Information between 28th October 2024 - 7th November 2024
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
Division Votes |
---|
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Sarah Champion voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 367 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 400 Noes - 122 |
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Sarah Champion voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 368 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 400 Noes - 120 |
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Sarah Champion voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 371 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 401 Noes - 120 |
6 Nov 2024 - Budget Resolutions - View Vote Context Sarah Champion voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 368 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 455 Noes - 125 |
29 Oct 2024 - Great British Energy Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Champion voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 343 Labour Aye votes vs 0 Labour No votes Tally: Ayes - 361 Noes - 111 |
29 Oct 2024 - Great British Energy Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Champion voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 345 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 115 Noes - 361 |
29 Oct 2024 - Great British Energy Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Champion voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 343 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 124 Noes - 361 |
29 Oct 2024 - Great British Energy Bill - View Vote Context Sarah Champion voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 346 Labour No votes vs 0 Labour Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 96 Noes - 353 |
Speeches |
---|
Sarah Champion speeches from: Great British Energy Bill
Sarah Champion contributed 5 speeches (1,245 words) Report stage Tuesday 29th October 2024 - Commons Chamber Department for Energy Security & Net Zero |
Written Answers |
---|
Animal Experiments: Standards
Asked by: Sarah Champion (Labour - Rotherham) Friday 1st November 2024 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, whether he is taking steps to (a) collaborate with international partners on best practices and (b) align regulatory frameworks for animal testing; and what discussions he has had with his international counterparts on reducing reliance on animal testing. Answered by Feryal Clark - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) Many of the regulations on animal testing are backed by international agreements and the government is keen to ensure regulatory alignment where appropriate. We are engaging with the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), who represent the UK at the International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, on how to accelerate the acceptance of data generated using non-animal methods for drug safety decision making. Government officials and representatives of the NC3Rs regularly attend international meetings to collaborate on best practice and to consider approaches to reducing reliance on animal testing. |
Cars: Digital Technology
Asked by: Sarah Champion (Labour - Rotherham) Friday 1st November 2024 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether his Department has had recent discussions with car manufacturers on the potential impact of digitally connected cars on the safety of domestic abuse survivors. Answered by Lilian Greenwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) Responsibility for domestic abuse policy rests with the Home Office. The Government has set out an ambition to halve violence against women and girls within a decade. The Department for Transport has not carried out discussions with car manufacturers on this issue. |
Bovine Tuberculosis: Disease Control
Asked by: Sarah Champion (Labour - Rotherham) Friday 1st November 2024 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, how many culled badger carcasses have tested positive for TB since 2013; what plans his Department has for the number of badgers to be culled up to January 2026; and of those how many and what proportion will be tested for TB. Answered by Daniel Zeichner - Minister of State (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) On 30 August, the Government announced the start of work on a comprehensive new strategy for England, to drive down bovine TB rates to save cattle and farmers’ livelihoods and end the badger cull by the end of this parliament. This will be undertaken in co-design with farmers, vets, scientists and conservationists, ensuring the new strategy marks a significant step-change in approach to tackling this devastating disease.
The published policy guidance as introduced by the previous Government does not require routine post-mortem examinations on badgers removed under culling licences issued in the High Risk and Edge Areas of England. There are no plans to change this guidance, with existing cull processes agreed by the previous Government being honoured to ensure clarity for farmers, while new measures can be rolled out through the work on a new bovine TB eradication strategy.
Information on the number of culled badgers that have been previously tested under licences in the High Risk and Edge Area can be found on GOV.UK: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/bovine-tb-surveillance-in-wildlife-in-england.
Information on the number of culled badgers that have been tested (including the proportion positive for Mycobacterium bovis) in the Low Risk Area is published annually on GOV.UK: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/bovine-tb-hotspots-in-the-low-risk-area-of-england. |
Television
Asked by: Sarah Champion (Labour - Rotherham) Monday 4th November 2024 Question to the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport: To ask the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, what assessment she has made of the potential implications for her policies of the report on the future of TV distribution, published by Ofcom on 10 May 2024. Answered by Stephanie Peacock - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Culture, Media and Sport) The Government welcomes Ofcom's research and the report published earlier this year and intends to use this alongside our own research to ensure a robust evidence base to inform our ongoing project on the future of TV distribution.
