Information between 24th June 2026 - 14th July 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
24 Jun 2026 - Climate Change - View Vote Context Scott Arthur voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 267 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 93 |
|
24 Jun 2026 - Climate Change - View Vote Context Scott Arthur voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 261 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 94 |
|
24 Jun 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Scott Arthur voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 315 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 323 Noes - 160 |
|
24 Jun 2026 - Climate Change - View Vote Context Scott Arthur voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 264 Labour Aye votes vs 1 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 332 Noes - 94 |
|
30 Jun 2026 - Draft Supply of Machinery (Safety) (Amendment etc.) and the EU Machinery Regulation (Enforcement etc. in Northern Ireland) Regulations 2026 - View Vote Context Scott Arthur voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 11 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 11 Noes - 4 |
|
1 Jul 2026 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Scott Arthur voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 107 |
|
1 Jul 2026 - Employment Tribunals - View Vote Context Scott Arthur voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 307 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 323 Noes - 107 |
|
24 Jun 2026 - Customs - View Vote Context Scott Arthur voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 315 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 323 Noes - 160 |
|
6 Jul 2026 - National Security (State Threats) Bill - View Vote Context Scott Arthur voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 320 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 394 Noes - 85 |
|
8 Jul 2026 - Town and Country Planning - View Vote Context Scott Arthur voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 280 Labour Aye votes vs 21 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 283 Noes - 182 |
|
8 Jul 2026 - Education - View Vote Context Scott Arthur voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 307 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 369 Noes - 102 |
|
8 Jul 2026 - Health and Safety - View Vote Context Scott Arthur voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 304 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 317 Noes - 103 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Internet: Children
Asked by: Scott Arthur (Labour - Edinburgh South West) Friday 26th June 2026 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what steps her Department is taking to help tackle harmful platform features that put children at risk online. Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Minister of State (Cabinet Office) (Jointly with the Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Technology) Protecting children online is a priority for the Secretary of State. Through our recent consultation, which included parents and children's consultations and nationally representative polls, we heard from over 116,000 people.
Following this, on 15 June the government published a progress statement announcing a ban on social media services from providing their services to under 16s as well as targeted functionality restrictions on a wider range of online services. This includes restrictions on creating livestreams and communicating with strangers. These functionalities will also be off by default for 16 and 17 year olds. |
|
Internet: Children
Asked by: Scott Arthur (Labour - Edinburgh South West) Friday 26th June 2026 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, whether she plans to extend proposed restrictions to livestreaming and communication with strangers for child users to other high-risk functionalities including disappearing messages, the visibility of children's accounts to unknown users and in-app gifting. Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Minister of State (Cabinet Office) (Jointly with the Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Technology) The government recently announced restrictions on social media services offering their services to under-16s and wider services offering livestreaming or stranger communication to under-16s. Combined with requiring more device level protections for children preventing the taking, sharing or viewing of nude images, this will make a difference tackling the key risks of disappearing messages. Ofcom’s codes of practice also include recommendations regarding children’s account visibility, to support compliance with existing illegal harm and child safety duties. The government has committed to provide an update on any further restrictions in July. |
|
Economic Growth: Environment Protection
Asked by: Scott Arthur (Labour - Edinburgh South West) Wednesday 24th June 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment she has made of the potential impact of permanent absolute GDP growth on long-term environmental sustainability in the context of the Dasgupta Review. Answered by Lucy Rigby - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury) The Government recognises the vital role of nature in the economy and agrees with the central conclusion of the Dasgupta Review that biodiversity underpins nature, and sustains our economies, livelihoods and well-being.
