Information between 12th October 2026 - 22nd October 2026
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
13 Oct 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Olney voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 69 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 189 Noes - 306 |
|
13 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill (Carry-over Extension) - View Vote Context Sarah Olney voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 67 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 304 Noes - 179 |
|
13 Oct 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Olney voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 68 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 301 Noes - 193 |
|
13 Oct 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Olney voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 66 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 89 Noes - 312 |
|
13 Oct 2026 - Courts and Tribunals Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Olney voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 67 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 196 Noes - 304 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Olney voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 58 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 184 Noes - 330 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Olney voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 61 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 179 Noes - 336 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Olney voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 61 Liberal Democrat Aye votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat No votes Tally: Ayes - 176 Noes - 329 |
|
20 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Olney voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 60 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 178 |
|
19 Oct 2026 - Northern Ireland Troubles Bill (Programme) (No.2) - View Vote Context Sarah Olney voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 51 Liberal Democrat No votes vs 0 Liberal Democrat Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 286 Noes - 163 |
| Speeches |
|---|
|
Sarah Olney speeches from: Heathrow Airport Expansion
Sarah Olney contributed 2 speeches (1,125 words) Tuesday 20th October 2026 - Westminster Hall Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government |
|
Sarah Olney speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Sarah Olney contributed 2 speeches (122 words) Monday 19th October 2026 - Commons Chamber Ministry of Defence |
|
Sarah Olney speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Sarah Olney contributed 2 speeches (237 words) Thursday 15th October 2026 - Commons Chamber Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade |
|
Sarah Olney speeches from: Oral Answers to Questions
Sarah Olney contributed 2 speeches (118 words) Wednesday 14th October 2026 - Commons Chamber Attorney General |
|
Sarah Olney speeches from: Youth Suicide Prevention and Mental Health Support
Sarah Olney contributed 1 speech (385 words) Tuesday 13th October 2026 - Westminster Hall Department of Health and Social Care |
|
Sarah Olney speeches from: Rejoining the EU
Sarah Olney contributed 1 speech (51 words) Monday 12th October 2026 - Westminster Hall Cabinet Office |
| Written Answers | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Water Abstraction: Teddington
Asked by: Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat - Richmond Park) Monday 12th October 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what assessment she has made of the ability of the proposed Teddington Direct River Abstraction Scheme to provide resilience in a 1:200 year drought event, in the context of the 1:40 drought event of 2022 seeing naturalised flows over Teddington Weir drop as low as the limit of the M2 (LTOA) abstraction licence. Answered by Emma Hardy - Minister of State (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The performance of the proposed Teddington Direct River Abstraction has been assessed through the water resources management planning process and shown to be effective under a range of drought conditions. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Water Abstraction: Teddington
Asked by: Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat - Richmond Park) Monday 12th October 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, pursuant to the answer of 8th September 2026, to Question UIN 26078, on Water Abstraction: Teddington, how many additional days would the proposed Teddington Direct River Abstraction add to London’s potable water supply in a very severe drought when reservoir storage dropped to 25% and emergency drought orders were imposed. Answered by Emma Hardy - Minister of State (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The proposed Teddington Direct River Abstraction will be an important scheme in reducing impacts of severe droughts. Days of additional water supply depend on water demand, reservoir storage, river-flows, drought severity and operational factors. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Water Abstraction: Teddington
Asked by: Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat - Richmond Park) Monday 12th October 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, pursuant to the answer of 7th September 2026, to Question UIN 26076, on Water Abstraction: Teddington, what assessment she has made of Thames Water’s M2 (LTOA) abstraction licence in continuing to allow abstraction into the Thames-Lee tunnel at Hampton, in the context of naturalised flow over Teddington Weir being at 300 Ml/d on average for 10 days. Answered by Emma Hardy - Minister of State (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The proposed Teddington Direct River Abstraction (TDRA) scheme is separate from the existing M2 abstraction licence. Any TDRA operation would require environmental assessment considering interactions with the existing M2 operations. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Access to Work Programme: Telephone Services
Asked by: Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat - Richmond Park) Monday 12th October 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what was the average length of time each year between 2015-2026 that a person would wait on hold for when calling the Access to Work helpline. Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government) (Equalities) The table below shows the Average Time to Answer for all calls to Access To Work services in an hours, minutes and seconds format (hh:mm:ss), itemised by Reporting Year. Please be aware that we DO NOT hold data for the 2015-2016 reporting year.
