Richard Tice - Alert Sample

Alert Sample

View the Parallel Parliament page for Richard Tice

Information between 30th June 2025 - 10th July 2025

Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.

Division Votes
1 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 335 Noes - 260
1 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Reform UK Aye votes vs 0 Reform UK No votes Tally: Ayes - 149 Noes - 328
2 Jul 2025 - Armed Forces Commissioner Bill - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 2 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 321 Noes - 158
2 Jul 2025 - Prevention and Suppression of Terrorism - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 3 Reform UK Aye votes vs 0 Reform UK No votes Tally: Ayes - 385 Noes - 26
2 Jul 2025 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 333 Noes - 168
2 Jul 2025 - Deferred Division - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 4 Reform UK Aye votes vs 0 Reform UK No votes Tally: Ayes - 338 Noes - 79
2 Jul 2025 - Prisons - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 4 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 333 Noes - 168
2 Jul 2025 - Competition - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted Aye - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 4 Reform UK Aye votes vs 0 Reform UK No votes Tally: Ayes - 338 Noes - 79
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Reform UK Aye votes vs 0 Reform UK No votes Tally: Ayes - 167 Noes - 346
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 415 Noes - 98
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Reform UK Aye votes vs 0 Reform UK No votes Tally: Ayes - 178 Noes - 338
8 Jul 2025 - Football Governance Bill [Lords] - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Reform UK Aye votes vs 0 Reform UK No votes Tally: Ayes - 86 Noes - 340
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Reform UK Aye votes vs 0 Reform UK No votes Tally: Ayes - 175 Noes - 401
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 3 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 130 Noes - 443
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Reform UK Aye votes vs 0 Reform UK No votes Tally: Ayes - 149 Noes - 334
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted No - in line with the party majority and in line with the House One of 3 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 35 Noes - 469
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Reform UK No votes vs 0 Reform UK Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 336 Noes - 242
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Reform UK Aye votes vs 0 Reform UK No votes Tally: Ayes - 105 Noes - 370
9 Jul 2025 - Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill - View Vote Context Richard Tice voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 3 Reform UK Aye votes vs 0 Reform UK No votes Tally: Ayes - 103 Noes - 416

Speeches
Richard Tice speeches from: Government Performance against Fiscal Rules Richard Tice contributed 1 speech (57 words) Monday 7th July 2025 - Commons Chamber HM Treasury
Richard Tice speeches from: NHS 10-Year Plan Richard Tice contributed 1 speech (96 words) Thursday 3rd July 2025 - Commons Chamber Department of Health and Social Care
Richard Tice speeches from: British Indian Ocean Territory: Sovereignty Richard Tice contributed 1 speech (80 words) Wednesday 2nd July 2025 - Commons Chamber Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office
Richard Tice speeches from: Heathrow Substation Outage: NESO Review Richard Tice contributed 1 speech (66 words) Wednesday 2nd July 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Energy Security & Net Zero
Richard Tice speeches from: Corporate Businesses and Franchisees: Regulatory Environment Richard Tice contributed 2 speeches (86 words) Wednesday 2nd July 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Business and Trade
Richard Tice speeches from: Glastonbury Festival: BBC Coverage Richard Tice contributed 1 speech (65 words) Monday 30th June 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport
Richard Tice speeches from: Prax Lindsey Oil Refinery Richard Tice contributed 1 speech (113 words) Monday 30th June 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Energy Security & Net Zero