As recommended by the Dasgupta Review, HM Treasury assesses the role of climate, nature and environmental sustainability in economic and financial decision making, including supporting economic growth, through a set of integrated analytical frameworks, including the Green Book and supportive supplementary guidance documents including the Enable a Natural Capital Approach (ENCA) and Accounting for the Effects of Climate Change (AECC) |
|
Economic Growth: Nature Conservation
Asked by: Scott Arthur (Labour - Edinburgh South West) Wednesday 24th June 2026 Question to the HM Treasury: To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps her Department is taking to (a) cost the degradation of natural assets resulting from headline GDP growth and (b) ensure long-term environmental costs are reflected in fiscal planning. Answered by Lucy Rigby - Economic Secretary (HM Treasury) Since the Dasgupta Review, the Government has taken forward work to integrate nature into policy-making, including improving the valuation of natural capital through collaboration with Defra and its Biodiversity Expert Committee.
The Government is supporting the Office for National Statistics to develop natural capital accounts, including estimates of asset depletion, to better capture changes in the value of natural assets.
HM Treasury embeds environmental considerations into fiscal decision-making. The Green Book requires departments to assess the full range of costs and benefits, including environmental impacts, supported by supplementary guidance such as Defra’s Enabling a Natural Capital Approach.
|
|
Driverless Vehicles: Accidents
Asked by: Scott Arthur (Labour - Edinburgh South West) Thursday 25th June 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether the Centre for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles is exploring the adequacy of compensation arrangements for victims of accidents involving uninsured vehicles in the context of the Automated Vehicles Act implementation programme. Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) Through the Automated Vehicles Act Implementation Programme, officials from the Centre for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles are working with the Motor Insurers' Bureau on insurance for automated vehicles. This includes assessing the adequacy of the insurance and compensation framework to ensure that victims of collisions with uninsured automated vehicles have a clear route to compensation. |
|
UK Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods: Finance
Asked by: Scott Arthur (Labour - Edinburgh South West) Monday 29th June 2026 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment he has made of the adequacy of funding to the UK Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods; what assessment he has made of the role of industry co-investment in supporting the Centre's aims; and whether his Department plans to develop a long-term funding mechanism for the Centre. Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Minister of State (Cabinet Office) (Jointly with the Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Technology) The Government is supporting the establishment of the UK Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods through funding secured as part of the Replacing Animals in Science strategy, with costs informed by analysis of validation requirements and comparable organisations such as the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM). The Government recognises the potential role of industry co‑investment and will work closely with partners across the life sciences sector to develop appropriate approaches as the Centre becomes operational. Long‑term support will be kept under review through delivery of the strategy and the multi‑year funding secured at the Spending Review. |
|
Delivery Services: Robots
Asked by: Scott Arthur (Labour - Edinburgh South West) Wednesday 1st July 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment the Department has made of the level of need for further regulation of autonomous delivery robots operating on public pavements and highways; and whether the Department plans to publish additional guidance on the operation of autonomous delivery robots on public pavements and highways. Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) The Government has committed to pursuing legislative reform for micromobility vehicles when parliamentary time allows by creating a ‘Low-speed Zero Emission Vehicle’ category. This could be used to regulate pavement robots in future. Any new regulations would be subject to public consultation and impact assessment before they came into force. |
|
Driving Tests: Edinburgh
Asked by: Scott Arthur (Labour - Edinburgh South West) Wednesday 1st July 2026 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, with reference to the answer to Question UIN 63826 on driving test waiting times in Currie, what the average waiting time is for a practical driving test at the Currie Driving Test Centre; and by what date she estimates the backlog at that test centre will be cleared. Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) The average waiting time for a car practical driving test at Currie driving test centre in May was 24 weeks. DVSA is taking sustained action to increase testing capacity and reduce waiting times as quickly as possible, including recruiting and training more driving examiners, making better use of existing capacity, and tackling misuse of the booking system. Progress is kept under close review to ensure reductions are delivered while maintaining road safety. |