*Please note, that the current 2026 – 2027* reporting year, shows data up to and including 13/09/2026 only.
Disclaimer The above answer contains unpublished figures. The data provided is derived from the Department’s management information, designed solely for the purpose of helping the Department to manage its business. As such, it has not been subjected to the rigorous quality assurance checks applied to our published official statistics. As DWP holds the information internally, we have released it. However, it is possible information held by DWP may change due to operational reasons and we recommend that caution be applied when using it.
Since the start of the 2026/27 operational year, Access to Work has made positive progress in reducing outstanding work. As of 1 October 2026, using the full reporting period from April to August 2026, we have achieved a net backlog reduction of almost 3,000 cases, specifically 2,980. With recruits now arriving and needing to be coached and trained for the next six months, we expect the backlog to stabilise before falling in the spring of 2027. Overall, the programme remains on track, and our assessment is that Access to Work continues to be on course to clear the backlog by September 2027. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Access to Work Programme
Asked by: Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat - Richmond Park) Monday 12th October 2026 Question to the Department for Work and Pensions: To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what was the average wait time for a decision to be made following an application for Access to Work each year between 2015-2026. Answered by Stephen Timms - Minister of State (Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government) (Equalities) The average wait time for a decision following an Access to Work application was:
2021/22: 28.3 days 2022/23: 57.8 days 2023/24: 45.1 days 2024/25: 67.1 days 2025/26: 100.9 days
Comparable data prior to 2021/22 is not available.
Please note that this data is derived from unpublished management information collected for internal use only and has not been quality assured to National Statistics or Official Statistics standards.
Since the start of the 2026/27 operational year, Access to Work has made positive progress in reducing outstanding work. As of 1 October 2026, using the full reporting period from April to August 2026, we have achieved a net backlog reduction of almost 3,000 cases, specifically 2,980. With recruits now arriving and needing to be coached and trained for the next six months, we expect the backlog to stabilise before falling in the spring of 2027. Overall, the programme remains on track, and our assessment is that Access to Work continues to be on course to clear the backlog by September 2027. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Packaging: Recycling
Asked by: Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat - Richmond Park) Monday 19th October 2026 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what steps she is taking to address the shortage of Packaging Recovery Notes. Answered by Emma Hardy - Minister of State (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) Due to exceptional factors that have reduced PRN and PERN availability this year, the four UK regulators issued Regulatory Position Statements on 9 October. This means that producers and compliance schemes that meet the reduced proportions of 2026 recycling obligations for plastic, steel and wood will not face enforcement action. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Special Educational Needs: Tribunals
Asked by: Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat - Richmond Park) Thursday 15th October 2026 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what are the current average wait times to complete Special Educational Need and Disability appeals heard through the HM Courts and Tribunals Service which have received an Order allowing the case to proceed towards determination on the papers. Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) The current waiting time for a final oral hearing in a Special Educational Needs and Disability appeal is 84 weeks.
The time taken to complete a Special Educational Needs and Disability appeal after an order for determination on the papers is set by the judiciary according to the circumstances of each case. Establishing an average would require a manual review of every case and could therefore be provided only at disproportionate cost.
The average wait for a call to the SEND helpline to be answered is approximately two minutes (1 minute 56 seconds). The current longest response time for written correspondence, including emails and letters, is eight days. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Special Educational Needs: Tribunals
Asked by: Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat - Richmond Park) Thursday 15th October 2026 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what are the current average wait times for Special Educational Need and Disability oral hearings within the HM Courts and Tribunals Service. Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) The current waiting time for a final oral hearing in a Special Educational Needs and Disability appeal is 84 weeks.
The time taken to complete a Special Educational Needs and Disability appeal after an order for determination on the papers is set by the judiciary according to the circumstances of each case. Establishing an average would require a manual review of every case and could therefore be provided only at disproportionate cost.
