Information between 15th September 2025 - 25th September 2025
Note: This sample does not contain the most recent 2 weeks of information. Up to date samples can only be viewed by Subscribers.
Click here to view Subscription options.
| Division Votes |
|---|
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Richard Fuller voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 81 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 332 Noes - 160 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Richard Fuller voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 81 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 327 Noes - 164 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Richard Fuller voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 83 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 314 Noes - 178 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Richard Fuller voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 83 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 161 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Richard Fuller voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 326 Noes - 160 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Richard Fuller voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 172 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Richard Fuller voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 158 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Richard Fuller voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 83 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 316 Noes - 161 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Richard Fuller voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 330 Noes - 161 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Richard Fuller voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 318 Noes - 170 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Richard Fuller voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 82 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 328 Noes - 160 |
|
15 Sep 2025 - Employment Rights Bill - View Vote Context Richard Fuller voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 85 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 329 Noes - 163 |
|
16 Sep 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Richard Fuller voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 72 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 340 Noes - 77 |
|
16 Sep 2025 - Sentencing Bill - View Vote Context Richard Fuller voted Aye - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 73 Conservative Aye votes vs 0 Conservative No votes Tally: Ayes - 78 Noes - 292 |
|
16 Sep 2025 - Child Poverty Strategy (Removal of Two Child Limit) - View Vote Context Richard Fuller voted No - in line with the party majority and against the House One of 75 Conservative No votes vs 0 Conservative Aye votes Tally: Ayes - 89 Noes - 79 |
| Written Answers |
|---|
|
Active Travel
Asked by: Richard Fuller (Conservative - North Bedfordshire) Monday 15th September 2025 Question to the Department for Transport: To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, whether he has considered including equestrianism within the definition of active travel for (a) planning and (b) other relevant policy purposes. Answered by Simon Lightwood - Parliamentary Under-Secretary (Department for Transport) The Government has no plans to include equestrianism within the definition of active travel.
Decisions on infrastructure to support horse-riding are a matter for local authorities. Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plans enable local authorities to take a strategic approach to planning local walking and cycling improvements, and to integrate these into wider plans for transport and economic development. We encourage and expect local authorities to consult with local groups such as equestrians as part of their stakeholder engagement.
|