|
Dogs: Electronic Training Aids
Asked by: Sarah Champion (Labour - Rotherham) Monday 4th November 2024 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, whether his Department has made an assessment of the potential merits of bringing forward legislative proposals to ban the use of electronic shock collars in dog training. Answered by Daniel Zeichner - Minister of State (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The Government will introduce the most ambitious programme for animal welfare in a generation and will bring forward plans in due course. Ministers will be considering available evidence around the use of hand-controlled e-collars and their effects on the welfare of animals. |
Forced Labour
Asked by: Sarah Champion (Labour - Rotherham) Monday 28th October 2024 Question to the Department for Business and Trade: To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, pursuant to the Answer of 10 October to Question 6252 on Forced Labour, whether he has made an assessment of the effectiveness of potential steps he can take to help prevent goods from entering the UK market where there is evidence of forced labour in particular supply chains. Answered by Douglas Alexander - Minister of State (Department for Business and Trade) The Government will continue to assess and monitor the effectiveness of the UK’s existing measures, alongside the impacts of other policy tools. As set out in my response of 10 October 2024, this Government is committed to working with businesses and international partners to ensure global supply chains are free from human and labour rights abuses and to understand the impact of measures used to combat forced labour. |
Marine Protected Areas: Fisheries
Asked by: Sarah Champion (Labour - Rotherham) Tuesday 29th October 2024 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, pursuant to the Answer of 14 October 2024 to Question 6253 on Marine Protected Areas: Fisheries, what assessment he has made of the potential impact of the decision to allow bottom trawl fishing in parts of the Farnes East marine protected area on (a) the ecological integrity of the site and (b) meeting its conservation objectives. Answered by Emma Hardy - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The Marine Protected Areas Bottom Towed Fishing Gear Byelaw 2023, which came into force on 22 March 2024, prohibited the use of bottom-towed gear over the rock and reef habitats of Farnes East Marine Protected Area. The Marine Management Organisation has been making further assessments of the impact of fishing activities on other designated habitats throughout the site and, if needed, will consult on further fishing restrictions. As mentioned in my answer to PQ 4529, the Department is considering next steps for this and other sites. |
Packaging: Recycling
Asked by: Sarah Champion (Labour - Rotherham) Tuesday 29th October 2024 Question to the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, whether he has made an assessment of the potential (a) impact of inflation on thresholds for qualification as a large business under Extended Producer Responsibility and (b) merits of staggered thresholds. Answered by Mary Creagh - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs) The thresholds for qualification under Packaging Extended Producer Responsibility remain in line with those set out in the Packaging Waste Regulations 2007 which sets the threshold for businesses handling at least 50 tonnes of packaging materials and with a turnover of £2 million a year. This decision was made following extensive consultation, which also considered reduction or removal of the threshold, to encourage all producers to use less packaging and ensure the packaging they do use is easy to recycle.
To support this aim, the Government is also introducing a new distributor approach which places a new obligation on large packaging manufacturers and importers that sell unfilled packaging to small, unobligated producers, ensuring all packaging is subject to extended producer responsibility.
Once the scheme is fully operational, we will review these thresholds to ensure they continue to meet the aims of the scheme. This will include the impact of inflation, and the effectiveness of the new distributor obligations, to ensure that we are obligating as much packaging as possible whilst still protecting the smallest businesses from the burden of complying with the regulations. |
Prescriptions
Asked by: Sarah Champion (Labour - Rotherham) Tuesday 29th October 2024 Question to the Department of Health and Social Care: To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what progress his Department has made on the implementation of the recommendations of his Department's report entitled Good for you, good for us, good for everybody: A plan to reduce overprescribing to make patient care better and safer, support the NHS, and reduce carbon emissions, published on 22 September 2021. Answered by Karin Smyth - Minister of State (Department of Health and Social Care) I refer the Hon. Member to the answer I gave on 9 September 2024 to Question 2902. |
Animal Experiments: Public Consultation
Asked by: Sarah Champion (Labour - Rotherham) Friday 1st November 2024 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, whether he plans to consult (a) civil society, (b) animal protection organisations and (c) the public on policy decisions on animal testing. Answered by Feryal Clark - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) The Labour Manifesto included a commitment to “partner with scientists, industry, and civil society as we work towards the phasing out of animal testing”, which is a long-term goal. The government will be consulting civil society and animal protection organisations as this process unfolds. |
Animal Experiments
Asked by: Sarah Champion (Labour - Rotherham) Tuesday 5th November 2024 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the Answer of 14 October 2024 to Question 6246 on Animal Experiments, what harms were experienced by dogs used in research on muscular dystrophy; and how much funding is being provided for human-specific research into that condition. Answered by Dan Jarvis - Minister of State (Home Office) The Home Office assigns severity classification to protocols in accordance with the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 (as amended) which is published at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1986/14/contents. The classification takes account of the highest severity likely to be experienced by any animal used in the protocol and takes account of the pain, suffering, distress and lasting harm that an animal is likely to experience, after applying all the appropriate refinement techniques. Of the 21 dogs used for creation and breeding in research on muscular dystrophy, 15 were subject to ‘Mild’ severity and 6 ‘Moderate’ severity. The Home Office assures that, in every research proposal, animals are replaced with non-animal alternatives wherever possible, the number of animals are reduced to the minimum necessary to achieve the result sought, and that, for those animals which must be used, procedures are refined as much as possible to minimise their suffering. The Department for Science, Innovation & Technology (DSIT) is leading on plans to accelerate the development, validation and uptake of alternatives to animal testing. |
Prostitution: Rotherham
Asked by: Sarah Champion (Labour - Rotherham) Tuesday 5th November 2024 Question to the Home Office: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what support her Department is providing to help victims of sexual exploitation exit prostitution in Rotherham. Answered by Jess Phillips - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Home Office) The trafficking of women and girls for sexual exploitation is a truly horrific crime. This Government has set out a mission to halve violence against women and girls in a decade, and we will use all the levers available to us to deliver this ambition. The Government is working closely with law enforcement to tackle the drivers of trafficking for sexual exploitation, including through operational intensifications to target perpetrators.