The average wait for a call to the SEND helpline to be answered is approximately two minutes (1 minute 56 seconds). The current longest response time for written correspondence, including emails and letters, is eight days. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Special Educational Needs: Tribunals
Asked by: Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat - Richmond Park) Thursday 15th October 2026 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the current average wait times are to respond to appellant enquiries regarding Special Educational Need and Disability appeals heard through the HM Courts and Tribunals Service. Answered by Sarah Sackman - Minister of State (Ministry of Justice) The current waiting time for a final oral hearing in a Special Educational Needs and Disability appeal is 84 weeks.
The time taken to complete a Special Educational Needs and Disability appeal after an order for determination on the papers is set by the judiciary according to the circumstances of each case. Establishing an average would require a manual review of every case and could therefore be provided only at disproportionate cost.
The average wait for a call to the SEND helpline to be answered is approximately two minutes (1 minute 56 seconds). The current longest response time for written correspondence, including emails and letters, is eight days. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Iodine: Health
Asked by: Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat - Richmond Park) Monday 19th October 2026 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, whether the Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition plans to undertake an assessment of iodine deficiencies in the UK before the end of this year. Answered by Diana Johnson - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) The Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN) considered the topic of iodine at its horizon scan meeting in June 2026. The SACN agreed to progress the topic in its future work programme. The SACN is planning to start this work in early 2027. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Small Businesses: Courier Services
Asked by: Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat - Richmond Park) Tuesday 20th October 2026 Question to the Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, what assessment they have made of the impact that delayed and lost deliveries from poor performance of courier services have on small and medium-sized businesses. Answered by Kate Dearden - Minister of State (Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade) We expect all delivery companies to provide a good level of service for businesses and have been clear that some need to do more to meet customer expectations. Ofcom, as the independent regulator, is responsible for reviewing the regulatory framework including considering the needs of small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) users. Ofcom monitors the experiences of businesses and consumers of parcel delivery services. Its last 2024/25 annual post monitoring report found that around eight in ten SMEs were satisfied with delivery services. Ofcom has, however, recognised concerns about parcel delivery performance and is keeping the need for further regulation under review. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Financial Services: Trade Competitiveness
Asked by: Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat - Richmond Park) Tuesday 20th October 2026 Question to the Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, what assessment he has made of the potential impact of restricting non-compete clauses on the competitiveness of the UK financial services sector. Answered by Kate Dearden - Minister of State (Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade) The Government recognises the importance of a competitive and dynamic UK financial services sector, which is a key driver of growth across the economy. The Prime Minister recently announced that the Government will legislate on non-compete clauses in employment contracts and bring forward options to address the wider use of restrictive practices. These reforms are intended to support labour mobility, innovation and business dynamism while ensuring firms continue to have tools available to protect legitimate business interests. Further detail will be set out in the Government's response to the working paper on reform of non-compete clauses at Budget 2026. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Small Businesses: Courier Services
Asked by: Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat - Richmond Park) Tuesday 20th October 2026 Question to the Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, what actions they have planned to review the regulatory framework for postal deliveries to ensure small and medium-sized businesses are not negatively impacted by the poor performance of courier services. Answered by Kate Dearden - Minister of State (Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade) We expect all delivery companies to provide a good level of service for businesses and have been clear that some need to do more to meet customer expectations. Ofcom, as the independent regulator, is responsible for reviewing the regulatory framework including considering the needs of small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) users. Ofcom monitors the experiences of businesses and consumers of parcel delivery services. Its last 2024/25 annual post monitoring report found that around eight in ten SMEs were satisfied with delivery services. Ofcom has, however, recognised concerns about parcel delivery performance and is keeping the need for further regulation under review. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Conditions of Employment
