington and Gateshead South constituency who are in receipt of the State Pension, and therefore covered by the Triple Lock, is 20,085.
This total has been adjusted to exclude a very small number of individuals, who receive only Graduated Retirement Benefit, a category of the Pre-2016 State Pension system, as such payments are uprated using CPI.
The constituency referenced above encompasses Gateshead South as well as the entire Washington area, including Washington Central, Washington South, Washington North, Washington East and Washington West. |
|
Health Services: Washington and Gateshead South
Asked by: Sharon Hodgson (Labour - Washington and Gateshead South) Thursday 22nd January 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what recent progress he has made in meeting the 18-week referral-to-treatment standard in Washington and Gateshead South constituency. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The Washington and Gateshead South constituency is served by the North East and North Cumbria Integrated Care Board (ICB). Performance against the 18-week Referral to Treatment standard for this ICB has improved from 68.9% to 70.5% since the Government came to office, and the waiting list has dropped by 11,854. The Elective Reform Plan, which was published in January 2025, sets out the productivity and modernisation efforts needed to reach the 92% standard by March 2029, which improve patient care in the Washington and Gateshead South constituency and across England. We have set a national ambition that by March 2026, 65% of patients will wait no longer than 18 weeks, with every trust expected to deliver a minimum 5% improvement on current performance over that period. We are making progress in several areas including demand management, validation of waiting lists, diagnostics reform, including straight to test pathways, and clinically-led pathway reform in priority specialties. |
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Tuesday 20th January Sharon Hodgson signed this EDM as a sponsor on Monday 2nd February 2026 Harm caused by exposure to sodium valproate 11 signatures (Most recent: 6 Feb 2026)Tabled by: Bob Blackman (Conservative - Harrow East) That this House recognises the severe and avoidable harm caused to individuals and families by exposure to sodium valproate; notes the findings of the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review First Do No Harm (2020), which identified serious failures in the regulation and prescribing of sodium valproate; further notes … |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
14 Jan 2026, 1:16 p.m. - House of Commons "that he is advocating. >> Sharon Hodgson. >> Speaker. " Rt Hon Heidi Alexander MP, The Secretary of State for Transport (Swindon South, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
13 Jan 2026, 11:50 a.m. - House of Commons " Sharon Hodgson can I thank the Minister for her response and Minister for her response and welcome the government's focus on improving survival rates for cancer, " Mrs Sharon Hodgson MP (Washington and Gateshead South, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
21 Jan 2026, 10:02 p.m. - House of Lords "colleague Sharon Hodgson MP, has outlined a plan for an in-depth inquiry into school food. It will " Baroness Walmsley (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
21 Jan 2026, 10:03 p.m. - House of Lords "here, though there may be recommendations about allocated. Now, Sharon Hodgson and I are " Baroness Walmsley (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
21 Jan 2026, 10:05 p.m. - House of Lords "parliamentary group led by Sharon Hodgson MP, as we share a common " Baroness Walmsley (Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
Children’s Wellbeing and Schools Bill
22 speeches (4,005 words) Wednesday 21st January 2026 - Lords Chamber Department for Work and Pensions Mentions: 1: None very effective All-Party Group on School Food led by the Minister’s very determined colleague, Sharon Hodgson - Link to Speech 2: None Sharon Hodgson and I are hoping to meet Minister Bailey from the Department for Education, who is now - Link to Speech 3: None she and her ministerial colleague in another place will work with the all-party group led by Sharon Hodgson - Link to Speech |
| Department Publications - News and Communications |
|---|
|
Thursday 22nd January 2026
Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office Source Page: UK response to the President of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly: UK statement to the OSCE Document: UK response to the President of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly: UK statement to the OSCE (webpage) Found: stance strengthened in the OSCE PA by your appointment of the UK Parliament’s Head of Delegation Sharon Hodgson |