Written Answers
Prisoners' Release Asked by: Richard Tice (Reform UK - Boston and Skegness) Wednesday 9th July 2025 Question to the Ministry of Justice: To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if she will take steps to ensure that (a) violent offenders and (b) people convicted of grievous bodily harm resulting in life-changing injuries are not inappropriately released early under existing early release schemes; and what review mechanisms are in place to assess whether the charge classification accurately reflects the severity of the offending behaviour in such cases. Answered by Nicholas Dakin - Government Whip, Lord Commissioner of HM Treasury This Government was left an unconscionable inheritance with the prison system days from collapse. To prevent the risk of gridlock across the Criminal Justice System, we had no choice but to take decisive actions to stop our prisons overflowing and keep the public safe. We changed the release point for certain standard determinate sentences from 50% to 40% (‘SDS40’) and increased the maximum Home Detention Curfew period from 6 months to 12 months. Both of these policies have extensive exclusion criteria, including sexual offences irrespective of sentence length and certain serious violent offences. Harm caused is one of the two core factors always taken into account when sentencing. The Crown Prosecution Service is responsible for bringing the right charge in all serious cases and there are established mechanisms for appealing unduly lenient sentences.

Written Answers

Prisoners' Release
Asked by: Richard Tice (Reform UK - Boston and Skegness)
Wednesday 9th July 2025

Question to the Ministry of Justice:

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if she will take steps to ensure that (a) violent offenders and (b) people convicted of grievous bodily harm resulting in life-changing injuries are not inappropriately released early under existing early release schemes; and what review mechanisms are in place to assess whether the charge classification accurately reflects the severity of the offending behaviour in such cases.

Answered by Nicholas Dakin - Government Whip, Lord Commissioner of HM Treasury

This Government was left an unconscionable inheritance with the prison system days from collapse. To prevent the risk of gridlock across the Criminal Justice System, we had no choice but to take decisive actions to stop our prisons overflowing and keep the public safe.

We changed the release point for certain standard determinate sentences from 50% to 40% (‘SDS40’) and increased the maximum Home Detention Curfew period from 6 months to 12 months. Both of these policies have extensive exclusion criteria, including sexual offences irrespective of sentence length and certain serious violent offences.

Harm caused is one of the two core factors always taken into account when sentencing. The Crown Prosecution Service is responsible for bringing the right charge in all serious cases and there are established mechanisms for appealing unduly lenient sentences.

Bills
Criminal Cases Review (Public Petition) Bill 2024-26 Presented by Richard Tice (Reform UK - Boston and Skegness) Private Members' Bill - Ten Minute Bill A Bill to make provision for the general public to petition the Criminal Cases Review Commission to review sentences that the petitioners believe to be either too harsh or too lenient; to make provision about the review of such sentences; to make provision about the referral of such cases to the Court of Appeal or the Supreme Court; and for connected purposes. Commons - 20%

Bills

Criminal Cases Review (Public Petition) Bill 2024-26
Presented by Richard Tice (Reform UK - Boston and Skegness)
Private Members' Bill - Ten Minute Bill

A Bill to make provision for the general public to petition the Criminal Cases Review Commission to review sentences that the petitioners believe to be either too harsh or too lenient; to make provision about the review of such sentences; to make provision about the referral of such cases to the Court of Appeal or the Supreme Court; and for connected purposes.

Commons - 20%

Richard Tice mentioned

Parliamentary Debates
Corporate Businesses and Franchisees: Regulatory Environment 41 speeches (6,337 words) Wednesday 2nd July 2025 - Commons Chamber Department for Business and Trade Mentions: 1: Gareth Thomas (LAB - Harrow West) Member for Boston and Skegness (Richard Tice). Each of them made important points. - Link to Speech

Bill Documents
Jul. 09 2025 Committee of the whole House Amendments as at 9 July 2025 - large print Universal Credit Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: Timothy Rupert Lowe Lewis Cocking Wendy Morton Lee Anderson Mr Andrew Snowden David Reed Richard Tice
Jul. 09 2025 Committee of the whole House Amendments as at as at 9 July 2025 Universal Credit Bill 2024-26 Amendment Paper Found: Timothy Rupert Lowe Lewis Cocking Wendy Morton Lee Anderson Mr Andrew Snowden David Reed Richard Tice
Jun. 18 2025 All proceedings up to 18 June 2025 at Report Stage Crime and Policing Bill 2024-26 Bill proceedings: Commons Found: Not called_NC110 Nigel Farage Richard Tice Lee Anderson James McMurdock Sarah Pochin .