Asked by: Sarah Olney (Liberal Democrat - Richmond Park) Tuesday 20th October 2026 Question to the Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade, what assessment his Department has made of the potential impact of restricting non-compete clauses on (a) labour market mobility, (b) innovation and (c) business investment in staff training. Answered by Kate Dearden - Minister of State (Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade) The evidence is clear that non-compete clauses deter labour mobility, which can lead to reduced wage growth and lower business creation. Around 5 million employees are subject to a non-compete clause in Great Britain with a typical duration of around 6 months. The government will legislate to make sure that non-compete clauses will no longer be a barrier to hiring for our most innovative and promising startups and scaling firms. The Competition and Markets Authority found non-compete clauses were associated with slightly more formal on-the-job training, but not with other types of training, suggesting that not all non-compete clauses are protecting substantial training investments. |
| Early Day Motions Signed |
|---|
|
Thursday 29th October Sarah Olney signed this EDM on Monday 2nd November 2026 Delivery of Budget 2026 through property tax systems 26 signatures (Most recent: 3 Nov 2026)Tabled by: Daisy Cooper (Liberal Democrat - St Albans) That this House notes that many announcements in Budget 2026 are predicated on out-of-date property tax systems and that the Government’s Household Energy Payment will be distributed through the outdated council tax system, resulting in 1.4 million low-income households being excluded while channelling payments to some high income individuals; further … |
|
Tuesday 15th September Sarah Olney signed this EDM as a sponsor on Monday 12th October 2026 Salt of the Earth receives King's Award for Enterprise 5 signatures (Most recent: 12 Oct 2026)Tabled by: Liz Jarvis (Liberal Democrat - Eastleigh) That this House congratulates Salt of the Earth, based in Chandler's Ford, on receiving the King's Award for Enterprise for Sustainable Development 2026; commends its success in building its natural deodorant product line; notes that the company was one of only 36 businesses across the United Kingdom to be recognised … |
|
Monday 14th September Sarah Olney signed this EDM on Monday 12th October 2026 Political donations and campaign finance regulation 51 signatures (Most recent: 27 Oct 2026)Tabled by: Lisa Smart (Liberal Democrat - Hazel Grove) That this House expresses alarm at the exposure of UK democracy to the undue influence of an ultra-wealthy minority; notes that donations are uncapped meaning that two individuals have been able to give £72 million to one party in one week; further notes recent investigations reporting foreign money and impermissible … |
|
Friday 11th September Sarah Olney signed this EDM on Monday 12th October 2026 Second Reading of the Mental Capacity (Duty to Assess) Bill 28 signatures (Most recent: 19 Oct 2026)Tabled by: Chris Coghlan (Liberal Democrat - Dorking and Horley) That this House notes that on 8 July 2026 the Mental Capacity (Duty to Assess) Bill, also known as Christopher’s Law, was introduced with cross-party support; recognises that cases where the process for deciding on the presumption of capacity under the Mental Capacity Act 2005 was not correctly followed are … |
| Live Transcript |
|---|
|
Note: Cited speaker in live transcript data may not always be accurate. Check video link to confirm. |
|
15 Oct 2026, 9:42 a.m. - House of Commons "incentives that I talked about. And again, a further agenda coming through the Milburn Review. >> Liberal Democrats spokesperson Sarah Olney. " Sarah Olney MP (Richmond Park, Liberal Democrat) - View Video - View Transcript |
|
19 Oct 2026, 6:07 p.m. - Public Accounts Committee "Sarah Olney, please. " Sarah Olney - View Video - View Transcript |
| Parliamentary Debates |
|---|
|
House of Lords Reform
56 speeches (9,554 words) Tuesday 20th October 2026 - Westminster Hall Cabinet Office Mentions: 1: Lisa Smart (LD - Hazel Grove) Friend the Member for Richmond Park (Sarah Olney) tabled an amendment to the House of Lords (Hereditary - Link to Speech |
|
Heathrow Airport Expansion
60 speeches (13,640 words) Tuesday 20th October 2026 - Westminster Hall Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government Mentions: 1: Will Forster (LD - Woking) Friends the Members for Richmond Park (Sarah Olney) and for Twickenham (Munira Wilson), will completely - Link to Speech |
|
Youth Suicide Prevention and Mental Health Support
67 speeches (9,136 words) Tuesday 13th October 2026 - Westminster Hall Department of Health and Social Care Mentions: 1: Alison McGovern (Lab - Birkenhead) Member for Richmond Park (Sarah Olney), asked whether I would meet them to discuss this topic, matters - Link to Speech |
| Select Committee Documents |
|---|
|
Wednesday 14th October 2026
Report - 15th Report - Annual Report of the Chair of the Committee of Public Accounts (2026) Public Accounts Committee Found: Lowe (Restore Britain; Great Yarmouth) Catherine McKinnell (Labour; Newcastle upon Tyne North) Sarah Olney |