This Government will also work closely with the voluntary and community sector to help sexually exploited people and ensure that those who want to exit prostitution are able to. We have several ways to estimate the scale of sexual exploitation. Victims of sexual exploitation make up a significant proportion of referrals to the National Referral Mechanism (the framework for identifying and referring potential victims of modern slavery to appropriate support). The most recent statistics show that in 2023, sexual exploitation accounted for 10% (1,679) of all referrals, a 2% increase from the previous year, with 9% (1,470) of referrals relating to women. The Home Office does not hold data specific to Rotherham. However, between January and June 2024, there were 25 potential victims of modern slavery referred to the NRM who reported (either part or whole) sexual exploitation which was disclosed as occurring in South Yorkshire. To help support people at risk of being sexually exploited, Changing Lives has received £1.36m from the Home Office over three years (2022-2025) for their Net-Reach project, which provides online outreach, early intervention and intensive support for women and girls at high-risk of exploitation and abuse. The Net-Reach project operates in several locations in England, including South Yorkshire.
In addition, the Modern Slavery Victim Care Contract provides support to adult potential and confirmed victims of modern slavery in England and Wales, including a support worker to help them access wider services, such as medical treatment, legal aid, legal representatives, and legal advice. |
Animal Experiments: Cats
Asked by: Sarah Champion (Labour - Rotherham) Tuesday 5th November 2024 Question to the Department for Science, Innovation & Technology: To ask the Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, pursuant to the Answer of 14 October 2024 to Question 6247 on Animal Experiments: Cats, what funding is being provided to support human-specific research into relevant conditions. Answered by Feryal Clark - Parliamentary Under Secretary of State (Department for Science, Innovation and Technology) UKRI (UK Research and Innovation) fund a variety of approaches to research on conditions affecting humans. One third of MRC (Medical Research Council) and BBSRC’s (Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council) research grants involve the use of animals licensed under ASPA (Animals Scientific Procedures Act) in some part of the research project. There are no active grants using cats. Although animal use is still considered important for many research areas, UKRI funds multiple approaches to the replacement of animals in research, including through core funding to the NC3Rs (National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research). |
Parliamentary Debates |
---|
Great British Energy Bill
131 speeches (28,443 words) Report stage Tuesday 29th October 2024 - Commons Chamber Department for Energy Security & Net Zero Mentions: 1: Perran Moon (Lab - Camborne and Redruth) Friend the Member for Rotherham (Sarah Champion) about human rights and the opportunity to produce domestically - Link to Speech |
Microplastic Filters (Washing Machines)
2 speeches (1,036 words) 1st reading Tuesday 29th October 2024 - Commons Chamber Mentions: 1: Alberto Costa (Con - South Leicestershire) our environment and our health.Question put and agreed to.Ordered,That Alberto Costa, supported by Sarah - Link to Speech |
Select Committee Documents |
---|
Tuesday 5th November 2024
Correspondence - Correspondence from the Minister of State for Development regarding the IFCAP guarantee, dated 16/08/24 Foreign Affairs Committee Found: Emily Thornberry MP Chair , Foreign Affairs Committee House of Commons London SW1A 0AA Sarah |
Wednesday 30th October 2024
Correspondence - Letter from the Minister of State for the Development at the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office relating to the Innovative Finance Facility for Climate in Asia and the Pacific (IFCAP) Guarantee, 16 October 2024 Public Accounts Committee Found: Emily Thornberry MP Chair , Foreign Affairs Committee House of Commons London SW1A 0AA Sarah |
Bill Documents |
---|
Oct. 29 2024
Consideration of Bill Amendments as at 29 October 2024 Great British Energy Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: bills by at least £300 in real terms. ” 3 REPORT STAGE Tuesday 29 October 2024 _5 Pippa Heylings Sarah |
Oct. 29 2024
Report Stage Proceedings as at 29 October 2024 Great British Energy Bill 2024-26 Bill proceedings: Commons Found: least £300 in real terms. ” 3 REPORT STAGE Tuesday 29 October 2024 Not called _5 Pippa Heylings Sarah |
Calendar |
---|