|
Musculoskeletal Disorders
Asked by: Scott Arthur (Labour - Edinburgh South West) Wednesday 8th July 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is taking to increase awareness of Inclusion Body Myositis and other rare progressive muscle disorders. Answered by Preet Kaur Gill The Government remains committed to improving outcomes for people living with rare diseases, including inclusion body myositis and other rare progressive muscle disorders, through the UK Rare Diseases Framework and successive England Rare Diseases Action Plans. Increasing awareness among healthcare professionals is one of the framework’s four priorities. As set out in the 2026 England Rare Diseases Action Plan, NHS England continues to expand rare disease education through the National Genomics Education Programme, including GeNotes, a clinical resource that now covers more than 150 rare diseases and has been integrated into primary care decision-support tools used by general practitioners. NHS England is also developing resources to support healthcare professionals in having sensitive conversations with patients receiving a rare disease diagnosis, while the Genomics Training Academy provides education and training to the specialist genomics workforce. These initiatives support earlier recognition, diagnosis, and appropriate management of rare conditions. |
|
Social Media: Children
Asked by: Scott Arthur (Labour - Edinburgh South West) Wednesday 8th July 2026 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, what assessment she has made of the potential risks of age verification methods involving facial or biometric data to enforce a social media ban for under-16s. Answered by Kanishka Narayan - Minister of State (Cabinet Office) (Jointly with the Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Technology) I have asked Ofcom to rapidly assess what constitutes highly effective age assurance for establishing whether someone is over 16, prioritising data privacy and security, and considering how it can work for all users. The ICO’s age-appropriate design code already requires online services to meet additional standards when processing children’s data, including on security, minimisation and sharing. |
|
Prosecutions: Costs
Asked by: Scott Arthur (Labour - Edinburgh South West) Monday 6th July 2026 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, when he plans to launch a consultation on proposed regulations relating to costs orders under Section 17 of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985. Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) The Victims and Court Act 2026 introduces an enabling power for the Lord Chancellor to set the rates at which private prosecutors can recover costs from central funds under section 17 of the Prosecution of Offences Act 1985. The Government will consult in due course on the appropriate level of those rates. |
|
Musculoskeletal Disorders: Research
Asked by: Scott Arthur (Labour - Edinburgh South West) Friday 3rd July 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps his Department is taking to incentivise research into Inclusion Body Myositis and other rare progressive muscle disorders. Answered by Preet Kaur Gill The Department funds research through the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR). The NIHR funds clinical, public health, and social care research and works in partnership with the National Health Service, universities, local government, other research funders, patients, and the public, and also funds global health research. NIHR funding is not typically ringfenced for specific conditions. Instead, research proposals are assessed through an open, competitive peer review, with funding decisions made on the basis of scientific quality, the importance of the research question to patients and health and care services, and value for money. This approach ensures that the strongest proposals with the greatest potential impact are supported. In this disease area over the last five financial years, from 2020/21 to 2024/25, the Department committed £40.4 million on new research projects alongside supporting infrastructure into inclusion body myositis and other rare progressive muscle disorders. This has included clinical trials and novel therapies at NIHR clinical research facilities and NIHR biomedical research centres looking at gene silencing, micro-dystrophin, and disease-modifying therapies for neuromuscular condition. The NIHR’s Be Part of Research allows people to find and take part in health and care research, and shows that there are currently eight studies where researchers are actively looking for participants in several aspects of muscle disorders. Further information on Be Part of Research is available at the following link: |
|
Pancreatic Cancer: Genomics
