All 2 Debates between Rachel Reeves and Joan Walley

Living Standards

Debate between Rachel Reeves and Joan Walley
Monday 5th March 2012

(12 years, 8 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Rachel Reeves Portrait Rachel Reeves
- Hansard - -

It is even worse than that, because the Chancellor is not even balancing the books.

Joan Walley Portrait Joan Walley (Stoke-on-Trent North) (Lab)
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

Does my hon. Friend agree that the 1,200 people in Stoke-on-Trent earning just under £17,000 a year who will be worse off under these changes desperately need the Government to listen to this debate and do something in the Budget about the comprehensive spending review, so that they do not have to pay the price for these unacceptable changes?

Rachel Reeves Portrait Rachel Reeves
- Hansard - -

My hon. Friend is right when she sticks up for the people of Stoke, who, like many of our constituents, will be hard hit by the changes, which do nothing to encourage people to go back to work, and instead encourage people to stay on the dole, because they will be better off on benefits than in work.

Pensions Bill [Lords]

Debate between Rachel Reeves and Joan Walley
Monday 20th June 2011

(13 years, 5 months ago)

Commons Chamber
Read Full debate Read Hansard Text Read Debate Ministerial Extracts
Iain Duncan Smith Portrait Mr Duncan Smith
- Hansard - - - Excerpts

With respect, I have just said that there are certain elements that would not be legal. That is all that I am saying. The hon. Lady can go on about this point as much as she likes, but I have answered her. She might not like my answer, but that is the one I have decided to give. The fact that the women who will be affected will remain on the same level of retirement but will be in retirement for two and a half years longer than men is an important feature. I stand by the need to equalise women’s state pension age in 2018.

Rachel Reeves Portrait Rachel Reeves
- Hansard - -

rose—