Tuesday 12th November 2024 1:30 p.m. International Development Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The humanitarian situation in Gaza At 2:00pm: Oral evidence Professor Nizam Mamode - Professor of transplant surgery At 2:30pm: Oral evidence Nebal Farsakh - Spokesperson at Palestinian Red Crescent Society Emina Ćerimović - Associate Director, Disability Rights Division at Human Rights Watch Rohan Talbot - Director of Advocacy and Campaigns at Medical Aid for Palestinians Sam Rose - Senior Deputy Director for UNRWA Affairs, Gaza at UNRWA View calendar |
Tuesday 26th November 2024 1:30 p.m. International Development Committee - Oral evidence Subject: The situation in Sudan At 2:00pm: Oral evidence Will Carter - Country Director, Sudan at Norwegian Refugee Council Alsanosi Adam - Coordinator at Emergency Response Room Claire San Filippo - Emergency Coordinator at Médecins Sans Frontières At 2:45pm: Oral evidence Dame Rosalind Marsden - Associate Fellow at Chatham House Dr Kate Ferguson - Co-executive director at Protection Approaches Dr Eva Khair - Director at Sudan Transnational Consortium View calendar |
Select Committee Inquiry |
---|
5 Nov 2024
In Development International Development Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 9 Dec 2024) In Development: call for potential topics of inquiry The International Development Committee has today launched an open call for potential topics of inquiry in the area of international relief and development. The Committee invites proposals on what it could investigate next and why, including what action is needed from the Government. Up to 10 individuals will be selected and invited to present their pitch to the Committee, either online or in person. The role of the Committee is to examine how the Government’s policy and spending supports lower-income partner countries in efforts to eradicate extreme poverty and improve development. A wide range of policy issues fall within our ‘international development’ remit, but the underlying thread is that they are funded by Official Development Assistance (ODA) funding. Areas include: poverty reduction; humanitarian assistance; conflict, stabilisation and mediation; good governance, rights and equality; education; energy, climate and the environment; global health; food security and nutrition; migration; investment, building trade capacity and exchanging expertise in areas such as science and technology; and the availability of international finance to help meet countries’ development goals. The Committee seeks ideas to feed into future inquiries from: civil society organisations, including relief and development NGOs, refugee and asylum charities, faith and community groups; academia, research institutions and think tanks; professional services; international organisations; and the wider public. It welcomes applications from the UK and overseas. We particularly want to hear from those who are typically underrepresented in policy debates on international development, such as those with direct experience on the ground, the more vulnerable in society, or those who bring an interdisciplinary approach to their research. Join the conversation on X using @CommonsIDC |
13 Nov 2024
The FCDO's approach to value for money International Development Committee (Select) Submit Evidence (by 7 Jan 2025) In November 2020, the Government announced a reduction of Official Development Assistance (ODA) from 0.7 per cent to 0.5 per cent of Gross National Income (GNI), a “temporary measure” until a set of certain fiscal rules were met. In the 2024 Autumn Budget, the Government confirmed that the FCDO would be held to the previous government’s fiscal rules, with the OBR confirming that these rules, and therefore a restoration of the aid budget, are not expected to be met during the life of this Parliament. With the UK’s aid budget being under further strain due to Home Office spend on in-donor refugee costs, it becomes increasingly important that the FCDO ensures Value for Money on its programme spending. In 2011, the former Department for International Development (DFID) published its Value for Money framework, setting out how the Department defined Value for Money, and how this was integrated within its work. This framework set out that Value for Money in DFID’s programme meant “maximising the impact of each pound spent to improve poor people’s lives”, and outlined the intention of DFID to “improve the Value for Money of all aid”, not just DFID’s own. No similar framework has been published by the FCDO since DFID merged with the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) in 2020. This inquiry will consider not just how the FCDO defines Value for Money and how this is implemented within its programming, but also its use of financing instruments to ensure that ODA achieves maximum impact. Join the conversation on X using @CommonsIDC |