Asked by: Scott Arthur (Labour - Edinburgh South West) Friday 3rd July 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what assessment his Department has made of the barriers to genomic testing for pancreatic cancer patients and how he plans to increase uptake nationally. Answered by Preet Kaur Gill Genomic testing in the National Health Service in England is provided through the NHS Genomic Medicine Service (NHS GMS) and delivered by a national genomic testing network of seven NHS Genomic Laboratory Hubs (GLHs). The NHS GLHs deliver testing as directed by the National Genomic Test Directory (NGTD), which includes tests for over 7,000 rare diseases and over 200 cancer clinical indications, including both whole genome sequencing (WGS) and non-WGS testing. Genomic testing is available for all eligible patients across the whole of England. The NGTD sets out the eligibility criteria for patients to access testing as well as the genomic targets to be tested and the method that should be used. Genomic testing for pancreatic cancer is available under the M219 clinical indication code and delivered by all seven NHS GLHs. NHS England captures Patient Level Contract Monitoring data across the NHS GMS to facilitate a national approach to reporting and validating activity data and turnaround times for the genomics element of the pathway. This national approach enables NHS England to understand activity volumes, detect any backlogs, and work with the NHS GLHs to implement improvement activities. NHS England has been undertaking a procurement of NHS GMS lead providers to embed a new operating model for delivery of the NHS GMS from 2026. This includes a cancer genomics clinical function, which will bring together multi profession leadership to work with partners to embed and develop cancer genomics pathways. |
|
Cancer: Genomics
Asked by: Scott Arthur (Labour - Edinburgh South West) Friday 3rd July 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether he will undertake a horizon-scanning review to identify emerging actionable gene mutations for timely inclusion in the National Genomic Test Directory, prioritising pancreatic cancer and other less survivable cancers. Answered by Preet Kaur Gill Genomic testing in the National Health Service in England is provided through the NHS Genomic Medicine Service and delivered by a national genomic testing network of seven NHS Genomic Laboratory Hubs (GLHs). The NHS GLHs deliver testing as directed by the National Genomic Test Directory (NGTD), with further information available at the following link: https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/national-genomic-test-directories/ This includes tests for over 7,000 rare diseases and over 200 cancer clinical indications, including both whole genome sequencing (WGS) and non-WGS testing. NHS England regularly updates the NGTD in line with scientific and technological advances, while delivering value for money for the NHS. NHS England undertakes horizon scanning with system partners, including the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, and a fast-track process ensures amendments that may be identified as requiring more urgent implementation are considered. Anyone can submit an application to the NGTD if the appropriate clinical and scientific evidence is in place. There is a robust and evidence-based Test Evaluation process and policy, with further information available at the following link: The policy ensures that genomic testing continues to be available for all patients for whom it would be of clinical benefit. NHS England is working with partners to expand the NGTD to include more comprehensive reporting of clinical trial targets, helping embed these targets in the standard of care and reporting rapid trial enrolment. |
| Early Day Motions |
|---|
|
Tuesday 30th June 4 signatures (Most recent: 2 Jul 2026) Tabled by: Scott Arthur (Labour - Edinburgh South West) That this House congratulates Edinburgh charity Community One Stop Shop (COSS) on its exceptional impact over the past year in supporting individuals experiencing poverty and crisis; applauds the expansion of its services through the new Waverley Care Van, which supported 1,868 people experiencing homelessness in Edinburgh city centre, and the … |
|
Tuesday 30th June 10th anniversary of Oxgangs Community Church 4 signatures (Most recent: 2 Jul 2026)Tabled by: Scott Arthur (Labour - Edinburgh South West) That this House congratulates Oxgangs Community Church on the celebration of its 10th anniversary; notes that the Church was established in 2016 to serve the community of Oxgangs and has since become a valued part of local life; recognises its commitment to supporting individuals and families through worship, community outreach, … |
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Monday 29th June Scott Arthur signed this EDM on Tuesday 7th July 2026 25 signatures (Most recent: 9 Jul 2026) Tabled by: Dave Doogan (Scottish National Party - Angus and Perthshire Glens) That this House commends Scotland’s Tartan Army for the outstanding example set during recent international fixtures in North America; notes the warmth, humour, generosity and exemplary conduct of thousands of travelling supporters; recognises that the Tartan Army captured hearts across the world through personal interactions and the power of social … |
|
