Oral Answers to Questions Debate

Full Debate: Read Full Debate
Department: Department for Transport

Oral Answers to Questions

Sarah Newton Excerpts
Thursday 27th June 2013

(11 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Sarah Newton Portrait Sarah Newton (Truro and Falmouth) (Con)
- Hansard - -

4. What plans he has to introduce an e-petitions system applicable to both Parliament and Government.

Simon Wright Portrait Simon Wright (Norwich South) (LD)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

6. What plans he has to introduce an e-petitions system applicable to both Parliament and Government.

Lord Lansley Portrait The Leader of the House of Commons (Mr Andrew Lansley)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

The introduction of the coalition Government’s e-petitions system has been a successful improvement for public engagement with Parliament. However, it is clear that the public expect to be able to petition their Parliament and seek action from their Government. I want to work with the Procedure Committee, the Backbench Business Committee and interested Members from across the House to develop the current system into something that more fully meets that expectation.

Sarah Newton Portrait Sarah Newton
- Hansard - -

I thank the Leader of the House for his answer, but can he really assure the House that any changes to the e-petition will not impact on or restrict the work of the Backbench Business Committee?

Lord Lansley Portrait Mr Lansley
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

I agree that reforms of this House should not have an adverse effect on the successful work of the Backbench Business Committee, which this coalition Government established. It may be possible, none the less, that there is a role for a Select Committee or Committees in examining petitions, taking evidence on petitions, seeking information from Government, and even recommending debates in Parliament. However, I envisage that it would remain for the Backbench Business Committee to consider and schedule debates.