Monday 1st June Scott Arthur signed this EDM on Wednesday 24th June 2026 Enhertu for metastatic breast cancer patients 51 signatures (Most recent: 15 Jul 2026)Tabled by: Clive Jones (Liberal Democrat - Wokingham) That this House recognises the recent changes to NICE’s cost effectiveness threshold, which could facilitate better access to new medicines; expresses concern that Enhertu, a treatment for people with incurable HER2-low metastatic breast cancer, remains unavailable to patients on the NHS in England; welcomes Breast Cancer Now's Enhertu Now campaign, … |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
1 Jul 2026, 1:41 p.m. - House of Commons " Scott Arthur thank you. >> In in knowing that the vast majority of. Ordinary Palestinians and Israelis want peace. And as an optimist, I hope they vote for it " Dr Scott Arthur MP (Edinburgh South West, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
25 Jun 2026, 11:10 a.m. - House of Commons " Scott Arthur thank you, Mr. Speaker. I thank the Minister for his statement and the level of reassurance he's been able to give us today. I also want to thank the " Dr Scott Arthur MP (Edinburgh South West, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
6 Jul 2026, 3:22 p.m. - House of Commons "will meet with her to discuss these issues afterwards. >> Now we come to a topical Scott Arthur Luke Evans. " Mr Calvin Bailey MP, Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Ministry of Defence) (Minister for Veterans and People) (Leyton and Wanstead, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
2 Jul 2026, 1:55 p.m. - House of Commons " Scott Arthur Al Pinkerton. Committee Chair, for securing this important debate today. I want to use the brief time I have just to " Dr Al Pinkerton MP (Surrey Heath, Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
8 Jul 2026, 1:05 p.m. - House of Commons " Scott Arthur Scott Arthur. thank the Minister for his answer to the question. I do have to remind people, of course, in Scotland, the holiday season has " Dr Scott Arthur MP (Edinburgh South West, Labour) - View Video - View Transcript |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 24th June 2026
Oral Evidence - Agilisys, Cycling UK, Chartered Institution of Highways and Transportation, Living Streets, and Hampshire County Council Road Safety Strategy - Transport Committee Found: Watch the meeting Members present: Ruth Cadbury (Chair); Steff Aquarone; Dr Scott Arthur; Mrs Elsie |
| Calendar |
|---|
|
Wednesday 8th July 2026 9:15 a.m. Transport Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Joined-up journeys: achieving and measuring transport integration At 9:15am: Oral evidence Simon Lightwood MP - Minister for Roads and Buses at Department for Transport Conrad Bailey CBE - Director General for Public Transport and Local Group at Department for Transport Ben Smith - Director for Public Transport Strategy and Security at Department for Transport View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 7th July 2026 4 p.m. Transport Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Wednesday 15th July 2026 9:15 a.m. Transport Committee - Oral evidence Subject: Road Safety Strategy At 9:15am: Oral evidence Lilli Matson - Chief Safety, Health and Environment Officer at Transport for London Adrian Berendt - Director and Community Champion at 20s Plenty for Us Dr Rob Török - Doctor in Pre-Hospital Emergency Medicine at Dorset and Somerset Air Ambulance Phil Jones - Chair at Phil Jones Associates View calendar - Add to calendar |
|
Tuesday 14th July 2026 4 p.m. Transport Committee - Private Meeting View calendar - Add to calendar |
| Select Committee Inquiry |
|---|
|
24 Jun 2026
Scrutiny of the draft Heathrow Expansion National Policy Statement Transport Committee (Select) Not accepting submissions The Government has published a draft of the National Policy Statement (NPS) that would be used as the basis for making a decision on whether to grant planning consent for a third runway at Heathrow Airport. The Transport Committee is holding an inquiry to scrutinise the draft Heathrow Expansion NPS, including the extent to which it provides clear guidance about how to assess a proposed runway scheme, and the robustness of the assumptions and requirements in the NPS and its associated documents. |
|
21 Jul 2026
Getting to work: transport connecting young people to jobs and training Transport Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 16 Oct 2026) The Transport Committee is examining how transport issues can act as a barrier to young people finding, taking up and remaining in employment or training. The inquiry will explore:
|
|
1 Jul 2026
Safer journeys for women and girls Transport Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 25 Mar 2033) The Transport Committee is looking at how effectively the Government is keeping women and girls safe as they travel, and what more could be done to ensure that they can make their journeys without fear of violence, intimidation or harassment. The Committee will consider how government could most effectively prevent risks to women’s safety when they make journeys in the UK, what interventions are most effective to respond to incidents of violence, intimidation or harassment, and how well the Department for Transport is working to ensure safer journeys for women and girls. DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTING EVIDENCE: 23:59 on 9 October 2026. |